Winston County Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 102.7 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.39 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.22 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.72 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.46 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans to address a physician-ordered fluid restriction for two (2) of five (5) dialysis residents, Resident #43 and Resident #58. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled Care Plan, revised 2/1/23, revealed under Purpose: To direct resident care from admission to discharge. Resident #43 Record review of Resident #43's dialysis Care Plan revealed Hemodialysis – I am at increased risk for complications related to I have diagnosis of: ESRD (end stage renal disease) with hemodialysis. There was no mention of fluid restrictions on the care plan. Record review of Resident #43's orders revealed, Hemodialysis at (Proper Name) Monday-Wednesday-Friday with active date 4/30/25. Record review of Resident #43's orders revealed, 1000 milliliters (mL) fluid restriction every 24 hours with active date 8/12/25. Record review of Resident #43's Nutritional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2026-06-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a physician-ordered fluid restriction was implemented and monitored for three (3) of five (5) dialysis residents. Resident #12, #43, and #58. Findings Include: Record review revealed that the facility does not have a policy and presented a statement on facility letterhead dated 06/17/26, that stated, (Proper name) nursing home does not have a policy specific to fluid restrictions on dialysis residents, signed by the Administrator. Resident #12An observation and interview with Resident #12 on 6/16/26 at 8:30 AM revealed she was lying in bed. A 32-ounce water pitcher full of ice water was located on the bedside table. The resident stated she attended dialysis three times weekly and was not aware of a fluid restriction.Record review of Resident #12's Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 2/20/26, Hemodialysis with 'proper name of dialysis company' Mon (Monday), Wed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store foods in kitchen refrigeration that was maintained in a clean, sanitary condition and good repair for one (1) of two (2) kitchen tours. Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Food Handling Guidelines: Cooling Process and Cold Holding, revised 4/26, revealed under, Policy: . An effective preventative maintenance plan is in place for each piece of food service equipment. All refrigeration is maintained in good working order and is calibrated, serviced, or tested per the manufacturer's instructions .During the initial kitchen tour on 6/15/26 at 11:00 AM, observation of the tray line cooler revealed the interior lower metal surface contained an excessive amount of moisture and was covered with a greenish-black substance in spotty patches. The interior lower door gasket was covered with a black substance, and the gasket was dangling from the refrigerator door, visibly preventing a proper seal.An observation and interview with Dietary Staff #3 on 6/15/26 at 11:06 AM confirmed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to promote dignity and maintain independence during meal service by failing to provide a table knife to residents who were capable of independently cutting their own food for six (6) of eight (8) residents reviewed during a dining observation in the Cypress Cottage. Residents #6, Resident #16, Resident #34, Resident #49, Resident #70, and Resident #90Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights revised 2/1/23 revealed under, Policy: It is the nursing home's policy to provide the kind of care that will maintain and enhance dignity, respect individuality and quality of life .An observation of the lunch meal and resident interviews in the Cypress Cottage on 6/17/26 at 12:31 PM revealed residents were served pork chop with gravy, rice, squash and zucchini, and a roll. During the observation, Resident #6 was observed attempting to cut her pork chop with a fork without success. She then used a spoon to attempt to cut the meat while holding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve resident grievances related to food quality, food preferences, alternative menu selections, meal variety, food temperature, and food palatability as evidenced by unresolved concerns identified during six (6) of 12 months of Resident Council meetings reviewed. Resident #6, #13, #25, #28, #34, #38, #42, #49, #69, #81, and #99 Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Grievances-Family and Resident Grievances revealed under, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal, or fear of discrimination. Additionally revealed under, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 12. The facility will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.Record review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated 12/1/25, 1/5/26, 3/2/26, 4/1/26, 5/4/26, and 6/1/26 revealed repeated resident complaints regarding food quality, alternative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, test tray review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and consistent with resident food preferences and dislikes for nine (9) of 23 residents reviewed for food services in the Elm and Cypress cottages (Residents #6, #8, #16, #34, #49, #58, #70, #81, and #90). Findings included repetitive menu items, tough meats that were difficult to chew, food that was excessively salty, spicy, undercooked, or otherwise unpalatable, and failure to honor resident food preferences and alternative meal requests. Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Guidelines for Patient Food Service revised 8/22 revealed under, Policy/Purpose: To ensure that all food served from the FNS (Food and Nutrition Service) is of the highest quality, prior to each serving period. Additionally revealed under, Procedure: . Prior to meal service, a designated team member will taste each prepared food item on the patient serving line. The following criteria will be used for testing food items: . Is food properly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a properly secured refrigerator for one (1) of four (4) medication storage rooms. C Hall Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage-Controlled Medication Storage revised 2/1/23, revealed: Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal and record keeping in the nursing care center in accordance with federal, state and other applicable laws and regulations .An observation on 6/16/2026 at 10:05 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, revealed the medication storage room on C Hall contained 44 Lorazepam syringes prescribed to Resident #50, and were maintained on the center shelf of the refrigerator rather than within the locked, affixed controlled-substance storage box.During an interview conducted with LPN #2 at 10:06 AM, she stated the syringes would not fit in the locked storage drawer in the refrigerator. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during medication administration for one (1) of four (4) care areas observed. Resident #9Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Infection Control-EBP with an effective date of 4/01/2024 revealed, It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms .2. Initiation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions: i .indwelling medical devices (e.g . feeding tubes .)On 6/16/26 at 4:15 PM, an observation during medication administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 2 revealed, she administered medications to Resident #9 via a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube and did not don a gown, required for EBP.An interview on 6/16/26 at 4:30 PM with LPN #2, confirmed she did not don a gown to administer Resident #9's medications and stated she forgot to wear the gown.An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/17/2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide an effective system for residents to summon staff assistance when the call light system was nonfunctional for two (2) of 24 residents residing on one (1) nursing unit, Unit C. (Resident #52 and #95)Findings include:Review of facility policy titled, Answering and Responding to Call Lights with revision date: 2/1/23, revealed, Purpose: To ensure that resident's needs are responded to and met in a timely manner .During initial rounds on 6/15/2026 at 12:39 PM, observation of the call light system was not functioning, and residents were using handbells to request assistance.During an interview on 6/15/2026 at 12:42 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 confirmed the call light system was down yesterday (6/14/2026) and today. During an interview on 06/15/2026 at 12:43 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the call system went out midday Friday. She stated maintenance was working on the roof Friday, and something caused the call system to go down.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure items in the kitchen refrigerator, freezer and dry good spices were labeled and dated on one (1) of two (2) kitchen tours during survey. Findings include: A review of the facility policy revised on 1/22, titled Food and Supply Storage revealed: Procedures: Cover, label and date unused portions and open packages . An interview on 03/26/24 at 10:15 AM, with the Assistant Dietary Director (ADD) revealed that the Dietary Director is off this week, and she oversees the kitchen. An observation and interview on 03/26/24 at 10:18 AM, of the walk-in freezer in the kitchen with ADD revealed four (4) clear gallon size Ziploc bags with some type of meat inside them. The ADD confirmed that it was fish inside two (2) of the gallon Ziploc bags and some type of red meat inside of the other 2 gallon size Ziploc bags. The ADD confirmed that the Ziploc bags should have been labeled and dated when the meat was placed in the bag and stored in the refrigerator. An observation on 03/26/24 at 10:35 AM, of the spice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — pattern
  Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to submit criminal background checks on four (4) of five (5) new employee personnel records reviewed during survey. Employee #1, #2, #3, and #5. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Hiring with no revision date revealed under Comments #3e. If the drug test is negative, a Criminal History Record Check (CHRC) will be performed. Employees will be fingerprinted, and fingerprints will be submitted to the (Proper Name State Agency) . An interview on 03/28/24 at 12:45 PM, with the Administrator confirmed that background checks were completed with the Human Resource Director who also oversees the hospital. The Administrator confirmed that she was not aware that the fingerprint letters were not on the employee files. An interview on 03/28/24 at 12:55 PM, with the Human Resource Director and the Administrator revealed that criminal background checks have not been performed on any employee that has been hired since the first week of January 2024. The Human Resource Director stated, I'm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice for end of life care was indicated accurately on medical records for one (1) of 24 residents reviewed for advance directives. Resident #56 Findings include: Record review of facility's resident rights pamphlet titled, A Matter of Rights, undated, revealed, As a resident in a long term care facility, you have many rights guaranteed by law. Your rights include . freedom to make your own decisions. You have a right to expect care and a residential setting that: promotes your quality of life, and reflects your individual needs and preferences . Record review of facility policy titled, Policy for Advanced Directives, undated, revealed, (proper name of facility) and the Medical Staff will comply with the 1990 Patient Self Determination Act by: 1. Inquiring upon admission if the patient has an advance directive (Living Will or Durable Power of Attorney), 2. Providing information related to advance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in MS