Lakeview Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 95 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 76.1 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.46 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to implement care plan approaches related to prohibiting the use of oxygen in the smoking area for one (1) of four (4) sampled resident's care plans. Resident #1. Findings Include: Record review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plans policy date implemented 4/3/20, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident . A record review of the Care Plan with a problem onset date of 11/6/23 revealed Problem/Need: SMOKING I am a smoker and requires supervision .Approaches .Supervise all smoking .Prohibition of oxygen use in the smoking area . A record review of the facility investigation revealed on 2/21/24, the Activities Director (AD) was assisting with the smoke break at the facility with her back turned and heard a popping/clicking sound. Upon turning, she observed sparks coming from Resident #1's nasal cannula. She immediately removed the cannula and turned his oxygen off. Record review of the Physician Orders for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe smoking environment when the facility staff did not remove an oxygen (O2) canister from Resident #1 prior to entering the smoking area and did not secure a cigarette lighter to prevent Resident #1 from lighting a cigarette. This failure resulted in Resident #1 receiving burns to his face. This was for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents reviewed for smoking. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, Accidents and Supervision, dated 12/9/2020, revealed, Policy: The resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as is possible .This includes .3. Implementing interventions to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s) . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .3. Implementation of Interventions .i. Resident-directed approaches may include .supervising .residents . Review of the facility's policy, Resident Smoking, Smokeless Tobacco, and Vaping Policy, dated 3/29/22, revealed, Policy: This facility provides a safe and healthy environment for residents,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen cautionary signage was posted on a resident's door for one (1) of 20 sampled residents (Resident #59).Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Oxygen Administration, dated 7/24/23, revealed, .Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines.6. Oxygen warning signs must be placed on the door of the resident's room where oxygen is in use.On 9/15/25 at 12:05 PM, an observation revealed no oxygen signage was posted on the door of Resident #59, where an oxygen concentrator was noted inside the room.On 9/16/25 at 9:00 AM, during an observation and interview, Resident #59 was observed with an oxygen concentrator in his room and there was no cautionary signage on the door. The resident stated he uses the oxygen sometimes, particularly after dialysis, when he feels tired. On 9/16/25 at 1:45 PM, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, she stated that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely and in accordance with professional standards of practice by allowing a resident to have medications stored at the bedside without an assessment for safe self-administration, for one (1) of 20 sampled residents. Resident #86Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Resident Self-Administration of Medication, dated 8/2024, revealed, .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines.7. Bedside medication storage is permitted only when it does not present a risk to confused residents.The following conditions are met for bedside storage to occur- a. The manner of storage prevents access by other residents.8. All nurses and aides are required to report to the charge nurse on duty any medication found at the bedside not authorized for bedside storage.On 9/15/25 at 2:45 PM, during an observation, Resident #86 had eye drops in the room on the overbed table in plain view.On 9/16/25 at 9:00 AM, during an observation, Resident #86 had two (2) small…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with an alternative meal choice of equal nutritive value for one (1) of 22 sampled residents (Resident #62).Findings included:On 9/17/25 at 11:00 AM, during an observation, the posted menu consisted of barbecue chicken, baked beans, and mixed vegetables, with no alternative entree listed.On 9/17/25 at 11:30 AM, during an observation and interview with the Dietary Manager (DM), there was no alternative entree or vegetables on the steam table. The DM stated that residents were provided with a Between Meal dining sheet, which included choices of hamburger with chips, grilled cheese with chips, cream of chicken soup with crackers, chicken noodle soup with crackers, peanut butter and jelly sandwich, or deli sandwich. She further explained that salad and chicken tenders were also available but verified the facility did not prepare any readily available alternative entrees. She stated residents requested an item from the Between Meal menu, and staff submitted the request using the sheet.On 9/17/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for two (2) of four (4) days of survey. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Safe and Homelike Environment, revised 07/24/2023, revealed, . In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 3. Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable environment . A review of the facility's document related to Housekeeping, undated, revealed, . Duties and Responsibilities: Ensures the provision of a clean environment for our residents and staff, providing high quality services and high standards of cleanliness .Functions .2. Ensures that daily and deep cleaning schedules are adhered to .14. Clean floors, to include sweeping, dusting, damp/wet mopping, stripping, waxing, buffing, disinfecting .22. Moves furniture and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a care-planned intervention related to falls for one (1) of eighteen (18) sampled residents. Resident #13. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 3/5/2025, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to . implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident . that includes measurable objectives .and meet professional standards of quality .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .8. Qualified staff responsible for carrying out interventions specified in the care plan will be of their roles and responsibilities for carrying out the interventions, initially and when changes are made . During an observation on 03/30/25 at 11:16 AM, Resident #13 was lying in bed with a fall mat folded at the head of the bed and not unfolded on the floor positioned in a way to prevent injury in the event the resident fell from the bed. During an observation and interview on 04/01/25 at 11:01 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0851 — pattern
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately report staffing data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) using payroll and other verifiable sources in a uniform format, for one (1) of four (4) quarters reviewed, resulting in the facility triggering for excessively low weekend staffing, no Registered Nurse (RN) hours, and no licensed nursing coverage 24 hours/day. Findings included: A record review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for the fourth (4th) quarter (July 1-September 30, 2024) revealed the facility triggered for Excessively Low Weekend Staffing, No RN Hours, and Failed to Have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day. Further review revealed the Infraction Dates for No RN Hours and Failure to Have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day were 7/6, 7/7, 7/13, and 7/14 of 2024. A record review of the Staffing Grid completed by the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the facility had RN and nursing coverage on 7/6/24, 7/7/24, 7/13/24 and 7/14/24. On 03/31/25 at 1:30 PM, during an interview with the Administrator,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a Change in Status Form to generate a request for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level Two (II) Assessment, for a resident with a mental status change, for one (1) of 18 residents reviewed for PASRR. Resident #37. Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Program, dated 01/10/25 revealed .This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs . Policy Explanation and Guidelines .9. Any residents who exhibits a newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition will be referred promptly to the state…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards when a fall mat intended to prevent injury during falls was not properly placed for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for accidents/hazards, Resident #13. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Accidents and Supervision, dated 2/19/2019 and revised 12/9/2020, revealed, .The resident environment will remain free of accidents hazards as is possible .this includes .3. Implementing interventions to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s) . On 03/30/25 at 11:16 AM, during an observation, Resident #13 was lying in bed with a fall mat folded at the head of the bed and not unfolded on the floor positioned in a way to prevent injury in the event the resident fell from the bed. On 04/01/25 at 11:01 AM, during an observation and interview, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 confirmed that Resident #13 was in bed and the fall mat was folded on the left side of the bed, instead of being unfolded on the floor bedside…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store food using sanitary methods to prevent cross-contamination, as evidenced by a plastic cup used as a scoop stored directly inside a container of cornmeal for one (1) of four (4) days of kitchen observations. Findings included: A review of the facility's document ServeSafe Manager, undated, revealed, .Preventing Cross-Contamination .Food, equipment, utensils .must be stored in ways that prevent cross-contamination .Storing .you need to store items in a way that prevents cross-contamination . On 03/30/25 at 10:34 AM, during an observation of the kitchen and interview with the Dietary Manager, there was a clear plastic cup inside the fish fry/corn meal container dry goods container. The Dietary Manager confirmed the clear plastic cup was being used as a scoop and acknowledged this constituted cross-contamination. On 04/01/25 at 12:25 PM, during an interview with the Registered Dietitian (RD), she explained the dietary department uses Serve Safe guidelines for policy and procedures related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to sustain corrective actions to prevent recurrence of previously cited deficiencies, specifically, the facility was cited for failing to maintain a clean environment and implement comprehensive care plan interventions during an annual recertification survey on 7/20/2023 and was cited again for the same deficiencies during the current survey, demonstrating that QAPI failed to sustain ongoing monitoring and oversight to prevent recurrence for two (2) of eight (8) deficiencies cited. F584 and F656. Findings Include: Record review of the facility's policy, Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement, dated 2/24/2021, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to .maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .2. The QA Committee shall .c. Develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,183 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $6,091 — penalty dated 2024-02-28
• $6,092 — penalty dated 2024-02-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $935K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS