Parkway Health & Rehab LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 130 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 87 beds and averages 78.2 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.49 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-02-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complainant and staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise a pressure risk care plan for a resident who developed a pressure ulcer for one (1) of (3) three residents care plans reviewed. (Resident #1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, with no revision date revealed, Policy Interpretation and Implementation: .13.) Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change . Record review of Resident #1's care plan titled Resident is a risk for pressure ulcers/further impaired skin integrity related to (r/t) incontinence dementia, with onset date of 12/11/24 and revision date of 1/27/25, revealed no revisions to the care plan prior to the onset of the deep tissue injury (DTI) identified on 1/19/25. On 1/31/25 at 4:00 PM, during a phone interview with the complainant, she revealed her mom (Resident #1) was sent to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-02-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on complainant, resident representative and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to prevent new pressure ulcers from developing for one (1) of three (3) residents with wounds reviewed. (Resident #1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Prevention of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries, with no revision date, revealed, Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide information regarding identification of pressure ulcer/injury risk factors and interventions for specific risk factors. In a phone interview with the complainant on 1/31/25 at 4:00 PM, she revealed her mom (Resident #1) was sent to the hospital on 1/19/25 and was assessed to have an open pressure ulcer on her right heel that was black and draining. She stated she was concerned because Resident #1 had started declining about a week before being sent to the hospital, requiring increased assistance with all her care and transfers. She then revealed she also cannot understand how a wound on her foot that was open, black in color and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to follow infection prevention and control practices during medication administration and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for two (2) of three (3) residents observed for infection control practices. (Resident #9 and Resident #81).Findings include: A record review of facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions undated, revealed, Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are utilized to prevent the spread of multi- drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents . Record review of the facility policy Infection Prevention and Control with a revision date of December 2023 revealed The facility adopted infection prevention and control policies and procedures.to help prevent and manage transmission of diseases and infections. Record review of the medication Procedure Guideline provided by the facility did not provide specific instructions on infection control.Resident # 9At 1:20 PM on 2/24/26, during an observation, Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan by not maintaining Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during care for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for infection control practices. Resident #9.Findings include:Record review of the facility policy Care Plans Comprehensive Person-Centered revised December 2016 revealed A comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives, and timetables to meet the resident's physical psychosocial and functional needs is.implemented for each resident.Record review of the Care Plan Report with a revision date of 1/13/26 revealed Focus.Resident is NPO (nothing by mouth) gastrostomy tube.Interventions/Tasks.Maintain Enhanced Barrier Precautions.On 2/24/26 at 1:20 PM, during an observation, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 performed Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube site care for Resident #9 without donning a gown prior to initiating care.On 2/24/26 at 1:26 PM, during an interview, LPN #2 reported she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice to address abdominal distention and fecal burden in a timely manner, which resulted in hospitalization for fecal impaction for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for hospitalization. Resident #56. Findings include:Record review of Radiology Interpretation dated 11/28/25 revealed .Impression: Acute process. Mild fecal loading.A record review of an XR (x-ray) Abdomen 1 view report dated 12/22/25 revealed .Impression.2. Moderate gaseous distention of the small bowel, unchanged in comparison with the prior.Record review of the CT (computer tomography) Abdomen WO (without) Pelvis dated 12/22/25 revealed Impression: 1. Large fecal burden with findings suggesting stercoral proctitis.Record review of the December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Dulcolax suppositories had been administered on 12/10/25 and 12/24/25. Lactulose was also administered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0800 — isolated
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff support and respect a resident's right to make choices about his or her meal preferences for two (2) of (18) sampled for Residents reviewed for food preferences. Resident #45 and #47.Findings include: A review of the facility policy, Dietary Preference & Nutritionally Accuracy undated, revealed, Objective: To ensure the Dietary Department provides meals that align with each resident's personal tastes .3. 2 .Menu Substitution Log: If a resident expresses a new dislike, the DM must update their Permanent Profile and ensure the production staff is notified of the change to avoid food waste.Resident #45During an interview with Resident #45 on 2/23/26 at 11:15 AM, she shared her worries about her current dietary preferences not considered in light of her diabetes diagnosis. For her, managing blood sugar levels is essential, and it has been quite frustrating that the meals provided at the facility do not match her dietary preferences. While she mentioned that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff followed proper hand hygiene practices and monitor food temperatures in a manner that prevented cross-contamination for one (1) of two (2) kitchen tours. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Hand and Single Use Glove Sanitation Practices with a revision date of October 2017, revealed Policy: Facility employees shall follow sanitary practices when handling food to prevent the spread of foodborne illness . Review of the facility policy titled Guidelines for Using Thermometers with a revision date of October 2017, revealed Policy: the facility shall monitor temperatures of hazardous foods to maintain quality and safety of food served using an appropriate thermometer . An observation of the kitchen on 3/12/25 at 11:00 AM revealed Dietary Staff #2, located near the 3-compartment sink, gathering kitchen utensils. He walked over to the steam table with a white dish cloth in his hands and began setting up to check food temperatures. Dietary Staff #2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-13 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to submit accurate staffing data into the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system for one (1) of four (4) quarters reviewed. Quarter 1 2025 Findings include Record review of facility policy titled, Submission Timeliness and Accuracy dated April 2016, revealed, Direct care staffing and census data will be collected quarterly, and is required to be timely and accurate. Record review of PBJ Staffing Data Report CASPER Report 1705D FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 1 2025 (October 1-December 31), revealed the facility triggered on this report for excessively low weekend staffing. During an interview on 3/11/25 at 11:50 AM, the Administrator revealed I don't understand how we were running excessively low weekend staffing; we were adequately staffed during that time. He revealed we were transitioning between payroll systems then, and maybe it didn't transition accurately. Record review of the facility staffing grid for the weekends of quarter 1 revealed no issues with low weekend staffing. During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement care plans related to Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for Residents #1, #34, #61 and #67, failed to develop a care plan related to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for Resident #41, and failed to develop a care plan related to activities for Resident #68. Additionally, the facility failed to implement a care plan intervention for a contracture device for Resident #12 for seven (7) of 23 resident care plans reviewed. The scope/severity of this deficiency was increased to E Pattern due to prior citation on the last Annual Recertification Survey. Findings include: Record review of the policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised December 2016, revealed its Policy Statement: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for residents that require assistance for four (4) of seventy-nine (79) residents observed during the initial tour. Resident's #1, #34, #61 and #67 The scope/severity of this deficiency was increased to E - Pattern due to prior citation on the last Annual Recertification Survey. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Quality of Life, revised August 2009, revealed Policy Interpretation and Statement: 3.) Residents shall be groomed as they wish to be groomed (hair styles, nails, facial hair, etc. (et cetera). Resident #1 An observation and interview on 3/11/25 at 9:34 AM revealed Resident #1's facial hair was approximately ¾ inch long on his chin, sides of his face, and neck area. His hair was unkempt and thick. Resident #1 stated, The barber has not been here in quite some time. I would like to have a haircut and be shaved. He…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a splint was applied for a resident with contractures for one (1) of 35 residents with limited range of motion (ROM) residing in the facility. Resident #12 The scope/severity of this deficiency was increased to E Pattern due to prior citation on the last Annual Recertification Survey. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Mobility and Range of Motion with a revision date of July 2017, revealed under, Policy Statement: 1. Residents will not experience an avoidable reduction in range of motion (ROM). 2. Residents with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in ROM. 3. Residents with limited mobility will receive appropriate services, equipment and assistance to maintain or improve mobility unless reduction in mobility is unavoidable . An observation of Resident #12 on 3/11/25 at 9:37 AM revealed he had a left upper extremity contracture with no contracture device in place. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on dialysis staff and facility staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to promptly notify the physician of a resident change in both nutrition and hydration status for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for nutrition. Resident #12 Cross Reference F692 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status with a revision date of May 2017, revealed, Policy Statement: Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status . Record review of Resident #12's MAR revealed an order dated 1/09/25, Dialysis Fluid Restriction 1,500cc (cubic centimeters). Record review of the Registered Dietician Note dated 2/18/25 for Resident #12 revealed, RD (Registered Dietician) spoke with RD from dialysis regarding resident having issues with fluid overload. RD suggests changing TF (tube feeding) to Nutren 2.0 in order to meet needs for weight gain/wound healing without having excess fluids…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-01-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS