No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Grove

11 Pecan Drive, Columbia, MS 39429 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 86 certified beds · (601) 736-4747 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (601) 736-4747 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0604) — cited Feb 2026
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1560 Sumrall Rd · (601) 736-6303 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walmart0.8 mi
1001 Highway 98 Byp · (601) 731-1266 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1001 Highway 98 Byp · (601) 697-0953 · Call to confirm hours
Park
173-04-000-02-026.01, 969 Park St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1309 Church St · (601) 736-6336

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased31.7%20.5%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.1%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.0%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection10.5%2.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.6%1.6%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.9%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened33.6%19.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.8%23.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%6.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.9%20.7%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.3%21.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication6.4%2.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.0%84.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.5%27.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.7%15.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.902.431.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.512.861.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 108 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
15.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
74.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 74.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.1%CMS range 33.4–51.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF15.1%CMS range 11.9–18.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge74.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge70.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.2–12.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.131.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
1.77
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.50
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.75
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
36.0%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 81.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.11 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-12)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement individualized care plan interventions for two (2) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident #1 and Resident #2.Findings include:A review of the facility's Total Care Plan Policy, undated, revealed, It is the policy of this facility that the Interdisciplinary care plan will be done as follows.Reminders.Care Plan must be followed by all staff included in resident's care.Resident #1A record review of the facility's document, Fall During Staff Assist, dated 4/3/26, revealed Resident #1 fell during a chair-to-bed transfer when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 used a sit-to-stand lift.A record review of the facility's Staffing Disciplinary, dated 4/3/26, revealed, .CNA.noted to not follow proper transfer status for resident (Resident #1).This write did a phone interview with CNA who states that she asked the resident how she transferred.Made CNA aware that the care profile and transfer status are to be looked at prior to the start of every shift.A record review of the Nurse Notes, dated 4/3/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment and implement interventions to prevent accidents for two (2) of six (6) residents reviewed with a history of falls. Resident #1 and Resident #2.Findings include:A review of the facility's Fall Protocol Policy, dated 2/2011, revealed, It is the policy of this facility that the fall protocol will be as follows.Fall review.Evaluate possible alternative interventions to help prevent falls.Resident #1A record review of the facility's document, Fall During Staff Assist, dated 4/3/26, revealed Resident #1 fell during a chair-to-bed transfer when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 used a sit-to-stand lift. A review of the facility's Staffing Disciplinary, dated 4/3/26 revealed .CNA.noted to not follow proper transfer status for resident (Resident #1).This write did a phone interview with CNA who states that she asked the resident how she transferred.Made CNA aware that the care profile and transfer status are to be looked at prior to the start of every shift.A record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to sanitize pots and pans according to manufacturer's guidelines and failed to calibrate food thermometers to ensure food remained hot for one (1) of four (4) kitchen observations.Findings include:A review of the facility's Calibration of Thermometers Policy, revised 10/17, revealed, .Facility shall ensure that a thermometer gives accurate recordings. Procedure: 1. All thermometers are to be calibrated: a. Before each use b. After being dropped c. When experiencing an extreme change in temperature. A review of the facility's Manual Warewashing Policy, dated 10/17 revealed, .Food service pots and pans that cannot fit in the dish machine or cleaned and sanitized in a three-compartment sink.Procedure.5) Third Compartment Sink a) Fill the third sink with water and sanitizer to the correct concentration. Hot water can be used as an alternative. B) Immerse items in the third sink in hot water or chemical sanitizing solution. I)If hot water immersion is used, the water must be a minimum of 171 F…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to dignity, as evidenced by standing over the resident while assisting to feed for one (1) of (18) sampled residents. Resident #34.Findings include:A review of the facility's Dignity Policy, undated, revealed, .Dignity means that staff carry out activities which assist the resident to maintain and enhance his/her self-esteem and self-worth as follows.Promoting resident independence and dignity in dining.A record review of Resident #34's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #34 on 7/16/12 with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis.A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/19/25 revealed Resident #34 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two (2), which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired.On 2/9/26 at 11:54 AM, during an observation, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #1 was observed assisting Resident #34 with feeding in the resident's room. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy and confidentiality by posting personal care information in the resident's room for one (1) of two (2) residents sampled for privacy. Resident #8.Findings include:A review of the facility's Privacy of Health Information Policy, undated, revealed, . It is the policy of this facility that resident's health information will be protected as follows: . No health information allowed on counter tops or in areas visible to unauthorized persons . - Posting notes and reminders in the residents' rooms by staff members will be prohibited (unless resident and/or responsible party has given us permission to do so AND it has been added to the resident's care plan) .A record review of Resident #8's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #8 on 2/7/24 with diagnoses including Encounter for Attention to Gastrostomy.A record review of the Order Summary Report with active orders as of 2/10/26 revealed Resident #8 had physician orders for . All Oral Meds to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from physical restraints by failing to identify and document the use of a lap belt as a restraint for one (1) of eighteen (18) sampled residents. Resident #55.Findings include:A review of the facility's Restraint Policy, undated, revealed, .Physical restraints are defined as any manual method or physical mechanical device, material, or equipment attached.to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body.On 2/9/26 at 3:55 PM, during an observation, Resident #55 was observed with a soft belt secured across her lap while up in a wheelchair.On 2/10/26 at 11:46 AM, during an observation, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 asked Resident #55 three (3) times to remove the belt. Resident #55 stared at the nurse and did not respond to the request.On 2/11/26 at 11:32 AM, during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported the facility failed to identify the resident's lap…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and state board of nursing information review the facility failed to follow professional standards by permitting an unlicensed Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) to apply a medicated product, zinc oxide, during incontinent care for one (1) of three (3) residents observed for care. Resident #10.Findings include:A review of the Mississippi Board of Nursing website (www.msbn.ms.gov) revealed, Can a RN (Registered Nurse) delegate the administration of medicated ointments, lotions, and protective skin barriers to unlicensed personnel? .The registered nurse may .2. Assign duties of administration of patient medications to other licensed nurses only.On 2/11/26 at 12:35 PM, during an observation, CNA #2 provided catheter and incontinent care to Resident #10 and applied zinc oxide to the perineal folds.A record review of the Order Summary Report for Resident #10 revealed a Physician's Order, dated 2/2/26, for Zinc Oxide skin protection.CNA may apply per nurses' direction for skin protection only.On 2/11/26 at 12:45 PM, during an interview, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to act upon a pharmacist-identified medication irregularity related to crushing an extended-release medication for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for medication administration. Resident #8.Findings include:A review of the facility's Pharmacy Consultant Policy, undated, revealed, . It is the policy of this facility that a licensed pharmacist will provide consultation . A monthly report of any irregularities found is made to the resident's physician (placed on the medical record) The Director of Nursing (DON) . Action taken based on the report will be documented . A file of monthly reports will be maintained by the Director of Nursing .A record review of the Pharmacy Recommendations for Nursing for Resident #8, dated 11/12/25 revealed, . Medication Administration Alert: Crushing of Meds. This resident's record indicates that their meds are (or can be) crushed. The following meds SHOULD NOT be crushed, (change to another form of therapy): . Toprol XL (metoprolol succinate ER) -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff demonstrated competency in sanitation procedures for the three-compartment sink for one (1) of three (3) kitchen observations.Findings include:A review of the facility's Manual Warewashing Policy, dated 10/17 revealed, .Food service pots and pans that cannot fit in the dish machine or cleaned and sanitized in a three-compartment sink.Procedure.5) Third Compartment Sink a) Fill the third sink with water and sanitizer to the correct concentration. Hot water can be used as an alternative. B) Immerse items in the third sink in hot water or chemical sanitizing solution. I)If hot water immersion is used, the water must be a minimum of 171 F and items must be immersed for 30 seconds. Ii) If chemical sanitizing is used, the sanitizer must be mixed to the proper concentration. Follow manufacturers' recommendations. The following are published guidelines. (1) Chlorine-Immerse for 7 seconds in water temperature 100 degrees F (Fahrenheit) (2) Iodine-Immerse for 30 seconds in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) requirements by not wearing required personal protective equipment (PPE), specifically a gown, during percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube care for one (1) of five (5) residents observed for care. Resident #8.Findings include:A review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy, dated 4/30/25, revealed, .Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread of multidrug resistant organisms to residents .Policy Interpretation and Implementation EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply.Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring the use of gowns and gloves for EBPs include.device care or use.feeding tube.Communication -Staff are trained prior to caring for residents on EBP and annually with PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) in-service.An orange sign will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to safely store and lock hazardous cleaning chemicals in one (1) of four (4) shower rooms observed during the annual survey. Findings Include: A review of the facility policy titled Hazardous Materials/Chemicals and Waste-Storage, revised on 11/7/23, revealed, Purpose: To provide a policy whereby hazardous materials/chemicals and waste can be stored in a safe manner to prevent injury to patients, personnel, or visitors. Policy: It is the policy of this facility that all hazardous materials are received into the department by appropriate personnel and stored in a supply closet suitable for chemicals . Storage areas are kept locked and secured from the public at all times to prevent injury to patients, personnel, or visitors . Hazardous waste storage and processing areas will be free of clutter and effectively separated from patient care . All Hazardous Waste is to be kept in a locked and secure area inaccessible to the general public . An observation of the south shower room on 8/26/24 at 10:30 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitation procedures were utilized during dishwashing, as evidenced by, the minimum water temperature of the low-temperature dishwasher machine was not reached during two dishwasher observations for two (2) of four (4) dietary tours. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled Machine Warewashing, revised on 09/12/11, revealed, Chemical Sanitizing Machines use a low temperature to clean and sanitize. Follow the dishwasher manufacturer's guidelines. Suggested temperature = 120 degrees. If the dish machine cannot be used, dishes should be washed according to the procedures for washing pots and pans in the three-compartment sink. During an observation on 08/28/24 at 12:01 PM, Dietary [NAME] #2 demonstrated how the low-temperature dishwasher worked. It was noted that the chemical sanitizer was within the recommended manufacturer's guidelines, however, the thermometer of the machine only measured 60 degrees Fahrenheit (F). At that time, the Dietary Supervisor ran the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident rights were honored by prohibiting residents from group activities and restricting resident use of common areas of the facility without clinical justification for three (3) of 18 sampled residents, with the potential to affect 62 residents. Residents # 3, #4, and #45 Findings include: Record review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights Policy, updated 9/5/15, revealed, It is the policy of this facility that resident rights will be addressed as follows: .Exercise rights .Each resident will be able to exercise his/her rights as follows: As a resident in this facility . 2. To voice grievances to: .State Department of Health . Resident #3 On 1/08/23 at 11:25 AM, during an observation and interview with Resident #3, he was dressed and sitting in his room with the door open. Resident #3 revealed that because his unit of the facility has COVID-19 positive residents, the facility has prohibited the COVID-19 negative residents from having group activities by restricting the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement its protocol for antibiotic use and thereby failed to prevent the unnecessary and inappropriate antibiotic use for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident #78. Findings Include: Review of the facility's, Antibiotic Stewardship Policy revised 9/9/22, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to observe the practice of Antibiotic Stewardship to monitor antibiotic use in the care and treatment of our residents. It is our goal to promote appropriate selection and use of antibiotics . Monitoring for accountability of provider and staff for following acceptable criteria (McGreer criteria) for initiation and continued treatment with an antibiotic . As part of the Antibiotic Stewardship Program, all clinical infections treated with antibiotics will undergo review by the infection preventionist (IP) . Review of the facility's, ESBL (Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases) or VRE (Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci) in Urine Protocol, updated 3/28/22, revealed, In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BRADSHAW, MICHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 06/09/2026

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$120K
Related-party expense1% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 12%Other / private 10%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $120K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$305per resident / day
operating cost
$9,271per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$329per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Mississippi Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Mississippi
$9,581/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,885/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,369/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 255316. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next