Manhattan Community Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 79 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 157.2 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.13 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.16 to 0.07 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a secure environment to prevent the elopement of one (1) of six (6) sampled residents, Resident #9.On 9/08/25 a newly admitted respite resident with diagnoses of restlessness and agitation, dementia and senile degeneration of brain and history of exit seeking behaviors and falls was assisted to exit the facility by staff, was outside unsupervised for twenty-five (25) minutes until a staff member observed the resident lying on the ground next to the iron fence that encircled the facility premises, approximately three hundred seventy-five (375) feet from the facility entrance.The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision to prevent the elopement of Resident #9 placed this resident, and other residents at risk for wandering and elopement, in a situation that was likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. While Resident was out of the facility unsupervised in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a care plan intervention regarding one-on-one supervision for a severely cognitive impaired resident which resulted in an unsupervised fall, leading to an acute transverse fracture of the lower sacrum for one (1) of two (2) care plans reviewed for falls. Resident #1 Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, Resident [NAME] of Rights, revised January 2023, revealed: Each resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of (his or her) quality of life . A. Facility residents shall have the right to: 1 .7 .d. The right to receive the services and/or items included in the plan of care . A record review of Resident # 1's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 1/27/25, revealed . one-on-one observation when family was not present . A record review of the facility's Supervisor Investigation Summary Form,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents and failed to ensure continuous one-on-one supervision resulting in a fall that caused an acute transverse fracture of the lower sacrum, leading to hospitalization for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for falls. Resident #1. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, Resident [NAME] of Rights, revised January 2023, revealed: Each resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of (his or her) quality of life . A. Facility residents shall have the right to: 1 .34. A safe environment. A record review of the facility ' s Supervisor Investigation Summary Form, dated 1/31/25, revealed, Briefly describe event: On 1/30/25 around 3:30 PM, (Proper Name of Resident #1) was found sitting in the day room, with his clothes on, in front of his wheelchair. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility policy review, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate bed linens to maintain a comfortable, homelike environment for one (1) of three (3) floors. Second Floor.Findings Included:Record review of the facility policy titled, Departmental (Environmental Services) - Laundry and Linen Revised January 2014, revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to provide a process for the safe and aseptic handling, washing and storage of linen .On 5/12/26 at 3:30 PM, observation and interview revealed the Resident Representative (RR) for Resident #4 was assisting Resident #4 by changing the linens on her bed and there were no pillowcases available on the second floor. Interview with the RR revealed that she had experienced lack of clean linens available for the care of Resident #4 several times in the past. On 5/12/26 at 3:55 PM, observation revealed Resident #2 had no top sheet on his bed. He was laying on a fitted sheet under a bedspread.On 5/12/26 at 3:58 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for one (1) of six (6) residents sampled. Resident #2.Findings Included:Record review of the facility policy titled, CALL LIGHT/CALL PAGER SYSTEMS with Revision Date 9/09/22, revealed, Purpose To provide a means of communication to staff for notification of resident needs and a system of communication among staff in the facility; including emergency notifications.All staff.The call system must be accessible to residents while in their bed or other sleeping accommodations within the resident's room.On 5/11/26 at 12:40 PM, observation revealed the call light for Resident #2 was placed under his bed and came up and over the headboard of his bed, so that the call button was behind the headboard and out of the resident's reach.On 5/11/26 at 2:00 PM, interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 revealed that each resident was to have their call light in reach to summon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to implement the comprehensive, person-centered care plan for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident #1. Findings Included:Record review of the Care Plan Detail report for Resident #1 revealed Problem: I have stage 4 pressure ulcer to sacrum.Approaches.that included cleanse sacrum with normal saline pat dry apply Santyl cover with dry dressing daily.An additional care plan revealed Problem: I have a stage 4 pressure ulcer to left lower leg.Approaches. cleanse left lateral leg with normal saline pat dry apply Santyl cover with calcium alginate secure with dry dressing daily. On 5/11/20/26 at 2:00 PM, during an observation of Resident #1 and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 and Nurse Practitioner (NP) #1 revealed Resident #1 had wound dressings on his sacrum, left lateral calf and left ankle dated 5/09/26. LPN #1 confirmed she had provided wound care for Resident #1 and that the dressings were those she had applied on 5/09/26. LPN #1 confirmed that the resident's care plan specified that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interviews the facility failed to ensure ordered wound treatments were administered as prescribed by the physician for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for existing skin impairments. Resident #1.Findings Included:Record review of the facility policy titled, Wound Care dated 1/09/22 revealed the policy stated, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing.After completing a thorough evaluation, the interdisciplinary team should develop a relevant care plan that includes measurable goals for prevention and management of PU/PIs with appropriate interventions.Orders should include.Frequency of dressing change.Document dressing change in medical record .During an interview and observation on 5/11/20/26 at 2:00 PM, an observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 and Nurse Practitioner (NP) #1 revealed Resident #1 had wound dressings on his sacrum, left lateral calf and left ankle dated 5/09/26. LPN #1 confirmed she had provided wound care for Resident #1 and that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention policy to protect residents from potential abuse, ensure proper reporting procedures were followed, and prohibit continued staff contact with residents following credible allegations. Specifically, the facility failed to (1) remove the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) from all resident care following multiple potential abuse allegations, (2) conduct a timely and complete investigation into resident and family reports of abuse, and (3) implement interventions to protect residents from further potential abuse. This deficient practice affected two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed for abuse (Residents #1 and #2).Findings include:A review of the facility's Abuse Components Plan Elder Just Act and Affordable Care Act, dated 10/24/22, revealed, .The purpose of this policy is to facilitate appropriate. investigation.of actual and/or suspected incidents of abuse.Investigation: Any report of suspected and/or actual resident mistreatment.abuse.will be promptly and thoroughly investigated by facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to provide needed care and services that would meet the resident's physical needs as evidenced by wound care not provided in one (1) of two (2) sampled residents with wounds. Resident #4. Findings include:Record review of the facility policy titled Wound Care Treatment Protocol (no review date) revealed the policy instructed staff to: Evaluate the wound daily for signs and symptoms of infection and for signs of healing. Document/Report Findings. Provide treatment as per physician's order.On 09/17/2025 at 9:22 AM, during an interview Resident #4 stated My wound care should be done every 3 days. It was done on 09/11/25 but not on 09/14/25. They just wipe it with wet gauze and cover it up. It's supposed to be irrigated with Dial soap. There's a doctor who sees wounds, but he's never looked at mine.Record review of Resident #4's electronic Treatment Administration Record (eTAR) for September 2025 revealed a physician order for treatment with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to accommodate resident preferences for two (2) of seven (7) residents reviewed. Residents #3 and #4 Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled A.M. Care, dated 10/09, revealed, A.M. Care will be given to residents daily . Procedure: . 11. Provide/assist with shaving (male and female) as needed . Review of the facility policy titled Hydration Cart, dated 2016, revealed, Water or other fluids shall be offered to all residents throughout the day. Fluids are typically offered during meals, snacks. A hydration cart or location may be used to enhance access and encouragement of fluids for residents. Procedure: 1. The Hydration Cart will be offered or refreshed each day at mid morning, mid afternoon, and bedtime . Resident #4 On 11/06/24 at 3:30 PM, an observation and interview with Resident #4 and his Resident Representative (RR)revealed that water was only provided upon request, and then the resident had to wait for delivery. They stated they would rather the resident have water available…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0800 — isolated
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received a diet that was according to the resident preferences for one (1) of seven (7) sampled residents. Resident #1 Findings include: Review of the Facility policy titled Resident Interview and Foot Preferences, dated 2016, revealed, Resident food preferences will be recorded and consistently utilized . On 11/07/24 at 2:30 PM, in an interview with Resident #1, she stated that she hated oatmeal and dietary services put oatmeal on her tray multiple times weekly. Resident #1 stated that she had made staff aware of preferences multiple times. On 11/08/24 at 2:52 PM, an interview with the facility Dietician, she stated that she had stressed the importance of resident food preference to dietary staff and cooks. The Dietician stated she had been made aware that Resident #1 had complained that she did not like oatmeal, and that she had continued to receive oatmeal on her breakfast trays. On 11/08/24 at 5:10 PM, during an interview, the acting Administrator confirmed that whenever possible, he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary practices within professional standards for food service safety related to hand hygiene for one (1) of two (2) kitchen observations. Findings Included: A review of the facility's policy, Proper Hand Washing and Glove Use, dated 2016, revealed, Guideline: All employees will use proper hand washing procedures .Procedure .4. Employees will wash hands before and after .touching any part of their uniform, face, or hair . On 07/22/24 at 10:29 AM, an observation of the Registered Dietitian (RD) revealed on two (2) occasions while she stood adjacent to the steam table, she picked up an ink pen from the kitchen floor and placed it back on the steam table. After placing the ink pen on the steam table, the RD proceeded to handle a food service utensil which was placed in a pan of pureed pork chops on the steam table, the food thermometer, and the menu book. The RD was observed licking her fingers and flipping through the resident's meal cards that were placed on each tray. On 07/22/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for residents as evidenced by unlocked biohazard rooms on two (2) of four (4) days of survey. Findings Included: During an observation on 07/22/24 at 12:00 PM, there was an unlocked door marked Biohazard on the second floor of the facility. Inside, a red biohazard can was open with red biohazard bags visible, alongside housekeeping chemical dispensers containing Vindicator (a type of disinfectant) and Super Shine All (a type of floor cleaner). A record review of the Safety Data Sheet (SDS), dated 02/04/21, revealed Vindicator had a health hazard for acute oral toxicity and skin corrosion/irritation. A record review of the Safety Data Sheet, dated 10/22/21, revealed Super Shine had a health hazard for serious eye damage/eye irritation. On 7/23/24 at 10:30 AM, during an observation and interview with the Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor, she observed the biohazard room door was not secured on the second floor of the facility. She stated that biohazard doors should always remain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,901 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $9,113 — penalty dated 2025-09-18
• $4,394 — penalty dated 2025-02-27
• $4,394 — penalty dated 2025-02-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS