Edgewood Health & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 132 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 108.6 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.78 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 26 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to be free from abuse and failed to protect Resident #1 from abusive and degrading treatment by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 and CNA #2 during the provision of care on the evening of 2/10/26. The abusive conduct included the use of disparaging, derogatory, and humiliating language and intimidation toward Resident #1 while the resident requested assistance and complained of pain during care for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1.The State Agency (SA) identified Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) on 2/26/26. The IJ began on 2/14/26, when the facility failed to protect residents from abuse, failed to report alleged abuse timely, failed to promptly investigate allegations of abuse, and Administration failed to implement and enforce the facility's abuse policies.The facility's failure to report, protect, and investigate abuse placed all residents residing in the facility at risk in a situation likely to cause serious injury, serious harm,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, record review and interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse of a resident within the required timeframe of two (2) hours after the allegation was reported to facility staff. The allegation was reported to the facility on 2/14/26 at approximately 8:40 AM but was not reported to the State Agency until 2/16/26 at 11:30 AM. This was for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1.This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) which began on 02/14/26 and placed Resident #1 and all other residents in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, serious impairment, serious injury or death.The IJ and SQC existed at:CFR 483.12(c)(1)(4) Reporting of Alleged ViolationsScope and Severity (S/S) JThe SA notified the facility Administrator of the Immediate Jeopardy on 02/26/26 at 4:05 PM and provided the IJ template.The facility submitted an acceptable removal plan on 02/27/26 in which the facility alleged all corrective actions were completed on 02/27/26 and the IJ was removed on 02/28/26.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse in a timely manner to prevent further potential abuse. The facility failed to initiate a prompt and thorough investigation after an allegation of verbal abuse of Resident #1 was reported on 2/14/26. The facility did not immediately interview staff or residents, did not initiate protective interventions, and delayed investigative actions until 2/16/26. This deficient practice affected one (1) of three (3) reviewed incidents with documented indications of possible abuse. Resident #1.The facility's failure to initiate a timely investigation and implement protective measures created the likelihood of continued abuse of Resident #1 and other residents and placed them in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, serious injury, serious impairment or death. Staff confirmed that the allegation involved demeaning and abusive language toward Resident #1, yet no interviews, resident assessments, or protective interventions were implemented on 2/14/26 when the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility failed to ensure administrative leadership implemented timely actions to respond to and manage an allegation of verbal abuse involving Resident #1. The Administrator was notified of the allegation on 2/14/26 at approximately 9:00 AM but failed to ensure the allegation was reported within required timeframes, failed to ensure the alleged perpetrator was immediately removed from resident contact, and failed to ensure a prompt investigation was initiated. This deficient practice affected one (1) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1.The facility's failure to provide effective administrative oversight resulted in delays in reporting the allegation to the State Agency (SA) and delays in initiating investigative actions. The alleged perpetrator, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) # 2, continued to work in the facility after the allegation was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and ensure environmental safety to prevent Resident #1, a vulnerable resident, from exiting the facility unnoticed and unsupervised for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed. Resident #1 On 6/10/25, Resident #1, who had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven (7), was let out of the building by a lawn service worker. She exited the facility in her wheelchair unnoticed and was last seen inside the facility at 11:05 AM. She was found at 11:08 AM by a visitor walking into the facility in the facility's parking lot, approximately 145 feet from the front door of the building. The facility's failure to provide supervision and ensure environmental safety put Resident #1 and other vulnerable residents at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was implemented to prevent a resident's access to a medication cart, when a resident, without supervision, opened an unlocked medication cart and drank Lactulose liquid for one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents. Resident #1 The facility's failure to implement care plan interventions placed this resident and other cognitively impaired residents at risk, in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, injury, impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 6/4/24, when Resident #1 opened an unlocked and unattended medication cart and took a bottle of Lactulose and drank from the bottle. The facility Administrator was notified of the IJ on 6/20/24 at 4:25 PM and was presented with the IJ Template. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan on 6/21/24, in which they alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ were completed on 6/21/24 and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident/hazards and supervision, as evidenced by leaving a medication cart unlocked and unattended, allowing a resident to remove and ingest a medication from the cart for one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents. Resident #1 The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) that began on 6/4/24, when Resident #1 opened an unlocked and unattended medication cart and took a bottle of Lactulose and drank from the bottle. The facility's failure to ensure the resident was protected from accident/hazards placed this resident and other residents at risk and in a situation likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment or death. The facility Administrator was notified of the IJ and SQC on 6/20/24 at 4:25 PM and was presented with the IJ Template. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan on 6/21/24, in which they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #1).Findings included:Record review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans-Comprehensive dated 10/2016 revealed .Care plan interventions are designed after careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their causes. When possible, interventions address the underlying source(s) of the problem area(s). Record review of the Care Plan Report for Resident #1 revealed Focus: Resident requires assistance with ADL's (activities of daily living) r/t (related to) muscle weakness/QUATDRIPLEGIA/PARESIS.Interventions.Requires the use of the total mechanical lift X 2 (with two) nursing staff members.Record review of the Care Plan Report date initiated 12/6/23 and revised on 10/20/25, revealed Focus: Resident is at risk for falls and fall related injuries. Interventions. Provide assistance as needed for transfers. 10/17/25 Resident returned from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and the implementation of safety interventions to prevent accidents for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2)Findings included:Record review of the facility policy titled, MODIFIED LIFTING POLICY with a revision date of September 2025 revealed .Use of a mechanical lift requires two (2) nursing assistants or nurses to perform the procedure each time that it is used.Record review of the facility policy titled, TRANSPORT OUT OF FACILITY dated 7/2008 (July 2008) revealed the policy did not address requirements, training for qualifications for staff who performed transportation of residents. Resident #1Record review of the Lift Determination for Resident Lift/Transfer Assistance for Resident #1 dated 9/23/25 revealed the facility assessed that the resident was dependent for surface-to-surface transfers, and that conditions likely to affect transfer techniques included colostomy, contractures/spasms, paralysis and pressure ulcers and that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the Physician or the Resident Representative (RR) when a resident experienced pain to her right knee after a resident transfer which resulted in a femoral fracture that was diagnosed the following day for one (1) of ten (10) sampled residents that require a mechanical lift for transfers. (Resident #5) Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy Resident Change in Condition revised 2016, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative (RR) of changes in the resident's condition .Procedure 1. The Charge Nurse will notify the resident's attending physician when: a. The resident is involved in any accident or incident that results in an injury .b. There is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status .g. Deemed necessary or appropriate in the best interest of the resident. 2. Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, the charge nurse will notify the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement care plan approaches or interventions related to pain when Resident #5 yelled out in pain during a transfer for one (1) of 23 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #5) Findings Include: A review of the facility's Following the Care Plan Policy, dated 1/2011, revealed, .It is the Policy of this facility to follow a written and approved care plan for each resident. All employees will be .required to follow the care plan. Procedure .All employees will follow the written care plan that is developed in order to assure the residents needs are met. A record review of the Comprehensive Care Plan with an initiation date of 6/2/23 revealed Focus: Resident is at risk for pain .Interventions initiated on 6/2/2023 .Document type, location and severity of pain .Give medications as ordered . A record review of the facility's investigation summary dated 7/6/24 and a follow up investigation dated 7/11/24 as reported to the State Agency revealed that on the morning of 7/3/24, Resident #5 complained…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of accidents and/or hazards when facility staff were aware a resident who was care planned for a mechanical lift was sliding from a wheelchair and the staff detached the lift pad from the mechanical lift, causing the resident to further slide and be manually transferred which resulted in a right femur fracture for one (1) of ten (10) sampled residents that required transfers via mechanical lift. (Resident #5) Findings Include: A review of the facility's Responsibility for Accident/Incident Report Policy dated [DATE] revealed, .It is the policy of this facility for all Incidents and Accidents involving resident's to be investigated immediately upon knowledge of the incident. Procedure .Procedure .They are to document on the proper forms and notify the Administrator and/or DON (Director of Nursing) immediately when there is an injury . A record review of the facility's investigation summary dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to a resident who complained of pain after a manual transfer from her wheelchair to the bed and was subsequently diagnosed with a femoral fracture for one (1) of 23 residents reviewed for pain, Resident #5. Findings Include: A record review of the facility's policy Pain Assessment/Management revised 09/10, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide guidelines in the identification and treatment of the residents at risk of acute and chronic pain. Each resident's pain will be assessed in an approach designed to increase comfort and promote dignity through administering alternative interventions or medications .pain will be assessed and recorded on the medication administration record. The nurse will document the type of nonverbal or verbal pain the resident is experiencing when documenting the reason the medication is being given. The nurse will also document the intensity of the pain each time a PRN pain medication is given using the rating scale . A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely manage and treat complaints of pain for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents, when the unit the residents resided on did not have a licensed nurse to assess, monitor, or treat complaints of pain from approximately 7:00 PM on 3/22/24 until approximately 1:47 AM on 3/23/24. Residents #2 and #4 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Pain Assessment/Management, revised 9/10, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide guidelines in the identification and treatment of residents at risk for acute and chronic pain. Each residents pain will be assessed in an approach designed to increase comfort and promote dignity through administering alternative interventions or medications .Staff members providing direct care .will use an interdisciplinary approach observing pain symptoms in the resident and report it to the nurse. If possible, the nurse will discuss with the resident the severity and quality of pain using the pain reference scale. This will be documented on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan regarding interventions to prevent a dependent resident from falling for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for falls. Resident #98. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Care Plans-Comprehensive, dated 10/2016 revealed, An individualized (person centered) comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident . 8. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change. 9. The Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the review and updating of care plans: a. When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; b. When desired outcome is not met; c. When the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and d. At least quarterly . Record review of the Fall Assessment for Resident #98, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner to protect vulnerable residents from falls resulting in injury for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for falls. Resident #98 Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Fall Risk Documentation Policy and Procedure, revised 5/2005 revealed, It is the policy of this facility to evaluate and provide least restrictive intervention when a resident is a risk for falls. Upon Admission, Quarterly, and as needed the Fall Risk documentation form will be completed for each resident. The resident will be scored in eight (8) areas. A total score of these areas will determine at what level of risk the resident is. A score of 10 or greater will place the resident in the High-Risk category. Prevention protocol will be initiated immediately and documented on the care plan. Review of the facility's protocol, Protocol for Residents Who Are at Risk for Falls, revised 5/2001 revealed, 1. Residents identified as being at high risk for fall shall be place on the fall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide assistance with turning and repositioning per standards of care for two (2) of nine (9) sampled residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and repositioning. Resident #1 and Resident #2. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled ADL CARE POLICY dated 8/23 (August 2023) revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide appropriate treatment and services in relation to ADL care to residents to ensure all ADL needs are met on a daily basis, while attaining or maintaining the residence of highest, practicable, physical, mental and social well-being.Resident #1On 1/12/26 at 9:30 AM observation revealed Resident #1 was resting in bed on her back with head of bed elevated. She had a family member (niece) seated in a chair next to her bed.On 1/12/26 at 2:00 PM, during an interview the family member that was sitting with Resident #1 revealed she had not left the resident's room since she arrived and Resident #1 had not been turned or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate labeling of medication for one (1) of three (3) medication carts. The 400 Hall Medication Cart. Findings include:Record review of the facility policy titled, Medical SUPPLY STORAGE POLICY dated 3/2011 (March 2011) revealed the policy did not address storage of one medication in another's package.Record review of the MEDICATION ERROR REPORT signed by the DON and dated 12/29/25 revealed, .Individual Restasis vial were inside of nebulizer box.family reported wrong vial was brought into the room .On 1/12/26 at 4:45 PM, during an interview the Administrator revealed he expected the nurses to maintain accurate storage of medications in a manner that would provide for safe administration of medications. He stated that storing one medication in the box of a different medication could lead to administration of the wrong medication and cause complications for the resident.On 1/12/26 at 5:00 PM, during an interview the Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed that on 12/29/25 she had been notified by Resident #1's family…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure staff who perform resident transportation possessed and demonstrated the competencies necessary to carry out their responsibilities safely one (1) of four (4) residents dependent on the facility for transportation, Resident #2. Findings included:Record review of the facility policy titled, TRANSPORT OUT OF FACILITY dated 7/2008 (July 2008) revealed the policy did not address requirements, training for qualifications for staff who performed transportation of residents. Record review of the Incident Report for Resident #2 dated 10/22/25 revealed LPN #1 documented, STAFF REPORTED THAT WHILE THE RESIDENT WAS SITTING IN THE WHEELCHAIR IN THE VAN, (FACILITY TRANSPORTATION) THE WHEELCHAIR MOVED BACK AND TILTED.STAFF ASSISTED REISDENT AND PLACED WHEELCHAIR IN A STABLE POSITION. At 3:10 PM on 10/28/25, during a telephone interview, the Resident Representative (RR) for Resident #2 revealed she confirmed that facility staff had notified her that Resident #2 had an incident on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint: MS #29210 Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and revise a comprehensive care plan in accordance with physician orders and professional standards for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for respiratory equipment (Resident #2). Specifically, the facility failed to update the resident's care plan to reflect a new physician order dated 1/31/25 for an auto-adjusting -(continuous positive airway pressure) C-Pap at 8-18 cm (centimeter) of H20 (water), with modem setup, and the interdisciplinary team did not review or implement updated interventions related to the resident's new therapy. Findings included: A review of the facility's Care Plans-Comprehensive, revised on 10/2016, revealed, .An individualized (person centered) comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident . A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #2 on 7/20/2020 with current diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint MS #29210 Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided and documented according to professional standards for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents receiving individual Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (C-Pap). Resident #2. Specifically, the facility failed to follow and transcribe a physician's order dated 1/31/25 for a new C-Pap machine, until 5/28/25. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Transcribing Physician Orders, revised 2/27/2012, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to transcribe and follow the attending physicians orders as written with order clarification obtained when needed . Resident #2 A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #2 on 7/20/2020 with current diagnoses including bipolar disorder. Record review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/4/25 revealed Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09, which indicated he is moderately impaired. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse for two (2) of seven (7) sampled residents reviewed, Resident #1 and Resident #2. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled Preventing Resident Abuse, with a revision date of 8/16/2016, revealed .1. The facility's goal is to achieve and maintain an abuse-free environment .3. Residents have the right to be free from all forms of abuse. Abuse includes conduct that causes or has the potential to cause the resident to experience humiliation, fear, shame, agitation, or degradation. Resident #1 Record review of the facility's Final Investigation dated 2/22/25-2/23/25 revealed the facility's documentation stated that on 2/24/25, the roommate of Resident #1 (Resident #6) reported to the Director of Nursing (DON) and Social Services Director (SSD) that on the night of 2/22/25 or early morning of 2/23/25, she heard Resident #1 say, Stop hitting me, while…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions on the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan for Resident #7 when the resident's drink was left unopened, her cereal was served dry, and her utensils were placed out of reach during the evening meal on 3/20/25 for one (1) of seven (7) sampled residents reviewed. Resident #7. Findings include: Record review of the Care Plan dated 7/07/24 for Resident #7 revealed a focus of Resident requires assistance with ADLs related to muscle weakness and diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease .Interventions .Provide assistance as needed for ADLs .Resident able to feed self with tray set-up but does require nursing staff to assist with feeding at times due to visual impairment On 3/20/25 at 5:30 PM, during a dining observation and interview, Resident #7 and her roommate were alone in their room. Resident #7 was sitting in bed with her supper tray on her over-the-bed table. She had her soda can…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate services to maintain the ability to carry out activities of daily living (dining/eating) when the resident's drink was left unopened and her utensils were left out of reach during the evening meal on 3/19/25, which prevented her from feeding herself for one (1) of seven (7) sampled residents reviewed. Resident #7 Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Meal Assistance and Assistance Policy, dated May 2024, revealed Policy . Compliance Guidelines . 5. Check the tray before serving it to the resident to be sure that it is correct diet ordered and that the food consistency is appropriate to the resident's ability to chew and swallow . Arrange the dishes and silverware so that the resident can reach them easily . 8. Open all cartons and remove all lids from items on the tray. Give the napkin to the resident . 17. Encourage the resident to participate with his or her meal as much as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a meal that was palatable in appearance when the facility posted Club Sandwich and French Fries on the menu for the evening meal on 3/19/25 and the sandwiches served were not palatable in appearance and did not match the facility's recipe for two (2) of seven (7) sampled residents reviewed. Resident #3 and Resident #4. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled MENUS, dated 4/21/22, revealed the policy stated: Policy . Foods will be served as planned on the menu unless there is a legitimate and extenuating circumstance . Standardized recipes are available for all items included on the cycle menu. Computerized recipes may be used. Record review of the posted menu for the evening meal on 3/19/25 revealed the menu listed Club Sandwich, Potato Chips, Cookie of Choice, Fruit of Choice, Iced Tea, and Milk. Record review of the Menu Calendar Report, Week 4, revealed that the Wednesday dinner menu…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the written contents of the notice of discharge included all of the requirements for a facility-initiated discharge for one (1) of two (2) Residents reviewed. (Resident #1) Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Transfers and Documentation, dated 02/2024, revealed Transfers may occur within the facility for the following reasons: 1. The needs of the resident cannot be met in the section of the facility in which he/she is residing. 2. The resident threatens the safety of himself/herself or the safety of other residents in the facility. 3. The health or other residents is endangered. 4. The resident and/or resident representative requests a transfer made . During an interview on 11/25/24 at 2:48 PM, Resident #1's brother stated the discharge letter was dated 9/6/24 and was received by certified mail on 9/18/24. He stated he felt like there should have been more communication between the facility and family…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$148,438 in federal fines across 8 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $35,165 — penalty dated 2026-03-02
• $6,435 — penalty dated 2025-10-29
• $6,500 — penalty dated 2025-10-29
• $12,428 — penalty dated 2025-06-19
• $7,278 — penalty dated 2024-08-01
• $7,279 — penalty dated 2024-08-01
• $10,036 — penalty dated 2024-06-24
• $63,317 — penalty dated 2024-04-03
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-01 for 21 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS