No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Baptist Homes, Tri-County

601 North Galloway Road, Vandalia, MO 63382 · Non profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (573) 594-6467 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited Mar 2022Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568, F0569, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Mar 2022
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569, F0570)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (70) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
425 N Galloway Rd · (573) 594-3832 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8 N Court St · (573) 324-2112 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1555 W US Highway 54 · (573) 594-6430 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1100 W US-54 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1501 W US Highway 54 · (573) 594-2146

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.3%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.4%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder5.0%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.8%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%18.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%4.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.7%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication39.9%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.9%17.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.2%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.4%26.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit40.1%13.7%12.0%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.812.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.472.331.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

33.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.09U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF33.5%CMS range 21.9–48.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 8.2–18.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge30.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified72.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 4.2–16.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.771.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
0.67
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.93
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
60.0%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 60.1 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.91 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.94 on weekdays — 1% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-05)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

70 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2022-03-02 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to implement their policy and failed to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (process of providing rescue ventilation and chest compressions to maintain circulation of blood) and call 911 for two residents (Resident #105 and #106) identified as having full code status (CPR required in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest), when staff found the residents unresponsive and without a pulse. The facility census was 55. The administrator was notified on [DATE] at 2:30 P.M. of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ), which began on [DATE]. The IJ was removed on [DATE] as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the undated facility policy CPR showed the following: Standard: -Residents who have Full Code status will be given CPR in the absence of vital signs; Policy: -Resident code status will be determined/reviewed on admission and yearly; -Resident's attending physician will order Full Code or DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) as resident chooses (or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to communicate accurate and consistent information related to Resident #42's condition to the resident's physician, including the resident's variations in level of alertness and expressions of thirst. The facility failed to include hospice and the resident's family in an effective plan of care, to address the resident's needs after the facility received an order for the resident to be given nothing by mouth (NPO) following an episode of difficulty in swallowing. The resident had periods of fluctuating levels of alertness both before and after 2/8/22 when the NPO order began. Following the NPO order the resident verbalized thirst. The facility failed to ensure the resident was assessed and received appropriate interventions to address thirst, hydration and nutrition. Additionally the facility failed to ensure the resident received a speech therapy evaluation after it was recommended by the speech therapist to evaluate the resident's ability to safely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and oversight to prevent falls for one resident, Resident #27, in a review of 19 sampled residents. The facility staff failed to implement fall prevention interventions as indicated on the resident's care plan, failed to provide safe transfers as directed by the resident's plan of care. Resident #27 had multiple falls with injuries including a subdural hematoma (pool of blood between the brain and its outermost covering). The facility census was 55. Review of the undated facility policy, Fall Assessment policy and procedures, showed the following: Fall assessment is completed up on admission to identify residents, who are at high risk for falls order to implement interventions and reduce the incidence of falls. It is also completed quarterly to identify residents who are at a high risk for falls and precipitating events and patterns leading to falls in order to implement interventions and reduce the incidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-03-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately assess pain twice daily as directed in the facility policy, report pain during care to the charge nurse, provide medications in anticipation of cares that caused pain, for one resident (Resident #43), in a review of 19 sampled residents, who yelled out in pain during care. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility undated Pain Management Policy showed the following: -Each resident who experiences pain will have an assessment of that pain and will have a treatment plan established to treat his/her pain; -To effectively prevent or reduce the limits pain causes on the activities of daily living for our residents. And, assist in maintaining their dignity, self-respect and quality of life they are entitled to; -Resident preferences must be respected when deciding on methods to be used for pain management. Family members should be involved when appropriate; -Definitions of Pain: 1. Acute = sharp, severe, having rapid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food service equipment/surfaces were appropriately cleaned under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility census was 58.Review of the facility policy, Sanitization, revised November 2022, showed the following:-The food service area is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner;-All kitchens, kitchen areas and dining areas are kept clean;-All equipment, food contact surfaces and utensils are cleaned and sanitized using heat or chemical sanitizing solutions. 1. Observations in the kitchen on 3/2/26 between 10:45 A.M. and 3:30 P.M., and on 3/3/26 between 8:30 A.M. and 3:40 A.M., showed the following:-A ceiling-mounted air unit, located above the coffee machine and clean cups, had a heavy buildup of oily substance, dust and debris on the bottom vent area;-A ceiling-mounted air vent, located between the clean coffee cup area and clean side of dishwasher area, had a moderate buildup of dust and debris;-A ceiling-mounted air vent, located above the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a system to ensure the resident trust fund account was managed in accordance with proper accounting principles by not maintaining an accurate accounting of all monies held in the resident trust fund petty cash account and by not reconciling each month. The facility managed funds for 37 residents. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility's monthly bank statements and resident trust fund records for December 2025, January 2026 and February 2026, showed no documentation the facility reconciled the monthly bank statements with the month ending resident trust fund records, to include outstanding checks and petty cash, to ensure an accurate accounting of all resident finds. During an interview on 3/5/26 at 1:00 P.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM), said the following: -She was responsible for managing the resident trust fund account and the resident petty cash; -The resident petty cash account was maintained from money withdrawn monthly from the resident trust account; -She typically kept $400.00 from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received mail on regular mail delivery days as identified by the United States Postal Service (USPS), including Saturdays. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility's undated admission Packet showed a Patient [NAME] of Rights (page 33), which included the right of each resident to send and receive unopened mail. Review of the facility policy, Mail and Electronic Communication, revised May 2017, showed the following: -Residents are allowed to communicate privately with individuals of their choice and may send and receive personal mail, email, and other electronic forms of communication confidentially; -Mail and packages will be delivered to the resident within twenty-four (24) hours of delivery on premises or to the facility's post office box (including Saturday deliveries). 1. During a group interview on 03/04/26 at 10:00 A.M., Resident #3, Resident #32, and Resident #39 said residents did not receive mail on Saturdays. 2. During an interview on 03/05/26 at 2:50 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents knew how to file a grievance, where grievance forms were located, or how to complete a grievance form. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility's undated admission packet, Resident Rights, showed the following: -Each resident shall be encouraged and assisted throughout his/her stay to exercise their rights as a resident and citizen and may voice grievances and recommend changes in policies and services to the facility staff or outside representatives of his/her choice; -A staff person shall be designated to receive grievances and residents may voice their complaints and recommendations to staff designee, an ombudsman, or any person outside the facility; -Residents shall be informed of and provided with a viable format for recommending changes in policy and services. Review of the facility policy, Grievances/Complaint, Filing, revised April 2017, showed the following: -Residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of practice for two residents (Resident #10 and #56), in a review of 19 sampled residents. The facility failed to administer bolus tube feedings according to physician orders and per manufacturer guidelines and failed to properly administer medications via a feeding tube for Resident #10. The facility failed to obtain a lithium level (a laboratory test to monitor the concentration of lithium in the blood - a mood stabilizing medication to treat mental illness) for Resident #56. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility policy, Enteral Feedings (nutrition delivered directly into the gastrointestinal tract) - Safety Precautions, revised November 2018, showed the following:-All personnel responsible for preparing, storing and administering enteral nutrition formulas will be trained, qualified and competent in his or her responsibilities;-All personnel responsible for preparing, storing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%), when staff made two medications errors out of a total of 30 opportunities for error, resulting in a 6.67% error rate. Staff did not ensure Resident #2 received the full dose of ordered insulin and did not administer the ordered dose of Tramadol (a narcotic pain medication) to Resident #44. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility policy, Administering Medications, revised April 2019, showed the following:-Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed;-The individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. Review of the facility policy, Insulin Pens, showed the following:-Priming an insulin pen (an air shot) is essential before each injection to remove air bubbles from the cartridge and needle, ensuring the resident receive the full, accurate dose of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure stock medications (a limited supply of non-prescription, over-the-counter [OTC] or emergency drugs stored on-site for immediate use) were labeled with the date they were opened and removed and/or replaced when expired. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility policy, Storage of Medications, last revised November 2020, showed the following: -The facility stores all drugs and biologicals (specialized medications used to treat specific conditions) in a safe, secure, and orderly manner; -Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are destroyed; -OTC medication will be available for use until the manufacturer expiration date unless there are signs of deterioration; -OTC will have an open date label when the container is opened; -OTCs that have been opened will be stored from a separate area from those that are unopened. 1. Observation on 03/05/26 at 9:45 A.M. of the 200-hall medication cart showed the following: -A previously opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff served food that was palatable and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 58.Review of the facility policy, Food Preparation and Services, revised November 2022, showed the following:-Proper hot and cold temperatures are maintained during food distribution and service; -Food and nutrition services staff are to monitor the temperatures of foods held in the steam tables throughout the meal service. 1. Review of the Resident Council Minutes, dated 01/08/26, showed the following:-The vegetables were cooked too long;-The food on the west hall was cold. Staff explained to the residents the plate warmer broke, and they were working on getting a new one. During an interview on 03/02/26 at 2:33 P.M., Resident #3 said the following:-Saturday night there was some kind of casserole on his/her plate that was unrecognizable. It didn't look appetizing, and he/she couldn't eat it;-The food was horrid and didn't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff offered suitable, nourishing evening snacks for two residents (Resident #01 and Resident #03), in a review of 18 sampled residents, and for two additional residents, (Resident #32 and Resident #39), who participated in a group interview and reported bedtime snacks were not offered on a routine basis at the facility. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility policy Frequency of Meals, dated July 2017, showed the following:-Nourishing snacks will be available for residents who need or desire additional food between meals;-Evening snacks will be offered routinely to all residents;-Residents will also be offered nourishing snacks if the time span between the evening meal and the next day's breakfast excessed 14 hours. Nourishing snacks are items from the basic food groups, offered either separately or with each other;-A substantial evening meal is an offering of two or more menu items at one time, one of which includes a high-quality protein such as meat, fish, eggs or cheese. The meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) the Infection Preventionist attended QAPI meetings as required. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility policy, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, dated 06/23/25, showed the following:-QAPI Committee Members:-Administrator;-Medical Director;-Director of Nursing;-Pharmacy Consultant;-Infection Preventionist (IP);-MDS Coordinator;-Social Services Director;-The QAPI Committee meets quarterly. 1. Review of the Quarterly QAPI Meeting Attendance, dated 04/29/25, showed documentation the IP was absent. Review of the Quarterly QAPI Meeting Attendance, dated 07/24/25, showed documentation the IP was absent. Review of the Quarterly QAPI Meeting Attendance, dated 10/27/25, showed documentation the IP was absent. The facility did not provide evidence of a fourth quarter QAPI meeting in 2025. 2. During an interview on 03/18/26 at 8:51 A.M., the IP said the following:-She works six shifts per month, all on the weekends;-She was a part of the QAPI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 56 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate infection control practices for six residents (Resident #59, #47, #1, #2, #9 and #36), in a review of 19 sampled residents, and for four additional residents (Residents #46, #60, #48 and #44). Facility staff failed to change gloves or perform appropriate hand hygiene during personal care and assistance with eating for Residents #59, #46, #47 and #60, failed to properly clean a multi-use glucometer (device used to obtain a blood sugar reading after obtaining a drop of blood from the resident that is then placed on a test strip and placed in the device), failed to maintain infection control when a barrier was not used during blood glucose checks for Residents #1, #2, #48 and #44, failed to maintain catheter bags and tubing to prevent infection for Resident #9, and failed to properly clean and store a nebulizer mask for Resident #36. The facility failed to develop written policies and procedures as required to outline the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have an adequate audible system for residents to signal nursing staff for assistance and failed to ensure staff responded to call lights timely for two residents (Resident #19 and Resident #2) in a review of 19 sampled residents and two additional residents (Resident #39 and Resident #32). The facility census was 58. Review of the facility policy titled Resident Call System dated [DATE] showed the following:-Residents are provided with a means to call staff for assistance through a communication system that directly calls a staff member or a centralized workstation;-Each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his/her bed, from toileting/bathing facilities and from the floor;-Call system communication may be audible or visual. The system may be wired or wireless;-The resident call system remains functional at all times. If audible communication is used, the volume is maintained at an audible level that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately address strong and pervasive urine odor at its source. The facility census was 58. No policy regarding addressing odors was received from the facility upon request. 1. Observation on 03/02/26 at 11:50 A.M. showed the following: A strong, urine odor in the hallway outside of Resident #28's room and adjoining resident rooms on the hall; -Resident #28's door was partially open; -The resident appeared to be sleeping and lay on his/her bed, unclothed, with his/her private area covered by a towel;-The fitted sheet beneath the resident had a dark, circular ring just beneath the resident's buttocks that appeared wet. Observation on 03/02/26 at 4:15 P.M. showed the following: -A strong urine odor noted in the hallway outside of the resident's room, and adjoining resident rooms in the hall; -The resident's door was partially open; -The resident sat on the side of his/her bed; -The fitted sheet beneath the resident had a dark, circular ring just beneath the resident's buttocks that appeared wet; -A partially…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor the drug regimen for unnecessary medications by not ensuring the as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (a chemical substance that changes brain function and results in alterations in perception, mood, consciousness or behavior) orders were limited to 14 days unless specific duration and clinical rationale were provided for two residents (Resident #19 and #14), in a review of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility policy, Antipsychotic Medication Usage, dated July 2022, showed the following:-Residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition;-Antipsychotic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review;-PRN orders for antipsychotic medications will not be renewed beyond 14 days unless the healthcare practitioner has evaluated the resident for the appropriateness of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included services to maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, when the facility failed to include skin breakdown and pressure ulcers for one resident (Resident #9), and the use of a nebulizer due to chronic health conditions for one resident (Resident #36), in a review of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 58.Review of the facility policy, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, showed the following:-A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident;-The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident;-The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven (7) days of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff transferred one resident (Resident #59), in a review of 19 sampled residents, using appropriate technique, consistent with the resident's abilities and condition, to ensure the resident's safety. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility policy, Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, revised July 2017, showed the following:-In order to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents;-Resident safety, dignity, comfort and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding the safe lifting and moving of residents;-Manual lifting of residents shall be eliminated when feasible;-Nursing staff, in conjunction with the rehabilitation staff, shall assess individual residents' needs for transfer assistance on an ongoing basis. Staff will document resident transferring and lifting needs in the care plan. Such assessment shall include the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a performance review of each nurse aide at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based upon the outcome of the reviews for two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA F and CNA G), in a review of two CNA employee files. The facility census was 58. Review of the Facility Assessment, revised 04/01/2025, showed the following:-The facility makes a good faith effort to provide the staff training/education and competencies necessary to provide the level and types of support and care needed for the resident population;-Required in-service training for nurse aides. In-service training must:-Address areas of weakness as determined in nurse aides' performance reviews and facility assessment and may address the special needs of residents as determined by the facility staff. 1.Review of Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) F's employee file showed the following:-Date of hire: 09/26/24;-No documentation of nurse aide evaluation/competencies or annual performance review. 2. Review of CNA G's employee filed showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician provided his/her rationale for not making a medication change as recommended by the pharmacist during the monthly drug regimen review for one resident (Resident #9), in a review of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 58.Review of the facility policy, Antipsychotic Medication Use, revised July 2022, showed the following:-All antipsychotic medications will be used within the clinically recommended dosage guidelines or clinical justification will be documented for dosages that exceed guidelines for more than 48 hours;-The physician shall respond appropriately by changing or stopping problematic doses or medications or clearly documenting (based on assessing the situation) why the benefits of the medication outweigh the risks or suspected or confirmed adverse consequences. Review of the facility policy, Psychotropic Medication Use, revised July 2022, showed the following:-Residents on psychotropic medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of two residents (Resident #2 and #8) in a review of nine residents when staff failed to provide incontinence care timely and maintain good personal hygiene and failed to ensure resident clinical assessments were completed and documented for Resident #2. The facility failed to provide sufficient staff on the memory care unit to ensure supervision of Resident #8. The facility also and failed to consistently have Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) staff as identified in the facility assessment. The facility census was 54. Review of the facility policy Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing, dated 8/2022 showed the following: -The facility provides sufficient numbers of nursing staff with the appropriate skills and competency necessary to provide nursing and related care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment; -Licensed nurses and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #2), who staff identified as incontinent and required staff assistance with toileting and incontinence care, in a review of nine residents, was provided incontinence care timely and maintained good personal hygiene. The facility census was 54. Review of the facility policy, Urinary Continence and Incontinence, Assessment and Management, dated 8/2022 showed the following: -As part of the initial and ongoing assessments, the nursing staff and physician will screen for information related to urinary continence; -Staff will check the resident for incontinence and change the resident at regular intervals using incontinence devices or garments. The primary goals are to maintain dignity and comfort and to protect the skin. 1. Review of Resident #2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument, completed by facility staff, dated 9/27/24 showed the following: -Severely impaired cognition; -Frequently incontinent of urine; -Always incontinent of bowel;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #2) in a review of nine residents, was provided treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to assess the resident's clinical condition, failed to ensure a heart monitor was in place and functioning as ordered by the physician, failed to ensure the resident received therapy services following a hospitalization, and failed to ensure the resident's Care Plan was up to date and reflected the resident's current condition and care needs. The facility census was 54. Review of the facility policy admission Notes, dated 9/2012, showed the following: -Preliminary resident information shall be documented upon a resident's admission to the facility; -When a resident is admitted to the nursing unit, the admitting nurse must document the following information in the nurses' notes, admission form, or other appropriate place, as designated by facility protocol; -The date and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were followed when staff failed to utilize proper handwashing and gloving techniques while providing wound care and failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention that utilizes personal protective equipment to reduce the spread of multi drug-resistant organisms) during wound care for two residents (Resident #3 and #7) in a review of nine residents. The facility census was 54. Review of the facility policy, Handwashing/Hand hygiene, dated 8/2019, showed the following: -The facility considered hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections; -All personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections; -All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitation and food storage practices were maintained in the main facility kitchen and the activity kitchen. The facility census was 47. Review of the facility policy, Food Storage (Dry, Refrigerated and Frozen), dated 2020, showed the following: -Food shall be stored on shelves in a clean, dry area free from contaminants; -Food shall be stored at appropriate temperatures and using appropriate methods to ensure the highest level of food safety; -All food items will be labeled. The label must include the name of the food and the date by which it should be sold, consumed or discarded; -Discard food that has passed the expiration date, and discard food that has been prepared in the facility after seven days of storing under proper refrigeration; -Store raw animal products such as eggs, meat, poultry, and fish separately from cooked and ready to eat food; -Raw animal foods such as eggs, meat, poultry and fish should be stored in drip proof containers. Review of the facility policy, Labeling and Dating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a system to ensure the resident trust fund account was managed in accordance with proper accounting principles by not maintaining an accurate accounting of all monies held in the resident trust fund account by not reconciling each month. The facility managed funds for 41 residents. The facility census was 47. 1. Record review of the facility maintained bank statements for months 01/2023 through 12/2023 showed no documentation of reconciliations. Record review of the facility maintained reconciliation forms, dated 01/2023 through 12/2023, showed the attempted reconciliations did not reconcile to the residents' current balance at the time of reconciliation. During an interview on 02/07/24 at 9:50 A.M., the Business Office Manager said there was no Business Office Manager in the beginning of 2023 and he/she was only told to reconcile to the bank statement. He/She was not told to reconcile to the residents' current balance.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete required pre-employment screenings for three of seven sampled employees hired since the previous survey. The facility failed to request a criminal background check for three employees and complete an Employee Disqualification List (EDL) check for one employee, prior to hire. The facility census was 47. Review of the facility policy, Background Screening Investigations, revised March 2019, showed the following: - For purposes of this policy ''direct access employee'' means any individual who has access to a resident or patient of a long term care (LTC) facility or provider through employment or through a contract and has duties that involve (or may involve) one-on-one contact with a patient or resident of the facility or provider, as determined by the state for purposes of the national background check program. -The director of personnel, or designee, conducts background checks, reference checks and criminal conviction checks (including fingerprinting as may be required by state law) on all potential direct access…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents on a pureed diet and residents on a dental soft (mechanical soft) diet received food in the proper form in accordance with their physician's orders. The facility census was 47. Review of the facility policy, Pureed Diet, dated 2022, showed the following: -The pureed diet is designed for individuals who cannot chew foods of the dental soft (mechanical soft) consistency and/or difficulty swallowing; -All foods are prepared in a food processor or blender, with the exception of those foods which are normally in a soft, moist and smooth state; -Additional liquid is added in the form of broth, gravy, vegetable or fruit juices, or milk to achieve the appropriate consistency (puddings, smooth mashed potatoes); -Process hot or cold items until they are smooth and homogenous in texture; -Add measured amounts of hot liquid for cooked foods and cold liquid (if required) for cold foods and process until a smooth consistency is achieved; -Scrape down sides and reprocess until very smooth like pudding; -Top…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure procedures were implemented to address prevention of Tuberculosis (TB) for four staff members in a review of seven sampled employees reviewed, when the facility failed to ensure Tuberculin Skin Tests (TST) were completed in accordance with the requirements for TB testing for long-term care employees. The facility census was 47. Review of the facility's policy, Employee Screening for Tuberculosis, revised March 2021, showed the following: -All employees are screened for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and active tuberculosis (TB) disease, using tuberculin skin test (TST) or interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) and symptom screening prior to beginning employment; -Each newly hired employee is screened for LTBI and active TB disease after an employment offer has been made but prior to the employee's duty assignment; -Screening includes a baseline test for LTBI using either a TST or IGRA, individual risk assessment and symptom evaluation; -The employee health coordinator (or designee) will accept documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete inspection of bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for three residents (Residents #32, #33 and #15), in a review of 12 sampled residents, and for one additional resident (Resident #5). The facility census was 47. Review of the undated facility policy, Bed Safety and Bed Rails, showed the following: -Bed frames, mattresses and bed rails are checked for compatibility and size prior to use; -Regardless of mattress type, width, length, and or depth, the bed frame, bed rail and mattress will leave no gap wide enough to entrap a resident's head or body. Any gaps in the bed system are within the safety dimensions established by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). -Maintenance staff routinely inspects all beds and related equipment to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment risks. -The maintenance department provides a copy of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were placed in an account separate from the facility operating account. The facility did not provide residents with refunds of their personal funds from the operating account in a timely manner for four residents (Resident #35, #39, #100 and #101). The facility census was 47. 1. Record review of the facility maintained Accounts Receivable Aging Report, dated 02/08/24, showed the following residents with personal funds held in the facility operating account. Resident Amount Held in Operating Account #35 $1,455.70 #39 $2,540.75 #100 $92.40 #101 $57.60 Total $4,146.45 During email correspondence on 02/09/24 at 9:59 A.M., the Business Office Manager said he/she did not realize there could be no resident credits in the operating account.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument to be completed by facility staff, after two residents (Resident #1 and #39), in a review of 12 sampled residents, were admitted to hospice. The census was 47. Review of the facility's Change in a Resident's Condition or Status Operational Policy, revised February 2021, showed a significant change in condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that: -a. Will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions (is not self-limiting); -limpets more than one area of the resident's health status; -creatures interdisciplinary review and/or revision to the care plan; and -d. Ultimately is based on the judgment of the clinical staff and the guidelines outlined in the Resident Assessment Instrument. Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care consistent with resident's specific conditions, needs, and risks for two residents (Residents #39 and #40), in a review of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 47. Review of the facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered Policy, revised [DATE], showed the following: -The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the required MDS assessment (Admission, Annual or Significant Change in Status), and no more than 21 days after admission. -Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. -The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan: a. When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; b. When the desired outcome is not met; c. When the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and d. At least quarterly, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications through a gastrostomy tube (g-tube; a tube placed through the abdomen directly into the stomach for nutrition and medications) in accordance with facility policy for one resident (Resident #3), in a review of 12 sampled residents. The census was 47. Review of the facility policy, A Stepwise Approach: Selecting Medications for Feeding Tube Administration, dated 2020, showed giving medications through an enteral feeding tube can be complicated. Clogging can be a major complication with feeding tubes. Inappropriate medication administration and inadequate flushing can lead to clogging. Generally, do NOT mix medications with tube feedings, mix medications together, or give multiple medications at the same time. Always flush tube before and after the administration of a medication with at least 15 to 30 milliliters (ml) of water. 1. Review of Resident #3's care plan, dated 11/23/23, showed the following: -Nothing by mouth (NPO), g-tube use; -Give fluids as ordered via tube; -Administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and ensure one resident (Resident #11), in a review of 12 sampled residents, was free from a significant medication error, when staff failed to discontinue a medication for 34 days after the resident's physician ordered to discontinue the medication. The facility also failed to properly transcribe the physician's orders received upon the resident's readmission to the facility from the hospital to show the previously discontinued medication was to be given as needed (PRN). Staff administered the medication as scheduled and not PRN. The facility census was 47. Review of the facility policy for administering medications, last revised April 2019, showed the following: -Medications were administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; -The director of nursing services supervised and directed all personnel who administered medications and/or have related functions; -Medications were administered in accordance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-03-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide/designate a registered nurse (RN) to serve as the director of nursing (DON) on a full time basis, and provide an RN eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility's undated policy, Staffing Plan, showed the following: -Nursing services are provided 24 hours a day, seven days a week; -At least one registered nurse (RN) is on duty eight hours a day, seven day a week. (Due to recent staffing shortages, if a RN is unavailable for eight hours a day, seven days a week, a licensed practical nurse (LPN) will be utilized); -When staffing falls below normal numbers, attempts will be made to call in help; -Nursing staff will be scheduled extended shifts and not be allowed to leave their unit until the proper personnel relief including: RN's -All contracted nursing agencies will be notified; -If unavailable, nursing administration will be called to provide coverage and to assure safe levels of care and adherence to state requirements. 1. Review of the RN/LPN/CMT schedule,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement sanitary practices and conditions within the dietary department to prevent the potential for contamination of food during storage, preparation, and distribution. The facility census was 55. Observations in the kitchen on 2/15/22 between 10:30 A.M. and 2:00 P.M. showed the following: -The four-plex outlet, located above the food preparation table by the food processor, was soiled with food debris; -Brown debris was splattered along the wall above this food preparation table, behind the food processor, blender and wall-mounted knife rack; -Dusty and black debris on the vent cover for the ceiling mounted HVAC units throughout the kitchen; -A buildup of black debris on the fan cover and inside the fan in the reach-in double refrigerator unit; -Black mold-like debris on the wall, metal conduits, and floor under the dishwashing counter in the dishwashing room; -The wall in the dishwashing room next to the sink with the sprayer was pealing and not cleanable. An area approximately 12 inches by 3 inches of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to implement their water management program to identify and reduce the risk of Legionella bacteria (cause of Legionnaire's disease - a severe form of pneumonia) growth and spread. The facility failed to ensure facility staff washed their hands after each direct resident contact when indicated by professional standards for one resident (Resident #207) in a sample of 19 residents and one additional resident (Resident #1). The facility also failed to ensure procedures were implemented to address prevention of Tuberculosis (TB) for six employees, in a review of ten sampled employees hired since the previous survey. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility's undated policy,Tuberculosis Testings, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the wireless call light system to ensure staff carried functioning pagers to alert them to residents' calls for staff assistance. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility policy, Policy and Procedure for Call Light System, updated January 2022, showed the following: -The facility will maintain a call light system in the facility for all residents and staff members to use for assistance and/or emergencies; -All nursing staff will be educated and trained on constant checking of the monitors to ensure call lights are being answered timely and that each resident has their call light within reach of using; -The system will allow each charge nurse or Special Care Unit (SCU) supervisor to carry beepers with them while on duty during their shift; -The beepers will alert the charge nurse immediately when assistance is needed; -Computer monitors are also displayed at each nurse's station as well on the East and [NAME] halls for a visual alert for CNAs to see, in order to know which room has called…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that enhanced resident dignity for three residents (Residents #43, #28, and #41), in a review of 19 sampled residents. Facility staff also failed to cover two residents' (Resident #2 and #30) urinary catheter (tube leading from the urinary bladder to the outside to drain urine) drainage bags with a dignity/privacy cover. The facility census was 55. Review of the undated facility policy, Residents Rights Policy, showed the following: -These resident rights ensure that at least, each resident admitted to this facility is/has: -Fully informed, as evidenced by the resident's written acknowledgement, prior to or at this time of admission and during stay, of these rights and of all rules and regulations governing residents conduct and responsibilities; -Treated with consideration, respect and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality, including privacy in treatment and care for his/her personal needs; -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of needs for two residents (Resident #41 and Resident #45), in a review of nineteen sampled residents, when Residents #41 and #45 yelled out for assistance periodically throughout the day because they did not have access to a call light. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility's Policy and Procedure for Call Light System, updated January 2022, showed the following: -The facility will maintain a call light system in the facility for all residents and staff members to use for assistance and/or emergencies; -All nursing staff will be educated and trained on constant checking of the monitors to ensure call lights are being answered timely and that each resident has their call light within reach of using; -No evidence to show the facility ensures that the staff are educated on the use of the call lights and correct placement of call lights for each resident. 1. Review of Resident #41's face sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-02 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to ensure resident funds were placed in an account separate from the facility operating account and did not allow the residents/guardian the right to manage his/her financial affairs. The facility did not provide residents access to their funds as soon as possible for 20 residents (Resident #17, #29, #34, #47, #50, #200, #201, #202, #205, #206, #208, #209, #210, #211, #212, #213, #214, #215, #217 and #218). The facility also failed to ensure negative balances were not maintained for one deceased resident (Resident #229). The facility refunded more funds to the resident's responsible party than the resident maintained in the resident trust fund at the time of death, which resulted in refunding funds that belonged to other residents. The facility census was 55. 1. Record review of the facility's maintained Resident Accounts Receivable Aging Report for the period 02/01/21 through 02/28/22, dated 02/28/22, showed the following residents with personal funds held in the facility operating account: Resident Amount Held in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-02 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to reconcile the resident trust fund bank balance and resident petty cash with the current balance of the resident trust fund ledgers. In addition, the facility failed to provide quarterly financial statements to one resident (Resident #21). The facility census was 55. 1. Review of the facility's reconciliation, dated January 2021, showed the reconciled balance (bank statement balance minus the outstanding deposits and withdrawals) was $30,310.76. Review showed no evidence the facility included the resident petty cash balance maintained in the facility in the monthly reconciliation. Review of the Resident Trust Fund Current Balance Report (report with each resident's account balance including funds in the checking account and resident petty cash), dated 1/31/21, showed the total balance in the resident trust fund was $30,173.45. (The facility failed to reconcile the bank statements and petty cash to the resident's trust fund ledgers to ensure the ending balances were equal. The facility's bank balance (without petty cash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident or his/her designee when the resident's account reached $200 less than the Supplemental Security Income resource limit of $5,000 (prior to [DATE] or $5,035 after [DATE]), for three residents (Residents #18, #226, and #227) who received Medicaid Benefit. The facility failed to refund resident funds within 30 days of discharge for four residents (Residents #55, #61, #219, and #225). The facility failed to provide a final accounting of resident trust fund balances within 30 days to the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate for seven residents (Residents #202, #217, #220, #221, #222, #223, and #224). The facility census was 55. 1. Review of the facility's Resident Trust Fund Current Balance Reports showed the following for Resident #226: -The resident's primary pay source was Medicaid; -On [DATE], the resident's balance was $5,338.53; -On [DATE], the resident's balance was $5,405.42; -On [DATE], the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond sufficient (an amount equal to at least one and one half times the average monthly balance of the residents' personal funds) to ensure protection of the resident funds. The facility census was 55. Record review of the facility's resident trust fund reconciled bank statement for the period of January 2021 through December 2021 showed an average monthly balance of $42,709.45. Calculation showed the facility required a bond amount of at least amount $64,500.00. (The facility was unable to provide a monthly accounting of the money maintained in the resident petty cash to include in the calculation.) Record review of the facility's current surety bond showed the facility held a bond in the amount of $20,000.00. During an interview on 3/18/22 at 2:00 P.M., the Accounts Payable Staff said the individual in his/her position prior to his/her employment was responsible for ensuring the surety bond was sufficient, however he/she was not made aware if this was his/her responsibility. He/She had not evaluated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable and odor free environment by failing to ensure flooring and walls in resident rooms, furnishings, hallways, ceiling vents, and common areas were clean and in good repair. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility policy, Homelike Environment, revised February 2021, showed the following: -Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible; -The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. The characteristics include: a. clean, sanitary, and orderly environment; b. inviting colors and decor; c. personalized furniture and room arrangements; d. clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition; e. pleasant, neutral scents. 1. Observation on 02/14/22 between 10:05 A.M. and 4:45 P.M., during the life…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-02 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer to the resident and/or the resident representative when four residents (Resident #2, #28, #42 and #48), in a review of 19 sampled residents, were transferred to the hospital. The facility census was 55. 1. During an interview on 2/16/22 at 4:25 P.M., the administrator said the facility did not have a policy regarding discharge notices for facility-initiated discharges. 2. Review of Resident #2's face sheet showed his/her admission to the facility on 1/13/21. Review of the resident's nurses notes, dated 1/11/22, showed the following: -The resident was being assisted by staff to stand and pull up his/her pants when he/she went limp, eyes rolled back in his/her head, and he/she stopped breathing; -Staff administered sternal rub and the resident started breathing again; -Upon assessment, breathing found to be labored with accessory muscle use; -Orders received to sent to the hospital via ambulance. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-02 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of bed hold with required information to the resident and/or resident representative for four residents (Resident #2, #28, #42, and #48) in a review of 19 sampled residents, when the facility initiated a transfer to the hospital. The facility census was 55. Review of the undated facility policy Bed Hold showed the following: -If facility beds are 95% occupied, there will be a bed hold charge and the resident will be billed the daily rate to reserve the same bed; -If occupancy is under 95% there will be no charge to hold the bed and it will be available when the resident returns; -All residents regardless of pay source will be treated equally. 1. Review of Resident #2's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's census report showed the following: -On 1/11/22 the resident was transferred to the hospital and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -On 1/26/22 the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete comprehensive assessments timely for one resident (Resident #207) in a review of 19 sampled residents and for three additional residents (Residents #306, #208, and #355). The facility census was 55. Review of the facility policy, Comprehensive Assessments and the Care Delivery Process, revised December 2016, showed the following: -Comprehensive assessments will be conducted to assist in developing person-centered care plans; -Comprehensive assessments, care planning and the care delivery process involve collecting and analyzing information, choosing and initiating interventions, and then monitoring results and adjusting interventions; -Comprehensive assessments are conducted and coordinated by a registered nurse (RN) with appropriate participation of other health professionals; -These assessments are used to develop, review, and revise the resident's comprehensive care plan. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-02 · tag F0637 — pattern
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment, required to be completed by facility staff, for three residents (Residents #11, #43 and #48), in a review of 19 sampled residents, within 14 days after the facility determined, or should have determined, there had been a significant change (major decline or improvement in the resident's status) in the resident's physical or mental condition which had an impact on more than one area of the resident's health status and required interdisciplinary review and/or revision of the care plan. The facility census was 55. Review of the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, version 3.0 showed a significant change is a decline or improvement in a resident's status that: -Shows consistent pattern of changes, with either two or more areas of decline, or two or more areas of improvement. This may include two changes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan consistent with the resident's specific conditions, needs and risks to provide effective person-centered care that met professional standards of quality care, within 48 hours of admission to the facility for one resident (Resident #207) in a review of 19 sampled residents, one closed record review (Resident #55), and one additional resident (Resident #208). The facility census was 55. Review of the facility's Baseline Care Plan Policy, revised December 2016, showed the following: -A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission; -The Interdisciplinary Team will review the healthcare practitioner's orders (e.g., dietary needs, medications, routine treatments, etc.) and implement a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate care needs including but not limited to: a. Initial goals based on admission orders; b. Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update interventions in the resident's care plan to reflect current care needs for three residents (Resident #2, #28, and #41), in a review of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility policy, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised December 2016, showed the following: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; -Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change; 3-The Interdisciplinary Team must review and update the care plan: a. When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; b. When the desired outcome is not met; c. When the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and d. At least quarterly, in conjunction with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff provided bathing and hygiene needs for six residents (Residents #6, #28, #37, #41, #43, #44), in a review of 19 sampled residents who were unable to perform their own activities of daily living (ADL's). The facility census was 55. Review of the undated facility policy, Routine Resident Care/ADL's, showed the following: -Routine care rendered by all nursing staff includes attention to physical, emotional, social, spiritual, and life style preferences according to individual job descriptions; -Residents are given routine daily care by a certified nursing assistant (CNA) under the supervision of a licensed nurse; -Routine care by a nursing assistant includes the following: a. Assisting resident in personal care, bathing, dressing, eating, and encouraging participation in physical, social, and recreational activities; c. Observing and recording all aspects of personal care including bathing, food intake, ambulation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to design and provide an activity program to meet the needs, interests, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for five residents (Residents #6, #11, #28, #43 and #48) in a review of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 55. 1. Review of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, version 1.17.1, Chapter 3, revised October 2019, showed the following: -Most residents capable of communicating can answer questions about what they like; -Obtaining information about preferences directly from the resident, sometimes called hearing the resident's voice, is the most reliable and accurate way of identifying preferences; -If a resident cannot communicate, then family or significant other who knows the resident well may be able to provide useful information about preferences; -Quality of life can be greatly enhanced when care respects the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services to assist three residents (Resident #41, #43, and #48), in a review of 19 sampled residents and one additional resident (Resident #21) in attaining or maintaining their highest level of functioning. The facility failed to prevent the development of limited range of motion for residents who were not admitted with a limited range of motion, or prevent further worsening of limited range of motion or development/worsening of contractures (shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). The facility failed to develop restorative plans with goals, frequency of task, number of repetitions, or length of time, or direction to staff to meet the resident's needs. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility policy, Restorative Nursing Services, revised July 2017, showed the following: -Residents will receive restorative nursing care as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately assess and reassess the safety and effectiveness of bed rails in use for 11 residents (Residents #2, #207, #28, #11, #18, #48, #45, #47, #41, #43, and #6), in a review of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 55. Review of the undated facility policy, Restraint Use and Use of Assist Handles, showed the following: -The need of each resident for restraint use is assessed on admission, quarterly (during care plan reviews), and as needed; -The Device Decision Guide will be used to determine whether or not a device is a restraint and if it should be used; -If it is determined not to be a restraint, it will be care planned for its purpose; -A side rail form should also be completed each time any change in side rail use is made; -A physician order will be signed for use of one or two assist handles on a resident bed; -When a need for an assist handle arises, instruct the resident as to their purpose and correct use; -Inform…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet residents' needs for two residents (Resident #28, and #43) in a review of 19 sampled residents and three additional residents (Resident #14, #21 and #54). Staff failed to provide routine showers to ensure good personal hygiene and prevent body odors and failed to respond timely to call lights. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility's undated policy, Staffing Plan, showed the following: -Consideration is given to the patients' and resident's needs when the composition of the nursing staff is determined; -Nursing services are provided 24 hours a day, seven days a week; -Sufficient personnel are assigned and on duty to assure safe, effective nursing care, including relief personnel during vacations, holidays, emergencies, and sick leaves; -Time schedules indicated the number of and classification of nursing personnel are developed; -These schedules are maintained and posted for each unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to adequately document appropriate diagnoses/behaviors to justify the implementation or continued used of antipsychotic medications for two residents with a diagnosis of dementia (Residents #28 and #42), in a review of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility policy Antipsychotic Medication Use, revised December 2016, showed the following: -Antipsychotic medications may be considered for residents with dementia but only after medical, physical, functional, psychological, emotional psychiatric, social and environmental causes of behavioral symptoms have been identified and addressed; -Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective; -The Attending Physician and other staff will gather and document information to clarify a resident's behavior, mood, function, medical condition, specific symptoms, and risks to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to remove and destroy expired medications for four residents (Residents #35, #36, #41 and #46) in a review of 19 sampled residents. The facility also failed to destroy expired stock supply of over the counter medications. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility policy, Storage of Medications, revised April 2007, showed the following: -The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner; -Drugs and biologicals shall be stored in the packaging, container or other dispensing systems in which they are received; -The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner; -Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels shall be returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing; -The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals, all such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed; -Medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0811 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three staff members (Feed Aide/Activity Aide BB, Feed Aide CC and Feed Aide DD) had successfully completed a State-approved training program for feeding assistants and failed to ensure these staff members were not providing feeding assistance to five residents (Residents #11, #18, #28, #44, and #48) in a sample of 19 residents with complicated feeding problems. The facility census was 55. Review of the undated facility policy, Paid Feeding Assistant, showed the following: -The regulation requires that paid feeding assistants must work under the supervision of a Registered Nurse (RN) or Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), and they must call the supervisory nurse in case of emergency; -Therefore, a facility that has received a waiver and does not have either an RN or LPN available in the building cannot use paid feeding assistants during those times; Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Assessment of Resident Eligibility for Feeding Assistance:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one resident's (Resident #500's) responsible party after the resident fell and re-opened a skin tear requiring treatment. The resident's responsible party learned of the resident's fall from another resident when he/she visited the facility. The facility census was 56. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Accident/Incident Event Report, showed the following: PROCEDURES: 1. Notify family; 8. The family should be notified immediately. Review of the facility policy titled, Assessing Falls and Their Causes, revised October 2010, showed the following: -Steps in the Procedure: -After a Fall: 4. Nursing staff will notify the resident's family in an appropriate time frame; -Reporting: 1. Notify the following individuals when a resident falls: a. The resident's family. 1. Review of Resident #500's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally required assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 4/13/22, showed the following: -Mild cognitive impairment; -Required extensive assistance of two staff for bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-02 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolated
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all staff who worked in the facility did not have a finding (Federal indicator) entered into the State certified nurse aide (CNA) registry concerning abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) PP, began work in the facility on 12/22/19 and had a Federal indicator preventing him/her from working in the facility. The facility failed to identify the LPN had a federal indicator. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's undated Abuse Prevention Plan, showed the facility will not hire or maintain employment with a person with a history of abuse and will report any employee known to be abusive to the appropriate authorities. This facility will not employ or otherwise engage individuals who: -Have been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by court of law; -Have had a finding entered into the State nurse aide registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care consistent with resident's specific conditions, needs and risks to provide effective person centered care within 21 days of admission to the facility for one resident (Resident #207) in a review of 19 sampled residents and three additional residents (Resident #306, #355, and #208). The facility census was 55. Review of the facility policy, Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team, revised September 2013, showed the following: -The facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident; -A comprehensive care plan for each resident is developed within seven days of completion of the resident assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff. Review of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for one resident (Resident #500), who had orders for lab work (blood and urine testing), out of seven sampled residents. The facility census was 56. 1. Review of Resident #500's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument, completed by facility staff, dated 4/13/22, showed the following: -Date of admission 4/6/22; -Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) of 14 (BIMS scores range from 0-15, the higher the score, the lower the impairment to the cognitive response); -No problems recalling three words; -Could recall the year; -Could recall the week; -Missed the month by six days to one month; -Resident was usually understood; -Resident understands others; -Always continent of bowel and bladder; -Rejection of cares one to three days out of the last seven. Review of the resident's discharge MDS, completed by facility staff, dated 6/1/22, showed the following: -Date of discharge 6/1/22; -BIMS score decreased to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a policy and procedure based on current standards of practice, to address the care of residents receiving dialysis services. The facility failed to consistently monitor the dialysis access site (fistula) according to the resident's physician's orders, and failed to complete post dialysis assessments to ensure no significant changes in the resident's condition following dialysis treatments for one resident (Resident #4), in a review of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 55. Review of Nursing Management: The Journal of Excellence in Nursing Leadership, October 2010, Volume 41, Issue 10, Caring for a Patient's Vascular Access for Hemodialysis showed the following: -A patient in end-stage kidney disease relies on dialysis to mechanically remove fluid, electrolytes, and waste products from the blood. For the most effective hemodialysis, the patient needs good vascular access with an arteriovenous (AV) fistula or an AV graft (access used to artificially connect a vein with an artery, so that a higher blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Quality Assurance (QA)/Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program when the facility did not have a director of nursing and no other nursing staff or nursing administration attended any QA/QAPI meetings. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility's undated Quality Assurance Process Improvement QAPI Program policy showed the following: Purpose: -To provide ongoing and comprehensive procedures that will guide the facility in monitoring resident care and services and will provide systems which facilitate the identification and correction of deficiencies and gaps in systems or processes; Goals: -The QAPI program will provide the structure for decision making and will guide our day to day operations; -The QAPI program will establish and maintain support and document ongoing monitoring and evaluation resident care and services; -The QAPI program encompasses all aspects of care including clinical care, quality of life, resident choice and care transitions; -The QAPI program will assist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer to four residents (Residents #3, #11, #33, and #40), in a review of 12 sampled residents, and/or their representative upon transfer to the hospital. The census was 47. Review of the facility policy, Facility-Initiated Transfer or Discharge, dated October 2022, showed once admitted to the facility, residents have the right to remain in the facility. Facility-initiated transfers and discharges, when necessary, must meet specific criteria and require resident/representative notification and orientation, and documentation as specified in this policy. -When residents who are sent emergently to an acute care setting, these scenarios are considered facility-initiated transfers, NOT discharges, because the resident's return is generally expected; -Residents who are sent emergently to an acute care setting, such as a hospital, are permitted to return to the facility. Residents who are sent to the acute care setting for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify three residents (Residents #3, #11, and #40), in a review of 12 sampled residents, and/or their representative of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital. The facility census was 47. Review of the facility undated policy, Bed Hold Policy Guidelines, showed the facility will notify all residents and/or representatives of the bed hold policy guidelines. This notification shall be given upon admission to the facility, at the time of the transfer to the hospital or leave; and at the time of the non-covered therapeutic leave. 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record showed his/her family member was his/her responsible party. Review of the resident's progress notes, dated 1/13/24, showed the resident was transferred to the hospital for a gastrointestinal consult due to coffee ground emesis (vomit) and a urinary tract infection. Review of the resident's progress notes showed he/she returned to the facility on 1/15/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BRAAMS, STUARTIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/10/2022
BROCK, ALANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2021
DE NOON, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2021
GAINES, BARBARAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2021
GOOD, DERRICKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2021
HOLDSWORTH, LEAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/01/2022
LANE, ALLANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2023
LARSON, MIKEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2021
MCKAY, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2023
NEWBOLD, BRADIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2021
STUNKEL, LEIDRAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2021
SULLIVAN, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2021
CULBERTSON, TROYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/01/2023
HARRISON, RODNEYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/03/2020
PARKER, BRANDYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/04/2022
THE BAPTIST HOMEOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-55.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 6%Other / private 31%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$320per resident / day
operating cost
$9,721per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$206per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265638. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next