Putnam County Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 56.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide oversight and prevent injury for one resident (Resident #1), who was dependent on staff for transfers and bed mobility and had a history of falls from bed on 8/25/24 and 10/1/24, in a review of 12 sampled residents. On 10/7/24, staff failed to ensure interventions to prevent falls from the bed were in place when staff left the resident's bedside while in the resident's room. The resident rolled out of bed and hit his/her head. The resident sustained an intraventricular hemorrhage (bleeding inside the brain) and left hip fracture, which resulted in his/her death. The facility census was 56. The administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 10/16/24 at 5:10 P.M., which began on 10/7/24. The IJ was removed on 10/7/24 as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility policy, Safety and Supervision of Residents, revised July 2017, showed the following: -The facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible; -Resident safety and supervision and assistance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide safe transfers for one resident (Resident #7), in a review of eleven sampled residents. Resident #7 was unable to use his/her left arm due to a stroke. Staff failed to protect the resident's left arm during transfers which caused repeated skin tears and bruising to his/her left arm that required wound care treatment within the facility. The facility census was 57.Review of the facility policy Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, dated July 2017, showed the following:-In order to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, the facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents;-Resident safety, dignity, comfort and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding the safe lifting and moving of residents;-Nursing staff, in conjunction with the rehabilitation staff, shall assess individual residents'' needs for transfer assistance on an ongoing basis. Staff will document resident transferring and lifting needs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record, review the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #4), in a review of nine sampled residents, who staff identified required an indwelling urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the urethra to drain urine from the body related to urinary retention and enlarged prostate (gland around the urethra), and history of urinary tract infection, received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet the resident's physical, mental and psychosocial needs. Staff failed to notify the physician and assess and document the resident's urinary status following an episode of urinary retention that required changing the indwelling urinary catheter (removing and inserting a new urinary catheter) with tea colored urine and foul urine odor noted. The resident was admitted to the hospital seven days later with urosepsis (a type of sepsis, systemic life-threatening infection, when a urinary tract infection spreads to the kidneys and bloodstream). The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one of eleven sampled resident's (Resident #4's), physician when the resident returned from a hospital stay with a urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain the bladder of urine) and failed to notify the physician and obtain orders for discontinuation of the urinary catheter. Staff also failed to notify the physician the resident had not urinated for two days following removal of the urinary catheter and failed to notify the physician before inserting a straight catheter (inserted a temporary urinary catheter and removal and then removing for the purpose of draining the bladder and determine the residual urine quantity). Staff failed to notify the resident's family the resident's urinary catheter was discontinued, the resident had not urinated for two days, or staff performed a straight catheterization procedure. The facility census was 57.Review of the facility policy Change in a Resident's condition or Status, dated February 2021, showed the following:-The facility promptly notified the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain one of 11 sampled residents' (Resident #4's) private health information when the Administrator shared the resident's change in code status (CPR -cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), vs DNR- do not resuscitate), with members of the public who were not privileged to that information. The facility census was 57.Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights, dated February 2021, showed the following:-Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of the facility including the resident's right to a dignified existence, privacy and confidentiality;-The unauthorized release, access or disclosure of resident information is prohibited. All release, access or disclosure of resident information must be in accordance with current laws governing privacy of information issues. All inquiries concerning the release of resident information should be directed to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA, a federal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care according to professional standards of practice for one resident (Resident #4) in a review of eleven sampled residents when staff failed to obtain physician orders for removal of the resident's urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain the bladder of urine) that was in place on re-admission from an outside hospital and failed to obtain orders for straight catheterization when the resident was unable to urinate for two days. The facility census was 57.Review of the facility policy, Urinary Catheter Care dated August 2022, showed the following:-The purpose was to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections;-Review and document the clinical indications for catheter use prior to inserting;-Nursing and the interdisciplinary team should assess and document the ongoing need for a catheter that is in place;-Observe the resident for complications associated with urinary catheters. Report unusual findings to the physician or supervisor immediately if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff utilized appropriate infection control technique when providing care for two residents, (Resident #1 and #2) who had indwelling urinary catheters, in a review of five sampled residents, to prevent infection. The facility census was 52. Review of the facility policy, Catheter Care, Urinary,, last revised 8/2022, showed the following: -Purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections; -Wash and dry hands thoroughly; -Use a clean washcloth with warm water and soap or bathing wipe to cleanse and rinse the catheter from insertion site to approximately four inches outward. Review of the facility policy, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, last revised 10/2023, showed the following: -Hand hygiene is the primary means to prevent the spread of healthcare-associated infections; -All personnel are expected to adhere to hand hygiene policies and practices to help prevent the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0570 — pattern
  Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond (an amount equal to at least one and one half times the average monthly balance of the residents' personal funds) sufficient to ensure protection of all personal funds the facility held for 15 residents in the resident fund account. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility undated policy, Surety Bond, showed the following: -The facility has a current surety bond to assure the security of all residents' personal funds deposited with the facility; -A surety bond is an agreement between the facility, the insurance company, and the resident or the State acting on behalf of the resident, wherein the facility and the insurance company agree to compensate the resident for any loss of residents' funds that the facility holds, accounts for, safeguards, and manages; -This facility holds a surety bond to guarantee the protection of residents' funds managed by the facility on behalf of its residents; -All funds (including refundable deposits) entrusted to the facility for a resident are covered by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy for multiple residents when one resident (Resident #51), who had diagnoses of dementia and identified as a wanderer, wandered in and out of other residents' rooms. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility policy, Dignity, revised February 2021, showed the following: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem; -Residents' private space and property are respected at all times; -Staff promote, maintain, and protect resident privacy. Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights, revised February 2021, showed Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to privacy. 1. Review of Resident #51's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's Wander…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan specific to the resident, for three residents (Resident #22, #31 and #47), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility's policy, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022 showed the following: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; -The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident; -The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment; -Assessment of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update interventions in the resident's care plan to reflect current care needs for four residents (Resident #26, #38, #44, #48), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022 showed the following: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; -The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident; -The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment; -Assessment of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision for one resident (Resident #51), in a review of 20 sampled residents. Resident #51 had dementia and wandered into other resident rooms causing two other residents (Resident #36 and Resident #37), to be upset and fearful, while another resident (Resident #35) expressed wanting to harm Resident #51 because of his/her behavior. The facility also failed to provide supervision when the resident was wandering by an unlocked and unattended treatment cart and attempting to gain access to the medication room. The census was 55. Review of the facility policy, Wandering and Elopement, last revised 03/2019 showed the following: -The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent them from harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents; -If identified as at risk for wandering, elopement, or other safety issues, the resident's care plan will include strategies and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
  Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure eight nurse aides (NA) (NA B, NA D, NA N, NA R, NA S, NA T, NA U and NA V) completed a nurse aide training program within four months of their employment in the facility. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility policy titled Nurse Aide Qualifications and Training Requirements revised August 2022 showed the following: -Nurse aides must undergo a state-approved training program; -The facility will not employ any individual as a nurse aide for more than four months full-time, temporary, per diem, or otherwise unless: -That individual is competent to provide designated nursing care and nursing related services; -That individual has completed a training program and competency evaluation program, or a competency evaluation program approved by the state; or -That individual has been deemed competent as provided in 483.150 (a) and (b) of the requirements of participation; -Nursing assistants failing to successfully complete the required training program within the first four months of their date of employment may…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$72,664 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $38,243 — penalty dated 2025-08-28
• $9,753 — penalty dated 2024-09-12
• $24,668 — penalty dated 2024-06-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO