Memorial Woodland Village Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 99.8 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.41 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 100% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy and confidentiality by posting personal health information on the resident's wall for one (1) of twenty-three (23) sampled residents, Resident #82. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, dated 2/10/25, revealed, .It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality . Compliance Guidelines .11 .No signage shall be posted in the room with personal information . On 6/23/25 at 8:48 AM, during an observation, signage was observed posted on the wall above the bed for Resident #82 which indicated 205 A- Nectar thick liquids with no straws. On 6/24/25 at 11:45 AM, during an observation and interview while Resident #82 was assisted with lunch, Certified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment related to a resident having a restraint, when no restraint had been ordered or used, for one (1) of twenty-three (23) residents reviewed. Resident #99. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Conducting an Accurate Resident Assessment, dated 2/10/25, revealed, . The purpose of this policy is to assure that all residents receive an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment . A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #99 on 6/14/24 with diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia. A record review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/21/25 revealed Resident #99 had a limb restraint. A record review of the medical record revealed there was no documentation indicating Resident #99 had a limb restraint. On 6/23/25 at 7:34 AM, during an observation and interview, Resident #99 was lying in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to acknowledge and honor the documented food preferences of one (1) of twenty-three (23) sampled residents, Resident #88. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Meal Service, revised 1/2025, revealed, .Residents will be offered menu choices for all meals, beverages, and snacks, and are based on their .food preferences . A record review of the Clinical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #88 on 7/5/23 with diagnoses that included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis. A record review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/22/25 revealed Resident #88 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated his cognition was intact. A record review of the meal ticket, dated 6/23/25, revealed Resident #88 had Food Dislikes listing of multiple vegetables including broccoli, carrots, and cauliflower. A record review of the facility's MenuWorks Weekly Menu revealed the meal for Monday (06/23/2025) included California Vegetables.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow safe food storage and handling practices on one (1) of four (4) survey days. Specifically, the facility failed to properly store, label, and date frozen food items that were opened, discard expired bakery rolls and refrigerate lemon juice in accordance with manufacturer instructions. Findings included: A record review of the facility's policy titled, Food and Supply Storage dated 01/2025, revealed, .All food .used in food preparation shall be stored in such a manner as to prevent contamination .Procedures .Foods past the use by, sell by, best-by or enjoy by date should be discarded. Cover, label and date unused portions and open packages .Frozen Storage .Label both the bind and the lid. Use food grade plastic bags for food storage .Wrap food tightly to prevent cross contamination . On 6/23/25 at 8:23 AM, during an observation and interview with the Dietary Manager, there was one (1) tray of [NAME] Artesano Bakery Sausage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to sustain corrective actions to prevent recurrence of previously cited deficiencies, specifically, the facility was cited for failing to properly store, label, and date food items and discard expired food on an annual recertification survey on 2/29/24 and was cited again for the same deficiencies during the current survey, demonstrating that QAPI failed to sustain ongoing monitoring and oversight to prevent recurrence for one (1) of seven (7) deficiencies cited. F812. Findings Include: Record review of the facility's policy, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement, dated 2/1/2025, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to .maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .2. The QAA Committee shall .c. Develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices when a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) placed soiled linens on the floor of a resident's room after incontinent care for one (1) of twenty-three (23) sampled residents, Resident #97. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 2/1/25, revealed, . This facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .12. A. Linens and direct care staff shall handle, store, process, and transport linens to prevent spread of infection . e. Soiled linen shall be collected at the bedside and placed in a linen bag . When the task is complete, the bag shall be closed securely and placed in the soiled utility room . A record review of Resident #97's admission Record revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program related to ants for one (1) of twenty-three (23) sampled residents, Resident #49. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled .Pest Control Program, dated 2/1/25, revealed: .It is the policy of this facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests and rodents. Definition: 'Effective pest control program' is defined as measures to eradicate and contain common household pests (e.g .ants .) . A record review of the Transfer/Discharge Report revealed the admitted Resident #49 on 8/5/21 and he had diagnoses including Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia. A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/25/25, revealed Resident #49 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. On 6/24/25 at 10:44 AM, during an interview, Resident #49 stated that his room had ants and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-29 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and review of resident council monthly meeting minutes, the facility failed to resolve grievances regarding food complaints for five (5) of eight (8) months reviewed. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council minutes revealed the residents complained about the food during their meetings in October 2023, November 2023, December 2023, January 2024, and February 2024. A record review of a written letter, dated 2/5/24, from the Resident Council President revealed the resident council had concerns regarding the food. During an interview on 02/26/24 at 10:32 AM, with the Ombudsmen stated the residents invited him to their last resident council meeting. The Ombudsmen stated the residents complained about the food being cold and not tasting good. The Dietary Manager (DM) attended that meeting. During an interview on 2/29/24 at 1:00 PM, with the Activities Director (AD), she confirmed that she recorded the minutes at the Resident Council meetings and the residents complained every month for the last five (5) months about the food. The AD explained…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-29 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and the facility policy review the facility failed to offer residents in the facility a bedtime snack for (3) of 23 sampled residents. (Resident #94, Resident #95, and Resident #107). Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, Offering/Serving Bedtime Snacks, revised 4/20/23, revealed, .It is the practice of this facility to offer and serve residents with a nourishing snack in accordance with their needs, preferences and requests at bedtime on a daily basis .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .1. The nursing staff offers bedtime snacks to all residents . Resident #94 On 02/27/24 at 01:30 PM, in an interview with Resident #94, she explained she has not noticed the staff offering snacks to residents in the facility, or taking bedtime snacks to residents who are unable to leave their room. She said that if she asked for a snack, the staff would provide it. A record review of the Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #94 on 12/21/22 and she had current diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. A record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement care plan approaches related to an indwelling catheter care for one (1) of 23 sampled residents. Resident #70 Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised December 2022 revealed . A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The Interdisciplinary Team .implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident . 7. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will: . b. Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . Record review of the Care Plan with a problem onset date of 9/15/2025 revealed Problem/Need .high risk for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) r/t (related to) presence of indwelling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $157K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS