Choctaw Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 9% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. Inspectors cited this home for failing to submit its staffing data to CMS (F0851) — see the citation below; CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, policy and procedure reviews, the facility failed to follow the Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care plan for Resident #1's bed mobility, which resulted in a fall with multiple fractures for Resident #1. Resident #1 was one (1) of three (3) Residents reviewed for care plans. The facility policy and procedure dated 2/18/22 and revised date of 1/5/25 titled Comprehensive Care Plans stated: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with residents rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and ALL services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of quality. Record Review of the facility's investigation documentation revealed the facility had documented that the fall of Resident #1 was caused by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 not following the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy and procedure reviews, interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure safety and to prevent an accident of a fall during bed mobility, resulting in multiple fractures to Resident #1. Resident #1 was one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for accidents and safety. Findings Include: The facility policy and procedure titled Safe Resident Handling/Transfers dated 1/1/22 revised 1/5/25 and signed by the facility Director of Nursing (DON) read: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risks for injury and provide and promote a safe, secure and comfortable experience for the resident while keeping the employees safe in accordance with current standards and guidelines. The interdisciplinary team designee will evaluate and assess each resident's individual mobility needs, taking into account other factors as well, such as weight, cognitive status. Staff will be educated on the use of safe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary condition in order to serve and prepare food for one (1) of two (2) kitchen tours. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Sanitary Conditions of the Food Service Department with an originated date of 9/04, revealed the following policy statement, Facilities and equipment used in the preparation and serving of food provided to residents are safe and sanitary. During the initial kitchen tour on 6/28/2026 at 2:20 PM with Dietary #1, Dietary #2, and Dietary #3, observations were made regarding the cleanliness of the kitchen environment. The pantry door frame facing the kitchen contained accumulated dirt and dried food residue. Above the left side of the door frame on the ceiling contained multiple dried food splatter marks, approximately six (6) inches in diameter. Dietary #3 stated, That's been there forever. Further observation revealed the vent hood above the cooking area contained accumulated grease and food residue on the lower portion of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete Section P of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment related to alarms for one (1) of 19 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. Resident #9Findings Include:The facility provided a statement on letterhead that read, We do not have a policy concerning accuracy of MDS. We do however follow the guidance of the MDS RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual.Record review of Resident #9's Physician Order revealed an order dated 7/18/25, Ensure chair alarm is turned on and functioning properly.Record review of Resident #9's MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/19/26 revealed Item P0200 did not identify the resident's use of a wheelchair alarm during the assessment reference period.An interview with the MDS Nurse on 6/30/26 at 1:10 PM confirmed Resident #9 had a wheelchair alarm during the May assessment reference period and acknowledged it should have been coded in Item P0200 of the MDS. She stated, I just missed it. She further revealed the MDS should be accurate to provide an individualized picture…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for two (2) of nineteen (19) residents reviewed for care planning. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan addressing urinary catheter care for one (1) resident (Resident #1) and failed to implement the established care plan related to diabetic nail care for one (1) resident (Resident #15). Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan undated revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident .to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and ALL services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of quality .Resident #1Record review of Resident #1's care plan revealed no mention of catheter care on foley catheter.During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care necessary to maintain personal hygiene for one (1) of 56 residents observed. (Resident #15)Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living undated revealed, .Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: Bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care .A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene .Record review of Resident #15's Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 7/7/2024, Diabetic nail care to be done monthly and as needed (PRN) per Registered Nurse (RN).On 6/28/2026 at 2:51 PM and again on 6/29/2026 at 2:11 PM, during observations and interviews with Resident #15 his fingernails were observed to be approximately one (1) inch in length with jagged edges and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to periodically reassess a resident's wheelchair alarm to determine whether it remained necessary and appropriate based on the resident's current assessed needs for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for falls. Resident #9Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Accidents and Supervision revealed under, Policy: The resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as is possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. This includes: 3. Implementing interventions to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s). 4. Monitoring for effectiveness and modifying interventions when necessary .Review of the facility policy titled Resident Alarms revealed under, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to utilize resident alarms in limited circumstances, in accordance with the resident's needs, goals, and preferences, so the resident will be able to attain or maintain his or her highest practical level of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper technique with catheter care to prevent a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for one (1) of two (2) residents with catheters. (Resident #1)Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Catheter Care, undated, revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care .Compliance Guidelines .Assist resident to a lying position .Perform hand hygiene. [NAME] gloves .Using circular motion, cleanse the meatus with a clean cloth .With a new moistened cloth, starting at the urinary meatus moving down, cleanse the shaft of the penis. With a new moistened cloth, starting at the urinary meatus moving outward, wipe the catheter making sure to hold the catheter in place .During an observation of catheter care on 6/29/2026 at 3:33 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 used the same wipe throughout the entire catheter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a self-administered medication was securely stored resulting in the medication being accessible to unauthorized individuals for 1 (one) of 56 residents reviewed. Resident #49 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Medication Storage revealed, It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security . An observation on 06/28/26 at 3:03 PM revealed Resident #49 sitting on his bed with oxygen in use and there was an Albuterol Inhaler on top of his bedside table. He revealed that his lungs were bad and he's had to wear oxygen and use breathing treatments and inhalers for a long time. Resident #49 revealed that he kept the albuterol inhaler in his room and used it when he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene and changed gloves between a contaminated task and a clean resident care task to help prevent the spread of infection during one (1) of four (4) resident care observations (Resident #1). Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Standard Precautions Infection Control undated revealed, .During the delivery of resident care services, avoid unnecessary touching of surfaces in close proximity to the resident to prevent both contamination of clean hands from environmental surfaces and transmission of pathogens from contaminated hands to surfaces .During an observation of catheter care on 6/29/2026 at 3:33 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 assisted Resident #1 with removal of his clothing and undergarment. CNA #1 then proceeded to provide catheter care while wearing the same gloves used during the clothing removal and did not perform hand hygiene…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal immunizations were administered in accordance with physician oversight, facility policy, and current CDC recommendations for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #42). Specifically, after the resident representative consented to pneumococcal vaccination, the facility failed to notify the physician when the electronic medical record generated a contraindication alert related to long-term steroid therapy. Instead, the vaccine was incorrectly documented as refused without physician evaluation to determine whether administration was appropriate. This deficient practice resulted in Resident #42, who had pulmonary fibrosis and was receiving long-term systemic corticosteroid therapy, not receiving a recommended pneumococcal vaccine despite having conditions that increased the resident's risk for pneumococcal disease. Findings Include:Record review of the facility policy titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow up on grievances from Resident council meetings related to missing silverware and condiments for four (4) of six (6) residents in the Resident Council Meeting. Resident #4, Resident #10, Resident #11, and Resident #35. Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances, undated, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievance without discrimination, reprisal or fear of discrimination or reprisal . Prompt efforts to resolve include facility acknowledgment of a complaint/grievance and actively working toward resolution of that complaint/grievance . An interview on 04/17/24 at 1:45 PM, at the Resident Council meeting, revealed Resident #4 (Resident Council President), Resident #10, Resident #11, and Resident #35, had concerns that they were at times still missing silverware and condiments on their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,472 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-03-18
• $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-11-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in MS