Ms Care Center Of Alcorn County, INC-SNF

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 296 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 27.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 107 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 87.0 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.551 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.92 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record reviews, facility policy reviews, and the facility's investigation, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident #1, who was identified as a wandering risk, from exiting the facility unnoticed and unsupervised for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed. Resident #1. The facility failed to provide supervision to prevent an elopement for Resident #1, who was a wandering risk. The resident left the facility unnoticed and unsupervised on 3/4/25 at 5:09 AM and was discovered asleep in the back seat of someone's car at their place of residency which was approximately eight (8) miles from the facility on 3/4/25 at approximately 9:30 AM after the resident rode home with them from their place of employment. During the investigation, the State Agency (SA) identified an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) which began on 3/4/25 and existed at 42 CFR: 483.25 (d)(1)(2)- Free of Accidents Hazards/Supervision/Devices (F689) - Scope and Severity J. This situation placed Resident #1 and other residents at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2026-04-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident and staff interviews, observation, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were maintained to prevent the recurrence of a pressure injury for one (1) of 18 sampled residents. Resident #3Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Pressure Injury Prevention Guidelines undated, revealed, Inspect skin while providing care .Pressure Relieving Devices: 6. Provide alternative support surfaces as needed. Considerations for utilizing specialized support surfaces: a. Medical condition and weight .e. Stage 3, 4, unstageable, or deep tissue injury on trunk .Record review of the Wound Care Note dated 2/4/26, by the Wound Care Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP), revealed Resident #3 had a Stage 4 pressure injury to the sacrum that was documented as a status of healed.Record review of the Wound Care Note dated 3/25/26, by the Wound Care FNP, revealed .being seen for evaluation of a re-opened Stage 4 sacral wound Record review of the Order Summary Report revealed a Physician Order dated 3/23/26 for Sacrum, Cleanse with wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse and neglect as required for one (1) of 20 residents reviewed. Resident A. Cross Reference F609, F656, F697 Findings Include: Review of facility policy Freedom from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation revised October 2022 revealed Policy Statement: All residents of this facility have the right to be free from neglect .Residents must not be subject to abuse by anyone .Practices of omitting part of resident care or neglecting resident and misappropriation of property is to be considered as leading to abuse and should be investigated and treated as abuse. A record review of the Grievance/Complaint Report documented by Social Services on 10/22/24 revealed that Resident A reported that staff was rude to him and refused to give him his medications, stating it was bad for him and that he did not need it. He further reported that staff threw his call light on the floor, refused to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-01-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews the facility failed to identify and report an allegation of abuse and neglect to the proper authorities within prescribed timeframes as required for one (1) of 20 residents reviewed. Resident A. Cross reference F600, F656, F697 Findings Included: Review of facility policy Freedom from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation revised October 2022 revealed Policy Statement: Practices of omitting part of resident care or neglecting resident and misappropriation of property is to be considered as leading to abuse and should be investigated and treated as abuse .5. The facility will ensure that all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or abuse .are reported immediately to the supervisor, and the administrator of the facility, or other officials, such as the State Board of Health and the Office of the Attorney General . A review of the Record of Complaint documented by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/21/24 indicated that Resident A's responsible party (RP) stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement pain management care plan interventions and failed to develop a care plan with individualized interventions to include triggers for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for two (2) of 20 sampled resident care plans reviewed. Resident A and Resident #64. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy Pain Management revealed, Policy: The facility will ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. A record review of Resident A's Care Plan revealed, Focus: Risk for altered comfort related to benign hypertrophy of the prostate (BHP) and pain related to fractures, with interventions including: .Administer pain medication as needed . A record review of the Grievance/Complaint Report documented by Social Services/Grievance Official on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-01-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received pain medication as ordered by the physician for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for pain management. Resident A. Cross reference F600, F656, F609 Findings include: Record review of the facility policy Pain Management dated September 2022 revealed, Policy: The facility will ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. A record review of the admission Record revealed that Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Left-sided Maxillary Fracture, Left-sided Fracture of the Medial Orbital Wall, Multiple Left-sided Rib fractures, other Physical Fracture of the Lower End of the Radius, and Unspecified Pain. Resident A was discharged home on [DATE]. A record review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-01 · tag F0552 — widespread
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent from the resident or resident representative prior to initiating psychotropic medications for five (5) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident #4, Resident #6, Resident #10, Resident #12 and Resident #92 Findings Include: Record review revealed that the facility did not have a policy and provided a statement on letterhead signed by the Administrator dated 03/31/26 (Proper name of the facility) does not currently have a Psychotropic Consent Policy. Resident #4 Record review of the Order Summary Report revealed a physician's order dated 2/13/2026 for Zyprexa oral tablet 5 milligrams (mg) give 5 mg by mouth at bedtime for schizoaffective disorder. Record review revealed a lack of consent forms for psychotropic medications were signed prior to initiation. Record review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a medical diagnosis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to label and store food properly for one (1) of two (2) kitchen tours. Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Storage of Refrigerated Food revised 11/23, revealed, .All opened foods are labeled with common name of food and date stored and/or use-by date.During the initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 3/30/26 at 9:12 AM several observations were made regarding food storage practices. In reach-in cooler number one (1), several items, including sliced tomatoes, sliced cheese in a clear container, a five (5) gallon container of pasta salad, a one gallon container of sweet and sour sauce, a four (4) pound (lb.) uncovered container of sweet cornbread, 12 boiled eggs, one gallon of liquid seasoning sauce, one gallon of sweet pickle relish, one gallon of BBQ sauce, one gallon of jalapeno peppers, and one gallon of apple cider vinegar were present without dates indicating when they were opened or when they expired. In reach-in cooler number two (2), several items, including 46-ounce…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-01 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain effective pest control management by preventing pests from entering the food and nutrition service department for one (1) of two (2) kitchen tours. Findings included:Review of facility policy titled Pest Control revised 8/17, revealed, Policy: In order to maintain a safe and sanitary environment, a pest management program is used to prevent pests from entering the food and nutrition service department and to implement measures to eliminate any pest infestations.During the initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 3/30/26 at 9:12 AM, multiple flies were observed randomly flying around in the kitchen prep and cook area and a cockroach was noted crawling on the floor in the dietary manager's office. During an interview on 3/30/26 at 9:12 AM, the Dietary Manager confirmed that the presence of pests (flies and roaches) was unsanitary and they should not be present in food prep or food storage areas.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to dignity was maintained by not providing privacy for a urinary catheter drainage bag for one (1) of six (6) residents with an indwelling catheter. Resident #3.Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Dignity and Respect, undated, revealed, Each resident at the facility has the right to a dignified existence . During an observation on 3/30/26 at 9:50 AM, Resident #3 was noted to have a urinary catheter drainage bag containing approximately 100 cubic centimeters (cc) of yellow urine hanging on the lower left side of the bed. The drainage bag was not placed in a privacy bag and was clearly visible to anyone entering the room. During an observation and interview on 3/30/26 at 9:56 AM, the Quality Assurance (QA) Nurse responded to the resident's call light and confirmed the urinary catheter drainage bag was not placed in a privacy bag. The QA Nurse acknowledged that the exposure of the drainage bag constituted a dignity concern for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident privacy during wound care when privacy measures were not implemented for one (1) of four (4) care opportunities observed. Resident #90 Findings Include:Record review of the facility policy titled Dignity and Respect undated revealed under, .5. Residents will be examined and treated in a manner that maintains bodily privacy. A closed door and/or drawn cubicle curtain should be utilized to maximize the privacy of each resident while rendering care .Record review of Resident #90's Treatment Administration Record revealed an order dated 3/17/26, Left heel, cleanse with wound cleanser, apply collagen to wound bed, cover with bordered foam dressing every day shift for stage 3 pressure injury. During an observation of Resident #90's wound care on 3/31/26 at 2:58 PM with the Wound Nurse, she performed wound care to the resident's left heel and pulled the resident's brief down to assess the skin on the resident's buttocks without shutting the window blind for privacy. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received an ordered supplement to prevent weight loss for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for nutrition. Resident #8. Findings Include: Record review of facility policy titled Weight Policy with no date, revealed, The facility shall evaluate a resident with significant weight changes to identify clinical conditions and risk factors that place the resident at risk for unintended weight change and initiate interventions if needed . A dining observation of Resident #8 on 3/30/2026 at 11:30 AM revealed no nutritional supplement that was ordered was present on the lunch meal tray. The meal included barbecue chicken, sweet peas, potato salad, garlic bread, peach cobbler, and four (4) ounces (oz) of apple juice. Record review revealed a diet order of Controlled Carb Diet (CCD), No Added Salt (NAS), and Super Pudding to lunch and supper meals. An interview with Quality Assurance (QA) nurse on 3/30/2026 at 11:32 AM revealed that the super pudding was on back…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered settings and proper oxygen integration for a Trilogy ventilator for one (1) of two (2) resident reviewed for respiratory care. Resident #100Findings Include:The facility provided a statement on letterhead that read, (Proper name of the facility) does not currently have a policy in place to obtain Physician Orders regarding Trilogy settings.On 3/30/2026 at 9:59 AM, during an observation of Resident #100, he was observed lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated and extremely short of breath (SOB) with rapid respirations. Oxygen was in place at three (3) liters by nasal cannula. A Trilogy ventilator was observed sitting on the table beside the bed without an oxygen enrichment line connected to the device.On 3/31/26 at 8:02 AM, an observation revealed Resident #100's Trilogy machine did not have an oxygen enrichment line attached to the device.Record review of Resident #100's Order Summary report revealed an order dated 3/20/26, Apply Trilogy Q (every)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure insulins were properly stored in accordance with manufacturer's guidelines to maintain safety and effectiveness for one (1) of two (2) medication carts observed. 300 hall Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Insulin Pen, with no date, revealed, .Insulin pens should be disposed of after 28 days.An observation of the 300 hall medication cart on 3/31/26 at 10:50 AM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, revealed the following insulins were in use and were not dated when opened:Resident #2 - Lantus SoloStar that was undated. Resident #4 - Basagalar KwikPen and Tresiva FlexTouch that was undated.Record review of the Insulin 28 Day Expiration Date Calculator with no date revealed, .Discard multi-dose vials 28 days after initially opening.Record review of In-Service: Medication Pass - Tips for Success with no date revealed, .Insulin.Ensure that insulin vials are dated when opened.An interview with LPN #1 on 3/31/26 at 10:52 AM revealed that all insulins, vials…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to prevent the spread of infection. This was evidenced by failure to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during high-risk care and failure to maintain urinary catheter equipment in a manner to prevent contamination for three (3) of 18 sampled residents. (Resident #2, #13, and #77).Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 4/1/2024, revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for preventing transmission of novel or targeted multidrug-resistant organisms .Enhanced barrier precautions refer to the use of gown and gloves for certain residents during specific high-contact resident care activities .An order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with any of the following: .feeding tube .High-contact resident care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident representative (RR) interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the resident representative of a significant change in physical condition and that the resident was being sent to the hospital for one of three residents reviewed. Resident #1. Findings Include: Review of the undated facility policy Required Notices revealed under Notification of changes: Facility will immediately inform the resident; consult with resident's physician; notify, consistent with their authority, the resident representative when: .b. The resident has a significant change in their physical, mental, or psychosocial status in either life threatening conditions or clinical complications d. A decision to transfer or discharge the resident from the facility . A phone interview on 03/17/25 at 9:06 AM with Resident #1's RR revealed that she was upset about a recent situation that occurred at the facility. RR revealed that she gone into the facility on [DATE], walked into…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$25,376 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $14,508 — penalty dated 2025-03-06
• $5,434 — penalty dated 2025-01-30
• $5,434 — penalty dated 2025-01-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MISSISSIPPI CARE CENTER — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS