Cleveland Community Care Center
4036 Highway 8 East, Cleveland, MS 38732 · Non profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (662) 843-4014 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603, F0609) — most recent Jan 2026
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 7 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (22) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $229,213 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-11)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.9% | 20.5% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 1.4% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 1.6% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.5% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.0% | 19.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 36.2% | 23.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 97.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 6.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.4% | 20.7% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 39.6% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 2.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.2% | 84.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.8% | 27.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.5% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.48 | 2.43 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.67 | 2.86 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 40.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.4–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 40.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 11.5%CMS range 6.8–18.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.37 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 109.6 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
22 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy/procedure review, and interviews, the facility neglected to identify a crisis of suicidal ideation of Resident #1 and neglected to provide the psychiatric services that were necessary to prevent death for one (1) of seven (7) residents sampled as evidenced by Resident #1 committed suicide by hanging on [DATE] using the remote-control cord from his bed and using an exposed pipe on the ceiling in his room. On [DATE], during the admission process Resident #1 told the admitting nurse that he wanted to call a friend to pick him up and take him to jump off a bridge. During the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift, on [DATE], a Medical Doctor's (MD) order was written for a psychiatric (psych) evaluation. On [DATE], Resident #1 elected to be admitted to hospice services. Another MD order was written on [DATE] to discontinue (D/C) the psych evaluation and resident was admitted to contract hospice services. An order was written on [DATE] with no time noted to place Resident #1 on one-on-one monitoring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy/procedure review and interviews, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin resulting in a serious bodily injury to law enforcement agencies after the death of one (1) of seven (7) residents sampled, Resident #1 as evidenced by Resident #1's suicide on [DATE]. Resident #1 told the admitting nurse during the admission process on [DATE] that he wanted to call a friend to pick him up and take him to jump off a bridge. During the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift, on [DATE], a Medical Doctor's (MD) order was written for a psychiatric (psych) evaluation. On [DATE], Resident #1 wanted to be admitted to hospice services. Another MD order was written on [DATE] to discontinue (D/C) the psych evaluation and resident was admitted to contract hospice services. He remained on one-on-one observation through to [DATE] when he went to every hour observations. Resident #1 was observed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 at 7:15 AM lying in his bed with his eyes closed. LPN #1 took Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-11 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to coordinate a resident review with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) program under Medicaid by not referring a resident that expressed suicidal ideations on admission for a significant change in status assessment for review by the State Designated Authority for one (1) of seven (7) residents sampled. Resident #1. During the admission process on 8/8/23, Resident #1 told the admitting nurse that he wanted to call a friend to pick him up and take him to jump off a bridge. During the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift, on 8/9/23, a Medical Doctor's (MD) order was written for a psychiatric (psych) evaluation. On 8/9/23, Resident #1 wanted to be admitted to hospice services. Another MD order was written on 8/9/23 to discontinue (D/C) the psych evaluation and resident was admitted to contract hospice services. He remained on one-on-one observation through to 8/17/23 when he went to every hour observations. Resident #1 was observed by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy and procedure review, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services to address a resident's needs as evidenced by failure to act upon Resident #1's verbalized suicidal ideations which resulted in Resident #1's suicide in the facility for one (1) of seven (7) residents sampled. During the admission process on [DATE], Resident #1 expressed suicidal thoughts when he told the admitting nurse that he wanted to call a friend to pick him up and take him to jump off a bridge. On [DATE], the facility obtained an physician order for a psychiatric evaluation. On the same day [DATE], the facility obtained a physician order for hospice services and obtained a second physician order to discontinue the psychiatric evaluation. The facility did not notify hospice services of the order for a psychiatric evaluation or the order to D/C (discontinue) the psychiatric evaluation. Record review revealed a physician order dated [DATE], with no time noted, to place Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy/procedure review and interviews, the facility failed to be administered effectively and efficiently to provide the mental health care for one (1) of seven (7) residents, Resident #1, as evidenced by Resident #1 committed suicide by hanging on [DATE] using the remote control cord from his bed and using an exposed pipe on the ceiling in his room. During the admission process on [DATE], Resident #1 told the admitting nurse that he wanted to jump off a bridge. During the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift, on 8/ On [DATE], a Medical Doctor's (MD) order was written for a psychiatric (psych) evaluation. On [DATE], Resident #1 wanted to be admitted to hospice services. Another MD order was written on [DATE] to discontinue (D/C) the psych evaluation and resident was admitted to contract hospice services. He remained one-on-one observation through to [DATE] when he went to every hour observations. Resident #1 was observed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 at 7:15 AM lying in his bed with his eyes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-11 · tag F0841 — isolatedDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy/procedure review and interviews, the Medical Director failed to coordinate, implement and evaluate the facility's care of one (1) of seven (7) residents, Resident #1, as evidence by Resident #1 committed suicide by hanging himself with the remote control cord of his bed on an exposed pipe in the ceiling of his room [ROOM NUMBER] days after the Medical Director discontinued the Physician Order for a Psychiatric (psych) Evaluation (eval) for suicidal ideations. During the admission process on 8/9/23, Resident #1 told the admitting nurse that he wanted to call a friend to pick him up and take him to jump off a bridge. On 8/9/23, a Medical Doctor's (MD) order was written for a psychiatric evaluation. On 8/9/23, Resident #1 wanted to be admitted to hospice services. Another order was written on 8/9/23 to discontinue (D/C) the psych evaluation and resident was admitted to contract hospice services. He remained one-on-one observation through to 8/17/23 when he went to every hour…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-11 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy/procedure review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective communication process, including how the communication would be documented between the Long-Term Care (LTC) facility and the hospice provider, to ensure that the needs of the resident were addressed and met 24 hours a day for one (1) of seven (7) residents sampled. Resident #1. During the admission process on 8/8/23, Resident #1 told the admitting nurse that he wanted to call a friend to pick him up and take him to jump off a bridge. On 8/9/23, a Medical Doctor's (MD) order was written for a psychiatric (psych) evaluation. On 8/9/23, Resident #1 wanted to be admitted to hospice services. Another MD order was written on 8/9/23 to discontinue (D/C) the psych evaluation and resident was admitted to contract hospice services. He remained on one-on-one observation through to 8/17/23 when he went to every hour observations. Resident #1 was observed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 at 7:15 AM lying in his bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was admitted with multiple pressure ulcers and other wounds received necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent worsening by failing to obtain wound treatment orders and initiate wound care upon admission for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident #1.Findings included:Record review of the facility policy Wound Care revealed Policy.Wound Care Orders and Care Plans. Each individual wound site requires a separate wound care order.A record review of progress notes for Resident #1, dated 4/17/26, revealed the resident refused assessment of her wounds. The physician was notified; however, there was no documentation that wound treatment orders were obtained.Further record review of a nursing progress note for Resident #1, dated 4/19/26, documented the resident had multiple wounds including a right heel pressure ulcer with slough, a right hip pressure ulcer with eschar, Stage four (4) pressure ulcers to the right buttock,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to dignity, choice, and self-determination by failing to assist one (1) of the twenty-seven sampled residents to attend the facility's beauty shop as requested. Resident #37Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights with revision date of December 2016, revealed Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: a. a dignified existence; b. be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity . On 1/5/26 at 11:45 AM, an observation and interview revealed Resident #37 seated in her wheelchair with visibly overgrown hair, measuring approximately four inches of gray overgrowth with red coloring remaining on the bottom half of her hair. Resident #37 revealed she was admitted to the facility in June 2025 and had been requesting assistance to go to the beauty shop since admission. She stated, It's like it falls on deaf ears. No one ever takes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents' grievances regarding missing personal clothing were investigated, resolved, and communicated to the resident for two (2) of 27 sampled residents. Resident #29, and Resident #37. Findings Include:Record review of the facility policy titled Resident Care Grievance Policy with an effective date of 6/26/2023 revealed, Grievance decisions should include the following: .date the grievance was received, a summary statement of the resident's grievance, the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns(s), a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance and the date the decision was issued .Resident #29During an interview on 1/05/2026 at 11:45 AM, Resident #29 reported that Unsampled Resident A repeatedly entered her room and removed her clothing from the hangers in her closet.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and a review of facility policy, the facility failed to honor residents' rights by secluding two (2) of twenty (20) residents in a locked Memory Care unit without proper assessment. This practice violated the residents' right to be free from involuntary seclusion. Resident #23 and Resident #83Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Component Plan, with an effective date of 10/24/22, revealed under policy, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion. Resident #23 An observation and interview on 01/05/2026 at 11:50 AM with Resident #23 revealed him sitting up in chair watching television in his room. His room was located on the back side of the north hall and was behind locked double doors. Resident #23 revealed that he moved to that room recently because he was acting a fool on the other hall. He revealed that they threw him back here…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded for one (1) of twenty-seven (27) MDS assessments reviewed (Resident #105). Findings include:Review of a facility policy titled, Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment, revealed, All personnel who complete any portion of the Resident Assessment must sign and certify the accuracy of the portion of the assessment .An observation on 1/05/26 at 11:30 AM revealed the resident's bilateral hands appeared contracted in appearance.Review of Section GG0115, Functional Limitation in Range of Motion (ROM), of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was coded as having no impairment to the upper extremities.An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/06/26 at 3:00 PM revealed she stated she had observed the resident's contracted hands and that the resident was supposed to have splints applied to his hands. She further stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a communication care plan for (Resident #46), failed to implement a Behavioral care plan for (Resident #22), failed to implement an activities of daily living (ADL) care plan for (Resident #29, #64, and #105), and failed to implement a range of motion (ROM) care plan for (Resident # 105) for six (6) of 27 care plans reviewed.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered, last revised March 2022, revealed the policy statement: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Resident #22 Review of the Behavior Management care plan, last revised 12/06/25, revealed the intervention: 1 on 1 (one-on-one) precautions. During an observation and interview with Resident #22 on 1/05/2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care for three (3) of 113 residents residing in the facility. Resident # 29, #64, and # 105 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, ADLs Supporting undated, revealed .Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene . Review of the facility policy titled, Fingernail Care, Foot Care, and Podiatry Referral, effective date 4/18/2017, revealed the stated purpose was to provide guidelines for the delivery of safe, evidence-based nail and foot care which promote good personal hygiene, prevent hand, foot, and nail infections, soft tissue injury, and foot ulcers . Resident #29 An observation and interview on 1/05/2026 at 11:30 AM revealed that Resident #29 was lying in bed, with her hair disheveled, and was wearing a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide Range of Motion (ROM) services for (2) two of 60 residents who have limited ROM. (Resident #24 and #105) Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Mobility and Range of Motion, with no revision date, revealed the policy statement: Residents with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion . Resident #24 An observation and interview on 01/05/2026 at 11:17 AM with Resident #24, revealed him sitting up in his wheelchair in his room. He had contractures to the second, third, fourth, and fifth digits on his left hand. His fingers were stiff and bent inward, and his fingernails were touching the palm of his hand. Resident #24 stated he had a brace that he wore sometimes, and it was located in the top drawer of his dresser. Resident #24 revealed that the last time he had therapy, the Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (1) of twenty-seven (27) residents on the sample (Resident #22). Findings include:Review of a facility policy titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents, with no revision date, revealed the policy statement: Our facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities .An observation and interview with Resident #22 on 1/05/2026 at 11:40 AM revealed the resident stated he wanted to go back to where he came from, and the conversation with the resident continued for approximately five minutes. When asked if the gentleman asleep in a chair in the room was his family member, Resident #22 stated, No, he is supposed to be watching me but just look at him sleeping. The gentleman asleep in the chair did not awaken during the observation and interview.During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, Payroll Based Journal data, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide adequate staffing to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a timely manner for one (1) of 28 sampled residents during survey and five (5) of 5 weekends in July 2023. Findings Include. The Administrator (ADM) provided on facility letterhead that the facility does not have a policy on staffing, the facility follows the State Department of Health Licensure regulations. A record review of PBJ Staffing Data Report CASPER Report 1705D FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 4 2023 (July1-September 30), revealed Excessively Low Weekend Staffing - Triggered. Triggered = Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low. During an observation and interview on 02/12/24 at 01:34 PM revealed Nurse Assistant (NA) #3 had Resident #55 up in the total lift sling hovering over her wheelchair with no other staff member in the resident's room. An interview with NA #3 revealed she is not certified, she stated she has completed her course…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 5 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff, and resident interviews the facility failed to correct maintenance issues in a resident bathroom for two (2) of 28 residents sampled. Residents #39 & #46 Findings Include: Review of the written statement on facility letterhead dated 2/14/24 and signed by the Administrator revealed the facility does not have a policy regarding maintenance repairs. An interview and observation on 02/12/24 at 11:06 AM, with Resident's #39 and #46 revealed the residents share a bathroom and the water in the bathroom will not turn on and there is a puddle of water in the floor approximately 2 feet wide by 2 feet wide between the toilet and the sink. Resident #39 & #46 revealed the sink has not worked in a long time and they both walk independently. When asked if the staff were aware their sink did not work and there appeared to be a leak, Resident #46 stated, Yes, they have come in and looked at it, but no one's fixed it. An observation and interview on 02/13/24 at 10:30 AM, of Resident #39 & #46's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed timely for one (1) of 28 resident's MDS reviewed. Resident #14 Findings include: Record review of a document, on company letterhead, dated 2/14/24 provided by the Administrator revealed, The facility does not have a policy on MDS completion and scheduling. The facility follows the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual. A record review of the RAI Version 3.0 Manual, dated October 2023, Chapter 2, Assessments for the RAI page 2-35, 05. Quarterly Assessment, revealed The Quarterly assessment .must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) assessment of any type . Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Nursing Home (NH) Final Validation Report, dated 2/9/24, revealed that the Quarterly MDS, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/25/24, for Resident #14 was completed late. During an interview with MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to implement a care plan for a resident requiring two person assistance utilizing a total lift with transfers for one (1) of 28 resident care plans reviewed. Resident #55 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan with a revision date of 3/18 revealed Policy .Each resident will have a person-centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care . Record review of Resident #55's Care Plans revealed a care plan with a problem onset date of 3/13/23, that indicated the resident required assistance with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) related to resident has diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy with decrease mobility with interventions that included transfer assistance of two (2) staff members with the total mechanical lift. On 02/12/24 at 01:34 PM, an observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards as evidenced by one staff member using a two-person total body lift to transfer Resident #55 and standing water in a bathroom (Resident's #39 & 46) for three (3) of 28 residents reviewed on sample. Findings Include Review of the typed statement on facility letterhead dated 2/14/24 and signed by the Administrator revealed the facility does not have a policy regarding accident and hazard prevention. Review of the facility policy titled, Invacare Total Lift with a revision date of 8/16 revealed under the Policy .The Invacare Total Lift is used for total lifts and/or to obtain a resident's weight from bed to chair, chair to bed, or from the floor . Resident #55 An observation and interview on 02/12/24 at 01:34 PM, revealed Nurse Assistant (NA) #3 had Resident #55 up in the total lift sling hovering over her wheelchair with no other staff member in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, facility policy review, and in-service record review the facility failed to prevent the potential for the spread of infection as evidenced by all staff not wearing or improperly wearing a face mask for one (1) of four (4) days of survey. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Coronavirus (COVID-19) with a revision date of 02/22 revealed Policy .It shall be the policy to utilize accepted infection control methods to prevent and control the spread of a respiratory illness caused by novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) . Review of the facility policy titled Infection Control-Personal Protective Equipment-Using Face Masks with no revision date revealed under Policy .Personal protective equipment, and training on the proper use of such, will be provided to all staff with direct resident contact. An observation on 06/26/22 at 03:30 PM, on entrance into the facility revealed Housekeeper # 1 sitting at a desk screening visitors and staff for COVID19 without a face mask. An interview on 6/26/22 at 03:32 PM, with Housekeeper # 1 revealed she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$229,213 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $229,213 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-07 for 4 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Mississippi Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 255114. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.