George Regional Health & Rehab Center
859 Winter St, Lucedale, MS 39452 · Government - County · 59 certified beds · (601) 947-9101 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Oct 2021
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (17) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.9% | 20.5% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 4.6% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 1.6% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.9% | 19.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.0% | 23.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.4% | 6.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.2% | 20.7% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 30.3% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 2.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 84.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 43.4% | 27.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 28.9% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.51 | 2.43 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 5.46 | 2.86 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 39.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.8%CMS range 43.2–61.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 8.2–18.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 39.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 28.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 21.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 90.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.5–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.68 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 37.8 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.63 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
17 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2021-10-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Amendment 12/07/2021 Upon secondary review with CMS Regional Office staff and State Quality Assurance review, the State Survey Agency (SSA) determined the Immediate Jeopardy to be removed on 7/8/21 for F600 and the scope and severity was lowered to D, while the facility develops and implements a plan of correction and monitors effectiveness of systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Based on interviews, record reviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident was protected from neglect as evidenced by a Temporary Nursing Assistant (TNA) neglected to obtain assistance required from licensed/certified staff when providing incontinent care that resulted in a resident obtaining a bilateral femur fracture for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for falls. Resident #31. On 7/3/21, TNA #1 neglected to obtain the assistance required when providing incontinent care for Resident #31. TNA #1 turned the resident to her side without removing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2021-10-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Amendment 12/07/2021 Upon secondary review with CMS Regional Office staff and State Quality Assurance review, the State Survey Agency (SSA) determined the Immediate Jeopardy to be removed on 7/8/21 for F610 and the scope and severity was lowered to D, while the facility develops and implements a plan of correction and monitors effectiveness of systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Based on staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the potential for further injury during the investigation process by not removing Temporary Nursing Assistant (TNA) #1 from the facility following an incident on 7/3/21 which resulted in a major injury to Resident #31, for one (3) of three (3) investigations reviewed. On 7/3/21, TNA #1 neglected to obtain the assistance required when providing incontinent care for Resident #31. TNA #1 turned the resident to her side without removing the pillows from the resident's feet. This resulted in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Amendment 12/07/2021 Upon secondary review with CMS Regional Office staff and State Quality Assurance, the State Survey Agency (SSA) determined the Immediate Jeopardy to be removed on July 8, 2021 for F600, F610, F656 and F689 and the scope and severity was lowered to D, while the facility develops and implements a plan of correction and monitors effectiveness of systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Based on observation, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to follow the comprehensive care plan for providing Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) for one (1) of sixteen care plans reviewed. Resident #31. The facility failed to follow the comprehensive care plan when Temporay Nurse Assistant (TNA) #1 provided incontinent care without the required two (2) person assistance licensed/certified staff needed which resulted in Resident #31 falling from the bed and sustaining a major injury. The facility's failure to follow the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2021-10-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Amendment 12/07/2021 Upon secondary review with CMS Regional Office and State Quality Assurance review, the State Survey Agency (SSA) determined the Immediate Jeopardy to be removed on 7/8/21 for F689 and the scope and severity was lowered to D, while the facility develops and implements a plan of correction and monitors effectiveness of systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Based on staff interview, record reviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a vulnerable resident was protected from accidents and hazards when a Temporary Nursing Assistant (TNA) failed to obtain the required assistance while providing incontinent care which caused a fall with a major injury for Resident #31. The facility failed to ensure the residents were free from rodents in the facility as evidenced by (AEB) a mouse was seen in the bed with Resident #31 and mouse droppings were under four (4) residents beds and in chests of drawers for seven (7) of 16 residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to privacy and confidentiality were maintained when personal care signage was posted on the wall for two (2) of three (3) survey days. Resident #10 and Resident #29. Findings Included: A review of the facility's policy, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, dated 10/10/24, revealed, It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity .Compliance Guidelines: . 12. Maintain resident privacy . A review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights, dated 2/10/25, revealed, . The facility will inform the resident .of his or her rights and all the regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility . Resident rights. The resident has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination . 7. Privacy and confidentiality. The resident has a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records. a. Personal privacy includes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (5%) for four (4) of thirty-one (31) observed medication opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 12.9%. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, revised 2/1/25, revealed, .Medications are administered .in accordance with professional standards of practice .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .17. Administer medications as ordered in accordance with manufacturer specifications .c .Do no crush medications with 'do not crush' instruction .Example guidelines for Medication Administration (unless otherwise ordered by physician) .Do Not Crush Medications: Crushed meds are not to be combined and given all at once, if via feeding tube . A review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration via Enteral Tube, revised 1/20/25, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to ensure the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to professional standards of practice by crushing and combining all medications into a single dose for administration via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube, without providing a rational for combining the medication or individualized resident needs, for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed with feeding tubes. (Residents #11). Cross Reference F759 Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, revised 2/1/25, revealed, .Medications are administered .in accordance with professional standards of practice .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .17. Administer medications as ordered in accordance with manufacturer specifications .c .Do no crush medications with 'do not crush' instruction .Example guidelines for Medication Administration (unless otherwise ordered by physician) .Do Not Crush Medications: Crushed meds are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection by not following manufacturer guidelines for cleaning and disinfecting the glucometer for one (1) of two (2) residents observed for blood glucose monitoring, Resident #95. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Blood Glucose Monitoring, dated 2/15/25, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to perform blood glucose monitoring to diabetic residents as per physician's orders . Policy Explanation and Guidelines . 2. The nurse will perform the blood glucose test utilizing the facility's glucometer as per manufacturer's instruction. 3. The nurse will abide by the infection control practices of cleaning and disinfection of the glucometer as per the manufacturer's instructions and in accordance with the facility's glucometer disinfection policy. 4. If possible, glucometers should not be shared between residents, but if this is not possible, the nurse is responsible for cleaning and disinfection of the machine between residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store foods safely as evidenced by food left open and exposed on shelves, undated/unlabeled foods without a use-by -date, food stored without an identifying label, and not discarding food items after their use-by or sell-by date for one (1) of two (2) kitchen observations. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Food and Supply Storage, review date 08/2021, revealed, All food, non-food items and supplies used in food preparation shall be stored in such a manner as to prevent contamination to maintain the safety and wholesomeness of the food for human consumption . Most products contain an expiration date. The words sell-by or use-by should precede the date . The sell-by, best-by or use-by date is the last date that a food can be consumed . Foods past the use-by, sell-by, best-by, or enjoy-by date should be discarded .Cover, label and date unused portions and open packages . On 12/18/23 at 10:44 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to correct a quality deficiency from a previous survey for one (1) re-cited deficiency of five (5) cited deficiencies from a previous annual recertification survey in October 2021. The deficiency was related to initiating and implementing care plans. The facility's continued failure during two surveys shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAPI Committee. Findings Include: Record Review of the facility's policy, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program revised August 2017, revealed, .The facility shall .maintain an ongoing, facility-wide QAPI plan designed to monitor and evaluate the quality and safety of resident care, pursue methods to improve care quality, and resolve identified problems .Policy Interpretation and Implementation The objectives of the QAPI Plan are to .5. Establish and implement plans to correct deficiencies, and to monitor the effects of these action plans on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for one (1) of 16 residents sampled. Resident # 6 Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled, MDS 3.0 Completion, reviewed/revised 10/02/23, revealed, Policy: Residents are assessed, using a comprehensive assessment process, in order to identify care needs and to develop an interdisciplinary care plan . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 2f. Discharge Assessment - completed using the discharge date as the ARD (Assessment Reference Date). Must be completed within 14 days of the discharge date /ARD . A record review of the facility's Face Sheet, revealed the facility admitted Resident #6 on 07/20/23, with diagnoses that included Essential Hypertension. A record review of the facility's Discharge Summary, for Resident #6, revealed the facility discharged the resident to home on [DATE]. A record review of the MDS, for Resident #6, revealed there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident (Resident #21) who had an indwelling catheter and failed to implement comprehensive care plan interventions for medication administration (Resident #21) and toenail care (Resident #34) for two (2) of 16 resident care plans reviewed. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised December 2016, revealed, .A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timelines to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .8. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will .b. Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being .13 .care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change . Resident #21 Record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to obtain a resident's pulse before administering an antihypertensive medication for one (1) of four (4) medication administration observations. Resident #21 Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, Medication Administration, with a revision date of 2/2023, revealed Policy: Medications are administered by licensed nurses .in accordance with professional standards of practice .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .8. Obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician orders. When applicable, hold medication for those vital signs outside the physician's prescribed parameters .Example guidelines for Medication Administration .Medication requiring vital signs prior to administration .Anti-Hypertensives . On 12/18/23 at 4:24 PM, in an observation of medication administration, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 administered Metoprolol Tartrate and did not obtain the resident's pulse prior to administering the medication. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for a resident who was dependent upon staff for toenail care for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for ADL care. Resident #34 Findings include: Review of the facility's policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, revised 1/12/2021, revealed Policy Statement . Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently .including appropriate support with: a. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming) . Review of the facility's policy Fingernails/Toenails, Care of, revised 02/2018, revealed .Purpose: The purpose of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections . General Guidelines 1. Nail care includes daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the failed to ensure multidose insulin pens were dated when opened for six (6) of 19 diabetic residents who are prescribed multidose insulin pens. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, Labeling of Medication Containers, revised 4/2007, revealed, Policy Statement .All medications maintained in the facility shall be properly labeled in accordance with the current state and federal regulations .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .3. Labels for individual drug containers shall include all necessary information, such as .h. The expiration date when applicable; . On 12/18/23 at 3:30 PM, an observation of the 600 Hall medication cart, with Licensed Practical Nurse #2 (LPN), revealed an opened NovoLog FlexPen pre-filled multi-dose insulin pen with no date indicating when the pen was opened. LPN #2 confirmed there was no date on the multi-dose pen or the box the pen was stored in. LPN #2 stated that all insulin pens should have a date written on the pen or box indicating the date it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-05-01 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure daily nurse staffing information was posted in a visible and accessible location for two (2) of three (3) survey days. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, Nurse Staffing Posting Information, dated 12/17/24, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to make nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents, staff, and visitors at any given time . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The Nurse Staffing Sheet will be posted on a daily basis and will contain the following information: a. Facility name b. The current date c. Facility's current resident census d. The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: i. Registered Nurses ii. Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses iii. Certified Nurse Aides 2. The facility will post the Nursing Staffing Sheet at the beginning of each shift . 3. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-12-20 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the resident, or the Resident Representative (RR), written notification of a hospital transfer at the time of transfer for three (3) of three (3) sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. Resident #8, Resident #22, and Resident #24. Findings Include: Review of the facility's, Transfer or Discharge Notice revised December 2016 revealed Policy Statement: Our facility shall provide a resident and or the residents representative (sponsor) with a thirty (30)-day written notice of impending transfer or discharge. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. A resident and or his or her representative (sponsor) will be given 30-day advance notice of an impending transfer or discharge from our facility. 2. Under the following circumstances the notice will be given as soon as it is practicable but before transfer or discharge. 3. The resident and or representative (sponsor) will be notified in writing of the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEORGE COUNTY HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2011 |
| LANSDOWN, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2016 |
| MASON, ANGIE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
| LONG TERM CARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $482K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Mississippi Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 255333. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.