No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Johnson County Care Center

122 East Market Street, Warrensburg, MO 64093 · For profit - Corporation · 87 certified beds · (660) 747-8101 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Call the home — (660) 747-8101 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 2022Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)$36,360 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2022
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $36,360 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-06)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
(660) 747-1111 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.5 mi
621 N Maguire St · (660) 747-6964 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Hy-Vee0.6 mi
410 E Young St · (660) 429-1188 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Park0.4 mi
115 Vamo Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
211 N Holden St · (913) 708-1279

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.5%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.9%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms67.6%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.6%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.8%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.5%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%4.5%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.7%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table44.8%23.5%17.1%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.09
RN hours/ resident / day
0.40
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.72
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.21
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.02
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 87 beds and averages 74.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.09 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.42 on weekdays — 30% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.12 to 0.02 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-10-14)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Protection (EBP-an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) for three out of three residents (Residents #5, #6, and #7) sampled for infection control with wounds. The facility census was 72 residents.Review of the facility policy enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 2025 showed:-The EBP approach recommended gown and glove use for certain residents during specific high-contact resident care activities.-EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following:--Certain infections.--Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices.--Wounds generally included chronic wounds such as pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue, usually over a bony prominence, resulting from prolonged pressure alone or in combination with shear/friction), diabetic foot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient proof of the Registered Nurse (RN) eight consecutive hours a day coverage during the Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter Four 2024 Payroll Based Journal (PBJ- a report that provides staffing dataset information submitted by nursing homes on a quarterly basis) for all the dates triggered within the quarter equaling nine total days; during FY Quarter One 2025 PBJ for all the dates triggered within the quarter equaling two total days; during FY Quarter Two 2025 PBJ for all the dates triggered within the quarter equaling 18 total days; and during FY Quarter Three 2025 PBJ for all the dates triggered within the quarter equaling 45 total days. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The facility census was 75 residents.Review of the facility's undated policy titled Policy for Staffing showed:-Followed the Missouri regulatory requirements at the minimal operation.-RN at least eight hours a day.-Used the services of a RN for at least eight hours a day, seven days a week.1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a comprehensive infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of Legionella (A [NAME] of pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria that includes the species L. pneumophila, causing legionellosis, all illnesses caused by Legionella, including a pneumonia-type illness called Legionnaires' disease and a mild flu-like illness called Pontiac fever) and/or other water-borne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease) that included specific assessments and contents, in accordance with State of Missouri rules and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) standards and guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who resided, visited, used, or worked in the facility. The facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was performed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have parameters listed in the medication orders for Acetaminophen (a widely used over-the-counter medication that relieves pain and reduces fever) containing medications for three sampled residents (Resident #1, #6, and #78) of out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents. Review of policy entitled Medication Management and Monitoring dated 2019 showed that it was the responsibility of nursing professionals was to be aware of action, correct dosage and route, frequency, and other considerations as required for the administration of medications.1. Review of Resident #78's admission Record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Medication Review Report dated 2/29/24 showed the following order:-Acetaminophen 325 milligram (mg) give two tablets by mouth every four hours as needed for pain or increased body temperature. -The order failed to have the parameters of not to exceed three grams of Acetaminophen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-14 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 10 Nurse Assistants (NA A, NA B, NA C, NA D, NA E, NA F, NA G, NA H, NA I, and NA J) out of 24 were not Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) within four months of hire. The facility census was 75 residents.A policy on NA training was requested but was not received from the facility. 1. Review of an undated hire record sheet showed:-NA A was hired on 2/6/25.-NA B was hired on 4/16/25.-NA C was hired on 3/17/25.-NA D was hired on 3/2/25.-NA E was hired on 6/11/24.-NA F was hired on 1/30/25.-NA G was hired on 2/27/24.-NA H was hired on 3/31/25.-NA I was hired on 1/3/25.-NA J was hired on 4/18/25.During an interview on 10/10/2025 at 2:23 P.M., NA A said:-He/She had started CNA class last week. -He/She was hired in February 2025. -The class was an on-line class and nurses observed him/her and did the checkoffs for the skill being observed.-He/She and three other NA's were in the class (NA F, NA H, and NA J)During an interview on 10/14/2025 at 9:50 A.M., the Administrator said:-He/She oversaw staffing and the NA program.-A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent and accurate wound assessments by a trained professional and failed to obtain a physician's order prior to treatment of an open wound for one sampled resident (Resident #2) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents.Review of the facility's Skin Integrity Management policy, dated 2007 showed:-Ulcers and wounds will be assessed accurately to determine the wound or ulcer type.-Non-pressure ulcers will be assessed weekly. All wounds will be documented using the Wound Tracking form.-After assessing a wound proper documentation is necessary to include the resident's name, vital signs, wound location and size, and description of any drainage, odor, necrotic tissue, infection, and any follow-up.-Do not stage (a system used by healthcare providers to classify the depth of tissue damage caused by pressure) a non-pressure ulcer.Review of the Missouri Nurse Practice Act (NPA), updated 8/28/24, showed:-A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete thorough and timely fall investigations and failed to update care plans for two sampled residents (Resident #3 and #19) who fell multiple times out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Fall Policy and Procedure showed:-The purpose of the policy was to ensure appropriate medical and multi-disciplinary assessment of falls and fall risk factors; to coordinate management of acute and recurrent falls; and to provide measures to help prevent falls.-The licensed nurse performed an assessment within a time frame appropriate to the clinical circumstance, right after the fall occurred and coordinated other indicated evaluation and management of injuries or underlying causative conditions.-Licensed nurses were responsible for providing adequate documentation of evaluation and management of the fall.-The incident report was for internal management only and should not be considered as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care for one sampled resident (Resident #10) with a Gastrostomy (G-Tube- an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall, made surgically for the introduction of food) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents.Review of the facility's undated policy titled Tube Feeding Protocol showed:-The head of bed (HOB) would be elevated at least 30 degrees.-If at any time during the tube feedings the resident's HOB was lower than the 30 degrees, staff were to stop the tube feeding until the HOB was re-elevated to at least 30 degrees.1. Review of Resident #10's admission Record showed the resident admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses:-Cerebral Palsy (a group of conditions that affect movement and posture caused by damage that occurs to the developing brain, most often before birth).-Gastrostomy Status.Review of the resident's care plan dated 7/24/25 showed:-The resident was fully dependent on staff for repositioning and turning in bed.-The resident required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate under five percent (%) for one sampled resident (Resident #69) out of 18 sampled residents. Two medication errors were detected out of 31 observed opportunities resulting in an error rate of 6.45%. This deficient practice had the ability to affect all residents. The facility census was 75 residents.Review of the facility's undated policy titled Crushing Medication Policy showed:-Medications that were not to be crushed may be opened and sprinkled into pudding or applesauce if clinically appropriate.-If medications were not able to be crushed or opened up, staff were to place them whole into a medication cup along with the crushed medication, then mixed together with pudding or applesauce.Review of How to Take Your Depakote (a medication used as a mood stabilizer or anti-convulsant (used to control seizures) which can come in a various oral formulations, including delayed-release tablets, extended-release (ER) tablets, and sprinkle capsules) Product dated in 2025 created by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day seven days a week in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year for July 2023, August 2023, September 2023, in the first quarter of the fiscal year for October 2023, November 2023, December 2023 and in the second quarter of fiscal year for January 2024, February 2024, March 2024. The facility further failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) was not serving as the charge nurse when the facility census was greater than 60 residents. This deficiency had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 69 residents. A facility RN staffing policy and procedure was requested and not received prior to exit. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment updated 8/2024 showed: -Purpose to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. -The resident population characteristics include: --Bowel and bladder incontinence; bedfast all or most of the time; chair fast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a comprehensive infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of Legionella (A [NAME] of pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria that includes the species L. pneumophila, causing legionellosis, all illnesses caused by Legionell, including a pneumonia-type illness called Legionnaires' disease and a mild flu-like illness called Pontiac fever) and/or other water-borne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease), and failed to provide documented assessments for such an outbreak with accepted response protocols, in accordance with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who resided, visited, used, or worked in the facility. The facility also failed to have a system for tracking and monitoring infections in the facility for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an antibiotic stewardship protocol/program and a system to monitor appropriate antibiotic use for residents. The facility census was 69 residents. Review of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship policy dated 2018 showed: -The purpose of the policy included: --To apply the best practice into a system to monitor antibiotic use. --To implement protocols to ensure residents who require an antibiotic are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic. --To monitor the use of antibiotics. --To reduce the risk of adverse events, including development of antibiotic-resistant organisms, from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. -Apply the revised McGreer criteria for assessing for the suspected infections for Upper Respiratory Infections (URI), Urinary Tract Infections (UTI), or other infections. -Document the antibiotic prescribed is for the correct indication, dose, and duration to appropriately treat the resident. -Implement Antibiotic Use Protocol: Antibiotic Prescribing Practices: --Document indication,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate one or more individuals with the required primary professional training as the Infection Preventionist (IP) for the facility's Infection Prevention Control Program. The facility census was 69 residents. The facility did not provide a policy regarding required primary professional training for the IP. 1. During an interview on 8/22/24 at 9:22 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said: -He/She was going to be the facility IP. -He/She had not taken any of the certification classes for the IP role at this time. During an interview on 8/22/24 at 9:38 A.M., the Administrator said: -He/She had the IP certificate and dedicated two to three hours per week for Infection Control duties. -His/Her degree was in Social Work. He/She did not have a degree in any of the approved primary professional medical trainings. -The previous IP left the faciity on 3/8/23. The current DON was going to be the primary IP but he/she had not taken the IP classes at this time.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a policy and a physician's order that addressed the settings for a low air loss mattress (LAL - a mattress with an air pump designed to distribute the patient's body weight over a broad surface area to prevent and treat pressure wounds) for one sampled resident (Resident #25) with an unstageable (not stageable due to coverage with dead tissue) pressure ulcer, failed to complete weekly wound/skin assessments to include detailed descriptions of the wounds, measurements, and accurate staging of the pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence) and failed to update the resident's care plan to reflect the current stage of the resident's pressure ulcer, out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 69 residents. Review of the facility Pressure Ulcer Treatment Policy and Procedure, dated 2007 showed: -Reduce or eliminate causative factors including pressure. -The policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize a tube feeding policy that instructed licensed nursing staff regarding the current professional standard for verifying correct placement of gastrostomy (G-tube - surgical creation of a permanent opening into the stomach through the skin for the introduction of nourishment and fluids through a tube; also known as feeding tube) tubes failed to ensure and document measurement of the resident's feeding tube to ensure correct placement and to ensure the resident's physician's order was correct and that the resident's tube feeding infused in accordance with the physician's order for one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 69 residents. Review of https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK593216/ the National Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine, Enteral (also known as tube feeding) Tube Management, dated 2021 showed: -The placement of an enteral tube is immediately verified after insertion by an X-ray; after X-ray verification, the tube should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Trauma Informed Care (TIC - an approach to delivering care incorporating knowledge about trauma into care plans, policies, and practices to avoid re-traumatization) assessment and care planning for two sampled residents (Resident #18 and Resident #53) out of 17 sampled residents. Residents #18 and #53 were diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - an anxiety disorder that can develop after a person experiences or witnesses a traumatic event. Symptoms of PTSD can include outbursts, disturbed sleep, distressing memories and thoughts about the event, and emotions such as fear, anger, guilt, and shame, which can be severe enough to interfere with one or more aspects of daily life). The facility census was 69 residents. Review of the facility's Trauma Informed Care policy, dated 2022 showed: -Provide self-assessment and trauma questionnaire by Social Services designee or the admitting staff before admitting to the facility. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to the pharmacist's recommendation for gradual dose reduction (GDR) for psychotropic (relating to or denoting drugs that affect a person's mental state) medication in a timely manner for one sampled resident (Resident #22) out of 17 residents. The facility census was 69 residents. Review of the facility Pharmacy Services policy, undated showed: -A consultant pharmacist makes monthly visits. -The consultant pharmacist makes recommendations to the physician and to the facility about GDR. -The Director of Nursing (DON) reviews and implements the monthly consultant pharmacist's recommendations. -The physician is notified for GDR recommendations by the pharmacist. -If there is no reason for the reduction of psychotropic medications, the physician should document the reason on the progress note or the recommendation responded form. -The Nursing Department is responsible to implement the recommendations from the pharmacist or pharmacy consultant. -Review the pharmacist's recommendations. -Assign a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the nozzles of the dishwasher spray wand free of debris; to maintain the vent outlets of the climate control units in the kitchen free from a heavy dust buildup; to discard molded food from the walk-in refrigerator; to ensure two thermometers were calibrated (correlate the readings of (an instrument) with those of a standard in order to check the instrument's accuracy), to ensure the food warmer was cleaned prior to use for breakfast on 11/14/22; to have test strips to test the concentration of the sanitizing agent in the sanitizing sink; and to maintain the ice machines on the 2nd floor and in the dining room free of biofilm (the result of microorganisms attaching to a surface). The facility census was 75 residents. Record review of the cleaning list for dishwashers to implement during the morning and the afternoon shifts included the following duties: - Sweep and mop the floor. - Clean the food carts inside and out. Record review of the cleaning list for dietary aides to implement during the morning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to include the following in its Water Management Plan: a diagram which showed which hot water heaters the water originated from and the destinations of water from those hot water heaters; plans for implementing testing protocols to ensure what corrective actions that the facility would implement as a result of changes in municipal or facility water quality; an assessment of where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens (e.g. Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Burkholderia, Stenotrophomonas, nontuberculous mycobacteria, and fungi) could grow and spread in the facility's water system; and failed to maintain infection control regarding improper hand hygiene during a transfer of one sampled resident (Resident #41) from his/her wheelchair to bed with a Hoyer lift, failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was completed during medication pass for two supplemental residents (Resident #25 and #33) out of 19 sampled residents and five…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) had a minimum of 12 hours of in-service education (which was required to include abuse/neglect and dementia cares) per year. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 75 residents. The policy regarding CNA training was requested and not received from the facility at the time of exit. 1. Record review of the facility's in-service records showed: -There were six in-services performed this year. -Dementia and abuse/neglect were not included. During an interview on 11/15/22 at 11:24 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility had not had any CNA in-services in a long time. During an interview on 11/15/22 at 11:25 A.M., the Administrator said: -The facility stopped doing in-services during the pandemic. -He/she had sent staff videos from a social media site for them to view but had no record of the videos being watched. -He/she was aware the facility was not providing appropriate in-services. During an interview on 11/16/22 at 12:32 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy curtains were clean for one sampled resident (Resident #25); failed to maintain the mattress in Resident #13's room in an easily cleanable condition and without cracks; failed to maintain the ceiling of the 3rd floor dining room free of a dust buildup; failed to maintain the fan in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] free of a dust buildup; failed to maintain the bed in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] in an easily cleanable condition; and failed to maintain a ceiling fan in the basement dining room free of a heavy dust buildup. The facility census was 75 residents. Record review of the facility's policies showed no reference to cleaning, laundering, or disinfecting residents' privacy curtains. 1. Record review of Resident #25's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: -Intellectual disability (when there are limits to a person's ability to learn at an expected level and function in daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the foods on the test tray after the residents on the third floor were served, maintained at or close to 120 ºF (degrees Fahrenheit) at the time of service. This practice potentially affected at least five residents who ate in the third floor dining room. The facility census was 75 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #57's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility for care planning) dated 10/14/22 showed he/she was moderately cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 out of 15. During an interview on 11/14/22 at 1:24 P.M., the resident said all three meals he/she received were cold. Observations on 11/14/22 showed: - At 1:29 P.M., three residents on the third floor received their meals Salisbury steak at 108 ºF. - At 1:35 P.M., the temperatures of the test tray foods were taken with Certified Medication Technician (CMT) C observing and the temperatures of the cabbage/carrots was 109.6 ºF and the temperature of the Salisbury…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prevent the existence of live roaches in the kitchen area. This practice affected the kitchen area. The facility census was 75 residents. 1. Observations on 11/14/22, showed the following: - At 9:30 A.M., one roach crawled around and under the table at the dishwasher area. - At 9:43 A.M. one dead roach was on the ground in the dry storage room next to the kitchen - At 9:52 A.M. one dead roach was observed behind table with seasoning bottles. - At 11:23 AM., one roach was seen on the phone table next to the Dietary Manager's (DM) office. During an interview on 11/14/22 at 1:47 P.M., the DM said roaches were an ongoing problem and the pest control company came every two weeks. During an interview on 11/17/22 at 7:29 A.M., the Administrator said the dietary staff were doing cleaning in addition to having the pest control company come in to address the presence of roaches in the kitchen.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to invite one sampled resident (Resident #41) to their quarterly care plan meetings out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #41's undated face sheet showed the resident admitted with the following diagnoses: -Altered Mental Status (AMS- a group of cognitive and physical symptoms that differ from the baseline mental status). -Major Depressive Disorder (MDD- a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood). -Personal History of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA- temporary interference with blood supply to the brain) without deficits. Record review of the resident's Social Service's note dated 8/16/22 showed: -The resident did not speak a lot to anyone. -When he/she did it was often a low tone mumble. -The resident was alert and oriented to self and immediate surroundings. -Social Service visited 1-2 times weekly for added stimulation. Record review of the resident's medical record showed there was no documentation of the resident being invited to his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a choice in scheduled meal times; to honor a resident's request for additional food after communicating he/she was still hungry; to provide snacks when requested; to assist the resident to move to a facility closer to his/her family for one sampled resident (Resident #38); and to provide an alternate food of similar nutritive value for one sampled resident (Resident #71) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents. Record review of the facility's undated Dietary Services Policy showed if a resident refused food, an alternate of a similar nutritive value, consistent with the usual and ordinary food items provided to residents, should have been offered. 1a. Record review of Resident #38's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility as his/her own responsible party. Record review of the resident's nurse's notes dated 5/24/22 showed: -The resident requested an order for snacks which was written by the Nurse Practitioner (NP). --NOTE: No order for snacks found on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse/neglect or mistreatment while under supervision of the facility staff, resulting in a resident to resident altercation for two sampled residents (Resident #73 and #66), who both had potential reactive behaviors that were known by the facility, out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents. Record review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy dated reviewed in 2016 showed: -To ensure that resident's rights are respected and honored. -To ensure each resident is treated with dignity and care, free from abuse or neglect, to take swift and immediate action to investigate and adjudicate alleged resident abuse and neglect. -An resident to resident alteration or mistreatment was defined as a negative, often aggressive, interaction between residents in long term care communities. These incidents include but not limited to: physical, verbal and sexual abuse and are likely to cause…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an alleged resident to resident altercation to the state agency within the required time frame for two sampled residents (Resident #73 and #66), who had an alleged non-injury altercation, out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents. Record review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy dated reviewed in 2016 showed: -An resident to resident alteration or mistreatment was defined as a negative, often aggressive, interaction between residents in long term care communities. These incidents include but not limited to: physical, verbal and sexual abuse and are likely to cause emotional and or physical harm. Other examples of a resident to resident mistreatment include: roommate conflicts, invasion of privacy and personal space; and verbal threats and harassment. -The suspected incident will be investigated immediately. The State Agency will be contacted if investigation was found valid. the facility will follow the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of a resident to resident altercation that showed the circumstances of the incident, what occurred, what the facility's response was, witness statements (including residents) and the facility's plan of action to prevent the recurrence for two sampled residents (Resident #73 and #66) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents. Record review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy dated reviewed in 2016 showed: -To ensure each resident is treated with dignity and care, free from abuse or neglect, to take swift and immediate action to investigate and adjudicate alleged resident abuse and neglect. -An resident to resident alteration or mistreatment was defined as a negative, often aggressive, interaction between residents in long term care communities. These incidents include but not limited to: physical, verbal and sexual abuse and are likely to cause emotional and or physical harm. Other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan that met the medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs by addressing major depressive disorder (a common and serious medical illness that negatively affects how you feel, the way you think and how you act) for one sampled resident (Resident #41) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents. Record review of the facility's policy titled Policy for Care Plan dated 2014 showed: -The care plan shall be comprehensively communicated to all care staff that addresses short-term problem/services and long-term problem/services. -The Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) Coordinator communicates with a care staff, licensed and non-licensed personnel and reviews medical records in order to obtain the information for developing the care plan. -The MDS coordinator communicates with other care providers to ensure the care plan reflects interventions such as hospice services, rehab, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include any direct care staff, the resident, and/or the resident's representative when developing a comprehensive care plan for one sampled resident (Resident #38) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents. Record review of the facility's policy titled Policy for Care Plan dated 2014 showed: -Care plans were to be developed with input from an interdisciplinary team (IDT) as well as the resident/family. -Care plans will be reviewed and updated every three months during care plan meetings with input from all care plan team members. 1. Record review of Resident #38's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility as his/her own responsible party with diagnoses of: -Depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). -Anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease, typically about an imminent event or something with an uncertain outcome). During an interview on 11/16/22 at 1:48 P.M., the Social Services Designee (SSD) said: -Care plans were done by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide one sampled resident (Resident #41) with proper Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care necessary to maintain grooming and care plan the procedures necessary to carry out grooming care out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #41's undated face sheet showed the resident admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Personal History of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA- temporary interference with blood supply to the brain) without deficits. -Essential (Primary) Hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure). Record review of the resident's care plan dated 11/9/22 showed: -The resident was fully dependent on care staff for personal hygiene and oral care. -No interventions for behaviors during ADL care and what the care staff could do to aide in completion of the grooming ADL's. Observation on 11/14/22 at 2:30 P.M. showed the resident had food crumbs and red liquid dried on his/her lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document medication administration and any refusal of medication; to notify the resident's physician of ongoing refusal of medication and document notification with outcome for one sampled resident (Resident #57) out 19 sampled residents. The facility census of 75 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #57's admission Face-sheet showed he/she had the following diagnosis: -Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation, stupor, deterioration of intellectual capacity and function, and impairment of control of memory, judgment, and impulses) with behaviors. -Diabetes Mellitus (a complex disorder of carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism that is primarily a result of a deficiency or complete lack of insulin secretion in the pancreas or resistance to insulin). -Non-compliance with medication. -Bipolar (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). -Traumatic brain injury…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow-up with recommendations from a hearing exam, to include a return appointment for hearing aids for one sampled resident (Resident #40) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents. A policy related to follow-up of outside appointments was requested and not provided at the time of exit. 1. Record review of Resident #40's admission Face Sheet showed he/she was his/her own responsible person. Record review the resident's Audiology Visit Summary Report dated 2/24/22 at 10:20 A.M. showed: -The resident was referred to the hearing clinic by the facility due to decreased hearing. -The resident had a hearing exam on 2/24/22. -The resident had profound hearing loss in the right ear and moderate/severe hearing loss in left ear. -The resident staid he/she would be getting a hearing aid elsewhere. -Plan was for a follow-up hearing aid evaluation in three to six months. -The Audiologist clinic was to be notified immediately if the resident's primary care physician did not agree with the plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for oxygen was transcribed to the resident's physician's order sheet and to ensure oxygen nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen through a plastic tube into the nose in a sanitary manner) and tubing was stored to prevent contamination when not in use for one sampled resident (Resident #42) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #42's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), seasonal allergies, high cholesterol and arthritis. Record review of the resident's Care Plan updated 7/25/22 showed the resident received oxygen at 2 liters per minute. Staff were to: -Change the oxygen tubing on Sunday. -Check oxygen settings every shift and as needed. -Notify the nurse of respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of an acute behavior, to document the facility intervention for one to one behavioral monitoring, to ensure timely follow up to behavioral health services was provided and to develop care plan interventions, to include a detailed suicide intervention plan, for one sampled resident (Resident #21) who had a history of verbalizing suicidal ideations and had expressed a suicidal ideation, out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents. Record review of the facility policies and procedures showed there was no policy and procedure for behaviors related to suicidal Ideation. The facility provided an undated Suicidal Ideation Screening form that showed screening questions to indicate whether a further more detailed assessment was indicated. Any yes answers to the initial questions indicated further assessment was necessary. The questions were: Are you seriously thinking about killing yourself? Do you have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to adequately assess, monitor, reevaluate and document ongoing verbally aggressive behaviors; and failed to implement and document a behavioral safety plan in response to increased aggressive behavioral reactions for one sampled resident (Resident #57) who had a history of inappropriate behavioral actions (barricade bedroom door), being verbally aggressive, and making threats of harm toward facility staff, out 19 sampled residents. The facility census of 75 residents. A behavior policy was requested and was not provided by the time of exit. 1. Record review of Resident #57's admission Face-sheet showed he/she had the following diagnoses: -Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation, stupor, deterioration of intellectual capacity and function, and impairment of control of memory, judgment, and impulses) with behaviors. -Diabetes Mellitus (a complex disorder of carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism that is primarily a result of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate social services were implemented upon admission when a history of depression and suicidal ideation was known; to provide acute interventions after an acute behavior and requested counseling services for one sampled resident (Resident #21); and to provide assistance with or make arrangements for a transfer to another facility for one sampled resident (Resident #38) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents. Record review of the facility's undated policy titled Discharge and Transfer Resident showed: -Residents were to be assessed for discharge potentials at admission, quarterly, and when a verbal request was made by a resident. -Residents were to be interviewed quarterly, at a minimum, to assess discharge wishes. -The Social Services Director (SSD) was to offer the option of discharge to each resident during each care plan meeting. 1. Record review of Resident #21's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's diet orders were followed for one sampled resident (Resident #52) with a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and orders for a mechanical soft diet (a diet designed for people who have trouble chewing and swallowing; chopped, ground foods are included in this diet, as well as foods that break apart without a knife) out of 19 sampled residents; and failed to follow the recipe for pureed (cooked food, that has been ground, pressed, blended or sieved to the consistency of a creamy paste or liquid) Salisbury steak and pureed cabbage and carrots to ensure those items had the consistency of creamy paste or liquid. This practice potentially affected at least six residents with pureed diets. The facility census was 75 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #52's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including: -Delusional disorder ( mental health condition in which a person can't tell what's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed accommodate residents' food preferences; and to offer appealing options of similar nutritive value to residents who chose not to eat the food that was initially served or requested a different meal choice for two sampled residents (Resident #38 and #17) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 75 residents. Record review of the facility's undated Dietary Services Policy showed if a resident refused food, an alternate of a similar nutritive value, consistent with the usual and ordinary food items provided to residents, should have been offered. 1. Record review of Resident #38's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility as his/her own responsible party. Record review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS a federally mandated assessment tool to be completed by the facility staff for care planning) dated 11/11/22 showed: -He/she was cognitively intact, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-08-22 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing was posted correctly at the beginning of each shift including facility name, date, census, and total number and actual hours worked per shift which could have the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 69 residents. A facility policy was requested for staff posting and was not received prior to exit. 1. Observation on 8/18/24 at 10:32 A.M., showed the daily staffing with required information on staff titles and total hours worked was not posted on second or third floor. Observation on 8/19/24 at 9:00 A.M., showed the daily staffing with required information on staff titles and total hours worked was not posted on second or third floor. Observation on 8/20/24 at 12:02 P.M., showed the daily staffing with required information on staff titles and total hours worked was not posted on second or third floor. During an interview on 8/22/24 at 8:08 A.M., the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment completed by the facility staff for care planning)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$36,360 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
  • $13,635 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-08-21
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-01-07 for 10 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 26E256. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next