Pine View Manor INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 57.8 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.85 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-04-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents right to be free from abuse when staff observed Resident #1 and Resident #2 get into a verbal argument, and a short while later, Resident #2 went into Resident #1s room and a physical altercation occurred where both residents were found on the floor. The nurse assessed Resident #1 and found he/she was upset and with physical injuries including a scraped left knee and left elbow and a red mark on the left side of his/her ribs. This affected one of three sampled residents. The facility census was 55. Review of the facilities Abuse and Neglect Protocol policy, dated 2/15/22, showed: -It was the purpose of the facility to prohibit and prevent abuse and to assist the facility staff members in recognizing incidents of abuse; -Abuse was defined as the willful infliction of injury, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm or pain. Review of the facilities Resident-to-Resident Altercations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the Resident #40's Significant Change in Status MDS, dated [DATE] showed: - Cognitive skills severely impaired; - Upper extremity and lower extremity impaired on both sides; - Dependent on the assistance of staff for toilet use; - Had a Foley catheter (sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine); - Always incontinent of bowel; - The resident had seven antibiotics in the last seven days; - Diagnoses included traumatic brain injury, seizure, dementia and depression. Review of resident's Urinalysis (UA, a test to analyze urine contents) and urine culture and sensitivity ( C & S, at test that identifies the amount and type of bacteria and medications to treat the infection), dated 10/11/24 showed: - The presence of bacteria indicative of a possible urinary tract infection (UTI); - The C & S showed the presence of organisms indicative of a UTI; - The resident was started on Cipro 250 mg (Antibiotic medication) twice daily for seven days, for a UTI. Review of the resident's urine culture…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed check bed rails regularly to make sure they were still installed correctly as rails may shift or loosen over time. The facility failed to inspect and regularly check the mattress and bed rails for areas of possible entrapment, and failed to include an evaluation of attempted alternatives prior to the installation or use of a bed rail on resident beds. This included three of 12 residents sampled (Resident #1, #33, and #34). The facility census was 48. Review of facility policy, side rail policy/ grab bars, revised 5/21/25, showed: -Facility would strive to provide a safe sleeping environment for all residents. -If resident wanted or needed side rails the MDS Coordinator or Nursing would contact the physical therapy department. The original side rail assessment was completed by physical therapy department for proper use and safety. -If deemed appropriate the entrapment assessment would be done by maintenance staff to ensure the safety by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, and the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff failed to keep all hair contained in hair restraints, failed to label and date food when it was opened, and failed to complete temperature checks on the refrigerator and freezers. This had the potential to impact all residents in the facility. The facility census was 48. 1. Review of facility policy, Hair Restraints, dated 5/29/24, showed: -Hair restraints shall be worn by all dietary staff when in food production areas, dishwashing areas, or serving food. -Staff shall wear hair restraints in all food production, dishwashing, and serving areas. -Hair restraints, such as hairnets, hats, hair bonnets, and/or beard guards shall be used to prevent hair from contacting exposed food. Facial hair was discouraged. Any facial hair that is longer than the eyebrow shall require coverage with a beard guard in the production, serving, and dishwashing areas. -Hair bonnets are to be one shift use and washed. Observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #40's Significant Change in Status MDS, dated [DATE] showed: - Cognitive skills severely impaired; - Upper extremity and lower extremity impaired on both sides; - Dependent on the assistance of staff for toilet use; - Had a Foley catheter (sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine); - Always incontinent of bowel; - The resident had seven antibiotics in the last seven days; - Diagnoses included traumatic brain injury, seizure, dementia and depression. Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated May 2025, showed: - Foley catheter for urinary retention. Review of the resident's undated care plan, showed: - The resident had an indwelling Foley catheter for bladder retention; - The resident had a Foley catheter. Position catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from entrance room door. Check tubing for kinks on every shift. Monitor, record, report to physician for signs and symptoms of UTI: pain, burning, blood tinged urine, cloudiness, no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards in the kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure dented canned foods were not in circulation in 1 of 1 dry storage area observed. This had the potential to affect all 55 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the kitchen. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, revised 05/29/2024, indicated, Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. The policy also indicated, When food is delivered to the facility it will be inspected for safe transport and quality before being accepted. During an interview on 05/29/2024 at 2:56 PM, the Administrator stated the facility had no specific policy regarding dented canned food. Observations of the facility's dry storage area on 05/28/2024 at 10:08 AM revealed compromised canned foods in the facility storage rack, specifically: - One unlabeled 6-pound can of food had dents along the rim, - One dented 46 ounce (oz.) can of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. A facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revised in 10/2010, indicated, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration; however, the policy did not address infection control measures for labeling or storage of oxygen equipment/supplies. During an interview on 05/31/2024 at 12:20 PM, the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) stated that night shift staff should change oxygen tubing once per week. The DNS stated the tubing should be labeled and stored in a blue bag. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #3 on 06/19/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of pneumonia and heart failure. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/06/2024, revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #3's Order Summary Report, listing active orders as of 05/31/2024, contained an order, started on 06/19/2023, for two liters of supplemental oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #5) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for self-administration of medications was assessed to determine if they were clinically appropriate to do so after the resident expressed a desire to self-administer one of their medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, revised in 12/2016, indicated Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. As part of their overall evaluation, the staff and practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is clinically appropriate for the resident. 2. In addition to general evaluation of decision-making capacity, the staff and practitioner will perform a more specific skill assessment, including (but not limited to) the resident's: a. Ability to read and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a care plan addressing the use of as needed, supplemental oxygen for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revised in 10/2010, indicated, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. The policy further indicated, 2. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #3 on 06/19/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of pneumonia and heart failure. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/06/2024, revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #3's Order Summary Report, listing active orders as of 05/31/2024, contained an order, started on 06/19/2023, for two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure only licensed personnel adjusted the flow rate on an oxygen concentrator for 1 (Resident #45) of 3 residents reviewed for supplemental oxygen use. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Administering Medications, reviewed 05/12/2017, revealed, Only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer and document the administration of medications may do so. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #45 on 03/19/2024. According to the admission record, Resident #45 had a medical history that included a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/26/2024, revealed Resident #45 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #45 had an active diagnosis of asthma, COPD, or chronic lung disease. The MDS indicated Resident #45 received oxygen therapy while a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to specify dose parameters for 1 (Resident #7) of 3 residents reviewed for supplemental oxygen use. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #7's supplemental oxygen orders specified liters per minute (L/min) parameters. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revised October 2010, indicated under the section titled Preparation to Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. The policy also indicated, Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered. Resident #7's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 09/15/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of hypoxemia (low blood oxygen levels) dystonia (involuntary muscle movements causing twisting and contorting), torticollis (involuntary muscle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO