Brooke Haven Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 61.1 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 59 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment per the resident's assessed level of need, when Resident #21 received a second degree (a burn that damages the epidermis and dermis, the two layers of skin) burn from the spilled coffee in his/her lap after a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) handed the resident hot coffee in a coffee cup without a lid for one sampled resident. The census was 69. The facility did not provide a policy regarding accidents/incidents. 1. Review of Resident #21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by the facility staff, dated 11/19/24, showed: - Diagnoses of non-traumatic brain injury (brain injury that occurs due to internal factors, rather than an external force to the head), dementia ( general term for a group of neurological conditions that cause a decline in mental abilities that affects daily life), and anxiety ( a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness that can be a normal reaction to stress); - Cognition severely impaired; - No speech and not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to assure staff treated five sampled residents (Residents #1, #11, #30, #31, and #39) in a manner that maintained their dignity during mealtimes by standing during meals, assisting multiple residents at a time, and meals being served without assistance available. The facility census was 57.Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights, revised December 2016, showed:- Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity;- Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: a. a dignified existence; b. be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity; c. be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation; d. be supported by the facility in exercising his/her rights. The facility did not provide a policy on dining assistance. 1. Observation on 02/24/26 at 11:40 A.M. to 12:15 P.M., showed:- Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D stood to the front and to the right of Resident #58 while…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refund resident funds within 30 days of when a resident expired for three residents (Residents #69, #71, and #72) out of three sampled residents and failed to complete a final accounting of resident personal funds within 30 days of discharge for one resident (Resident #70) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 57.Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Trust Fund, undated, showed:- When a resident leaves the facility with no plans to return, their Resident Trust Fund (RTF) account must be closed out;- If a resident moves to another nursing facility, it is the responsibility of the office staff to make arrangements to transfer any balance to that resident at the new facility, the office manager will first make sure that no funds are due to the facility for any reason, If there are outstanding balances with the facility, those funds remaining will be considered for use to cover such balances;- If the facility is representative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR - a federally mandated preliminary assessment to determine whether a resident may have a mental illness or an intellectual disorder and to determine the level of care needed) for one resident (Resident #8) out of two sampled residents and one resident (Resident #52) outside the sample. The facility census was 57.The facility failed to provide a policy regarding the PASRR. 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record showed:- admitted on [DATE];- Diagnoses of stroke, schizoaffective disorder (a condition characterized by abnormal thought processes and deregulated emotions), aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech caused by brain damage), depression (a serious medical illness that negatively affects how you feel, think, and act), anxiety (persistent worry and fear about everyday situations), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty in communication), mild cognitive impairment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document the type, the stage, the measurements, and the characteristics of the facility acquired pressure ulcer (areas of localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence, generally the result of pressure, shear, and/or friction) and also failed to notify and obtain a physician order for one resident (Resident #11) out of one sampled resident with a pressure ulcer. This resulted in Resident #11's stage 1 (intact skin with non-blanchable (discoloration of the skin that does not turn white when pressed) redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence) pressure ulcer progressing to an open wound. The facility census was 57. Review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Injury Risk Assessment, dated March 2020, showed:- The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the structured assessment and identification of residents at risk of developing new pressure injuries or worsening of existing pressure injuries (PIs);- Risk factors that increase a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of nasal cannulas (plastic tubing placed in the nostrils to provide supplemental oxygen) when not in use for two residents (Residents #4 and #38) and failed to follow oxygen orders for two residents (Residents #38 and #52) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 57.Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revised October 2010, showed:- Verify there is a physician's order for this procedure;- Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration;- Assemble the equipment and supplies as needed;- Place appropriate oxygen device on the resident (i.e., mask, nasal cannula and/or nasal catheter);- Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered;- Check the mask, tank, humidifying jar, etc., to be sure they are in good working order and are securely fastened, be sure there is water in the humidifying jar and that the water level is high enough that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  :Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). There were 25 opportunities with two errors made, resulting in an error rate of 8% for two residents (Residents #13 and #54) out of seven sampled residents. The facility's census was 57.Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised April 2019, showed:- Only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer and document the administration of medications may do so;- Medications are in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame;- Insulin pens containing multiple doses of insulin are for single resident use only;- Insulin pens are clearly labeled with the resident's name or other identifying information. Prior to administering insulin with an insulin pen, the nurse verifies that the correct pen is used for that resident;- Each nurse's station has manufacturer's instructions or user's manuals related to any medication administration devices kept with the devices or at the nurses'…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and follow appropriate infection control practices with hand hygiene and glove changes when staff performed wound care for three residents (Residents #2, #20, and #58) out of four sampled residents, and during incontinent care for three residents (Residents #11, #31, and #58) out of four sampled residents. The facility also failed to correctly screen three residents (Residents #20, #51, and #68) for tuberculosis (TB - an infectious disease characterized by the growth of nodules in the tissues, especially the lungs) out of five sampled residents as required by state regulation 19 CSR 20-20.100. The facility census was 57. Review of the facility's policy titled, Wound Care, dated October 2010, showed:- Wipe nozzles, foil packed, bottle top, with alcohol before opening;- Use disposable cloth to establish clean field on resident's overbed table;- Wash and dry hands thoroughly;- Wash and dry hands…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 69. The facility did not provide a policy regarding the kitchen. 1. Observation on 12/03/24 at 9:34 A.M., and 12/05/24 at 11:38 P.M., of the kitchen showed: - No cleaning logs; - Two unlabeled white plastic food bins with clear unlabeled lids near the gas range with white sugar and brown sugar; - A metal backsplash behind the gas range with a 2 foot (ft.) diameter (dia.) area with dark brown carbon build-up; - The commercial style can opener with an oily film on the base and blade; - One 3 ft. by 4 ft. diffuser (one of the few visible parts of an air conditioning system) with dust buildup and a brown substance on the front exterior surfaces and between the ventilation louvers outside the water heater closet door; - The floor below the reach-in freezer, the reach-in refrigerator, gas range, deep fryer, mixer, and food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0570 — isolated
  Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the surety bond (a purchased bond for security of the residents' personal funds) for at least one and one-half times the average monthly balance of the residents' personal funds for the last twelve consecutive months from October 2023 to September 2024. The facility census was 69. The facility did not provide a policy for the surety bond. 1. Review of the residents' personal funds account on 12/05/24, for the last twelve consecutive months from October 2023 to September 2024, showed: - The facility's current approved bond amount equaled $100,000.00; - The average monthly balance for the residents' personal funds equaled $68,621.10; - An average monthly balance of $68,621.10 required a bond of at least $103,500. During an interview on 12/05/24 at 11:07 A.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said the surety bond should be one and one-half times the amount on the residents' trust balance. During an interview on 12/05/24 at 11:20 A.M., the Administrator said the surety bond amount should be one and one-half times the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for one resident (Resident #118) out of six sampled residents when the facility failed to administer the correct amount of insulin (a hormone that helps regulate blood sugar levels by moving glucose from the bloodstream into cells for energy). The facility also failed to follow Registered Dietician (RD) recommendations for one resident (Residents #22) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 69. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, dated April 2019, showed: - Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed; - Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. The facility did not provide a policy regarding RD recommendations. 1. Review of Resident #22's medical record showed: - Diagnosis of cerebral palsy (a group of neurological disorders that affect a person's ability to move, balance, and maintain posture); No documentation regarding the RD's recommendation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,033 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-12-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $348K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO