Jasper County Nh

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 100.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.82 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.86 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medications when the resident received an antipsychotic medication without an appropriate diagnosis and without informed consent, which resulted in lethargy, weight loss, and poor meal intake for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident #79.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy titled .Use of Psychotropic Medication(s), dated 9/17/25, revealed, .It is the intent of this policy to ensure that residents only receive psychotropic medications when other nonpharmacological interventions are clinically contraindicated.During an observation on 10/6/25 at 12:15 PM, Resident #79 was observed asleep in her wheelchair in the common area.On 10/8/25 at 1:05 PM, Resident #70 was observed asleep in her wheelchair and remained asleep until 5:15 PM.On 10/8/25 at 4:17 PM, during an interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, she explained that Resident #79 had good days and bad days, often refusing to eat on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-01-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met current professional standards when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 prepared two (2) residents medications simultaneously and administered the wrong medications to Resident #1, resulting in the resident being admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a local acute care hospital due to an adverse reaction for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1 Findings Included: A review of the facility policy titled Medication Set-Up and Administration, revised 5/31/2023, revealed, Medications are administered by licensed nurses .as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice .8. Identify residents by photo in the electronic medication administration record (EMAR). Record review of the facility's Incident Note revealed, 12/15/2024 22:56 (10:56 PM) Incident Note .@1930 (7:30 PM) arrived to station 4 and notified of cart nurse (LPN #1) medication error.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2025-01-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 administered blood pressure medications to a resident that were prescribed for his roommate, resulting in Resident #1 being admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a local acute care hospital due to an adverse reaction for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed. Resident #1 Findings Included: Record review of the facility's policy titled Medication Set-Up and Administration, dated 5/31/23 revealed, .Policy .Medications are administered by licensed nurses .as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .8. Identify residents by photo in the EMAR (electronic medication administration record) . Record review of the facility's Incident Note revealed, 12/15/2024 22:56 (10:56 PM) Incident Note .@1930 (7:30 PM) arrived to station 4 and notified of cart nurse (LPN #1)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow infection prevention and control practices, as evidenced by failure to wear gloves during the administration of eye drops and by placing medication containers on contaminated surfaces without cleaning or using a barrier for two (2) of three (3) residents observed for medication administration (Residents #14 and #96). Findings include:A review of the facility's .Medication Administration Policy, dated 7/30/25, revealed, . Medications are administered by licensed nurses.as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection .Resident #14A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #14 on 11/14/22 with current diagnoses including Unspecified Glaucoma.A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/28/25 revealed Resident #14 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy and dignity during medication administration when licensed nursing staff administered prescribed eye drops to a resident in the dining room while other residents were present, for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for medication administration, Resident #96.Findings include:A review of the facility's .Medication Administration Policy, dated 7/30/25, revealed, .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines.7. Provide privacy.On 10/7/25 at 8:37 AM, during an observation, LPN #1 administered medications to Resident #96 while the resident was in the dining room. At the time of the observation, nine (9) other residents were also present in the dining room.On 10/7/25 at 8:45 AM, during an interview, LPN #1 stated she normally administered medications in the dining room for residents who were present there during the morning medication pass. She reported that Resident #96 had not expressed a problem with receiving medications in the dining room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) related to an insulin medication for Resident #2 and an anticoagulant medication for Resident #14 for two (2) of (21) sampled residents.Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Assessment Frequency/Timeliness dated 10/1/23, revealed, The purpose of this policy is to provide a system to complete standardized assessments in a timely manner, according to the current RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Manual . Resident #2A record review of Drugs.com website revealed the drug classification for Trulicity is GLP-1 receptor agonists.A review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #2 on 6/19/24 with current diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy. A record review of the Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 8/04/2025 revealed Section N, N0300. Insulin was marked as Resident #2 had received two (2) insulin injections in the seven (7) day look-back period.A record review of the Order Summary Report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement resident-specific care plan interventions when staff did not provide personal hygiene (shaving) as identified in the care plans (Residents #6 and #11), and failed to develop a care plan addressing triggers and interventions for a resident with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (Resident #2) for three (3) of (21) sampled residents.Findings include:A review of the facility's Care Plan Assessment (CAA) Care Planning Policy (undated), revealed, It is the policy of this facility that the CAA/Care Planning Process will be done as follows: Includes.Each triggered CAA will be assessed to facilitate a plan of care based on problems identified through the assessment process.Resident #2On [DATE] at 11:55 AM, during an interview with Resident#2 she confirmed she had the diagnosis of PTSD and reported it is related to her husband died due to a stab wound to his leg. He bled out and said he waited to tell her that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide shaving for residents who were dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for two (2) of (21) sampled residents, Residents #6 and #11.Findings include:A review of the facility's Shaving Policy, (undated) revealed, It is the policy of this facility that male residents will be shaved as follows: - Encouraged to be shaved daily and as needed .Resident #6A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #6 on 2/13/23 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease.A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/9/25 revealed Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. Section GG revealed Resident #6 had limitations in range of motion in both lower extremities and was dependent on staff for bathing and personal hygiene.A record review of the facility's Bath Schedule - Group C revealed Resident #6…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure triggers and resident specific interventions were identified and initiated for a resident with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for one (1) of (21) sampled residents. Resident #2.Findings include:A review of a written statement provided and signed by the Administrator revealed, (Proper Name) Nursing Home does not have a policy on Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #2 on [DATE] with current diagnoses including Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Unspecified.A record review of the Order Summary Report revealed orders for .May consult (Proper Name) Health Services for Psych (Psychiatric).as needed, dated [DATE], and May have Psych consult as needed, dated [DATE].A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate resident clinical record related to a physician's order for a resident hospital transfer for one (1) of (21) sampled residents. Resident #7Findings include: A review of the facility's Physician's Orders Policy, revised 8/29/17 revealed .Reminders.The nurse noting the order is responsible for.Transcribing the orders to the appropriate place. A record review of the facility's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #7 on 4/23/2019 with current diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus A record review of the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/25/25 revealed Resident #7 was transferred from the facility due to a unplanned discharge to a Short-Term General hospital on 7/25/2025. A record review of Progress Notes revealed Resident #7 had a Transfer to Hospital Summary note, dated 7/25/2025, which indicated she had been sent to an acute hospital for further evaluation. A review of the clinical record for Resident #7…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner by posting clinical data in a resident room (Resident #85) and failing to knock before entering a resident's room (Resident #69) for two (2) of 21 sampled residents. Findings Include: A review of the facility's Dignity Policy, undated, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to promote care for the residents .in a manner and environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity, with respect in full recognition of his or her individuality .Special Concerns .Respecting the resident's private space and property, knocking on doors and requesting permission to enter . Resident #69 On 11/5/23 at 12:10 PM, during an observation and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #2 entered Resident #69's room without knocking on the door, addressing the resident, or introducing herself and did not explain the purpose for her visit. CNA #2 placed the resident's meal tray on the bedside table, set it up for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure grievances raised by resident council members were consistently resolved for six (6) of (12) months. Findings Include: A review of the facility's Grievance/Complaint Policy (undated) revealed It is the policy of this facility that a resident/responsible party/legal representative has the right to voice a grievance .All grievances should be directed/reported to Social Services . A review of the facility's Resident Council Policy (undated) revealed, It is the policy of this facility that residents have the right to form a Resident Council group to elect a governing body made up of fellow residents who preside over the resident council, conduct regularly scheduled meetings .Purpose .to identify problems within the nursing home, to help resolve the problems that have been identified . A record review of the resident council minutes revealed from 5/22/24 through 10/16/24, residents had recurring complaints regarding issues such as staff noise on the unit, staff clearing meal trays before…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility draft policy review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed as high risk for acquiring multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) Resident #69 and had the potential to affect six (6) residents identified as high risk for MDROs. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy Draft Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy dated reviewed 9/28/24 revealed This policy aims to mitigate the risk of transmission of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) within our facility by implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This policy seeks to prevent the spread of MDRO's among residents and staff members by expanding the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during high contact resident care activities for certain residents .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .4. Examples of indwelling medical devices for EBP should include but are not limited to .feeding tube . On 11/05/24 at 12:10 PM, during an observation, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in MS