Nmmc Baldwyn Nursing Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 100.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.04 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure skin care treatments were completed as ordered for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for wound and skin care. This deficient practice resulted in deterioration of a resident's wound, including a significant increase in wound size for Resident #1.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Skin and Wound Care, last reviewed 5/2/24, revealed: Policy: It is the policy that skin anomalies should be identified, and basic wound care should be provided.Resident #1During an onsite complaint survey, an interview with Resident #1 on 11/3/25 at 10:30 AM revealed she had wounds to her legs. Resident #1 stated she often does not get her dressing changed to her leg at night and sometimes during the day. Observation revealed a dressing to the left posterior leg.Review of wound care orders for Resident #1's left lower leg ulcer revealed orders dated 9/20/25, 10/14/25, and 10/22/25, with treatment intervals of two (2) times daily.Review of Resident #1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure residents received necessary care as evidenced by failure to complete activities of daily living (ADL) care, including bathing, grooming, and nail care; failure to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner; and failure to address repeated concerns voiced by residents during resident council meetings regarding delays in care and unmet needs for three (3) of four (4) survey days. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Scheduling of Nursing Staff with a revision date of 03/20, revealed under Policy: It is the policy of (Proper Name) to provide consistent expectations and standardized scheduling processes in staff schedules enabling appropriate staffing levels to ensure patient and staff safety. An observation and interview on 3/23/26 at 12:20 PM revealed Resident #10 with facial hair on the sides of his face, on his chin, and neck,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure informed consent was obtained prior to the initiation of a psychotropic medication for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident #2 Findings include:Record review revealed the facility had no policy requiring psychotropic consent forms to be obtained prior to initiation of a psychotropic medication.Record review of Resident #2's Active Order Sets revealed an order dated 2/25/26 for Seroquel oral tablet 50 milligrams (mg) to be given by mouth at bedtime for non-Alzheimer's dementia and an order dated 2/25/26 for Buspar oral tablet 10 mg to be given three times daily for depression.Record review revealed the Psychotropic Medication Informed Consent Form was not signed until 3/23/26.On 3/26/2026 at 8:37 AM, during an interview with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Consultant, she stated there should have been signed consent for Seroquel and Buspar prior to initiation; however, the facility did not obtain consents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to implement a Catheter and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan for five (5) of 25 resident care plans reviewed. (Resident #4, Resident #7, Resident #10, Resident #46, and Resident #54) Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled, Care Plan Policy with most recent revision date of 10/24, revealed, .In accordance with each resident's plan of care, all services provided or arranged by the facility should meet professional standards of quality and should be provided by qualified persons Resident #4 Record review of the Care Plan revealed, Requires a foley catheter related to neurogenic bladder.Approaches.Secure catheter to prevent trauma. On 3/24/26 at 2:10 PM during an interview and observation of catheter care by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2, it was noted that Resident #4 had an indwelling catheter. It was observed that no securing device was in place for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) was provided to residents requiring assistance with personal hygiene for four (4) of the twenty-five sampled residents. (Residents #7, # 10, #46, and #54) Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled, AM/PM Care dated 10/24 revealed, Rationale: to provide guidelines to help promote resident cleanliness. Residents should be shaved per preference. Resident #7 During an observation with Resident #7 on 3/23/26 at 11:40 AM, the resident revealed she would like for her fingernails to be trimmed. Observation revealed the resident's fingernails were approximately one-half (1/2) inch in length. The resident was also observed to have dark chin hair approximately one-fourth (1/4) inch in length. During an observation with Resident #7 on 3/24/26 at 8:39 AM, the resident continued to request that her fingernails be trimmed. Observation revealed long…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and care were provided to promote healing and prevent worsening of pressure ulcers for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #7). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Skin and Wound Care, last reviewed 5/2/24, revealed: Policy: It is the policy that skin anomalies should be identified, and basic wound care should be provided. Resident #7 An interview with Resident #7 on 3/25/26 at 2:00 PM revealed the resident was admitted with two wounds, one on the buttock and one on the sacrum. The resident stated one wound had healed and the sacral wound remained present. Record review of wound care orders for Resident #7's sacral stage four (4) pressure ulcer with physician orders dated 2/10/2026 with treatment intervals of two (2) times daily. Record review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for March 2025 Flow Sheet for the sacral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and implementation of interventions to prevent accidents for one (1) of four (4) falls reviewed. Resident #65.Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Fall Prevention and Post Fall Assessment & (and) Follow-up revealed under, Rational: To provide guidelines for the identification of residents at risk for falls. To provide assessments, interventions, and documentation after a resident fall. Also revealed under, Policy: It is the policy of 'Proper name of the facility' to identify residents at risk for falls in the attempt to help prevent falls and resident falls should be handled appropriately. An observation outside Resident #65's room on 3/23/26 at 12:20 PM revealed that the door was closed. The resident was located on the window side of the room, and the center privacy curtain was pulled. Resident #65 was lying in bed, awake and non-verbal. The left side of the bed was against the wall and one-half (1/2) side rails were located on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a catheter securement device for a resident with an indwelling catheter for one (1) or four (4) catheters observed. Resident #4 Findings include: Resident #4 Record review of facility letterhead titled Catheter Care (if present) dated 3/25/26, revealed 5A. The catheter tubing should be secured with securement device to resident's upper portion of lower extremity (ex. Adhesive securement device, leg securement strap, or other approved device provided by [local hospital]). During an interview and observation of catheter care by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 on 3/24/26 at 2:10 PM, it was noted that Resident #4 had an indwelling catheter. It was observed that no securing device was in place for the securement of the catheter. CNA #2 revealed that use of the device was required to secure the catheter in place and this must have fallen off. An interview on 3/24/26 at 2:20 PM with the Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate nutritional support and implementation of physician-ordered interventions to prevent significant weight loss for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for nutrition. Resident #1 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Weight Loss: Monitoring of unrevised, revealed under, Policy: It is the policy of 'Proper name of the facility 'that the weight and the nutritional status of residents be monitored. Also revealed under, Procedure: If a resident has a weight loss greater than 5 (five) percent of body weight in one month or 10 percent of body weight in a six month period, the dietician should be consulted and recommendations of dietician should be followed. Record review of Resident #1's Flowsheet History revealed the following weights: Record review of Resident #1's weights revealed on 9/17/2025, the resident weighed 135 pounds (lbs.). On 02/05/2026, the resident weighed 119 lbs., which was a significant weight loss of -11.85% (percent) in 6 months. On 12/11/2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the safe use, assessment, and ongoing evaluation of bed rails and failed to identify and remove a known entrapment hazard for one (1) of 25 sampled residents. Resident #65 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Bed Rails revised 9/18, revealed under, Policy: It is the policy of 'Proper name of the facility' that bed rails should be used appropriately. This failed practice was not in accordance with facility policy requiring appropriate use and assessment of bed rails. An observation of Resident #65 on 3/23/26 at 12:20 PM revealed he was lying in bed, awake and non-verbal. The left side of the bed was against the wall and one-half (1/2) upper side rails were observed to the left and right side of the bed with a fall mat on the floor. Record review of Resident #65's Significant Event Note dated 3/3/26 revealed, I heard residents peg (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) pump going off, upon entering room Director of Nursing (DON) was standing next to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications and treatment solutions were secured and not accessible to the resident for three (3) of four (4) survey days. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration revised 3/11/24 revealed, 3. No medications should be left in the resident's room [ROOM NUMBER]. Storage of medications and several other associated products should be secure, i.e., in a locked drawer/cabinet, or under constant surveillance. An observation inside room C3 on 3/23/26 at 11:12 AM and again on 3/24/26 at 8:14 AM revealed four (4) bottles of Dakin's solution quarter-strength (1/4), 16 fluid ounce bottles; two (2) bottles sitting on a table beside the bed and the other two (2) in a pink pail by the sink. Other items stored on the counter by the sink included a bottle of ethyl alcohol, 16-ounce bottle 70% (percent), and hydrogen peroxide 3% (percent). An observation and interview with Licensed Practical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,788 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,788 — penalty dated 2025-11-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NORTH MISSISSIPPI HEALTH SERVICES — 2 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes:

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS