Bedford Care Center Of Picayune
2797 Cooper Road, Picayune, MS 39466 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (601) 799-1616 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0609, F0610) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- inspectors cited 6 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 6 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (26) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $39,392 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-18)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.3% | 20.5% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.1% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.0% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.7% | 2.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.9% | 1.6% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.1% | 19.6% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 32.6% | 23.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.4% | 97.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.5% | 6.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.1% | 20.7% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.1% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.7% | 2.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.2% | 84.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.5% | 27.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.7% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.31 | 2.43 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.44 | 2.86 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 110 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 48.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.4%CMS range 45.0–68.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.8%CMS range 11.1–17.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 65.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.7%CMS range 4.8–12.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.37 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.455 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
26 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to protect residents from neglect when Resident #1 sustained a burn from hot coffee on 12/31/25 at approximately 3:40 PM and the facility failed to implement safeguards or supervision to protect other residents from exposure to the same hazard. Residents continued to have access to hot coffee in the dining room without supervision, temperature controls, or access restrictions until 1/12/26. Additionally, on the night shift beginning at 7:00 PM on 12/29/25, residents on Station B remained under the care of an impaired licensed nurse who was unable to safely perform nursing duties. Despite staff observations of impairment, the nurse remained responsible for resident care until approximately 3:00 AM on 12/30/25. Review of medication administration records revealed multiple medications were not documented as administered and others were documented late. Staff interviews confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to immediately report allegations of neglect to the State Agency for two (2) of (2) events reviewed. The facility's Administrator became aware on 1/6/26 that Resident #1 had sustained a burn from hot coffee on 12/31/25 and residents continued to have access to hot coffee without safeguards in place to prevent additional injuries until 1/12/26. The facility also failed to report to the SA when the Administrator became aware on 12/30/25 that an impaired licensed nurse had remained responsible for resident care from 7:00 PM on 12/29/25 until approximately 3:00 AM on 12/30/25 and medication administration could not be verified as accurate and timely. The facility's failure to report suspected neglect delayed regulatory oversight and corrective intervention, allowing unsafe conditions to continue, placing residents who had access to hot coffee and all (29) residents residing on Station B at likelihood for serious injury…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct thorough and timely investigations and failed to implement corrective actions to prevent further neglect for two (2) of (2) events reviewed. Resident #1 sustained a burn on 12/31/25 at approximately 3:40 PM; however, the facility failed to determine the root cause of the injury or implement safeguards to prevent additional residents from exposure to the same hazard, and residents continued to have access to hot coffee without supervision, temperature controls, or access restrictions until 1/12/26. Additionally, residents remained under the care of an impaired licensed nurse from 7:00 PM on 12/29/25 until approximately 3:00 AM on 12/30/25. Medication administration could not be verified as accurate and timely. However, the facility failed to immediately investigate how long the nurse had been impaired, whether medications were administered correctly, or what system failures allowed unsafe care to continue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards when Resident #1 sustained a burn with blisters from hot coffee on 12/31/25 at approximately 3:40 PM and the facility failed to implement environmental controls or supervision to prevent other residents from exposure to the same hazard. Despite staff knowledge that hot coffee posed a burn risk, coffee pots remained accessible to residents in the dining room without supervision, temperature controls, or access restrictions until 1/12/26. This deficient practice affected one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #1) with the potential to affect all residents who drink hot coffee.The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision resulted in Resident #1 sustaining a burn with blisters and placed all residents who had access to hot coffee at likelihood for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death.The situation was determined…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient licensed nursing supervision and coordination of care when no licensed nurse was designated to serve as charge nurse for the night shift beginning at 7:00 PM on 12/29/25. The scheduled charge nurse called in sick, and no replacement charge nurse was designated. As a result, no licensed nurse was assigned responsibility to supervise staff, coordinate care, or respond to unsafe conditions. During this shift, residents on Station B remained under the care of an impaired licensed nurse who was unable to safely perform nursing duties, and leadership was not notified until approximately 1:30 AM on 12/30/25, with the impaired nurse not replaced until approximately 3:00 AM for one (1) of seven (7) shifts reviewed. The facility's failure to ensure a designated licensed charge nurse was present to supervise staff and coordinate resident care resulted in unsafe nursing care continuing for over eight (8) hours, including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment dated [DATE] was updated appropriately and failed to identify staffing and supervisory needs by shift and failed to ensure individual staff assignments and systems for coordination and continuity of care for residents within and across staff assignments. The facility assessment did not include contingency planning for absence of supervisory nursing staff and did not ensure onsite licensed supervision when the scheduled charge nurse was absent. On the night shift beginning at 7:00 PM on 12/29/25, the scheduled charge nurse called in sick, and no replacement charge nurse was designated. As a result, there was not a licensed nurse assigned the responsibility to supervise staff, coordinate care, or respond to unsafe conditions. Residents on Station B remained under the care of an impaired licensed nurse who was unable to safely perform nursing duties until approximately 3:00 AM on 12/30/25. This deficient practice affected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-02-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the Physician or the Resident Representative (RR) when a resident was observed to have bruising, edema, and pain to her left thigh and vaginal area, until the following day when she was diagnosed with a femoral fracture for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident #1. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Notification of Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised 8/2/22, revealed, Policy Statement: Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .1. The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been .b. discovery of injuries of an unknown source .4. Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the resident's representative when: a. The resident is involved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect as evidenced by Resident #1, who was observed to have bruising, edema, and pain to her left thigh and vaginal area, did not receive care or treatment until the following day when she was diagnosed with a femoral fracture for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident #1. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, Abuse Prevention Program, reviewed July 2019, revealed, Policy Statement: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect . A review of the facility's policy, Compliance with Reporting Allegation of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation, dated 10/10/22, revealed, .Compliance Guidelines .Identification: The facility will identify events, occurrences, patterns and trends that may constitute: a. Neglect: Failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin within two (2) hours when facility staff observed a Resident who had bruising, edema, and pain to her left thigh and vaginal area for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident #1 Findings include: A review of the facility policy, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, revised July 2019, revealed Policy Statement: .All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) . A review of the facility's policy, Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation, dated 10/10/22, revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse .injuries of unknown sources .are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement care plan approaches or interventions related to pain and resident transfers for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for care plans. Resident #1. Findings Include: Record review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plans policy, revised 8/24/22, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights .to meet a resident's medical, nursing .needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .3. The comprehensive care plan will describe .a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . Record review of the Order Summary Report with active orders as of 11/20/23, revealed Resident #1 had a Physician Order, dated 8/1/2019 for Acetaminophen Tablet 500 MG…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of accidents and/or hazards when a staff member transferred a resident using a mechanical lift without two (2) people to assist for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident #1 Findings include: Record review of the facility's Safe Transfer and Lifting of Residents policy, revised 8/2/22, revealed, .In order to protect the safety and well-being of .residents, and to promote quality care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .VI. Procedure for transferring resident with full body lift .f. Ensure 2nd person is assisting . A record review of the facility's investigation which included the,Alleged Abuse Incident Report dated 11/3/23, revealed that on 10/28/23 at approximately 1:45 PM, License Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 reported to Registered Nurse (RN) #2 Supervisor that Resident #1 had bruising to the left thigh…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-02-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to a resident when the resident was observed with bruising, edema, and pain to the left thigh and vaginal area, and was subsequently diagnosed with a femoral fracture for (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for pain. Resident #1. Findings include: Record review of the facility's policy, Pain Assessment and Management, revised 8/2/22, revealed, .The purposes of this procedure are to help the staff identify pain in the resident, and to develop interventions that are consistent with the resident's goals and needs and that address the underlying causes of pain .6. Assess the resident's pain and consequences of pain at least each shift for acute pain or significant changes . A record review of the facility's investigation which included the,Alleged Abuse Incident Report dated 11/3/23, revealed on 10/28/23 at approximately 1:45 PM, License Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 reported to Registered Nurse (RN) #2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-31 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were protected from misappropriation for one (1) of four (4) medication carts. Findings include:A review of the facility's policy Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, Revised 2/3/26 revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property.Definitions.Misappropriation of Resident Property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful.use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. A record review of the facility's investigation Alleged Medication Diversion, dated 3/13/26, revealed that on 3/12/26 during the 7:00 PM shift change narcotic count the following medications were missing from the narcotic box on one medication cart: Resident #1, four (4) Percocet 5-325 mg (milligrams); Resident #2, one (1) Percocet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records to document the services provided for four (4) of (4) sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4). Specifically, review of the Medication Administration Records (MARs) for the night shift of 12/29/25 revealed multiple medications were not documented as administered and medication administration could not be verified as accurate and timely.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy Administering Medications revised 8/2/22 revealed, Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed.Policy Interpretation and Implementation.10. The resident must be observed taking the medication.14.The nurse will document on the EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) when the medication is administered to the resident.A record review of the facility's Medication Admin Audit Report for Station B with Documentation Type: Missed for 12/29/25 through 12/30/25 revealed 25 residents had medications with no administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a required Significant Change PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) for 1 (one) of 23 (twenty-three) sampled residents (resident #113) after the initiation of an antipsychotic medication. The facility's failure to complete the Significant Change PASRR prevented the appropriate evaluation of the resident's mental health needs and compliance with federal PASRR requirements. A record review of the Level I PASARR dated July 9, 2019, was completed prior to admission. A review of the admission Record revealed Resident #113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of chronic systolic heart failure. A subsequent review of the admission Record revealed the resident was diagnosed with unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition on May 15, 2025.A review of the Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference ARD) of September 19, 2025, revealed Section C…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan with appropriate interventions for a resident diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (UTI) for one (1) of 23 sampled residents, Resident #7. Findings include:A review of the facility's policy Comprehensive Care Plans with revised date 8/24/22 revealed . It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident.that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment.A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #7 on 07/31/2025 with diagnoses including Polyneuropathy. A record review of the Results Urine Culture which was lasted resulted on 12/10/2025, revealed Resident #7 had a urine culture that was positive for greater than 100 thousand counts for an Klebsiella pneumoniae (a type of bacteria).A record review of the Order Summary Report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store medications in a safe and secure manner for two (2) of four (4) medication carts reviewed.Findings included:A review of the facility policy, Storage of Medications, revised 8/2/22, revealed, .The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation.7. Compartments (including, but not limited to.carts.containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use.carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others.On 12/17/25 at 8:05 AM, during an observation of medication pass in Building One with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, the medication cart was observed left unattended and unlocked on the resident hallway while LPN #1 went to the medication room. The medication cart remained unattended and unlocked from 8:15 AM to 8:20 AM.On 12/17/25 at 8:21 AM, during an interview with LPN #1, he confirmed that the medication cart was left unlocked while he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — widespreadHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive, specifically a durable Power of Attorney (POA), was available and readily retrievable by facility staff for one (1) of 32 residents reviewed for advance directives. (Resident #100). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who had a durable POA. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advanced Directives, revised 11/1/22, revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to .formulate an advance directive. Definitions: Advance Directive is a written instruction, such as a . durable power of attorney for health care .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .3. Upon admission, should the resident have an advance directive, copies will be made and placed on the chart . Record review of the Acknowledgement of Advance Directives Decisions, Rights, and Information, signed 2/9/24, which was located in the electronic health record and signed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise comprehensive care plan interventions related to oxygen therapy (Resident #3), pain management (Resident #103), and trauma-informed care (Resident #62) for three (3) of 21 sampled residents. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised 8/24/22, revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident .Definitions . Trauma-Informed care is an approach to delivering care that involves understanding, recognizing, and responding to effects of all types of trauma. A trauma-informed approach to care delivery recognizes the widespread impact, and signs and symptoms of trauma in residents, and incorporates knowledge about trauma into care plans .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .3. The comprehensive care plan will describe .a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to discard expired foods and failed to label opened foods with a use-by date for one (1) of three (3) kitchen observations. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Food Safety Requirements, revised 11/21/22, revealed, .Food will be stored .in accordance with professional standards for food safety .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .1. Food safety will be followed throughout the facility's entire food handling process .b. Storage of food in a manner that helps prevent deterioration or contamination of the food .3. Facility will inspect all food .and ensure timely and proper storage .c. Refrigerated storage .Practices to maintain safe refrigerated storage include .iv. labeling, dating, and monitoring refrigerated food . On 05/20/24 at 8:00 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM) #1 of Building 1, revealed an opened gallon of buttermilk in the Cook's Refrigerator with a manufacturer's expiration date of 12/2023. DM #1 confirmed the buttermilk was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to store an O2 (Oxygen) nasal cannula and a nebulizer mask in a designated container and failed to change or discard a disposable humidifier water bottle timely for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. Resident #3 Findings include: Record review of the facility's policy, Oxygen Administration, revised 8/2/22, revealed Purpose The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration . However, the policy did not address O2 and Nebulizer tubing storage or changing the disposable water humidifier bottle. On 5/20/24 at 9:13 AM, Resident #3 was observed sleeping in bed. She was not wearing oxygen and there was an O2 concentrator located next to the bed and bedside table. There was a nasal cannula tubing wrapped around the concentrator and not stored in a bag. The disposable humidifier water bottle attached to the concentrator had a handwritten date of 12/21/23, was half full, and was attached to a nasal cannula tubing that was dated 5/16/24. There was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure triggers and resident specific interventions were identified and initiated for a resident with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for one (1) of 21 sampled residents. Resident #62 Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Trauma Informed Care, revised 6/1/23, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to provide care and services which, in addition to meeting professional standards, are delivered using approaches which are culturally competent, account for experiences and preferences, and address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re -traumatization .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .2. The facility will use a multi-pronged approach to identifying a resident's history of trauma, as well as his or her cultural preferences. This will include asking the resident about triggers that may be stressors or may prompt recall of a previous traumatic event, as well as screening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to discard expired stock medications for one (1) of five (5) medication storage areas reviewed. Nurses Station-Building 1 Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Medication Storage, revised 7/17/23, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .8. Unused Medications: The pharmacy and all medication rooms are routinely inspected by the consultant pharmacist for discontinued, outdated, defective or deteriorated medications with worn illegible or missing labels. On 05/20/24 at 9:16 AM, during an observation, there were expired medications in the medication storage area of the nurses' station in Building 1. The expired stock medications were Magnesium 750 milligrams (mg), which had an expiration date of 12/2023, Folic Acid 1 mg with an expiration date of 1/2024, and Aspirin 325 mg with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide hand hygiene for residents prior to meals for one (1) of four (4) dining rooms observed. Dining Room C. Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene revised 8/2/22, revealed, .This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .5. Residents .will be encouraged to practice hand hygiene .7. Use an alcohol-based hand rub .or .soap .and water for the following situations .o. Before and after eating or handling food . On 5/20/24 at 10:51 AM, during an observation of Dining Room C, the facility staff did not offer to assist residents with washing or sanitizing their hands. There were four (4) Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) and one (1) Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) present. On 5/20/24 at 11:44 AM, during an observation, three (3) residents were assisted to the dining room table in Dining Room C by therapy staff. The residents were not offered assistance with washing or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had readily available and reasonable access to their personal funds, seven (7) days a week, for one (1) of 30 residents with personal fund accounts. Findings Included: Record review of the facility's Policy and Procedures Resident Trust, undated, revealed, .Access to Funds The residents shall have access to funds daily during normal business hours and for some reasonable time of at least two hours on Saturdays and Sunday unless approved otherwise by the resident council . On 08/15/22 at 08:39 AM, in an interview with Resident #35, he stated he has a trust fund at the facility, but he is not able to get any money on the weekends. If he wanted money for the weekend, he would have to request it on Friday. On 08/17/22 at 03:53 PM, in an interview with the Business Office Manager (BOM), she stated the residents can come to her anytime on Monday through Friday and get money from their account. She stated that the facility does not have anyone to give out the money on weekends, but the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for pain for two (2) of 19 sampled residents. Resident #20 and Resident #38. Findings Include: Record review of the facility's policy, Care Plans - Comprehensive with a review date of 8/2/22 revealed, Policy Statement An individualized Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident . Resident #20 On 08/16/22 at 1:31 PM, in an interview Resident #20, she stated that she frequently has back pain that requires her to take pain medication. Record review Resident #20's Order Summary Report with Active Orders As Of: 08/18/2022 revealed a Physician's Order dated 11/5/21 for Ultram Tablet 50 MG (Milligrams) . by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/15/22 revealed Resident #20 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$39,392 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $30,775 — penalty dated 2025-12-18
- $8,617 — penalty dated 2024-02-08
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to BEDFORD CARE CENTERS — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEDFORD HEALTH PROPERTIES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/26/2001 |
| BEVON, NICOLE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/26/2001 |
| MCELROY, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/08/2021 |
| MICHAEL E. MCELROY FAMILY TRUST FBO MICHAEL E. MCELROY, JR. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 13% | since 04/02/2025 |
| JANET F. MCELROY FAMILY TRUST FBO MICHAEL E. MCELROY, JR. | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/27/2025 |
| BEVON, JACK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/21/2021 |
| MCELROY, SONYA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2001 |
| HATTIESBURG MEDICAL PARK MANAGEMENT CORP. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/13/2015 |
| BEVON, CHARLES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2005 |
| JANET F MCELROY FAMILY TRUST FBO NICOLE MCELROY BEVON | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/27/2025 |
| MICHAEL E MCELROY FAMILY TRUST FBO NICOLE MCELROY BEVON | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/02/2025 |
| BEAN, LISA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/28/2008 |
| BLACKLEDGE, RICHARD | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/09/2016 |
| GILBERT, HEATHER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/08/2024 |
| KELLY, JASON | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/20/2015 |
| RYALS, JENNIFER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/04/2006 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Mississippi Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 255343. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.