No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lakeland Community Care Center

3680 Lakeland Lane, Jackson, MS 39216 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 105 certified beds · (601) 982-5505 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (601) 982-5505 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0604) — cited Sep 2023Resident-funds citation (F0569)$8,424 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,424 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-05)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1659 Lelia Dr · (601) 981-3033 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1200 Eastover Dr · (601) 326-4000 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1200 Eastover Dr · (601) 414-9711 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1398 Lakeland Dr · (601) 960-0471 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased23.9%20.5%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.7%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%2.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%1.6%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.2%19.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.4%23.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.2%97.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.6%6.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.9%20.7%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.3%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.1%2.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.0%84.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.5%27.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.6%15.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.362.431.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.892.861.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 134 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
22.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 22.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.8%CMS range 44.2–60.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.5%CMS range 9.2–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge22.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge38.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge18.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified60.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge87.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 4.0–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
1.07
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.43
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.90
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
59.0%
Total nursing turnover
55.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 93.8 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-30)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure personal funds that were deposited with the facility were returned within (30) days of discharge for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident #1.Findings Included:Record review of the Transaction Report dated 6/16/26 for 11/01/25 through 7/16/26 revealed the resident had a credit balance of $580.07.Record review of the Trust Statement dated 2/28/26 for Resident #1 revealed that she had an Opening Balance of $178.00 with one debit on 2/10/26 for $21.00 for Shampoo, Cut & Style (in-facility beauty shop service) leaving a Closing Balance of $157.00.On 6/15/26 at 3:40 PM, during an interview the Administrator explained that Resident #1 was cared for by the facility 11/14/25 through 11/30/25 at no charge to the resident. She said that in January 2026 the resident paid $3,173.92 and should have paid $3,343.97. She said that the resident's account was charged $119.42 for the eight days she resided at the facility which left a credit balance of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' rights to access the use of a telephone privately for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident #1Findings Include:Record review of the facility policy Resident Rights revised December 2016 revealed . 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to.cc. access to a telephone, mail and email; dd. communicate in person and by mail, email and telephone with privacy.Record review of the admission Record for Resident #1 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 12/18/24 and the resident had diagnoses of Sjogren syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic kidney disease, and morbid obesity.On 4/21/26 at 11:00 AM, during an interview Resident #1 reported that she had dropped and broken her personal cellular telephone, which she had used for private communication. She reported that the facility did not have any telephone that was convenient for her to use for private…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) to maintain personal hygiene for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident #2. Findings Included:Record review of the facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting revised March 2018 revealed .Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene .Record review of the admission Record for Resident #2 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 12/09/25 with diagnoses that included heart failure, chronic kidney disease and hypertension.Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/11/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and the resident required substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a clean, orderly homelike environment for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1 and Resident #2. Findings included:Record review of the facility policy titled, Homelike Environment with Revision Date February 2021, revealed Policy Statement: Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment .The facility staff and management maximize .the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include a. clean, sanitary and orderly environment. On 1/26/26 at 1:40 PM, during an interview with Housekeeper #1 revealed that housekeeping conducted a deep cleaning of all rooms prior to admission of new residents.On 1/26/26 at 2:00 PM, observation and interview with Resident #1 in her room revealed a urine collection device on the floor of the resident's bathroom, and a one and a half (1 1/2) inch by one half (1/2) inch hole in the drywall above the light. There were six (6) cracked linoleum tiles ten feet from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to provide palatable food at an appetizing temperature for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1 and Resident #2. Findings included:Record review of the facility policy Assisting the Resident with In-Room Meals with a revised date of 2013 revealed .6. Check that hot foods are hot.On 1/26/26 at 2:00 PM, during an interview Resident #1 stated that she ate her meals in her room and they were usually cold, or too cool to be enjoyable. She said that staff told her that her meals were not hot because she was the last served due to the location of her room. On 1/26/26 at 3:00 PM, during an interview with Resident #2 in her room, she reported that she ate in her room and her meals were never served hot, she said she ate the meals without them being replaced or heated because I'm going home this week.On 1/27/26 at 11:20 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed that as the cook prepared the resident meals the dietary aid placed the plates on trays and placed insulated dome-covers on the plates without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident discharge rights by not providing all medications, specifically as needed pain medications, for one (1) of four (4) discharged residents. Resident #1. Findings include:Record review of the facility policy Discharge Medications with the most recent history of July 2024 revealed Procedure: 1. Medications are sent with the resident on discharge based on.the physician's order.On 9/03/25 at 3:40 PM, during an interview Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 confirmed she had been working on 6/27/25 when Resident #1 discharged home with home health care. She stated she didn't recall reviewing upcoming scheduled appointments with the resident prior to discharge. She confirmed she used the Current Medications list included in the Transfer/Discharge Reported dated 6/27/25 to review medications with the resident and that the list included a current prescription for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Oral Tablet 5-325 MG (milligrams) one (1) tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. LPN #1 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of residents for four (4) of 14 staffing days reviewed in January, 2025. (1/19/25, 1/20/25, 1/25/25, and 1/27/25). Findings Include: Record review of a typed document on facility letterhead dated January 30, 2025, and signed by the Executive Director (Administrator) revealed There is no Staffing policy A review of anonymous complaints, received 1/20/25 and 1/21/25, revealed 3-11 and 11-7 shifts are always short CNAs and there was one CNA working the floor Central Unit by herself on 3-11 Sunday 1/19/25. A record review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Data Report for the 4th Quarter (July 1-September 30) revealed the facility triggered for One Star Staffing Rating and Excessively Low Weekend Staffing. A record review of the Facility Assessment Tool dated 1/10/2025, revealed .There are 3 units: South, Central, and North .Staffing plan .Nurse aides .3-11 CNA (3 South/2 Central/4 North) 11-7 CNA (2-3 south/2 central/ 3 north unit) . The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility job description review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to a homelike environment for one (1) of eighteen (18) sampled residents, Resident #5. Findings included: A review of the facility's Job Description, dated 08/01/2012, for the Director of Maintenance revealed, .General Description .the Director of Maintenance . is accountable for the upkeep of the grounds, Facility, and equipment in a safe and efficient manner .Essential Duties 1. Provides a safe, clean environment for residents in accordance with Resident Care Policies and Procedures . On 01/27/2025 at 3:26 PM, during an observation, Resident #5 was seated in her wheelchair in her room. The resident was confused but able to make simple needs known. The linoleum flooring in the resident's room was torn and folded back under the resident's wheelchair. The flooring was also buckling up under the resident's bed. On 01/27/2025 at 4:00 PM, during an interview, Resident #5's sister…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure proper food handling and sanitation practices to prevent cross-contamination when Dietary [NAME] (DC) #2 failed to sanitize the thermometer when checking food temperatures on the tray line for one (1) of two (2) kitchen observations Findings included: On 01/27/2025 at 11:15 AM, during an observation of the tray line, DC 2 was observed checking food temperatures. DC #2 used a brown paper towel to clean the thermometer between food items. DC #2 wiped food residue off onto a brown paper towel and then tested each food item on the tray line without properly sanitizing the thermometer. On 01/27/2025 at 12:10 PM, during an interview, the Dietary Manager (DM) #1 stated that staff should always use an alcohol pad to clean the thermometer when checking tray line temperatures. DM #1 explained that using a paper towel instead of an alcohol pad constitutes cross-contamination. She confirmed that dietary staff had been trained to use alcohol swabs when performing tray line temperature checks. On 01/29/2025 at 1:56 PM, during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed while providing care to a resident requiring high-contact precautions for two (2) of three (3) care observations, Resident #27. Findings included: A review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated 04/2024, revealed, Enhanced Barrier Precautions are indicated for residents with .indwelling medical devices, secretions/excretions that are unable to be covered/contained, and are not known to be infected/colonized with any MDRO (Multidrug-Resistant Organism) during high-contact resident care activities, as these residents are at an increased risk of being infected . On 01/29/2025 at 8:50 AM, during an observation, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, the Nursing Supervisor, was observed administering medications to Resident #27 via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. LPN #2 did not wear a gown while accessing the resident's PEG tube. On 01/29/2025 at 10:20 AM, during an observation, LPN #7 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident who was coded as discharged to the hospital but was discharged to home instead of the hospital for one (1) of 18 sampled residents. (Residents #83) Findings included: A record review of the Discharge MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/09/24 revealed the Resident #83 was discharged to a short-term general hospital. A record review of a Physician's Telephone Orders, dated 11/09/24, revealed Resident #83 had an order to be discharged home. On 01/29/25 at 08:07 AM, an interview with the Social Services Director (SSD), revealed Resident #83 was admitted for a brief time as she was there for skilled care and had planned to return home. The SSD stated she prepared the discharge summary based on the physician orders on the day Resident #83 left the facility. On 01/29/25 at 08:45 AM, in an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1/MDS, she acknowledged the MDS was coded incorrectly as being discharged to the hospital because he went back home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan regarding a resident's impaired vision for one (1) of (18) care plans reviewed. Resident #68. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan Policy, revised on 01//2025, revealed, Each resident will have a person-centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care. All disciplines work together to develop a plan of care that meets the resident's needs, preferences, and goals. A record review of the Comprehensive Care Plan revealed Resident #68 did not have a care plan regarding impaired vision. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #68 on 6/23/23 and he had current diagnoses including Paralytic Ptosis of Left Eyelid. A record review of the Eye Examination, dated 09/19/2024, revealed Resident #68 was seen by a local optometrist and was diagnosed with Dry Eye Syndrome of bilateral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured and inaccessible to unauthorized residents and staff one (1) of four (4) days of survey observations. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage, dated 01/2015, revealed, .All drugs, treatments, and biologicals must be stored securely . Resident #5 A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #5 on 04/21/2017 with diagnoses including Spinal Stenosis. A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/15/2024 revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight (8), which indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. On 01/28/2025 at 4:40 PM, during an observation and interview with the Administrator, an unattended medicine cup was observed on Resident #5's bedside table alongside a glass of water. The resident was lying flat in bed, and no staff were present to monitor the resident taking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records by failing to document that residents were informed of their rights regarding Advance Directives for three (3) of (18) resident records reviewed, Residents #22, #27, and #61. Findings included: A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #22 on 06/10/2024 with diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia, Resident #27 on 06/14/2024 with diagnoses including Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, and Resident #61 on 9/20/2024 with diagnoses including Vascular Dementia. A record review of the Resident Rights/Advance Directive revealed the Advance Directive was not initialed by the residents or Resident Representatives that confirmed they were informed of information regarding formulating an Advance Directive for Residents #22, #27, and #61. A record review of the Resident Rights/Advance Directive revealed the Advance Directive was not initialed by the residents to confirm being informed of information regarding formulating an Advance Directive for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff and Resident Representative (RR) interviews, record review, facility investigation, and policy review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff treated residents with respect and dignity during procedures and medication administration for two (2) of eight (8) residents sampled. Residents #5 and Resident #6. Findings Include: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Resident [NAME] of Rights, reviewed/revised on 1/23, revealed, Each resident has a right to a dignified existence . and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of (his or her) quality of life .10. Reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation or resident needs and preferences . Resident #5 During an interview with Resident #5 on 5/19/24 at 1:22 PM, she stated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 was disrespectful and demanding when she entered her room to collect a urine sample. She explained that this conduct was nothing new. This nurse had frequently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for three (3) of five (5) sampled residents. Resident #3, Resident #4 and Resident #5 Findings Include: Resident #3 On 1/25/24 at 11:15 AM, an observation revealed the call light for Resident #3 was draped over the back of a bedside chair at the end of the resident's bed. The resident was seated on the end of the bed with the call light out of reach. On 1/25/24 at 4:14 PM, an observation revealed the call light for Resident #3 was draped over the back of a bedside chair. The resident was seated in her wheelchair with her call light out of reach. Resident #3 was observed looking for her call light, attempted to reach it, however, the call light was out of reach. On 1/26/24 at 11:18 AM, observation revealed that Resident #3 was seated in her wheelchair in her room with her call light out of her reach, draped over the back of the bedside chair at the end of her bed. She was coughing and sneezing. The resident needed a tissue, but there were none in her room. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement interventions included in the individualized care plans for four (4) of five (5) sampled residents. Residents #1, #3, #4 and #5. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled, COMPREHENSIVE PERSON-CENTERED CARE PLANS, with revision date 3/18, revealed, Policy: Each resident will have a person centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care . Procedure: .6. Staff approaches are to be developed for each problem/strength/need . Assigned disciplines will be identified to carry out the intervention Resident #1 Record review of the Care Plan for Resident #1 with a problem onset date of 1/5/2024 revealed Total urinary incontinence related to impaired mobility and diuretic med use .Approaches Toilet checks on me q2h (every 2 hours) and prn .Keep call light within easy reach of me . Record review of the Care Plan for Resident #1 with a problem onset date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that dependent residents received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident #1 Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled, INCONTINENT CARE, with a review date of 7/12, revealed, Policy: To provide routine, preventive skin, perineal care to residents after an incontinent episode. Responsibility: All Nursing Personnel . Record review of a statement signed by the Executive Director and dated 1/26/24, revealed that the facility did not have a specific policy for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care. On 1/25/24 at 2:37 PM, an interview with Resident #1 revealed that she received morning care, including incontinent care and a bed bath prior to breakfast on 1/25/24 and received incontinent care following breakfast. She stated that she went to the Therapy Department prior to lunch at approximately 11:45 AM, returned to her room for lunch and then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care regarding fingernail care for residents who are dependent upon staff for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1 and Resident #2 Findings Include: Record review of the facility's policy, Fingernails/Toenails Care, reviewed 10/09, POLICY:The purpose of this procedure is to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections. Responsibility: Nursing Assistant or Licensed Nurse .1. Nails can be partially cleaned during bath care .3. Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming . Resident #1 On 12/04/23 at 4:00 PM, an observation and interview with Resident #1 revealed she had contractures of both hands, and all of her fingernails were long. There was a black substance caked under her right thumbnail. Resident #1 stated that she did not prefer to have long fingernails and wanted her fingernails trimmed. The resident said she could not recall the last time her fingernails were trimmed. On 12/05/23 at 10:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure secure storage of medication included limited of access, for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents reviewed for pressure sores as evidenced by skin protectant ointment left unattended at resident's bedside. Resident #1. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage ,reviewed 11/10 revealed POLICY: Medication supply must be accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. All drugs, treatments, and biologicals must be stored securely and following the manufacturer's labeled recommendations, or per facility policy . Record review of a handwritten statement dated 11/14/23 and signed by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 revealed that she fed some of a white substance she noticed next to the resident's supper tray to the resident. Record review of the Resident Incident Report dated 11/14/23 at 6:00 PM revealed that CNA #1 reported that Resident #1 had ingested approximately five (5) cubic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of urine odor for two (2) of three (3) facility halls. Central Hall and North Hall. Findings include: A review of the facility document, Resident [NAME] of Rights, dated 01/2023, revealed, Each resident has a right to a dignified existence .in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of (his or her) quality of life .A. Facility residents shall have the right to .32. A safe clean, comfortable home like environment . An observation of the Central and North halls, on 09/12/23 at 10:05 AM, revealed there was a strong urine odor along both hallways. An observation of the Central and North hallways, on 09/12/23 at 01:30 PM, revealed both hallways had a strong urine odor. An observation, on 09/13/23 at 09:32 AM, revealed the Central and North hallways had a urine odor. On 9/14/23 at 9:10 AM, an observation of the North Hall and Central Hall biohazard rooms revealed strong urine odors coming from the rooms. The barrels were full but covered. No debris was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was without physical restraints related to the use of full-length bed rails for one (1) of 21 sampled residents. Resident #22 Findings include: A review of the facility document, Resident [NAME] of Rights, dated 01/2023, revealed, Each resident has a right to a dignified existence .in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of (his or her) quality of life .A. Facility residents shall have the right to .37. be free of physical .restraints . A record review of the facility's policy Restraint Evaluation and Restraint Reduction, dated 8/2013 revealed . all residents have the right to be unrestrained. Restraints should be used only as a last alternative and only when other less restrictive measures have been tried and rejected .Definition: 'Physical restraints' are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review, and the facility policy review the facility failed to provide respiratory services in a manner to prevent the possibility of complications for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for respiratory conditions. Resident #3 and Resident #15. Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy, Standard Precautions, dated 09/2019, revealed, .Procedure .5. Handle soiled patient care equipment in a manner that prevents transfer of microorganisms to others and to the environment . Resident #3 On 09/12/23 at 9:00 AM, during an observation, Resident #3 had a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) device in his room and the tubing was on the floor of the room. There was no bag or designated container to store the tubing. On 09/12/23 at 11:50 AM, in an observation of Resident #3, his CPAP tubing remained on the floor on the right side of bed. There was a face mask for the CPAP located in a plastic bag on the resident's windowsill in his room. On 09/13/23 at 08:30 AM, in an observation of Resident #3, he was lying in bed and the CPAP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and the facility policy review the facility failed to prevent the possibility spread of infections by placing soiled dressings in the resident's trash for (1) out of 21 sampled residents. Resident #11 Findings include: Review of the facility's Standard Precautions policy, dated 09/2019, revealed, .Standard Precautions will be utilized to provide a primary strategy for the prevention of healthcare-associated (HAI) agents among patients and healthcare personnel .Procedure .10. Follow procedures for disposal of regulated/infections waste when items are saturated with blood . On 09/13/23 at 03:07 PM, in an observation and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 she performed wound care on Resident #11 with the assistance of Registered Nurse #2/Nurse Manager. LPN #2 removed the soiled dressings from the wounds to the buttocks and sacrum and discarded the bloody dressings in a clear bag in the resident's garbage can. During the interview, LPN #2 confirmed that placing soiled dressings in the resident's garbage, and not in red…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor residents' rights by not providing showers per choice for five (5) of 18 residents sampled. Residents #1, #15,#25, #29, #38. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, Resident [NAME] Of Rights, dated 11/17, revealed, Each resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the Facility in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of (his or her) quality of life, regardless of diagnosis, severity of condition or payment source and to exercise those rights as a citizen of the Unites (United) States without interference, coercion. including those rights specified herein .15. Self determination, which the facility must promote and facilitate through support of resident choice, consistent with his or her interests, assessments and plan of care and make other choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-13 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident, staff and family interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to honor the residents rights for visitation for four (4) of seven (7) family interviews. Resident #15, #17,#38, #77. Findings Include: A review of the facility's visitation policy, titled Visitation Guidance, dated May 2021 revealed .Indoor visitation for unvaccinated residents in a facility that has less than 70 % of the residents vaccinated and county positivity rate greater than 10 % visitation should be compassionate only. Any resident with active COVID, regardless of vaccination status, will have no visitation until they meet criteria to discontinue isolation . A review of the facility's, Resident [NAME] of Rights, dated 11/17 revealed Each resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communaiton with and access to persons and services inside and outside the Facility in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancemento of (his or her) quality of life,regardless…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-13 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the resident or resident representative in writing of residents' hospitalization for four (4) of 21 records reviewed. Resident #34, #46, #83, #57 Findings Include: A record review of the facility's policy, Discharge and Transfer Policies-Involuntary, with a revision date of 1/2015, revealed before a facility transfers a resident to a hospital or allows a resident to go on therapeutic leave, the nursing facility must provide written information to the resident and a family member or legal representative that specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy and the facility's policies regarding bed-hold policies. Resident #34 On 8/09/21 at 11:56 AM, in an interview and observation of Resident #34 sitting in his wheelchair, he stated he has been to the hospital a couple of times due to his leg being amputated. A record review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #34's initial admission was on 5/10/21. A record review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the comprehensive care plan by not providing showers per residents' request for five (5) of 18 sampled residents. Resident #1, #29, #38, #25, #15 Findings include: A review of the facility's Care Plan Policy, titled Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plans, dated 3/18 revealed,Policy Each resident will have a person centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care .Interdisciplinary: All disciplines work together to develop a plan of care that meets the residents' needs, preferences, and goals. Resident #1 During an interview on 08/11/21 at 03:49 PM, with Resident #1, revealed he prefers to have showers rather than bed baths. Resident #1 said bed baths do not clean as good as a shower. Resident #1 said he asked the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) when the shower room will be open again and he did not get an answer. Record review of the bathing report for July and August 2021 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of food-borne illness for one (1) of four (4) observations. Findings include: A record review of the facility's Monitoring Food Temperatures for Meal Service policy, 2016 Edition, revealed Guideline: Food temperatures will be monitored daily to prevent food borne illness and ensure foods are served at palatable temperatures.Procedure: 1. Prior to serving a meal, food temperatures will be taken and documented for cold and hot foods to ensure proper serving temperatures. Any food not found at the correct holding/serving temperature will not be served but will undergo the appropriate corrective action On 08/11/21 at 11:50 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) brought a meal tray into the conference room for the State Survey Agency (SSA) to taste and observe per the SSA request. After the DM brought the meal tray, he left the room. The meal was served in a hinged Styrofoam divided plate with a lid. The meal included fried chicken, sweet potato casserole, greens, cornbread and a piece…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection for one (1) of three (3) meals observed. Resident #34. Findings Include: A record review of the facility's policy, Standard Precautions, reviewed date 1/15, revealed, POLICY: Standard Precautions will be utilized to provide a primary strategy for the prevention of healthcare-associated infectious (HAI) agents among patients and healthcare personnel. A review of the facility's policy, Contact Precautions, dated 9/19, revealed, POLICY: Contact Precautions are a transmission based precaution that will be utilized to reduce the risk of epidemiologically important micro-organisms by direct or indirect contact. On 8/11/21 at 12:26 PM during an observation and interview with Resident #34 revealed he had not been served a lunch tray although Resident #34's roommate had been served a meal tray. Resident # 34's roommate confirmed the meal tray, which was observed on his bedside table, was his lunch tray. Resident # 34 stated they (staff) had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,424 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,424 — penalty dated 2023-12-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 10%Other / private 24%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$285per resident / day
operating cost
$8,657per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$310per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Mississippi Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Mississippi
$9,581/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,885/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,369/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 255116. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next