The Meadows

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 466 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 214 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 125.1 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-11-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident during a mechanical lift transfer and a resident sustained a forehead laceration requiring sutures for one (1) of four (4) residents sampled. Resident #1Findings include:Record review of facility policy titled, Total Lift Policy with revision date of 2/2/17 revealed, It is the policy of the facility that a total lift will be utilized as follows: by a licensed nurse or CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) . It requires two employees when lift is used .A phone interview with CNA #1 on 11/3/25 at 10:40 AM, revealed she was the CNA caring for Resident #1 when the lift incident occurred. She admitted that she transferred the resident without assistance and did not position the lift legs properly which caused the lift to tilt and the bar hit the resident on the forehead. She revealed I tried to do it by myself, and it didn't go well. She acknowledged that some of the staff were in an in-service, but there were others available to assist, but she did not ask…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possible contamination of ice, as evidenced by a buildup of a black substance on the inside door and the interior ledge of the ice machine that was used for all residents for one (1) of three (3) kitchen tours.Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Ice Machine Cleaning Policy with an effective date of 5/3/2021 revealed, .The kitchen staff will be responsible for weekly cleanings of ice machines in the kitchen .During the initial kitchen tour on 6/1/2026 at 10:24 AM, observation of the ice machine revealed two areas of black substance, each approximately two to three inches in diameter, on the underside of the ice maker lid. Black substance was also observed along the interior ledge of the ice machine. The interior ledge was covered with small, circular spots of the black substance that extended across the entire ledge surface.During an interview on 6/1/2026 at 10:25 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed the presence of the black substance observed on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-04 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist implemented and monitored the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program by failing to conduct infection surveillance, track and trend infections, analyze infection data and identify infection control concerns. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 118 residents residing in the facility.Findings Include:Record review of the facility policy titled Compliant Infection Preventionist (IP) Job Description revealed under, Position Summary: The Infection Preventionist (IP) is responsible for the development, implementation, oversight, and evaluation of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP). The IP works collaboratively with nursing, medical staff, department managers, residents, families, and community agencies to prevent, identify, investigate, monitor, and control infections and communicable diseases throughout the facility .Record review of the facility's Urinary Tracking Infection Logs from February…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program, failed to ensure urinary tract infections (UTIs) were reviewed using established infection criteria before antibiotic treatment, failed to track and trend infection data, and failed to identify and implement interventions to reduce infections for numerous UTI episodes identified on the facility's infection tracking logs from February 2026 through April 2026.This was for three (3) of four (4) months reviewed.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Policy revealed, It is the policy of this facility to minimize inappropriate and unnecessary antibiotic use and improve patient outcomes. This facility will follow the antibiotic stewardship program. Review of the facility's Urinary Tracking Infection Logs from February 2026 through April 2026 identified 54 UTI episodes, excluding residents admitted with infections and duplicate entries for the same active infection. Multiple residents experienced recurrent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plans were implemented for two (2) of 25 residents sampled. Specifically, the facility failed to implement established ADL care plan interventions related to facial hair for Residents #59 and #67. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Total Care Plan Policy revised 5/19/2015, revealed, .Identify problems that affect the residents and his/her care needs .Identify the interventions related to the specific problems .Be maintained on the extent practicable . Resident #67 Review of Resident #67's ADL care plan dated 11/6/25, revealed, .Place personal hygiene items within reach and allow to perform per self. Assist to complete tasks as needed. On 6/1/2026 at 11:35 AM, an observation revealed Resident #67 had several long, curly facial hairs on her chin. On 6/3/2026 at 10:00 AM, during an interview Registered Nurse (RN) #2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide necessary Activities of Daily Living (ADL) services for two (2) of 25 sampled residents who were dependent on staff assistance to maintain their personal hygiene and grooming needs. Resident #59 and Resident #67. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Dressing and Grooming Policy revised 11/20/2017, revealed, It is the policy of this facility that dressing, and grooming will be done as follows: Grooming includes: .shaving, removal of facial hair . Resident #67 During an observation on 6/1/2026 at 11:35 AM, revealed Resident #67 had several long, curly facial hairs on her chin. During an observation an interview with Resident #67 on 6/3/2026 at 9:56 AM, revealed Resident #67 still had multiple long, curly chin hairs. She stated, while feeling her chin, I didn't know those were there. She verbalized she would like someone to shave those off. During an interview on 6/3/2026 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program by failing to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (Resident #91) and by failing to provide an appropriate biohazard (red barrel) container for a resident under transmission-based precautions. (Resident #118) for two (2) of 25 sampled residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Control-Contact Isolation/Transmission Based/Enhanced Barrier Policy with a revision date of August 2024 revealed, 2. Contact Isolation.Red/Yellow bagged barrels will be utilized . Record review of physician orders revealed Resident #118 had an order dated 6/2/2026 for contact isolation precautions related to ESBL (Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase) in urine every shift. An observation on 6/01/2026 at 2:53 PM revealed Resident #118 was on transmission-based precautions related to ESBL. A red bag/ biohazard barrel was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, and review of facility-provided documentation, the facility failed to notify the medical provider prior to administering a medication that required pulse rate monitoring for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for medication monitoring (Resident #1). This failure resulted in a medication being administered multiple times when the resident's pulse rate was below the facility-required threshold of sixty (60), without provider notification or guidance.Findings include:Review of a statement on facility letterhead provided by the Administrator revealed, All medications requiring pulse monitoring should be monitored before the medication is given by radial pulse for one full minute. If the pulse is below 60, contact the physician for guidance prior to giving the medication.Review of Resident #1's November 2025 medication record revealed a physician's order for Sotalol 120 mg tablet every twelve hours for atrial fibrillation. Continued review revealed the resident's pulse rate dropped below sixty on three occasions on 11/8/25 through 11/9/25. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to promote dignity by not ensuring the use of a privacy cover for the urinary catheter bag for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed with a catheter. (Resident #2) Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Catheter Placement Policy, with a revision date of August 14, 2017, revealed catheter bags should be placed inside a privacy bag. Review of the facility policy titled Dignity Policy, with a revision date of September 6, 2010, revealed care should be provided in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity with respect in full recognition of his or her individuality. On 5/27/25 at 9:40 AM, observation of Resident #2 revealed the resident lying in bed with a urinary catheter bag hanging at the bedside, uncovered and lacking a privacy cover. Record review of the physician orders revealed Resident #2 had an order for a suprapubic catheter. During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)# 1 at Resident 2's bedside on 5/28/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to involve a bed-bound resident for a scheduled care plan meeting for one (1) of 21 sampled residents. Resident #80 Findings Include: Review of the Care Plan Invitation Policy unrevised revealed, It is the policy of this facility that invitations to care plan conferences will be handled in the following manner: The resident and/or the responsible party will be invited to attend the care planning conference by one week prior to the scheduled date . A formal interdisciplinary care planning conference will be held weekly on Thursday. All members present are to provide input and sign the care plan verifying attendance . Review of the Resident Rights Policy with a revision date of 12/06/10 revealed under, Exercise Rights: Each resident will be able to exercise his/her rights as a resident in this facility and as a citizen of the United States. 11. To participate in his/her total care plan preparation and implementation . An observation and interview with Resident #80 on 5/27/25 at 10:06…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to allow a resident the opportunity to make important care-related decisions for one (1) of 21 sampled residents. Resident #87 Findings Include: Review of the Resident Rights Policy with a revision date of 9/06/10 revealed under, Exercise Rights: Each resident will be able to exercise his/her rights as a resident in this facility and as a citizen of the United States. An observation and interview with Resident #87 on 5/27/25 at 10:56 AM revealed she was sitting in her wheelchair in her room and stated that she did not sleep well last night and explained that they made her get up early this morning. She revealed, I told them I would rather not get up, and I wanted to sleep in. The resident stated that they made her get up anyway. An interview with Resident #87 on 5/28/25 at 9:50 AM revealed she was [AGE] years old, and depending on how she felt, she might not want to get up early every morning. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-11-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS