Woodland Care & Rehab Center
1347 East Valley Watermill Road, Springfield, MO 65803 · For profit - Individual · 94 certified beds · (417) 833-1220 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.0% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.3% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.0% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 4.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 31.0% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 40.1% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.4% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.2% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.2% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 15.0% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 86.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurate when staff failed to document medication administrations during a multi-day internet/phone outage for four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4). The census was 87.Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medication, revised 04/19, showed the following:-Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed;-The Director of Nursing (DON) supervises and directs all personnel who administer medications and/or have related functions;-Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame;-Medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit, not staff convenience;-Medications are administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders);-If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall initial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations of possible abuse were reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made, to the State Survey Agency (SSA - Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS)) when the facility failed to report an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse involving two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2). Four residents were sampled out of a facility census of 89.Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Abuse and Neglect, revised 07/21/25, showed the following information:-Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain, or mental anguish; -All allegations of abuse must be reported immediately to the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and other officials according to state law;-The Administrator or DON immediately reports his/her suspicion to the state licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility, the residents representative,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standard, physician's order, and resident's preference when the facility failed to order or provide a drop arm commode for one resident (Resident #3), which would increase his/her independence. The facility census was 89. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding the process of ordering durable medical equipment or the process of handwritten physician orders. 1. Review of Resident #3's face sheet (gives basic profile information) showed the following information: -admission date of 01/09/25 with the last return on 03/25/25;-Diagnoses included complete traumatic (emotional stress) amputation (the surgical removal of a body part) at level between right hip and knee, complete traumatic amputation at level between left hip and knee, absence of left leg above the knee, long-term kidney disease, urinary retention (the inability to completely empty your…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were kept as free from accident hazards as possible when staff failed to [NAME] steps to prevent future burns and failed to update the care plan regarding a burn for one resident (Resident #3) who suffered burns after spiling hot soup on him/herself. The facility census was 89.Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to resident use of microwaves. 1. Review of Resident #3's face sheet (gives basic profile information) showed the following information:-admission date of 01/09/25 with the last return on 03/25/25;-Diagnoses included complete traumatic (emotional stress) amputation (the surgical removal of a body part) at level between right hip and knee, complete traumatic amputation at level between left hip and knee, absence of left leg above the knee, long-term kidney disease, major depressive disorder (a serious mood disorder causing sadness, loss of interest, tiredness, sleep and appetite changes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-29 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated with dignity and respect when one staff (Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A) spoke disrespectfully and did not honor the resident's sleeping preferences for one resident (Resident #1) in a selected sample of four residents. The facility census was 89.Review of the facility's Dignity and Quality of Life Policy, updated 02/13/25, included the following information:-The facility will promote care for the residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains and enhances each resident's dignity, quality of life and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality. Facility staff will respect and promote the rights of the resident to exercise his or her autonomy regarding what the resident considers important facets of his or her life. The facility staff will provide services in a manner which enhances/maintains a dignified existence for our residents;-Staff must carry out activities in a manner which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure all food was protected from possible contamination when the facility was maintained in a sanitary and comfortable fashion when staff failed to keep the inside of the ice machine clean. The facility census was 85. Review of the facility's policy titled Cleaning instructions, Ice Machine, and Equipment, dated 2021, showed the following: -Ice machine will be cleaned and sanitized on a regular basis; -Wash the interior thoroughly using a detergent solution. Rinse and drain the interior with clean hot tap water. Pay close attention to the crevices. Review of the 2013 Missouri Food Code showed food-contact surfaces of equipment and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch 1. Observations on 06/09/25, beginning at 9:00 A.M., and on 06/11/25, at 11:50 A.M., of the kitchen showed a brown substance along the top of the ice deflector shield and four or five pin size spots of green on the left side of the ice deflector shield. Review of the facility's nightly shift check off list showed no task for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure the facility was maintained in a sanitary and comfortable fashion when staff failed to keep the outside of the ice machine clean and when the fans located in the walk-in refrigerator has lint and a black substance. The facility census was 85. Review of the facility's policy titled Cleaning Instructions, Ice Machine,and Equipment, dated 2021, said the following: -Clean the exterior of the machine with detergent solution daily; -Rinse and allow to air dry. Review of the 2013 Missouri Food Code showed the following information: -Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris; -Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues; -The physical facilities shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean 1. Observations on 06/09/25, beginning at 9:00 A.M., and on 06/11/25, at 11:50 A.M., of the kitchen showed the following: -Several white streaks down…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents' drug regimens were free from unnecessary drugs when staff failed to provide a stop date or rationale for extending the order for one as needed (PRN) medication for one resident (Resident #47). The facility census was 85. Review of the facility policy titled Medication Therapy, , dated April 2007, showed the following: -Each resident's medication regimen shall include only those medications necessary to treat existing conditions and address significant risks; -All medication orders will be supported by appropriate care processes and practices; -Upon or shortly after admission, and periodically thereafter, the staff and practitioner, assisted by the consultant pharmacist, will review an individual's current medication regimen, to identify whether there is a clear indication for treating that individual with the medication; the dosage is appropriate; the frequency of administration and duration of use are appropriate; and potential or suspected side effects are present; -Periodically, and when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete quarterly care plan meetings for four residents (Residents #8, #1, #44, and #58). The facility census was 85. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Participation-Assessment/Care Plans, revised February 2021, showed the following: -The resident and his or her legal representative were encouraged to attend and participate; -It is the resident/representative's right to participate in the development and implementation of his/her plan of care; -The care planning process included an assessment of the resident's strengths and his/her needs as well as incorporating the resident's personal and cultural preferences; -The facility holds care planning meetings at times of day when the resident and representative and family members can attend, provide sufficient notice of the care plan meeting; -The Social Services Director (SSD) is responsible for notifying the resident and representative and for maintaining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services to prevent possible urinary tract infection (UTI - infection in any part of the urinary system, the kidneys, bladder) when staff failed to ensure the catheter drainage tubing (tubing that drains urine from the bladder to a collection bag) of one residents (Resident #68) did not sit or drag on the floor; and when the facility failed to ensure the staff entered a catheter order that included the size of catheter to be used for three residents (Resident #68, #8, and #42). The facility had a census of 85. Review of the facility policy titled Urinary Catheter (flexible tube inserted through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine) Care, dated August 2022, showed the following: -The purpose of the procedure was to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections; -Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident; -Assemble the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Review of Resident #58's face sheet showed the following: -admission date of 05/16/24; -Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction often caused by illness or organ dysfunction), weakness, swelling, restless leg syndrome, insomnia, and obstructive sleep apnea (breathing disorder while asleep). Review of the resident's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Cognition intact; -Upper extremity impairment to one side; -Dependent on others for toileting hygiene, showers, dressing, and bed mobility. Review of the resident's care plan, last updated/reviewed 05/19/25, showed the following: -Used side rail to assist in repositioning, mobility device; -Ensure valid consent on chart prior to use of side rails; -Quarterly review of safety for the device. Observation on 06/10/25, at 10:27 A.M., showed the resident's right side rail in the raised position. The left side rail was lowered and the bedside table was against the resident's left side. During the interview the resident said he/she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide pharmacy services to meet the needs of each resident when the facility failed to have ordered medications available for staff administration resulting in five residents (Resident #8, #77, #18, #68, and #70) not receiving medications as ordered. The facility census was 85. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, revised April 2019, showed the following: -Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed; -Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber's orders, including any required time frames. 1. Review of Resident #8's face sheet (a general information sheet) showed the following: -admission date of 12/29/23; -Diagnoses included quadriplegia (loss of movement in all four limbs) and depression (persistent feelings of sadness). Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 03/05/25, showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate the right of self-determination for every resident when staff failed to honor reasonable shower preferences for two residents (Resident #8 and #49) . The facility census was 85. Review of the facility's policy titled Protocol for Bathing/Shower/Tub, revised September 2021, showed the following information: -Purposes of the procedure was to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin; -Document the date and time of the shower, name and title of the individual assisting, and assessment of the individual. 1. Review of Resident #8's face sheet (a general information sheet) showed the following: -admission date of 12/29/23; -Diagnoses included quadriplegia (loss of movement in all four limbs) and depression (persistent feelings of sadness). Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies to prevent possible abuse when staff failed to follow-up on results for a criminal background check (CBC) requested on one staff member (Maintenance Assistant E). The facility census was 85. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure, updated 03/22/25, showed the following: -It was the policy and the right of each resident to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This included but was not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms; -All potential employees will have CBC prior to hiring. 1. Review of the personnel file for Maintenance Assistant E showed the following: -Hire date of 03/16/25; -Staff did not document completion or result of a CBC. During an interview on 06/12/25, at 11:38 A.M., the Receptionist said he/she sends an employee's information to the corporate office to request a CBC. If the person is already…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to complete an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool completed by facility staff) assessment for one resident (Resident #14) was completed timely as required. The facility had a census of 85. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, Chapter 2, Assessments for the RAI, showed the following information: -The annual assessment is an OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987) comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed on an annual basis (at least every 366 days) unless an SCSA (Significant Change in Status Assessment) or an SCPA (Significant Correction to Previous Assessment) has been completed since staff completed the most recent comprehensive assessment; -The annual assessment ARD is the ARD of previous OBRA comprehensive assessment plus 366 calendar days, and ARD of previous OBRA Quarterly assessment plus 92 days. Review of a facility policy entitled Resident Assessments,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan with 48 hours of admission for two residents (Residents #132 and #281) of 26 sampled residents. The facility census was 85. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy specific to baseline care plans for residents upon admission. 1. Review of Resident #132's face sheet (gives basic profile information) showed the following: -admission date of 05/28/25; -On hospice services on admission to facility; -Diagnoses included history of transient ischemic attack (TIA - mini-stroke) and stroke with resulting weakness and difficulty with speech and swallowing, history of falls, dementia with agitation, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, high blood pressure, heart disease, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD - stomach acid backs up into the throat), chronic inflammation of the pancreas (causes abdominal pain), and unsteady on feet/lack of coordination. Review of the facility admission checklist, dated 04/17/25, showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a consistent code status (a medical directive that specifies the type of resuscitation and medical interventions a patient wishes to receive in the event of a cardiac or respiratory arrest) in the resident's medical record for two sampled residents (Resident #48 and Resident #17) out of 26 sampled residents. The facility census was 85. Review of the facility's policy entitled Advance Directives, revised [DATE], showed the following: -Advance Directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy; -Upon admission the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so. If the resident is incapacitated and unable to receive information about his or her right to formulate an advance directive, the information ay be provided to the resident's legal representative. If the resident becomes able…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pain management program was in place for all residents when staff failed to administer pain medication as ordered for one resident (Resident #12) resulting in increased pain for the resident. The facility census was 85. Review of the facility provided policy titled Administering Medications, dated April 2019, showed the following: -Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; -Staffing schedules are arranged to ensure that medications are administered without unnecessary interruptions; -Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Review of the facility policy titled Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors, dated April 2014, showed the following: -The interdisciplinary team (IDT) evaluates medication usage in order to prevent and detect adverse consequences and medication-related problems such as adverse drug reactions and side effects; -Adverse consequences shall be reported to the attending physician and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all dialysis residents received services consistent with professional standards of practice when staff failed to obtain orders related to dialysis (a process of filtering and removing waste products from the bloodstream when the kidneys can no longer sufficiently do so) services, failed to appropriately monitor the resident after dialysis appointments, failed to routinely communicate and collaborate with the dialysis center after appointments, and failed to care plan dialysis for one resident (Resident #281). The facility census was 85. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to dialysis. 1. Review of Resident #281's face sheet (a general information sheet) showed the following: -admission date of 05/28/25; -Diagnoses included enterocolitis (small and large intestine's inflammatory response to an injury or illness) due to clostridium difficile (inflammation of the colon caused by bacteria), stage 3 chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension (high blood pressure), congestive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to acknowledge, assess, provide supportive services, and to develop a care plan that showed interventions the facility staff would take to try to protect the resident and prevent trauma from recurring for one resident (Resident #48) out of 17 sampled residents . The facility census was 85 residents. Review of the facility's policy entitled Trauma-Informed Care and Culturally Competent Care, dated 2022, showed the following: -Trauma results from an event, series of events, or set of circumstances that is experienced by an individual as physically or emotionally harmful or life threatening and that has lasting adverse effects on the individual's functioning and mental, physical, social, emotional or spiritual well-being; -Trigger is a psychological stimulus that prompts recall of previous traumatic event, even if the stimulus itself is not traumatic; -Traumatic events which may affect residents during their lifetime include physical, sexual or emotional abuse and neglect; -Evaluate the need for trauma-informed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors when staff failed to prime an insulin pen before use for one resident (Resident #37). The facility census was 85. Review of the provided policy, titled Administering Medications, dated April 2019, showed the following: -Medications are administered in accordance with the prescriber orders; -Insulin pens containing multiple doses of insulin are for single-resident use only; -Insulin pens are clearly labeled with the resident's name; -Prior to administering insulin with an insulin pen, the nurse verifies that the correct pen is used for that resident; -Manufacturer's instruction or user's manuals related to medication administration devices are kept with the devices or at the nurses' station. Review of the facility policy titled Insulin Administration, dated January 2020, showed the following: -Methods of injecting insulin include with insulin syringe and needle using insulin from a vial and with a pre-filled pen device and needle; -If the insulin is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure new residents completed the first step tuberculosis testing when two residents (Resident #231 and # 281) did not have their first TB test completed or documented in a timely manner. The facility had a census of 85. Review of the facility policy titled Screening Residents for Tuberculosis, dated August 2019, showed the following: -The facility shall screen all residents for tuberculosis infection and disease (TB - contagious bacterial infection, primarily affecting the lungs); -The admitting nurse will screen referrals for admission and readmission for information regarding exposure to or symptoms of TB; -If a potential resident has been exposed to active TB or is at increased risk of TB infection he/she will be screened for latent tuberculosis infection using tuberculin skin test or interferon gamma release assay; -Screening of new admission or readmissions for tuberculosis infection and disease is in compliance with state regulations. 1. Review of Resident #231's face sheet showed an admission date of 06/03/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents with a history of prior trauma received appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practical psychosocial well-being when staff failed to care plan triggers and failed to provide care in a manner that was responsive to triggers caused by a history of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition that can develop after a person has experienced or witnessed a traumatic event) for one resident (Resident #1). Facility census was 81. Review of the facility policy titled Dignity and Quality of Life, undated, showed the following: -The facility will promote care for the residents in a manner and an environment that maintains the resident's dignity, quality of life, and respect in full recognition of his/her individuality. The facility will respect and promote the rights of the resident to exercise his/her autonomy regarding what he resident considers important facets of his/her life. The facility staff will provide services in a manner which enhances/maintains a dignified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-25 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in placed to ensure nurse aides (NA) completed their training, competencies, and testing in a timely manner when five NA's failed to complete a state approved certified nursing assistant (CNA) training program, competency evaluation, and certification test within four months of hire and continued to work providing direct care to residents. The facility's census was 87. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding NA training classes. 1. Review of the facility's list of NA's currently employed at the facility, and working the floor as an NA, as of 02/24/25, showed the following: -NA B was hired as a NA on 07/22/24; -NA C was hired as a NA on 08/05/24; -NA D was hired as a NA on 10/29/24; -NA E was hired as a NA on 11/19/24; -NA F was hired as a NA on 01/21/25. During an interview on 02/21/25, at 2:42 P.M., NA F said the following: -He/she has worked at the facility since August 2024; -He/she hasn't started NA classes; -He/she has been fired and rehired four times; -He/she took one class at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when staff failed to address and notify the provider in a timely manner of a change in condition for one resident (Resident #1) when the resident showed decline in cognition and required increased assistance with cares. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility's current policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, showed the following: -The facility promptly notifies the resident, his/her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status; -The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on-call when there has been a significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition or the need to transfer the resident to the hospital; -Prior to notifying the physician or healthcare provider, the nurse will make detailed observations and gather relevant and pertinent information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated in a dignified manner when one staff member (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A) made disrespectful comments and spoke in a harsh tone to three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3). The facility census was 86. Review of the facility's policy titled Dignity and Quality of Life Policy, undated, showed the following: -The facility will promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains and enhances each resident's dignity, quality of life and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality; -Staff will provides services in a manner which enhances/maintains a dignified existence for the residents; -Staff will respect resident's social status, speaking respectfully, listen carefully, treating residents with respect at all times. 1. Review of Resident #'1's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care per standard of practice for all residents with pressure ulcers when the facility staff failed to complete and document full wound assessments in a consistent and timely fashion to track if wounds improved or declined for four residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4) who had identified pressure ulcers. The facility census was 88. Review of the facility's policy Wound Protocol/Procedure, undated, showed the following: -The charge nurse should document in the wound event or progress note about the wound's drainage, wound bed, peri-wound and edges. This is also charted in the weekly skin assessment while the the wound is present, until healed; -The wound nurse will follow the wounds weekly with measurements and assessment and staging of the wounds or other skin issues until the wound heals. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (admission information) showed the following: -admission date of 01/09/25; -Diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for all residents when staff failed to address the use of, care of, and monitoring of and related to an indwelling urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) for one resident (Resident #5). The facility census was 88. Review of the facility policy Urinary Catheter Care, revised August 2022, showed the following: -Purpose of procedure was to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections; -Empty the collection bag at least every eight hours using a separate, clean collection container; -Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor; -Observe the resident's urine level for noticeable increases or decreased. If the level stays the same, or increases rapidly, report it to the physician; -Follow the facility procedure for measuring and documenting input and output; -Position the drainage bag lower than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care per standard of practice when facility staff failed to accurately and consistently track one resident's skin conditions, failed to document timely full assessments of skin conditions, and failed to document orders for completion of skin care for one resident's (Resident #1) who developed cellulitis (a potentially serious bacterial skin infection). The facility census was 88. Review of the facility's policy Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised February 2021, showed the following: -The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on-call when there has been a significant change in the resident's physical, emotional, or mental condition; a need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly; or specific instruction to notify the physician of changes in the resident's condition; -A significant change of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff; impacts more than one area of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete infection prevention and control program when the facility failed to develop a policy regarding enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - precautions for use during high-contact resident care activities for residents infected with a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO - microorganisms that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) or any resident who has a chronic wound and/or indwelling medical device), failed to train staff on EBP, failed to have personal protective equipment (PPE) and signage present for residents that met the guidelines for EBP, and failed to ensure staff wore PPE in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for three or three residents (Residents #1, #2 and #3) who met the guidelines for EBP. A sample of nine residents were reviewed in a facility with a census of 83. Review of the CDC's Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment Use in Nursing Homes to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-20 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely complete and submit Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) assessments for three residents (Resident #52, #53, and #63), out of 39 sample residents. The facility census was 73. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated 10/19, showed the following: -The RAI helps nursing home staff look at residents holistically-as individuals for whom quality of life and quality of care are mutually significant and necessary; -Interdisciplinary use of the RAI promotes this emphasis on quality of care and quality of life; -Nursing homes have found that involving disciplines such as dietary, social work, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech language pathology, pharmacy, and activities in the RAI process has fostered a more holistic approach to resident care and strengthened team communication; -The next comprehensive assessment is due within 366 days after the ARD of the most recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-20 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to timely complete and submit Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) assessments for four residents (Resident #13, #19, #21, and #22), out of 39 sample residents. The facility census was 732. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated 10/01/19, showed the following: -The Quarterly assessment is an OBRA (Omnibus Reconciliation Act) non-comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type; -It is used to track a resident's status between comprehensive assessments to ensure critical indicators of gradual change in a resident's status are monitored; -The ARD (Assessment Reference Date) must be not more than 92 days after the ARD of the most recent OBRA assessment of any type. 1. Review of Resident #13's electronic medical record's (EMR) Face Sheet, undated, located under the Resident tab, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two residents (Resident #11 and #47), of 39 sampled residents, were treated with dignity and respect when one resident's (Resident #11)' urinary catheter (a flexible tube used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag) bag was observed uncovered and visible from the hallway and when one resident (Resident #47) was not provided with appropriate grooming to ensure the removal of her facial hair. The facility census was 73. Review of the facility's policy titled, admission Contract, undated, showed the resident's rights will be respected by staff. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Policy and Procedure Foley Catheter, dated 10/09/23, showed the equipment and supplies necessary when performing this procedure included dignity bag (bag that covered catheter collection bag). Review of the Resident #11's Face Sheet, undated, found in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Resident tab, showed an admission date of 03/15/22 with a diagnoses that included of acute kidney failure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective grievance policy and procedure when staff failed to file a grievance and follow-up with the resident for one resident (Resident #31), of 39 sampled residents, who reported multiple personal items missing. The facility census was 73. Review of the facility policy titled Grievance Policy, undated, showed no reference to missing personal items, reimbursement, or restitution for missing items. 1. Review of Resident #31's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/14/23, located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the MDS tab, showed an admission date of 07/29/19 and moderately impaired cognitive. During an interview on 10/17/23, at 12:10 P.M., the resident said he/she had plenty of things missing, things missing all the time. He/She had a bright orange hunting shirt that's been missing for two months, two beautiful blankets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents received assistive devices to maintain their hearing abilities when staff failed to assist one resident (Resident #25), of 39 sampled residents, with ensuring his/her hearing aids were being worn and that hearing aid's batteries were functioning. The facility census was 73. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to hearing aids. 1. Review of Resident #25's Electronic Medical Record's (EMR) Face Sheet, undated, under the Profile tab, showed diagnoses included bilateral hearing loss. Review of the resident's Care Plan, dated 12/12/22, showed the resident was hard of hearing and wore hearing aids for communication. Nursing staff is responsible for ensuring that hearing aids are clean, functioning, and properly placed in both ears. Review of the resident's reentry/quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/15/23, showed the resident's cognition was intact and the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse by staff when one staff member (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A) forced cares when he/she placed one resident's (Resident #1) dentures in his/her mouth with after the resident refused. The facility census was 72. Review of the facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure, dated 06/17/23, showed the following: -It is the policy and right of each resident to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation, and exploitation; -Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting in physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; -Physical abuse includes, but it not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet showed the following: -admission date of 09/11/19; -Diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to report allegations of abuse involving one resident (Resident #1) immediately to facility management and within two hours of staff being aware of the allegation to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS)). The facility census was 72. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure, dated 06/17/23, showed the following: -All reports of resident abuse will be reported to the local, state, and federal agencies within two hours of an allegation involving abuse or result in serious bodily injury. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet showed the following: -admission date of 09/11/19; -Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), chronic kidney failure, stage 3 (moderate kidney damage), dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory), and anorexia (lack or loss of appetite for food). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to immediately begin an investigation and immediately take steps to protect all residents during the investigation when staff observed one staff member (Certified Nursing Assistant, (CNA) A) force one resident (Resident #1) to wear dentures when he/she had refused. The facility census was 72. Review of the facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure, dated 06/17/23, showed the following: -All allegations will be thoroughly investigated; -The Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON)/and/or designee shall initiate the investigation; -Within five days of the incident, the Administrator or designee will provide a follow up investigation report to the State surveying Agency. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet showed the following: -admission date of 09/11/19; -Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), chronic kidney failure, stage 3 (moderate kidney damage), dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-02-27 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a transfer or discharge to a hospital, including the reasons for the transfer, for five residents (Resident #6, #35, #57, # 89, and #138). The facility failed to notify the Ombudsman (a resident advocate who provides support and assistance with problems and/or complaints regarding the facility) a copy of the notification for three residents (Resident #57, #89, and #138) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 90. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer or Discharge Documentation, included the following information to be documented in the medical record when a resident is transferred or discharged from the facility: -That an appropriate notice was provided to the resident and/or legal representative; -Should it become necessary to make an emergency transfer or discharge to a hospital or other related institution, the facility will prepare a transfer form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-02-27 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of the bed hold policy at the time of a transfer to the hospital for four residents (Resident #35, #57, # 89, and # 138) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 90. Record review of the facility's policy titled, bed-holds and returns, showed the following information: -Prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the resident and the resident representative that explains in detail: -The rights and limitations of the resident regarding bed-holds; -The reserve bed payment policy as indicated by the state plan (Medicaid residents); -The facility per diem rate required to hold a bed (non-Medicaid residents), or to hold a bed beyond the state bed-hold period (Medicaid residents); and - he details of the transfer (per the Notice of Transfer) 1. Record review of Resident # 35's nursing progress notes showed the following information: -On 12/5/19, at 10:30 P.M., staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-27 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice on code status (the level of medical interventions a resident wishes to have if their heart or breathing stops) was clearly and consistently documented throughout the resident's medical record for four residents (Resident #37, #42, #43, and #66) out of a facility sample of 18 residents in a facility with a census of 90. Record review of the facility's policy, titled Advance Directives, last revised [DATE], showed the following information: -Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are followed should a person be unable to communicate them to the physician) if he or she chooses to do so; -Information about whether or not the resident has executed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-10-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review or update their Infection Prevention Program (IPCP), policies and procedures yearly. The facility census was 73. 1. Review of the facility's Policy and Procedures related to the IPCP showed the Policies and Procedues had not been reviewed or updated since 2020. During an Interview on 10/20/23, at 9:07 A.M., with the Administrator and the Infection Preventionist trainee (IP) showed both were not sure why the IPCP had not been reviewed and revised since 2020.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-28 for 13 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-13 for 57 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOURLEY, EWING | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 100% | since 05/01/1989 |
| ALEXANDER, BRENDA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 11/01/2019 |
| WHITTAKER, AMANDA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/02/2007 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $514K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265749. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.