Chadwick Community Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 89.1 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, facility policy review, and facility investigation review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision of Resident #1, who was identified as an elopement and wandering risk, from exiting the facility unnoticed and unsupervised for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed. On 5/09/25, at approximately 7:45 AM, Resident #1 exited the facility while unsupervised wearing a wander alarm device. The resident was out of the facility unsupervised and walked approximately one (1) mile crossing a four-lane highway for approximately two (2) hours before being located and returned to the facility. The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision for Resident #1, who was an elopement risk, put this resident and all other residents at risk for wandering and elopement, at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC), which began on 5/09/25, when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to consult with the primary care provider regarding the psychosocial status of the resident which resulted in missed dialysis treatments for one (1) of three (3) residents dependent on dialysis treatments. Resident #1. Findings Included:Record review of the facility policy, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised February 2021 revealed, Our facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status .1. The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been .significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition; need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly; refusal of treatment or medications two (2) or more consecutive times) . On [DATE] at 1:32 PM during a telephone interview, the Resident Representative (RR) for Resident #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, facility policy review, and interview the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan to meet and address the resident's psychosocial needs for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1.Findings Included:Record review of the facility policy, Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Care Planning with effective date 6/02/16 revealed, The comprehensive care plan is an interdisciplinary communication tool It must include measurable objectives and time frames and must describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. The interdisciplinary team in conjunction with the resident and his/her family and/or responsible party as appropriate will develop, evaluate and amend as needed.Record review of the care plans for Resident #1 revealed there was not a care plan in place that addressed resident behaviors or psychosocial needs.On 6/30/26 at 12:50 PM, during an interview with Resident #1, he revealed that he required assistance and confirmed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0742 — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment and services to address known psychosocial concerns in order to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1. Findings Included:Record review of the facility policy, Behavioral Health Services with Revised Date February 2019 revealed, The facility will provide and residents will receive behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care .Residents who exhibit signs of emotional/psychosocial distress receive services and support that address their individual needs and goals for care.During a telephone interview, on [DATE] at 1:32 PM, the Resident Representative (RR) for Resident #1 revealed that she was concerned related to the resident missing medical and dialysis appointments.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to consistently provide necessary activities of daily living (ADL) care, including daily oral hygiene, routine nail care, and regular shaving of facial hair for one (1) of (19) residents reviewed. Resident #78.Findings include: Record review of the facility policy, Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) Supporting revised March 2018, revealed, .Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.On 1/27/26 at 11:51 AM, during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, he stated that he had been assigned to provide ADL care to Resident #78 for the past two days. He explained that oral care and grooming, such as shaving, are routine parts of ADL care. He acknowledged that he had failed to perform this type of ADL care for Resident #78 but stated he could do it now if the State Agency (SA) would like him to.On 1/27/2026 at 11:54 AM, during an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record reviews and facility policy review the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan related to Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and wound care for two (2) of six (6) care observations. Resident #60 and Resident #78. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy Comprehensive Person Centered, revised 03/2022, revealed, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timetables to meet each resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident . Resident #60 Record review of Resident #60's Care Plan Report with a date initiated of 12/29/2025 revealed .Approaches/Tasks: Cleanse site with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply skin preparation and barrier cream, and cover with a dry dressing daily and as needed . On 01/28/2026 at 1:39 PM, an observation of wound care was conducted by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4. LPN#4 cleansed the wound with wound cleanser but did not pat dry prior to betadine application as ordered by the physician orders and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow standards of practice during medication administration and wound care for two (2) of five (5) residents observed for medication administration and wound care. Residents #8 and #60.Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy Wound Care, revised 1/9/22, revealed The purpose of the procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing . Record review of the facility policy Administering Medications through an Enteral Tube, undated, revealed, General Guidelines. Administer each medication separately and flush between medications . Resident #8 On 01/28/2026 at 8:30 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 was observed administering medications to Resident #8 via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube. During medication administration, the nurse administered multiple medications through the tube without flushing with water between each medication. The tube became clogged, requiring the nurse to use a syringe plunger to push the medications after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter was secured with a leg strap for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed with urinary catheters. Resident #2.Findings Include:Record review of the facility policy Catheter Care, Urinary, undated, revealed .Ensure that the catheter remains secured with a leg strap to reduce friction and movement at the insertion site .On 01/29/2026 at 10:53 AM, during an observation and interview of foley catheter care conducted by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3, assisted by CNA #4 revealed upon removal of Resident #2's pajamas a leg strap to secure the catheter was not in place. CNA #3 and CNA #4 confirmed there was not a leg strap in place to secure the catheter. CNA #4 stated Resident #2 should have a leg strap. She stated the purpose is to prevent the catheter from pulling out. She stated she notifies the nurse when one is not present.On 01/29/2026 at 2:56 PM, during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated CNAs should apply a leg strap during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were clinically indicated and free from unnecessary use for one (1) of seven (7) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident #5.Findings Include:Record review of Resident #5's medication orders revealed an active order for Narcan Nasal Liquid 4 milligrams per 0.1 milliliters, spray alternating nostrils every two minutes as needed for signs and symptoms of overdose including unresponsiveness, shallow breathing, and cyanosis, with instructions to notify the Medical Doctor and Emergency Medical Services immediately. (Narcan is indicated to reverse the effects of opioid overdose.) Record review of Resident #5's medication orders revealed an active order for Narcan Nasal Liquid 4 milligrams per 0.1 milliliters, spray alternating nostrils every two minutes as needed for signs and symptoms of overdose including unresponsiveness, shallow breathing, and cyanosis, with instructions to notify the Medical Doctor and Emergency Medical Services…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide alternative menu choices and ensure meal preference options were communicated for one (1) of (19) sampled residents reviewed for food service choices. Resident #70.Findings Include:On 01/27/2026 at 12:32 PM, during an interview, Resident #70 stated he sometimes does not like the food he is served. He stated he did not know alternate meals were available. He stated when he tells the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) he does not like the meal served, sometimes they bring something else and other times they do not. He stated he is not aware of what foods are being served daily and would like to know what is being served.On 01/28/2026 at 11:06 AM, during an interview, Resident #70 stated he still did not know what foods would be served that day. Observation of the resident's room revealed there was not a menu posted in the room.On 01/28/2026 at 11:23 AM, during an interview, the Dietary Manager stated menus are posted on each hall. She stated CNAs ask residents at lunch and notify kitchen staff of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow infection prevention and control guidelines during medication administration for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for medication administration. Resident #8. Findings Include:Record review of the facility policy, revised October 2018, revealed This facility's infection control policies and practices are intended to. help prevent and manage transmission of disease and infection.On 01/28/2026 at 8:30 AM, medication administration was observed for Resident #8 via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube. Prior to administration, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 removed the stopcock plunger from the feeding tube syringe and placed it on top of the plastic container it came in. During medication administration, the stopcock plunger slid off the plastic container onto the bare bedside table, which had not been disinfected prior to medication preparation. During the medication administration process, the resident's feeding tube became clogged, requiring LPN#1 to use the stopcock…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-05-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS