River Heights Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 67% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 58.2 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed follow the person centered care plan to use a full body lift as indicated, causing a dislocated shoulder for Resident #1. This was for one (1) of four (4) resident care plans reviewed. Findings Include Record review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive, Person Centered with no revision dated revealed Policy Statement: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident . Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan revealed a care plan dated 3/8/23 Alteration in ADLS (Activities of Daily Living) r/t (related to) generalized weakness, difficulty walking, impaired mobility secondary to Hx (history) CVA (Cerebral vascular accident) with left sided Hemiplegia, extensive assist x (times) 2 staff with bed mobility and transfer .Interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent an accident that resulted in an injury, as evidenced by a staff member using a lift the physician had not ordered for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed that required a lift. Resident #1 Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled, Modified Lifting Policy with no revision dated revealed .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .3. Staff will follow the documented lifting protocol deemed appropriate for each resident. This information is documented in the resident's chart and on the Resident Care Sheet. This information should be referred to prior to lifting/transferring or assisting each resident . An interview and observation on 4/17/24 at 9:10 AM, revealed Resident #1 lying in bed with a total lift sling underneath her. She revealed they now use a lift that lifts her up out of the bed and sits her in her wheelchair. She stated she hurt her shoulder a few weeks ago, but they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse when a registered nurse used profane, intimidating, and demeaning language toward two (2) of 10 residents reviewed for abuse. Resident #1 and Resident #4.Based on corrective actions taken by the facility on 6/3/26, the State Agency determined the deficiency to be Past Non-Compliance, and the facility was in compliance on 6/4/26 prior to survey entrance on 6/15/26. Findings included:Record review of facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revealed Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms .Resident #1Record review of facility investigation regarding an allegation of the verbal abuse of Resident #1 revealed on 5/31/2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity from a staff member for six (6) of eleven (11) residents who attended the Resident Council meeting on 5/5/26. Residents #2, #20, #19, #29, #18, #47.Findings include:A review of the facility policy, Resident Rights, revised October 2025, revealed, Policy Statement .Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity .A record review of the grievance logs for 2026 revealed no documented concerns related to staff conduct or resident dignity.A record review of the Resident Council meeting minutes for 2026 revealed no documented concerns related to staff conduct or resident dignity.During a Resident Council meeting on 5/5/26 at 2:00 PM, (11) residents were present, all with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of (15), indicating the residents were cognitively intact. All (11) residents identified Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 as often being rude during medication administration and general interactions. They…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination by restricting residents' right to freely congregate in the activity room during evening hours for three (3) of eleven (11) residents who attended the Resident Council meeting on 5/5/26. Residents #2, #20 and #40.Findings include:A review of the facility policy, Resident Rights, revised October 2025, revealed, Policy Statement .Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity .Policy Interpretation and Implementation. 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the residents right to .exercise their rights as a resident of this facility .f.be supported by the facility in exercising their rights.A record review of the grievance logs for 2026 revealed no concerns documented related to restrictions on resident congregation.A record review of the Resident Council meeting minutes for 2026 revealed no documented concerns related to restrictions on resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two (2) of (16) sampled residents reviewed (Resident #7 and Resident #9).Findings include:A record review of the facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered with a revision date of March 2022 revealed, A comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable, objective and timetables to meet the residents physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident.Resident #7A record review of Resident #7's Care Plan Report revealed an intervention to maintain Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) including washing hands, wearing a gown, wearing gloves, and other precautions when performing close contact care in the resident's room.During an observation on 5/6/26 at 9:20 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 was observed administering medication via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (peg) tube to Resident #7. Enhanced Barrier Precaution signage was posted on the door. LPN #1 did not put on a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to implement physician orders related to colostomy care and suprapubic catheter care for one (1) of (1) care observations. Resident #9Findings Include:A record review of the facility's policy Compliance Risks--Resident Quality of Care and Quality of Life revised January 2025, revealed Compliance with the Medicare and Medicaid Requirements of Participation for resident quality of care and resident quality of life is consistent with the goals of the overall compliance and ethics program .On 5/5/26 at 2:00 PM, during an interview, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 stated Resident #9 performs his own catheter care.On 5/5/26 at 3:27 PM, during an interview and observation with Resident #9 stated he performs his own catheter care and colostomy care. He stated the 11-7 nurse brings his colostomy bag to his room around 3:00-4:00 AM daily. He stated he applies three pairs of gloves and removes one pair after each step of care, uses a wet soap towel for catheter care, and wipes from the insertion…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for one (1) of (1) sampled residents reviewed for pain management. (Resident #1).Findings include: A policy review of the Pain Management and Assessment policy no date, reveals, Purpose . The purposes of this procedure are to help the staff identify pain in the resident, develop interventions consistent with the resident's goals and needs, and address the underlying causes of pain .General guidelines. 1. Pain management is a multidisciplinary process that includes the following .monitoring for the effectiveness of interventions; and modifying approaches as necessary .During an interview on 5/4/26 at 1:00 PM, Resident #1 stated he has been experiencing consistent pain at a level of 6 for the last couple of years and that his current pain medication regimen is not strong enough. He stated he has reported this to his medication nurse and to the Nurse Practitioner (NP), who told him it will get better eventually, but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0851 — pattern
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that complete and accurate direct care staffing information was electronically submitted to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) through the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system within the required timeframe for one (1) of four (4) quarters reviewed, FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 1 2026 (October 1-December 31).Findings Include:A review of the facility policy Reporting Direct Care Staffing Information (Payroll-Based Journal) with a revision date of August 2022 revealed, Direct care staffing information is reported electronically to CMS through the Payroll-Based Journal system. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Complete and accurate direct care staffing information is reported electronically through the PBJ system in a uniform format specified by CMS .10. Staffing information is collected daily and reported for each fiscal quarter no later than 45 days after the end of the reporting quarter. Dates are as follows: Quarter 1 Submission Deadline - February 14th.During an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) protocols during high-contact resident care activities for one (1) of (1) residents reviewed. (Resident #7)Findings include:A record review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions with a revision date of 12/2024 revealed Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) are utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO's) to residents .7. a. Gowns and gloves are applied prior to performing the high contact resident care activity (as opposed to before entering the room) .During an observation on 5/6/26 at 9:20 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 was observed administering medication via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube to Resident #7. EBP signage was posted on the door. LPN #1 entered the room but did not don (put on) a gown prior to administering medication via PEG tube, as required by the facility's EBP policy and the posted door signage.During an interview on 5/6/26 at 9:54 AM, LPN #1 confirmed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, facility policy review, and record review the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to sustain corrective action to prevent recurrence of previously cited deficiencies, specifically, the facility was cited for failing to ensure infection control standards were adhered to related to proper use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during care in June 2025 and was again cited for the same deficient practice on the current survey, demonstrating that QAPI failed to sustain ongoing monitoring and oversight to prevent recurrence for one (1) of eight (8) deficiencies cited. F880. Findings included:Record review of the facility policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program revealed Policy Statement: The facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents .Record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Form 2567 (Statement of Deficiencies) dated 6/5/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide dignity to a resident, as evidenced by leaving an indwelling urinary catheter bag and tubing uncovered for one (1) of three (3) residents with a catheter reviewed. Resident #55 Findings include: A review of the facility policy, Dignity with a revision date of February 2021, revealed .12. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist residents; for example: . a. helping the resident to keep urinary catheter bags covered . An observation on 06/03/25 at 7:49 AM, and again at 9:08 AM, revealed Resident #55 lying in his bed in his room. A urinary catheter bag containing 200 milliliters of yellow urine was hanging on his bed and visible from the hall, with no privacy bag in place. During an interview on 6/04/25 at 10:05 AM with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #4 and CNA #6, CNA #4 revealed that all urinary catheters are supposed to be kept inside a privacy bag, so the resident's urine is not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,800 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $8,800 — penalty dated 2024-04-17
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-16 for 12 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $362K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS