Greenbriar Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 166 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 88.7 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan requiring two (2) staff to assist with bed mobility, when staff provided care without the required assistance, resulting in the resident falling from the bed and sustaining a proximal humeral fracture (a break in the upper arm bone near the shoulder) for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) .Findings include:A record review of the Care Plan Report revealed Resident #1 had a focus of an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit with interventions initiated on 7/14/25 that included, BED MOBILITY: The resident requires x (times) 2 staff to turn and reposition in bed.A record review of the facility's investigation revealed that on 2/11/26 at 10:05 PM, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #1 was providing in-bed care to Resident #1, including a linen and brief change. During care, the resident rolled to assist and subsequently rolled too far, exiting the bed and landing on the floor.A record review of the Incident Witness Statement, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2026-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from accident hazards during bed mobility when a Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) performed a linen and brief change without the required two (2) person assistance, in which Resident #1 fell from the bed and sustained a proximal humeral fracture (a break in the upper arm bone near the shoulder) for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for accidents.Findings include:A record review of the facility's investigation, undated, revealed that on 2/11/2026, at approximately 10:05 PM, CNA #1 was providing in-bed care to Resident #1, including a linen and brief change. During care, Resident #1 rolled to assist. She subsequently rolled too far and exited the bed, landing on the floor. A record review of the Incident Witness Statement, dated 2/11/26 and signed by CNA #1 revealed a Narrative if incident if witnessed which indicated the CNA was changing the resident and went to pull the sheet from under her and the resident rolled and fell. The CNA documented, .the brief was already on her, and I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise care plans to accurately reflect residents' infection control status for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for infection control. Resident #1 and Resident #3Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change, dated November 2024, revealed, .to provide a consistent process for reviewing and revising the care plan. Policy Guidelines.1. care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary. 2. Procedure for.revising the care plan.d.care plan will be updated with the new or modified interventions. f.Care plans will be modified as needed. h.to ensure care plans have been updated to reflect current resident needs.Resident #1A record review of Resident #1's Care Plan Detail revealed an individual care plan with focus Resident has active diagnosis ESBL (Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase) UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) dated 4/26/26. The goal revealed Resident's symptoms will be managed and ESBL will be resolved. The Interventions/Tasks revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment as evidenced by adequate clean linens and washcloths were unavailable for resident care for one (1) of two (2) survey days.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights, revised February 2023, revealed, .The resident has the right to a dignified existence.8. Safe environment. The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including.treatment and supports for daily living safely .On 2/9/26 at 10:50 AM, during an observation and interview with the facility owner, linen closets, supply closets, and nurses' station supply rooms were observed. The linen closet on Beach Avenue Hall was observed to contain no towels, washcloths, fitted sheets, blankets, or bed linen pads. Only one item was observed in the linen closet. The owner reported the closets would be filled once laundry staff made rounds.On 2/9/26 at 12:21 PM, during an interview, Certified Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure perineal care was provided in a manner to prevent the possible spread of infection when a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) failed to perform hand hygiene during care for one (1) of four (4) residents observed for care, Resident #22. Findings included: A review of the facility's Hand Hygiene Policy, dated 8/23, revealed, .The facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection .Policy Guidelines .6. Additional considerations: a. The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves and immediately after removing gloves . On 6/12/25 at 10:34 AM, during an observation of perineal care provided by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #2, she began to assist Resident #22 and then stated, I need some help. She removed her gloves and exited the room without performing hand hygiene. She returned, did not perform…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain privacy during the provision of perineal care for one (1) of four (4) residents observed for care, Resident #22. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights, dated 2/2023, revealed, The resident has the right to a dignified existence .7. Privacy and confidentiality. The resident has a right to personal privacy . On 6/12/25 at 10:34 AM, during an observation of perineal care provided by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #2, the CNA left the resident exposed while she exited the room to get assistance. Resident #22 remained exposed and was pulling at her shirt in an attempt to cover her private area. CNA #2 returned with CNA #1, then later left the room again to retrieve additional towels, once again leaving Resident #22 exposed. The resident continued to pull her shirt down while waiting. On 6/12/25 at 10:59 AM, during an interview with lead CNA #1, she confirmed Resident #22 was left exposed and stated it was a dignity issue. She noted that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the protection of privacy and confidentiality of resident care information when clinical instructions were posted in public view without safeguards for one (1) of eighteen (18) sampled residents, Resident #78. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy Resident Rights, dated 02/2023, revealed, .7. Privacy and confidentiality. The resident has the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her . medical records .a. Personal privacy includes .medical treatment .b. The resident has a right to secure and confidential personal and medical records . On 6/10/25 at 12:32 PM, during an observation, a sign indicating NPO (Nothing by Mouth) was observed posted on the outside of Resident #78's door, in plain view from the hallway. On 6/12/25 at 8:45 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated the signage was posted so staff would know the resident was not to be given anything by mouth. She also stated she was unsure if the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to sustain corrective actions to prevent recurrence of a previously cited deficiency, specifically, the facility was cited for failing to provide Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) care in a manner to prevent the possible spread of infection during an annual recertification survey on 2/8/24 and was cited again for the same deficiency during the current survey, demonstrating that QAPI failed to sustain ongoing monitoring and oversight to prevent recurrence for one (1) of four deficiencies cited. F880. Findings include: Record review of the facility's QAPI Change Process Policy (undated) revealed, .The facility has established and utilized a systematic approach to performance improvement activities to ensure changes are effective and improvements are sustained or modified as needed . Record review of the Provider History Profile revealed the facility received a citation for F880-Infection Control. Record review of the CMS-2567…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse within two (2) hours, as required, when Resident #1 verbalized she was sexually abused for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents. Findings included: A review of the facility's, Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation Policy, revised in August 2023, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment .immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations with prescribed timeframes . Procedure for Response and Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation . Any owner, operator, employee, manager, agent, or contractor of the facility can report an allegation of abuse/neglect/exploitation to the abuse agency hotline . A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 09/13/2024 with diagnoses including Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide peg tube care (Resident #29) and catheter care (Resident #61) in a manner to prevent the possible spread of infection for two (2) of five (5) resident care observations. Findings Include: Review of the facility's Gastrostomy Site Care Policy, dated 10/23, revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to perform gastrostomy site care as ordered. Policy Guidelines .14. Using soap and water/wound cleanser gently clean the area around the tube and continue in an outward circular fashion, ensuring that under the bolster is cleaned . Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene Policy, dated 8/23, revealed, Policy: This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to .residents .Policy Guidelines .6. Additional considerations: 1. The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable room temperature levels of 71 degrees to 81 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for two (2) of 18 sampled residents. Resident #13 and Resident #9 Findings include: A review of the facility's Safe and Homelike Environment Policy dated Apr (April) 23 revealed Policy: In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment . Policy Guidelines: 7. The facility will maintain comfortable and safe temperature levels . Resident #13 On 02/05/24 at 12:53 PM, during an observation and interview with Resident #13, the resident complained the room temperature was too cold for him. He stated had had complained to all the staff about the room temperature, but nothing had been done. There was no unit or thermostat in the room for the resident to be able to adjust the temperature. On 02/08/24 at 9:52 AM, during a phone interview with Resident #13's wife, she explained the resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) related to restraints for two (2) of 18 sampled residents. Resident #30 and Resident #36 Findings Include: A review of the facility's MDS 3.0 Completion Policy, dated October 2023, revealed, Policy Statement: Residents are assessed, using a comprehensive assessment process, in order to identify care needs and to develop an interdisciplinary care plan .Policy Guidelines .4. Care Plan Team Responsibility for Completion go MDS Sections .a. ii. Persons completing .the assessment must attest to the accuracy of the section they completed . Resident #30 During an observation on 2/5/24 at 1:35 PM, Resident #30 was observed to have one full length bedrail on one side of the bed and 1/4 (quarter) length side rail on the other. He stated that he requested the long bedrail to be up at night, and he kept it down during the day to make it easier to get out of the bed. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #30…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $165K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS