Care Center Of Aberdeen

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 90.2 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.447 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect a resident's safety and prevent an accident when staff failed to use a wheelchair lift safety belt to secure a resident's wheelchair on the lift gate during the lift procedure to place the resident into the back of the van. This resulted in the resident rolling backwards in the wheelchair and flipping off the lift gate when it was lifted around four (4) feet high in the air and the resident hit backwards onto the concrete injuring her head and received a three (3) centimeter (cm) laceration to the back of her head. This was for one (1) of two (2) residents incidents reviewed. Resident #37 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Policies for Company Owned Vehicle with a revision date of 5/18 revealed under, 3. Seatbelts: The driver and all passengers in the company/facility owned vehicle must be safely restrained by buckled seat belts, wheelchair floor tie downs and wheelchair harness type seatbelts at all times the vehicle is in use. A qualified individual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items in the kitchen were properly labeled and dated after opening and failed to maintain a clean refrigerator to prevent cross-contamination of stored foods during one (1) of two (2) kitchen tours. Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Cleaning and Sanitizing Equipment, revised 5/18, revealed under Policy: All equipment is kept clean and food contact surfaces are cleaned and sanitized.Review of the facility policy titled Food Storage Labeling, revised 8/12, revealed under Policy: The facility will ensure the safety and quality of food by adhering to proper storage and labeling procedures. Also revealed under Procedure 1. Labelinga. All temperature-controlled foods and ready-to-eat foods that are prepared in the facility and held for longer than twenty-four hours will be labeled. Information included on the label: Name of the food, Date of storage.Observations on 5/4/26 at 5:25 PM during the initial kitchen tour revealed Refrigerator #1 contained:- One (1) 5-pound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, as evidenced by incorrectly coding during the 7-day observation look-back period for three (3) of nineteen sampled residents. Residents #3, Resident #7, and Resident #53 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Minimum Data Set Charting Documentation Guidelines, dated 11/25, revealed, To have an accurate assessment of the residents, information must be gathered on the residents while in the observation period for the MDS. This information must come from resident assessment and documented information in the residents' chart within the time frames set forth on the MDS. To ensure that information is in the chart to validate information on the MDS the Charting Documentation guidelines should be utilized . Record review of the facility policy titled, MDS Process revealed, The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual shall serve as the primary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the feeding tube care plan was implemented for Resident #5 and an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan was implemented for Resident #17 for two (2) of nineteen care plans reviewed. Resident #5 and #17. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plan Process with a revision date of 12/24, revealed Regulations require facilities to complete, at a minimum and at regular intervals, a comprehensive, standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity and needs, in relation to several specified areas (e.g., customary routine, vision, and continence). Resident #5 Record review of Resident #5's Care Plan Report revealed The resident requires tube feeding related to (r/t) resisting eating . Interventions . Diabetasource @ 59 ml(milliliters)/hr(hour) for 24 hours . with a revision date of 2/23/2026. Record review of the Order Summary revealed an order dated 02/23/2026 for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to ensure blood sugar monitoring was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of five (5) residents who were reviewed for medication monitoring. Resident #94Findings Include: Review of a statement typed on facility letterhead dated 5/6/26 and signed by the Administrator revealed, The facility does not have a policy on insulin/glucose monitoring. Record review of Resident #94's Medication Administration Record (MAR) with order date of 04/28/2026, revealed Novolin 70/30 Flex Pen Subcutaneous Suspension Pen-Injector (70-30) 100 Unit/ml (milliliter) (Insulin NPH Isophane & Reg (Human) Inject eight (8) units subcutaneously two times a day. Record review of Resident #94's Medication Administration Record revealed no documentation of monitoring blood sugar. Record review of Blood Sugar Summary revealed Resident #94's blood sugar was checked on 4/28/2026 and 4/29/2026. On 5/6/2026 at 10:45 AM an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that blood sugars should be monitored when a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care necessary to maintain personal hygiene for one (1) of 89 residents observed. Resident #17Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living, with a review date of 9/2025, revealed, .ADLs shall include, but are not limited to personal hygiene, bathing, voiding, toileting, repositioning, and meals offered.On 5/4/2026 at 5:48 PM, 5/5/2026 at 8:47 AM, and again on 5/6/2026 at 8:26 AM, observations of Resident #17 revealed her fingernails were approximately one (1) inch in length with jagged edges and contained a dark brown/black substance underneath the nails.During an observation and interview on 5/6/2026 at 8:30 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 confirmed Resident #17's fingernails were long, jagged, and contained a dark brown/black substance underneath. She stated the resident's fingernails should have been trimmed during bathing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered continuous enteral feedings were consistently administered for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for tube feeding management. Resident #5Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Tube Feedings with a revision date of 12/15 revealed, 1. All tube feedings will be administered in accordance with verified medical necessity, established infection control policies and procedures and physician's orders .Record review of the Order Summary revealed an order dated 02/23/2026 for Enteral Feed Order.Diabetasource at 59 ml (milliliters) /hr (hour) for 24 hours to include 1700 kcals (kilocalories), 88 grams of protein, and 1189 ml of fluid.An observation on 5/04/2026 at 5:36 PM revealed Resident #5's enteral feeding pump was paused and actively beeping.During an observation and interview on 5/04/2026 at 5:45 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 was observed feeding Resident #5 a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff and representative interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from the use of chemical restraints for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for chemical restraints (Resident #5), when the facility administered psychotropic medications without obtaining the required consent to inform the resident or representative of the risks, benefits, and alternatives of the medication prior to use. Findings include:Review of a facility policy titled Anti-Psychotics - Use of Anti-Psychotics, last revised 02/25, revealed consent for anti-psychotic and psychoactive medication treatment shall be completed.A phone interview with Resident #5's representative on 12/2/25 at 12:30 PM related to a complaint that she had reported, revealed she had requested a list of all of her mom's medications so she could review them. She stated she found that her mom was taking Haldol, an antipsychotic medication that has a black box warning. She stated she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0559 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor the resident's right to receive written notification, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room in the facility was changed for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed. Resident #1Findings include:Record review of facility policy titled, Room Changes dated 11/17, revealed, The Social Service Designee/Social Worker, in conjunction with the DON (Director of Nursing), will facilitate that each resident is assigned a room suited to his/her needs.4. The resident or resident representative, when applicable, will receive written notice to include the reason for the change before the resident's room or roommate in the facility is changed.During an interview on 7/28/25 at 2:45 PM, the Social Service Director stated that she and Resident #1's representative had discussed moving the resident closer to the nurses' station and this was done in August 2024. When another room became available in September…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to label and store food properly and maintain the kitchen and the equipment in a clean and sanitary condition for two (2) of three (3) kitchen tours. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Storage Labeling, with revised date 5/18 revealed, Policy: The facility will ensure the safety and quality of food by following good food storage labeling procedures . Review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning Schedule, with revised date 5/18 revealed, .Procedure: .All equipment and work areas are cleaned after each use, or, on a routine basis .A cleaning schedule is established by the Director of Food and Nutrition Services .The Director of Food and Nutrition Services checks routinely to see that the task is completed according to standards . During the initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 5/12/25 at 10:24 AM several observations were made regarding food storage practices. In produce refrigerator number one (1), several items, including mashed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure cognitive residents' right to determine their end-of-life care for three (3) of 24 residents reviewed. Resident #37, #73, and #75 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Advance Directives with a revision date of 6/15, revealed under, Policy: The facility recognizes that all adults have a fundamental right to make decisions relating to their own medical treatment, including the right to accept or refuse medical care. It is the policy of the facility to encourage residents and their family/caregivers to participate in decisions regarding care and treatment . Resident #37 During an interview with Resident #37 on [DATE] at 3:26 PM, the resident stated she wanted to make her own healthcare decisions while she was able. She reported that no one from the facility had spoken to her about her end-of-life preferences. When asked whether she wanted the facility to do everything possible to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,358 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-05-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS