No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sunnyview Nursing Home & Apartments

1311 E 28th Street, Trenton, MO 64683 · Government - County · 94 certified beds · (660) 359-5647 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$30,295 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $30,295 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-19)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3300 E 10th St · (660) 359-3939 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1903 E 9th St · (660) 359-5700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Hy-Vee1.0 mi
1617 E 9th St · (660) 359-2278 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2711 Meadowlark Ln · (660) 359-6816

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.9%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%5.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.2%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection9.7%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.3%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.6%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.6%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.1%25.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.8%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.4%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.1%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.0%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.0%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.0%63.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.0%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit29.8%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.252.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.052.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 6.3–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay6.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened12.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 3.4–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.231.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.32
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.24
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.46
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
63.9%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 53.2 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.46 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.24 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.64 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-19)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect one cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1) from physical abuse, when Resident #2, who had a history of multiple instances of physical abuse including slapping, grabbing, and pushing Resident #1 and/or staff did not put any interventions in place to prevent further abuse. On 9/26/25, Resident #2 shoved Resident #1 into a bird aviary which caused broken glass to scratch Resident #1's back. Furthermore, the facility failed to provide protection to all other residents, from the potential of physical abuse, when no safety measures were put into place for Resident #2 after the 9/26/25 incident of abuse. The facility census was 58. The Director of Nursing was notified on 10/2/2025 at 2:49 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 8/22/25. The IJ was removed on 10/2/2025, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, or Misappropriation Prevention Program, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-19 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents or their responsible party were informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers prior to being placed on psychotropic medications for, four of the 14 sampled Residents ( Residents #15, #7, #8, and #34). The facility census was 56.Review of the facility's policy Psychotropic Medication Use undated., showed: A psychotropic medication is any medication that affects brain activity and behavior. These medications would include anti-psychotics, anti-depressants, anti-anxiety, and hypnotic medications. Residents, their families and or representative are to be informed of the indications for use, does, duration, how the resident will be monitored and preventing adverse consequences. Residents or their representative have the right to decline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-19 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post nurse staffing data in a prominent place, readily accessible to all residents and visitors on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's policy for posting direct care daily staffing numbers, revised August 2022 showed:Our facility will post on a daily basis for each shift nurse staffing data, including the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents.Within two hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of licensed nurses (Registered Nurse (RN), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) and the number of unlicensed nursing personnel (Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), and Nurse Aides (NAs) directly responsible for resident care is posted in a prominent location (accessible to residents and visitors) and in a clear and readable format.Shift staffing information is recorded on a form for each shift. The information recorded on the form shall include the following: the name of the facility, the current date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to discard expired medications and biologicals stored in the medication cart and the medication room, failed to date two opened vials of Lorazepam (used to treat anxiety) for two of the 14 sampled residents, (Resident #26 and #62) and failed to ensure medication had a pharmacy label to indicate who it belonged to. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's policy for medication labeling and storage, revised February 2023 showed:- Labeling of medications and biologicals dispensed by the pharmacy is consistent with applicable federal and state requirements and currently accepted pharmaceutical practices.- The medication label includes, at a minimum: medication name (generic and/or brand); prescribed dose; strength; expiration date, when applicable; resident's name; route of administration; and appropriate instructions and precautions.- Only the dispensing pharmacy may label or alter the label on a medication container or package.- Liquid medications are to be dated when opened. Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the correct form to provide one resident out of 14 sampled residents notification of changes in coverage to items and services covered by Medicare and/or by the Medicaid State plan, the facility additionally failed to provide notice to residents of the change as soon as is reasonably possible. The facility census was 54.Review of facility's Medicare Advance Beneficiary and Medicare Notice, policy undated showed:-Residents are informed in advance when changes occur to their bills. -CMS (Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services) form 10055 will be provided to the resident prior to discharging from Medicare part A. 1. Review of Resident #31's face sheet showed the Resident was admitted to Medicare part A on 2/19/25 with a diagnosis included COPD, renal failure, and heart failure. Review of the facility's ABN (the advanced beneficiary notice of non-coverage) form dated 5/7/2025, showed the facility used an outdated form, titled CMS-R-131. The form did not include the date that Medicare part A coverage would be ending. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who used psychotropic drugs did not exceed 14 days of use without a physician evaluation and renewal of the medication, and documentation of the rationale, in the resident's medical record, to indicate the duration for the PRN order, which affected two of the 14 sampled residents, (Resident #7 and #8). The facility census was 56.Review of the facility's policy for psychotropic medications use, dated July 2022 showed: - Residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition. - A psychotropic medication is any medication that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior. - Psychotropic medications are not prescribed or given on a PRN (as needed) basis unless that medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record. - PRN orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days. - For psychotropic medications that are NOT antipsychotics: if the prescriber or attending…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff followed facility's policy to timely update one Resident's care plan (Resident #15) out of the 14 sampled residents after the resident eloped from the facility. The facility census was 56. Review of the facilities Emergency Procedure- Missing Resident policy, not dated, showed:-Nursing staff is tasked with updating the care plan after a resident who eloped is found;-The DON is to ensure the care plan is updated. 1.Review of Resident #15's care plan, updated on 08/03/2025, showed:-The resident was at an increased risk for wandering related to repeated attempts to exit the facility;-The resident had impaired decision making related to dementia;-The resident had a diagnosis of depression;-The resident's care plan had not been updated after the resident eloped on 09/13/2025. Review of nursing progress notes, dated 9/19/25 at 8:00 P.M showed the resident eloped out the door on the 100 hall without his/her walker. The resident was then later found behind the facility 25 minutes later without his/her wander guard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they maintained a safe, clean, comfortable environment for the residents, when staff failed to keep all areas of the facility clean and free from mold-like substance throughout areas in the building. The facility census was 46. No policy regarding housekeeping or maintaining the environment was provided. Observation of the facility on 9/10/24 at 6:30 A.M. showed a strong, damp and musty (having a stale, moldy or damp smell) smell outside of a resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. Observation of the facility on 9/10/24 at 11:45 A.M. showed a black, mold-like substance on the outside of the air return vents above the nurse's station on the 300 hall; above the kitchenette on the ceiling of the closed wing; on the return air vents in the kitchen area on the 300 hall; and on the ceiling tile behind kitchen freezer in dry storeroom. Observation of the facility on 9/10/24 at 11:50 A.M. showed there was a strong, damp and musty smell in the dining room adjacent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident were appropriately assessed and had documentation to support the use of wander guards for two of two residents (Residents (R) 34 and R12) reviewed for wander guards of 16 sample residents. This failure could result in residents with unwarranted use of wander guards. Findings include: During an interview on 07/25/24 at 2:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility did not have a policy related to wander guard use. 1. Review of R34's Resident Face Sheet located in the Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavior disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of R34's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/09/24 revealed R34 had short-term and long-term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards for two of two residents (Residents (R) 3 and R99) reviewed for respiratory care out of 16 sample residents. This failure has the potential for the residents to be subjected to contaminated respiratory equipment and to not receive proper airflow. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) - Prevention of Infection, dated 11/11, documented: .8. Keep oxygen cannula and tubing used as needed (PRN) in a plastic bag when not in use. 9. Wash filters from oxygen concentrators every seven (7) days with soap and water. Rinse and squeeze dry. Review of the undated Maintenance instruction sheet, provided by the facility, revealed remove the filter and clean at least once a week depending on environmental conditions. 1. Review of R3's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff properly stored nebulizer masks when not in use for two of two residents (Resident (R) 35 and R7) reviewed for nebulizers and ensure proper wound care procedures for one of one resident (R99) reviewed for wound care of 16 sample residents. This failure had the potential to contribute to the potential of contamination and spread of infection. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Wound Care, dated 10/10, under the Steps in Procedure section revealed, 1. Use disposable cloth (paper towel is adequate) to establish clean field on the resident's overbed table. Place all items to be used during the procedure on the clean field. Arrange the supplies so they can be easily reached .3. Position resident. Place disposable cloth next to resident (under the wound) to serve as a barrier to protect the bed linen and other body sites. 1. Review of R35's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment after a resident was started on hospice services for one of two residents (Resident (R) 7) reviewed for hospice of 16 sample residents. This has the potential to affect all residents with a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment ensuring proper care and services. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the undated Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) revealed Guidelines for determining the need for an SCSA [significant change in status assessment] for residents with terminal conditions. The key in determining if an SCSA is required for individuals with a terminal condition is whether or not the change in condition is an expected well-defined part of the disease course and is consequently being addressed as part of the overall plan of care for the individual. If a terminally ill resident experiences a new onset of symptoms or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for a resident receiving hospice services for one of two residents (Resident (R) 7) reviewed for hospice services of 16 sample residents. This has the potential to affect all residents receiving hospice services. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered, revised March 2023, revealed the comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed within seven days of the required MDS [Minimum Data Set] assessment. Review of R7's admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed re-admission to the facility on [DATE] and with diagnosis of mild intermittent asthma. Review of R7's quarterly MDS under the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/08/24, revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) could not be completed due to resident rarely being understood. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received alternative measures prior to the installation of side rails for one of two residents (Resident (R) 22 and R37) reviewed for side rails of 16 sample residents. The lack of alternative side rail measures could lead to potential restraint or side rail entrapment. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1. Review of R22's admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed re-admission to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of muscle weakness. Review of R22's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/21/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score could not be completed due to the resident rarely understood. Review of R22's care plan located under the ''Care Plan'' tab of the EMR and dated 07/08/22, revealed ''The resident had ½ side rails on bed for bed mobility. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the correct medication as ordered by the physician for two of eight residents (Resident (R) 20 and R38) reviewed for medications of 16 sample residents. This failure could result in unwarranted medication side effects and mismanaged medical conditions. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised April 2019, revealed Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. 1. Review of R20's Resident Face Sheet located in the Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure and essential (primary) hypertension. Review of R20's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/28/24, revealed R20 had a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was documented rationale and a stop date for a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication for one of eight residents (Resident (R) 12) reviewed for medications of 16 sample residents. This failure has the potential to lead to unwarranted medication side effects. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, dated July 2022, revealed PRN orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days. (1) For psychotropic medications that are NOT antipsychotics: If the prescriber or attending physician believes it is appropriate to extend the PRN order beyond 14 days, he or she will document the rationale for extending the use and include the duration for the PRN order. Review of R12's Resident Face Sheet located in the Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident (R) 99) was free from significant medication errors when the facility administered R99 someone else's medication, out of 16 sample residents. This medication error had the potential to cause R99 to become hypotensive (low blood pressure). The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, dated 04/19, revealed Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed .9. The individual administering medications verifies the resident's identity before giving the resident his/her medications. Methods of identifying the resident include: (a) checking identification band; (b) checking photograph attached to medical record; and (c) if necessary, verifying resident identification with other facility personnel. Review of a professional reference titled Hypotension, dated 02/19/23 and retrieved from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed follow their policy when they failed to immediately notify facility administration after one Certified Medication Technician made a sexually inappropriate comment to a resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 57. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation Prevention Program policy, dated April 2021, showed: -Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes, but is not limited to, freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. -The resident abuse, neglect, and exploitation prevention program consists of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support the following objectives: 1. Protect residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of property by anyone, including but not necessarily limited to: a. Facility staff 6. Provide staff orientation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-01 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, see the Statement of Deficiencies dated 3/22/22. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day seven days a week. This deficiency had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 53. Review of the May 2022 staffing sheets showed no RN coverage on: -May 14, 2022; -May 21, 2022; -May 22, 2022. Review of clock in times for May 14, May 21 and May 22, 2022 showed: -No clock in times for the Director of Nursing (DON); -No clock in times for RN A; -No clock in times for RN B . Record review of the staffing sheets showed: - 2 RNs: DON and RN A. Review of a letter from the DON, dated 5/24/22, showed: -He/she was available on May 14, May 21 and May 22, 2022 by phone and able to enter the facility as needed. Review of emails between the facility and Contracted Staffing Agency A showed: RN coverage requests for May 14, May 21 and May 22, 2022 were canceled by the DON. During an interview on 5/24/22 at 12:13 P.M., the Administrator said: -The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in sanitary condition and to store food in a sanitary manner. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Labeling and Storage, dated 2/19/2020, showed it did not include seasonings on the list to be dated. Review of the facility's kitchen cleaning checklists showed the following: - Clean shelves under toaster- weekly; - Clean shelves- weekly. 1. Observation on 5/23/22 beginning at 10:35 A.M., showed the following in the kitchen: - There was a sticky substance on the drying rack that contained clean pots and pans; - The following seasoning containers were opened and did not contain a date: o 12.5 ounce (oz) Ground Ginger; o 16 oz. Ground Nutmeg; o 32 oz. Celery Salt; o 12 oz. Ground Oregano o 5 pound (lb) ground black pepper Observation on 5/25/22 beginning at 9:23 A.M.,showed the following in the kitchen: - Plastic tub containing lids and condiment bottles stored under food preparation table with brown liquid and food particles in the bottom of the plastic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections and failed to have written standards, policies and procedures in place for their IPCP. Staff failed to ensure they completed a two step tuberculosis (TB) skin test (TST) accurately for three of five residents sampled for immunizations and TB testing (Residents #27, #53, and #54). The facility's census was 53. 1. Review of the Infections - Clinical Protocol, revised April 2012, showed: - Assessment and Recognition: 1. As part of the initial assessment, the physician will help identify individuals who have had a recent infection or who are at risk for developing an infection. 2. Infections may be suspected based on clinical signs and symptoms and/or temperature. 3. For any individual suspected of having an infection, or who has a change in function, appetite, mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-01 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed develop and implement policies and procedures and to maintain documentation to show they established an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) which included, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility's polices and procedures addressing infection control showed they did not have a policy and procedure to direct staff how to establish an IPCP, including an antibiotic stewardship program. Review of the Infection Summary Report, dated 5/1/22 through 5/31/22, form showed the form listed the source of the infection, if it was acquired in-house or of the resident admitted with the infection in a table at the top of the form. The types of infections listed were blood, ear, eye, gastrointestinal (GI), respiratory (URI), skin, urinary (UTI), and other. The form did not indicate the facility had had any blood, ear, eye or GI infections during the month. They indicated the following: - URI one;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to put measures in place to honor residents' or their responsible parties' do not resuscitate order when staff allowed a resident who had been deemed incapacitated to sign his/her Outside the Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OHDNR) form, failed to transcribe physician's orders when the resident signed his/her OHDNR, and allowed a resident with severe cognitive impairment to sign their OHDNR. This failure affected three of 14 sampled residents (Residents #26, #40 and #53). The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's undated Advanced Health Care Directives/Code Status Policy showed in part: - Annual discussion will be handled either in a group or one on one basis, in regards to their current advance directives and code status. In the event the resident is unable to comprehend what he/she is being told and the legal representative is unavailable, information and literature shall be sent to the legal representative and charted in the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-01 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed assess residents using the quarterly assessment review instrument no less than every three months or at least every 92 days after the last assessment which affected four of 14 sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #9). The census was 53. The facility did not provide a policy for completing the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff. 1. Review of Resident #3's electronic medical record (EMR) on 5/31/22 showed: - A quarterly MDS assessment date of 3/15/22; - The MDS coordinator signed the MDS assessment on 5/17/22 that she completed sections A ,B, E, G, GG, H, I, K, M, N, P; - The MDS coordinator electronically signed that she completed sections C-Interview, D, D-Interview, J, J-Interview, L, O, Q, Z on 5/20/22; - The Director of Nursing (DON) had not signed the assessment to signify it as accurate and complete. 2. Review of Resident #2's EMR on 5/31/22 showed: - A quarterly assessment date of 3/2/22; - The MDS coordinator signed the MDS assessment on 5/17/22 that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care which included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet each resident's medical, nursing, and mental psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for six of 14 sampled residents (Resident #9, #18 #35, #39, #46 and #50). The facility census was 53. Review of the facility's policy for care plan, dated October 2010, showed in part: - An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the residents medical, nursing, mental, and psychological needs is developed for each resident. - Our facility's care planning/Interdisciplinary team, in coordination with the resident, his/her family or representative, develops and maintains a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain. - The comprehensive care plan is based on a thorough…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-01 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed ensure the proper use of bed rails when staff failed to complete assessments for the use of bed rails prior to applying to residents beds, failed to provide education and obtain consents for the use of bed rails from the residents and/or their responsible parties, failed to obtain physician's orders and failed to implement interventions for the use of bed rails for four of 14 sampled residents with bed rails (Residents #27, #39, #40, and #46). The facility census was 53. Review of the facility policy for Proper use of side rails, dated December 2010, showed in part: - The purpose of these guidelines are to ensure the safe use of side rails as resident mobility aids and to prohibit the use of side rails as restraints unless necessary to treat a residents medical symptoms. - Physical restraints is based on the functional status of the resident and not on the device, therefore any device that has the effect on the resident of restricting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-01 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to complete entrapment assessments for four of 14 sampled residents with side rails and/or therapeutic mattresses (Residents #9, #39, #40, and #46) to ensure the environment remained safe and free of accident hazards. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility policy for Bed Safety, dated December 2007, showed in part: -The resident's sleeping environment shall be assessed by the interdisciplinary team, considering the resident's safety, medical conditions, comfort and freedom of movement, as well a input from the resident and family regarding previous sleeping habits and bed environment; -To try to prevent deaths/injuries from the beds and related equipment (including the frame, mattress, side rails, headboard, footboard, and bed accessories), the facility shall promote the following approaches: -Inspection by maintenance staff of all beds and related equipment as part of our regular bed safety program to identity risks and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-01 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to issue the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) from Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) form 10055 to each resident. The SNF ABN provides information to residents/beneficiaries so that they can decide if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services that may not be paid by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. This affected two of the three sampled residents (Residents #36 and #46). The facility census was 53. The facility did not provide a policy regarding ABN. 1. Review of Resident #36's medical records showed: - The resident's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), a notice provided to the resident and/or their responsible party when the resident had skilled benefit days remaining, is being discharged from Part A services and will continue living the in the facility, showed the resident was being discharged from Part A services on 12/16/21 and was signed by the resident's representative on 12/14/21. There was not a record that an ABN had been provided. Records indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-01 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a copy of their bed hold policy before transferring one of 14 sampled residents (Resident #26) to the hospital when they could not meet the needs of the resident. The facility's census was 52. Review of the facility's undated Bed Hold policy showed: - It is the policy of the facility that during the absence of any resident for any reason, the regular charge herein shall apply until the room is released and all belongings are removed, unless otherwise specified by administration. - The resident or their representative shall notify the facility's social service department regarding whether the resident's bed should be held, or whether the resident should be discharged . If notice is received, the resident's bed will automatically be held and charges will continue to accrue. - Upon a resident's discharge to the hospital, the business office or social service office will contact the resident's family on the 11th day following discharge to clarify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-01 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change in condition comprehensive assessment for one of 14 sampled resident's (Resident #9). The facility census was 53. The facility did not provide a policy for determining a significant change condition and completing the comprehensive assessment timely after the change had been identified. 1. Review of Resident #9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by the facility staff, dated 12/16/21, showed: - A brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. - Resident required extensive assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). - Resident was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. - Resident was at risk of pressure ulcer. Required staff to assist with turning and repositioning. - The resident was not and had not been receiving hospice services. Review of the ADL care plan (CP), dated 12/16/21, showed: - On 01/12/22 the resident returned from emergency room (ER) with diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed implement pressure ulcer precautions for one resident (Resident #46) per physician orders and facility care plan. This affected one of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 53. Review of Prevention of Pressure Ulcer policy dated October 2010 showed in part: Purpose of this procedure: Is to provide information regarding identification of pressure ulcer risk factors and interventions for specific risk factors. Preparation: - Review the residents' care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. - See policy and procedure for specific tasks, such as bathing, incontinence care, and repositioning. General Guidelines: - Pressure ulcers are usually formed when a resident remains in the same position for an extended period of time causing decrease of circulation to that area. - The most common site of pressure ulcer is where the bone is near the surface of the body. - Pressure can also come from splints, casts, bandages, and wrinkles in the bed linen. - Pressure ulcers are often made worse by continual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards when staff did not implement interventions to prevent falls for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident #27) who was at risk for falls and who had both experienced multiple falls. The facility census was 53. The facility did not provide a policy for falls. 1. Review of Resident #27's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 4/26/22, showed: - A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment; - Extensive assistance with bed mobility; total dependence on staff for transferring, moving on and off the unit, personal hygiene, toilet use, dressing, and eating; - Diagnoses included stroke and one sided paralysis; - No falls in the six months prior to admission, and now falls since admission; - Neurological surgery prior to admission; - No restraints or bed rails in use. Review of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs) for a resident with a suprapubic catheter (a catheter which enters the bladder through the lower abdomen) which affected one resident (Resident #46) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility policy regarding perineal care, dated October of 2010, showed in part: - If the resident has an indwelling catheter, gently wash the junction of the tubing from the urethra down the catheter tubing about 3 inches. Gently rinse and dry area. Hold the tubing to one side and support the tubing against the leg to avoid traction or unnecessary movement of the catheter. -The policy does not show where to place the bedside drainage bag during or after care. 1) Review of resident #46 Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/7/22, showed: - Resident was readmitted on [DATE] - A brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 14 sampled residents (Resident #27) received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding when staff failed to enter orders for upgrading the resident's diet, failed to monitor intake and output to ensure the resident received adequate calories when staff upgraded his/her diet, and failed to implement interventions after the resident's diet was upgraded. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility's policy on enteral nutrition, revised December 2011, showed adequate nutritional support through enteral feeding will be provide to residents as ordered. The policy interpretation and implementation included: - The interdisciplinary team (IDT), including the dietitian will conduct a full nutritional assessment within current initial assessment timeframes to determine the clinical necessity of enteral feedings and will include: a. Evaluation of the resident's current nutritional status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #46) of 14 sampled residents received a gradual dose reduction (GDR), and/or a rationale from the physician as to why the GDR was not attempted and failed to contact the physician once the resident no longer needed an antipsychotic medication. The facility census was 53. The facility policy titled psychotropic medication use, dated January 2022, showed in part: - Psychotropic medication is prescribed for a diagnosed condition and not being used for convince or discipline. - Facility should not use psychotropic medications to address behaviors without first determining if there is a medical, physical, functional, psychological, social, and environmental cause of the residents behaviors. -Gradual dose reduction is used in an effort to discontinue antipsychotic medications. 1. Review of Resident #46's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 01/07/2022, showed in part: - A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-01 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice in the development of a coordinated plan of care for residents receiving hospice care. This affected one of 14 sampled residents (Resident #9). The facility census was 53. Review of the facility's contracted agreement with hospice providers, dated 08/25/2020, under Provision of Services, showed in part: - Hospice plan of care (HPOC) must identify the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider is responsible for performing the respective functions that have ben agreed upon and included in the HPOC. - HPOC reflects participation by the hospice, facility, patient and patient's family. - Discussions of changes to the HPOC with the facility or patient. - Design of POC states facility shall coordinate with hospice in developing a POC. Review of facility policy regarding shower/tub baths, dated October 2010, showed in part; - No mention of frequency of showers for residents and when to provide/offer. 1) Review of Resident #9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$30,295 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $30,295 — penalty dated 2025-09-19
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-11-08 for 12 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
YOUTSEY, DONITAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/19/2013

CMS files one row per role, so the 2 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 7%Other / private 32%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$300per resident / day
operating cost
$9,105per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$271per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265715. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next