Riverview Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 73.2 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.25 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.42 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a person-centered care plan for monitoring side effects of medications, range of motion (ROM) and providing nail care for 11 of 24 resident care plans reviewed. Resident #4, #9, #10, #17, #18, #19, #39, #44, #51, #55 and #58. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Assessments and the Care Delivery Process with a revision date of 12/16 revealed under, Policy Statement: Comprehensive assessments will be conducted to assist in developing person-centered care plans. Resident # 4 Record review of Resident #4's care plan revealed under focus, Closed fracture of right tibia and fibula, date initiated 05/01/2024. Interventions included Xarelto 10 milligram tablet, monitor for side effects such as abdominal pain, back pain, itching, dizziness, muscle spasms, trouble sleeping, and anxiety. Date initiated 5/6/2024. In an interview on 11/05/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to monitor for side effects and obtain a stop date for a psychotropic medication for five (5) of 40 residents receiving psychotropic medications reviewed. Resident #10, #18, #44, #51 and #55 Findings include: A review of the policy titled, Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring, revised December 2016 revealed . Management: 10.) When medications are prescribed for behavioral symptoms, documentation will include a.) Rationale for use . h.) Monitoring for efficacy and adverse consequences . Resident #10 Record review of Resident #10's Order Summary Report with active orders as of 11/3/24 revealed an order dated 10/18/24 Buspirone HCI oral tablet 10 mg (milligrams) Give 2 tablets by mouth two times a day related to anxiety disorder. An additional order dated 10/7/24 revealed Venlafaxine HCI oral tablet 75 mg Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to anxiety disorder. The order summary revealed there was not an order to monitor for side effects of the multiple psychotropic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews and record reviews the facility failed to promote dignity as evidenced by a resident not being assisted with his meal immediately after nursing staff delivered the meal tray to his room for one (1) of eight (8) residents reviewed for dining. Resident #16 Findings Included: Record review of the facility policy titled, Residents' Rights with no revision date revealed Residents Rights Under Federal Law. The facility shall protect and promote the rights of each resident, including each of the following rights: 1. The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication with access to people and services inside and outside the facility . On 11/3/24 at 5:28 PM, during a continuous observation, Resident #16 was observed in bed as Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #8 delivered a meal tray to his room, placing it on the overbed table positioned against the wall and out of the resident's reach. The tray remained covered as CNA #8 exited the room without assisting Resident #16. She then delivered the meal tray to Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to make health care decisions for one (1) of 25 residents reviewed for advanced directives. Resident #58 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Advanced Directives with a revision date of 8/11 revealed under, Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Prior to or upon admission of a resident to our facility, the Social Services Director or designee will provide written information to the resident concerning his/her right to make decisions concerning medical care including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment, and the right to formulate advance directives. Record review of the Advanced Directive Form for Resident #58 revealed a family member signed the form dated 4/23/24, with no signature from the resident. An interview with Resident #58 on 11/4/24 at 1:20 PM, revealed when he admitted to the facility, he did not sign his advanced directives form and explained that no one had spoken to him regarding his code…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment, as evidenced by an over-bed table with exposed jagged edging (Resident #4) and a sagging mattress (Resident #58) for two (2) of 61 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Maintenance Service with a revision date of December 2009 revealed, Maintenance service shall be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment. J. Ensuring equipment is maintained in good, operational working order. Resident #4 An observation on 11/03/24 at 4:25 PM, revealed Resident #4 lying in bed with her overbed table pulled up to her. The overbed table edging was missing around the table, exposing chipped and jagged wood. An observation on 11/04/24 at 8:25 AM, revealed the overbed table remained in the same condition as the prior day. During an interview and observation on 11/04/24 at 1:30 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #4 confirmed that Resident #4's overbed table was tattered and torn and revealed she had not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints as evidenced by a resident with full side rails to both sides of the resident's bed for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for restraints. Resident #44. Findings Include: A review of the facility policy titled Residents' Rights with no revision date revealed The facility shall protect and promote the rights of each resident, including each of the following rights: . The resident has a right to be free from any physical restraints imposed or psychoactive drugs administered for the purpose of discipline or convenience and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. During an observation on 11/03/24 at 3:35 PM, Resident #44 was observed in bed with side rails extending the length of the bed on both sides. In an interview on 1/4/24 at 1:12 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 stated that she did not know why Resident #44 had full side rails on his bed. During an interview on 1/4/24 at 1:17 PM, with a Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) was coded accurately for one (1) of 22 sampled residents. Resident #19. Findings Included: Record review of the facility policy, titled Resident assessment Instrument revealed Policy Statement: A comprehensive assessment of a resident's needs shall be made within fourteen (14) days of the resident's admission. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .4. Information derived from comprehensive assessment helps the staff to plan care that allows the resident to reach his/her highest practicable level of functioning. 7. All persons who have completed any portion of the MDS Resident Assessment Form must sign such a document attesting to the accuracy of such information. Record review of Resident #19's Annual MDS with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/2/24, revealed in Section A 1500 coded as No, Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) process to have serious mental illness…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan timely and provide a summary of the baseline care plan to the resident and their representative for two (2) of three (3) baseline care plans reviewed. Resident 59 and 166 Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans-Baseline, with a revision date of 12/2016 revealed Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1.) To ensure that the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within forty-eight (48) hours of the resident's admission. 4.) The residents and their representatives will be provided with a summary of the baseline care plan . Resident #59 A record review of the Baseline Care Plan for Resident #59 revealed the care plan was completed on 8/22/24 with no signature of the resident or representative acknowledgement of receipt of the care plan summary findings. In an interview with Resident # 59 on 11/4/24 at 3:00 PM, she revealed that there were no staff that discussed her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care to maintain hygiene as evidenced by: Resident # 9, # 17, #58 were observed with long jagged fingernails and Resident #12 was observed with unkept and greasy hair and an unkept beard for four (4) of 61 residents reviewed for ADL care. Residents #9, #12, #17 and #58. Findings Included: Record review of a statement on facility letterhead, undated, and signed by the Administrator revealed We do not have a direct policy ADLs. Resident #9 An observation on 11/03/24 at 2:30 PM revealed, Resident #9 lying in bed with long jagged nails on both hands, measuring approximately three-eighths (3/8) inch in length past the tips of the fingers with a brown substance underneath. An observation and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/4/24 at 1:10 PM, confirmed Resident #9's nails were long and had a brown substance underneath. She revealed the treatment nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the services needed for a resident to maintain and/or improve their level of range of motion (ROM) and mobility for four (4) of 32 residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. (Resident #17, # 19, #22, and #39). Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled Resident Mobility and Range of Motion with a revision date of 7/2017 revealed Policy Statement, 1. Residents will not experience an avoidable reduction in range of motion (ROM). 2. Residents with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in ROM. 3. Residents with limited will receive appropriate services, equipment and assistance to maintain or improve mobility unless a reduction in mobility is unavoidable. Resident #17 An observation on 11/03/24 at 2:44 PM revealed Resident #17 to have a right and left-hand contracture with no device in place. In an observation of Resident #17 with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 11/04/24 at 12:50 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $471K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS