McComb Community Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 141 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 105.6 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.22 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-06 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide emergency basic life support immediately when needed, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), to a resident requiring such care or initiate the emergency response system in accordance with related physician's orders and the resident's advance directives for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1 The facility's failure to review and implement the code status according to the advance directives resulted in Resident #1 not receiving CPR and emergency services. The resident subsequently expired at the facility. During the investigation, the SA identified an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) that began on [DATE] and existed at: 42 CFR(s): 483.24 (a)(3) -Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (F678) Scope and Severity J.This situation placed Resident #1 and all other residents who were full code status at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death.The SA notified the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement care plan intervention related to activities of daily living (ADL) care and hydration for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents, Resident #1. Findings Included: Review of the facility's policy, Care Plans, dated 1/15, revealed, .Each resident will have a plan of care to identify problems, needs and strengths that will identify how the team will provide care Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 2/22/24 with current diagnoses including [NAME] Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Record review of the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/20/25 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment. Further review revealed Resident #1 was dependent upon staff for ADL care. Record review of the Order Summary Report for Resident #1 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care, specifically nail care, for a dependent resident for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents, Resident #1. Findings Included: Review of the facility's policy titled, A.M. Care, dated 10/09, revealed, .A.M. (Morning) Care will be given to residents daily .Procedure .10. Provide nail care as needed . Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 2/22/24 with current diagnoses including [NAME] Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).a Record review of the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/20/25 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment. Further review revealed Resident #1 was dependent upon staff for ADL care. On 4/07/25 at 12:15 PM, an observation revealed Resident #1 had ten fingernails with thick…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide hydration care and services to one (1) of four (4) sampled residents, Resident #1. Findings Included: Policy review of the facility policy titled 'Water Pitchers/Water Glasses' with review date 10/09 revealed the policy stated, Each resident will be provided with ice water/tap water at the bedside .Responsibility Nursing Assistants. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 2/22/24 with current diagnoses including [NAME] Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Record review of the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/20/25 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment. Further review revealed Resident #1 was dependent upon staff for ADL care. Record review of the Order Summary Report for Resident #1 revealed the resident had physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide the resident or the Resident Representative (RR) with written notification of the bed-hold policy at the time of transfer for one (1) of one (1) sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. Resident #18. Findings Include: Record review of a typed statement on facility letterhead, dated September 13, 2024, and signed by the Administrator revealed, (Proper name of facility) does not have a policy regarding bed holds. On 09/13/24 at 8:16 AM, during an interview with the RR for Resident #18, he stated that he did not receive a call from the Business Office Manager (BOM) or anyone from the facility regarding his father's bed hold for the hospital transfer that occurred on 09/10/24. The RR explained that no written notification or information was provided about the bed-hold process On 09/13/24 at 8:36 AM, during an interview with the BOM she revealed that she does not send out a bed-hold letter to families when residents are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement the care plan interventions as reflected in the resident's comprehensive Care Plan related to a fall for one (1) of twenty-three (23) sampled residents. Resident #37. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plans, (D.3) dated 3/18, revealed, Each resident will have a person centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care .Definitions .Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan (CCP) - contains services provided, preference, ability, goals for admission and desired outcomes, and care level guidelines .Procedure: .4. The Interdisciplinary Team along with the resident and /or Resident Representative will identify resident problems, needs, strengths, life history, preferences, and goals . A record review of Resident #37's care plan with a start date of 5/7/2024 revealed (Proper name of Resident #37) has the potential for falls…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care and oral care for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Resident #73 Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled A.M. Care, dated 10/09, revealed: Policy: A.M. Care will be given to residents daily. Responsibility: All Nursing Assistants . On 09/09/24 at 11:48 AM, during an interview, the Resident Representative (RR) of Resident #73 stated that the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) did not regularly brush her daughter's teeth or wash her hair. She explained that her daughter was unable to perform personal care independently and could not feed herself. The RR expressed her wish was that staff would more consistently perform these tasks. On 09/09/24 at 11:52 AM, an observation revealed Resident #73's RR brushing and flossing the resident's teeth. The resident's hair appeared short and oily. On 09/12/24 at 2:39 PM, during an interview, CNA #4 stated that ADL care, which includes perineal care,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide urinary catheter care in a manner that prevents possible complications for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for urinary catheter care. Resident #18. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled Catheter Care, dated 5/22, revealed, Catheter care is performed to keep the catheter insertion site clean .3. Cleanse around the area where the catheter enters the urethral meatus with an incontinent wipe in a downward motion about 4 inches . Discard soiled incontinent wipes and plastic bag appropriately. On 09/09/24 at 02:38 PM, during an observation and interview, it was noted that Resident #18 had a urinary catheter. The resident was unable to recall how long he had a urinary catheter, however, he stated that it had been for some time. A record review of Order Summary Report, with active orders as of 9/13/24, revealed Resident #18 had a physician order, dated 8/15/24, for urinary catheter and another order, with the same order date, for urinary catheter care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in a manner to prevent the possibility of complications as evidenced by oxygen tubing that was not dated to indicate weekly oxygen tubing/nasal cannula changes and not cleaning the oxygen concentrator filter as required for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for respiratory care. Resident #26 Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Therapy, dated 8/14 revealed, Oxygen (O2) is administered to promote adequate oxygenation and provide relief of symptoms of respiratory distress .Procedure: . 8. Change tubing weekly. 9. Date tube when changed (weekly). On 9/9/24 at 10:30 AM, during an observation of Resident #26, who was sitting in her wheelchair in her room with a nasal cannula in her nose, it was noted that the oxygen tubing was not dated. On 9/9/24 at 10:35 AM, during an observation and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she explained that staff should write the date on a clear plastic bag when the tubing is changed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and enhanced barrier precautions were followed prior to providing care for a resident with an indwelling catheter, for one (1) of one (1) resident observed for urinary catheter care. Resident #18. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), dated 4/24, revealed . Definition: 1. Enhanced Barrier Precautions are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) in Nursing Homes. Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as those at increased risk for MDRO acquisition (e.g. residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices) A review of the facility's policy titled Catheter Care, dated 5/22 revealed, Catheter care is performed to keep the catheter insertion site clean .Procedure: 1. Complete perineal care. 2. Wash hands and apply…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, Resident [NAME] of Rights review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure residents had readily available and reasonable access to their personal funds on weekends. This had the potential to affect 55 of 112 residents who had funds managed by the facility. Findings Include: Record review of the facility's policy, Resident [NAME] Of Rights, with a revision date of 11/2017, revealed, .A. Facility residents shall have the right to . 22. Manage his or her financial affairs. The resident must authorize the facility in writing to manage any personal funds and the facility must ensure the resident has reasonable and ready access to those funds . On 12/05/22 at 11:16 AM, in an interview with Resident # 29, he stated that he has a trust fund at the facility, but he is not able to get money on the weekends. He stated that if he wanted money for the weekends, it would have to be requested on Friday, as the lady that disperses the money does not work on weekends. On 12/7/22 at 3:40 PM, in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,740 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $12,740 — penalty dated 2026-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS