No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Noxubee County Nursing Home

78 Hospital Rd, Macon, MS 39341 · Government - County · 60 certified beds · (662) 726-2097 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Jun 20252 immediate-jeopardy citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (27% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
78 Hospital Rd · (662) 726-4264 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
34 Hospital Rd · (662) 788-4398 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
101 W Pearl St · (662) 726-5467 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Thomas Mill Pond Dam · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.8%20.5%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.3%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.6%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.0%2.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%1.6%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained3.6%0.2%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.1%19.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.8%23.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%6.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.5%20.7%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.0%21.7%17.1%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.832.431.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.042.861.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
1.08
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.68
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
27.1%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 58.1 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.47 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-12)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to timely revise and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for one (1) of eight (8) residents at risk for aspiration and choking risk. Resident #1. The facility's failure to revise the care plan and provide supervision on [DATE] at 11:20 AM, resulted in serious injury and death for Resident #1, who had a documented aspiration/choking risk. Resident #1 was not provided supervision while eating when staff served his lunch meal and stepped away from the table. Resident #1 began choking and required transfer to the emergency department where he was intubated and air lifted to another hospital for a higher level of care. Resident #1 expired after being taken off the ventilator on [DATE]. During the investigation, the SA identified Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on [DATE] when Speech Therapy evaluated Resident #1 and recommended close supervision while eating.42 CFR 483.21 (b)(1) Comprehensive Care Plans (F657)- Scope/Severity J.This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility investigation, staff interviews and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance during meals for one (1) of eight (8) residents at risk for aspiration and choking risk. Resident #1. The facility's failure to provide supervision on 5/4/26 at 11:20 AM, resulted in serious injury and death for Resident #1, who had a documented aspiration/choking risk. Resident #1 was not provided supervision while eating when staff served his lunch meal and stepped away from the table. Resident #1 began choking and required transfer to the emergency department where he was intubated and air lifted to another hospital for a higher level of care. Resident #1 expired after being taken off the ventilator on 5/8/26. During the investigation, the State Agency (SA) identified Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC), which began on 4/27/26 when Speech Therapy evaluated Resident #1 and recommended close supervision while eating.The IJ and SQC existed at:42 CFR(s) 483.25(d)(1)(2) Accidents (F689) Scope/Severity J.This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment as evidenced by a dirty air conditioning unit in one (1) of 30 rooms observed. room [ROOM NUMBER]. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, Routine Cleaning and Disinfection with revision date of February 2023, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to ensure the provision of routine cleaning and disinfection in order to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to prevent the development and transmission of infections to the extent possible . An observation on 06/09/25 at 11:23 AM and on 06/11/25 at 2:55 PM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed a dirty air conditioning unit that had a damp, black substance scattered on the plastic slats on the front panel. There were also scattered food particles and dried crumbs on the front lower part of the thermostat section of the air conditioner unit. An observation in room [ROOM NUMBER] and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to address a grievance regarding answering a call light and providing Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care in a timely manner for one (1) of the 17 sampled residents. Resident #45 Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Policy Statement Filing Grievances/Complaints with a revision date of 3/17/17 revealed, .Staff will assist in completing and filing a grievance or complaint when such requests are made. Grievances include, but are not limited to, resident care, treatment, abuse, neglect .2. Grievances can be filed orally, in writing, or anonymously .4. Grievances will be responded to within 5 working days of the date the grievance was filed. Immediate action will be taken on grievances where alleged violations of any resident rights are reported to prevent further potential violations . An observation and interview on 6/09/25 at 10:20 AM, revealed Resident #45 lying in her bed and she was visibly upset. Resident #45 stated, It has been almost three hours that I have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) psychotropic hypnotic medication for insomnia was limited to 14 days or to an appropriate time frame approved by the provider for one (1) of five (5) medication reviews. Resident #20 Findings include: Record review of facility letterhead signed by the Administrator and dated 6/12/25 revealed, (Proper name of facility) does not have a policy on stop dates for psychotropic drugs. Record review of Resident #20's Orders revealed an order dated 4/17/25 for Zolpidem 5 milligram oral tablet .every night at bedtime PRN for insomnia. Record review of Consultant Pharmacist Recommendation to Physician dated 4/23/25, revealed, Ambien 5 mg (milligrams) qhs (every night at bedtime) PRN (as needed) for insomnia. May we extend the above order for 6 months? The physician's response was, Agree .Cont (continue) it 6 months. During an interview on 6/11/25 at 10:10 AM, Registered Nurse/Minimum Data Set Coordinator (RN/MDS) revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered care plan for providing incontinent care for one (1) of the 18 care plans reviewed. Resident #45 Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled Quality of Care undated revealed, Each resident shall receive optimal care to attain and/or maintain the highest mental and physical functional status as defined by the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Additionally, the resident will receive the appropriate interventions to maintain or to improve his/her abilities. Record review of Resident #45's care plan, updated 4/9/25 revealed Plan Comments: I am incontinent of bowels . Outcomes .I will be kept clean & dry of incontinent bowel .Interventions .Provide incontinence/pericare after each incontinent episode . Record review of Resident #45's care plan, updated 4/9/25 revealed Plan Comments: I have a potential for complications associated with urinary incontinence .Outcomes .I will be kept clean, dry, & comfortable daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) with incontinent care was provided for one (1) of 17 sampled residents. Resident #45 Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled Quality of Care undated revealed, .The policy of the facility is to establish a minimum acceptable level of daily care, which shall include and involve the maximum utilization of the resident's capabilities, while providing the necessary assistance to accomplish the following: . Toileting .Staff is to check and change incontinent residents every 2 hours and prn (as needed) . On 6/09/25 at 10:20 AM, during an observation and interview revealed Resident #45 lying in her bed visibly upset and stated, It has been almost three hours that I have been sitting in a poopy diaper the last time my diaper was changed was on the night shift. Resident #45 further revealed, I have put my call light on several times this morning. They come in and ask me what I need, and I tell them I need my diaper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record review, and facility letterhead review, the facility failed to monitor residents for side effects of anticoagulant medication use for two (2) of five (5) medication reviews. Resident #27 and Resident #56 Findings include: Record review of facility letterhead signed by the Administrator and dated 6/12/25 revealed, (Proper name of nursing home) does not have a policy on anticoagulant monitoring. Resident #27 Record review of Resident #27's Orders revealed an order dated 8/26/24 for Apixaban (Eliquis) 5 milligram oral tablet) .BID (two times daily). During an interview on 6/10/25 at 3:40 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 revealed Resident #27 received an anticoagulant medication and acknowledged awareness of the risk of anticoagulant medication use and the need to observe for bruising or bleeding. She revealed there was not an area in the computer documentation to prompt the nurses to monitor or to document that the resident was monitored for bleeding or bruising. During an interview on 6/11/25 at 10:10 AM, the Registered Nurse/Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly in a secure manner in the medication cart for one (1) of five (5) medication administration observations. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage, undated, revealed .1. General Guidelines: c. During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart . An observation on 06/11/25 at 9:05 AM, revealed a medication card of Lasix tablets on top of an unattended medication cart. An observation revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 walked away from the medication cart down to the end of the hall in the sitting area and assisted a resident in a wheelchair to her room to receive her medications. An interview on 06/11/25 at 9:15 AM with LPN #1 revealed that medications were supposed to be locked up in the the medication carts when unattended. She confirmed that she left the Lasix 40 milligram (mg) medication card face down on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to utilize protective barriers to prevent possible contamination and spread of bacteria during two (2) of five (5) resident medication administration observations. Resident #1 and Resident #43. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, Administration of Eye Drops or Ointments Policy with revision date of 04/24/23 revealed, Eye medications are administered as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice .5. Administration: a. Remove medication cap and place on clean, dry surface (i.e. tissue or paper towel) to prevent contamination Resident #1 An observation on 06/11/25 at 8:20 AM, during Resident #1's medication pass revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, removed Timolol eye drop bottle from the box and placed it on the overbed table with no barrier in use and had not sanitized the overbed table prior to placing the eye drop bottle on the table. LPN #1 administered the eye drops, placed the eye drop bottle back on the overbed table and then returned it to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment as evidenced by the presence of a pressure ulcer not being indicated on the assessment for one (1) of 16 MDS assessments reviewed. Resident #50 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, MDS 3.0 Completion with an implementation date of 6/14/21 and no revision date revealed under the Policy .Residents are assessed, using a comprehensive assessment process, in order to identify care needs and to develop an interdisciplinary care plan. An interview on 10/18/23 at 8:45 AM, with Registered Nurse (RN)/Treatment Nurse #1 revealed that Resident #50's pressure ulcer was facility acquired and was currently still receiving treatment to the heel that started in July of this year. Review of Resident #50's physicians orders revealed an order dated 7/27/23 to Paint left (L) heel Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) with betadine for one week. Review of Resident #50's MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to implement a care plan regarding the placement of hand rolls per physician's order for one (1) of 16 care plans reviewed. Resident #29 Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans with an implementation date of 6/14/21 revealed, Policy .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a residents medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs . Record review of Resident #29's care plan with an onset date of 9/3/23 revealed, I am at risk for pressure ulcers related to poor body control/positioning, poor cognition, contractures to right and left hand . Approaches . Resident to wear hand roll in bilateral hands on at 9 AM and off at 3 PM to help prevent further contracture . On 10/16/23 at 11:33 AM, observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to place hand rolls on a resident with contractures for one (1) of 25 residents reviewed with contractures. Resident #29 Findings include: Review of the typed documentation on facility letterhead dated 10/19/23 and signed by the Administrator revealed, We have no policy on splints or hand rolls. An observation on 10/16/23 at 11:33 AM revealed Resident #29 had contracted hands bilaterally with no splints. An observation on 10/17/23 at 11:15 AM revealed Resident #29 lying in bed; hands contracted bilaterally with no splints or hand roll. Record review of Resident #29's Physician Orders revealed an order dated 10/14/21 for resident to wear hand roll in bilateral hands, on at 9 AM and off at 3 PM, to help prevent further contracture. An interview on 10/17/23 at 3:05 PM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 revealed Resident #29's hand rolls are supposed to be applied by the treatment nurse and are documented on the Treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility policy review, record reviews, and staff interviews the facility failed to prevent the likelihood of infection, as evidenced by failure to change the water flush bag and feeding tube bag every 24 hours for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube. Resident #35 Findings Include: Record review of facility policy titled, Gastrostomy Tube Feedings Continuous Feeding Per Pump, dated 12/21/21, revealed . 6. Bottles of formula and/or feeding bags are to be changed every 24 hours . An observation on 06/06/22 at 1:38 PM revealed Resident #35's PEG tube feeding bag was empty and a filled water flush bag. Both bags were hanging on the PEG feeding pump pole and was labeled with the date of 6/4/22 on each bag. An observation and interview on 6/6/22 at 1: 45 PM, with the Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN)#1 confirmed she worked on 6/4/22 on the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift. She confirmed that the date on the water flush bag and that the date on the empty PEG tube feeding bag that were presently hanging on the PEG feeding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in MS

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Mississippi Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Mississippi
$9,581/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,885/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,369/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 25A374. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next