Choctaw Residential Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to protect residents from abuse for two (2) of (2) residents reviewed for abuse (Resident # 1 and Resident # 3). Specifically, the facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident inappropriate sexual contact, when (2) incidents occurred when one resident touched another resident inappropriately.Findings include:Record review of the facility policy Resident Rights revised 3/24, revealed, .shall insure each resident of the following.J. THE RIGHT to be free from mental and physical abuses. Each resident has the right to a safe, secure, and homelike environment .The facility is responsible for implementing interventions to prevent resident-to-resident altercations and to ensure supervision sufficient to protect residents from harm. Resident #2 and Resident #3On 03/18/2026 at 10:15 AM, during an interview with Resident #3, the resident reported that she was involved in an incident with Resident #2 on 03/06/2026 in the front…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary behavioral health care and services, specifically, the facility failed to proactively assess and implement effective behavioral interventions to address inappropriate sexual behaviors for two (2) of five (5) sampled residents reviewed for behavioral concerns. Resident #1 and Resident #3.Findings include:Record review of the facility policy Resident Rights revised 3/24, revealed, .shall insure each resident of the following.J. THE RIGHT to be free from mental and physical abuses. Each resident has the right to a safe, secure, and homelike environment .The facility is responsible for implementing interventions to prevent resident-to-resident altercations and to ensure supervision sufficient to protect residents from harm. Record review of the facility's Behavioral Health Services policy revealed, It is the policy of this facility to ensure all residents receive necessary behavioral health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to resolve a resident grievance in a timely manner related to missing clothing, activities, and noisy environment for four (4) of seven (7) residents that attended resident council. Residents #27, #76, #100, and #309 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Grievance/Complaint Policy unrevised, revealed, It is a policy of this facility that a resident/responsible party/legal representative has the right to voice grievances as follows: . All grievances should be directed/reported to the departmental supervisor and departmental director. Review of the facility policy titled Resident Personal Belongings unrevised, revealed under, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to protect the resident's right to possess personal belongings, such as clothing and furnishings, for their use while in the facility. Also revealed under, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guideline: . 7. The facility will exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for nail care, oral hygiene, and hand rolls for one (1) of 25 sampled residents. Resident #74 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans unrevised, revealed under, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and all services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of quality. Review of Resident #74's Care Plan Report revealed under, Focus: I require total assistance with my ADL's (activities of daily living) r/t (related to) CVA (cerebrovascular accident) with left hemiplegia and bilateral hand contractures. Also revealed under, Interventions: Caregiver to don (apply) bilateral hand rolls to bilateral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean homelike environment for Residents #6, #11, and #60. This was for one (1) of four (4) hallways. Findings include: A record review of facility policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment, dated 2024, revealed, In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment . A record review of the facility policy titled, Deep Cleaning Rooms undated revealed, (6) Check all room curtains if it needs taking to laundry for washing. Resident #6 During an observation and interview on 03/03/25 at 3:10 PM, Resident #6's room was noted to have a large section of the wall (approximately 3 feet by 3 feet) with scratches and paint missing. Behind the resident's headboard of her bed, a piece of plywood measuring approximately 4 feet by 3 feet was noted to be attached to wall. The plywood had large chunks of wood missing which left uneven and splintered edges on the broken part as well as on the edges of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff followed professional standards of practice for medication administration. This resulted in the administration of discontinued and incorrectly scheduled medications, and failure to administer prescribed medications. This deficient practice was identified for four (4) of 37 medication administration observation opportunities (Resident #39, Resident #90) CROSS REFERENCE F759 Findings include: A review of the policy titled Medication Administration revealed the following: Policy: Medications are administered by licensed nurses who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: Section 10 states that staff must ensure the six rights of medication administration are followed: a. Right resident, b. Right drug, c. Right dosage, d. Right route,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received oral care and nail care for one (1) of 25 sampled residents. Resident #74 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living Policy with a revision date of 7/2014, revealed under, Policy Statement: Based on previous evaluations and current date, the nursing staff, in conjunction with Attending Physician, Consultant Pharmacist, therapy staff, and others, will seek to identify the level of care a resident requires for ADLs. An observation of Resident #74, on 3/03/25 at 12:00 PM, revealed he was lying in bed with fingernails that were approximately 1 inch (in.) in length on the left hand with a brown substance on each nail and one nail that was broken off and hanging inside his palm. The residents' upper and lower teeth and lower gum line were covered in a thick white substance. An observation with interview on 3/05/25 at 7:50 AM with Resident #74 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide activities that met the interest of the residents for three (3) of 25 sampled residents. Resident #6, #9, and #41 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities revealed under, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. Facility-sponsored group, individual, and independent activities will be designed to meet the interest of each resident, as well as support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Resident #6 During an interview on 3/4/25 at 9:00 AM, Resident #6 stated the facility does not offer activities on the weekends and she would like to have activities on these days as well as during the week. She revealed she had been sick and had preferred to do activities in her room, but lately she felt better and wanted to participate in group activities. An interview with the Activity Director…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure hand rolls were applied for a resident with finger contractures for one (1) of 25 sampled residents. Resident #74 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Prevention of Decline in Range of Motion unrevised, revealed under, Policy: Residents who enter the facility without limited range of motion will not experience a reduction in range of motion unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that a reduction in range of motion is unavoidable. Record review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed an order dated 7/08/24, Caregiver to don (put on) B (bilateral) hand rolls to B (bilateral) hands to decrease risk of skin breakdown and decrease risk of further contracture formation with skin checks/cleanse at the end of each shift to ensure no adverse effects x (times) 7 days a week every shift. The hand rolls were signed as applied/administered on each shift (day, evening, and night) for the dates of 3/3/25 and 3/4/25. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain a stop date for as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medications for two (2) of six (6) residents reviewed who were receiving psychotropic medications (Resident #43 and Resident #259). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medications, last revised in March 2025, revealed the following under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: Section 16: Psychotropic medications used on a PRN basis must be limited to no more than 14 days unless the provider determines it is appropriate to extend the order. The medical record must indicate a specific duration. Resident #43 Record review of the Order Summary Report for Resident #43 revealed an order dated 12/06/24 for Ativan (Lorazepam) 1 mg (milligram), to be administered one tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for anxiety with no stop date provided. Record review of the admission Record revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,757 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,757 — penalty dated 2025-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $109K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS