Sharkey-Issaquena Nursing Home
431 West Race Street, Rolling Fork, MS 39159 · Government - County · 54 certified beds · (662) 873-5182 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.2% | 20.5% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.8% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.7% | 2.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.8% | 1.6% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 2.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.0% | 19.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.4% | 23.8% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 6.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.4% | 20.7% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.9% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 9.1% | 2.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 4.58 | 2.43 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.02 | 2.86 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
10 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to check and record food temperatures before serving all meals for the last 30 of 30 days. Findings Included: A review of the facility's policy titled Monitoring Temperatures of Cooked Foods revealed, Policy: The temperature of potentially hazardous cooked foods will be monitored to ensure that the foods are not in the danger zone (above 41 degrees F (Fahrenheit) and below 135 degrees F) for more than six hours . Cooking, holding, and storage temperatures should be recorded on a Food Temperature Monitoring Log. These logs should be maintained for at least three (3) months. During an observation of the kitchen on 10/2/24 at 11:35 AM, it was noted that kitchen staff were serving lunch to the dining room residents from the steam table. A record review of the meal temperature logbook revealed there was no documentation for breakfast, lunch, or dinner since 9/2/24. In an interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 10/2/24 at 11:40 AM, she stated that the kitchen staff had not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This failure was evidenced by the facility's failure to administer a second-step tuberculin (TB) skin test to one (1) of 17 residents (Resident #104) and 34 of 37 employees, who had no documentation of a negative TB skin test within the last 12 months. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled TB Testing MS, with a revision date of 4/14, stated: Resident Testing for Tuberculosis .Residents .shall have a baseline Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) performed with the initial step of a two-step Mantoux TST placed within 30 days prior to the day of admission. The second step shall be administered, read, and documented within 10-21 days of the first step . Employee Testing for Tuberculosis .Employees with a negative tuberculin skin test and a negative symptom assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conceal the urine collection bag for a resident's indwelling urinary catheter, thus failing to maintain the dignity of a resident, for one (1) of two (2) residents with urinary catheters. (Resident #51). Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights revealed, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that the rights of the residents residing at this facility are upheld in the highest regard . 2. Each resident has the right to a dignified existence . During observations on 10/01/24 at 10:50 AM and 1:28 PM, it was noted that Resident #51's door was open, and an indwelling catheter bag was visible hanging on the side of the bed, without a privacy cover. In a follow-up observation and interview on 10/01/24 at 1:29 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 confirmed that the catheter bag had no privacy cover and agreed that it should have been covered to maintain the resident's dignity. During an interview on 10/01/24 at 1:31 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verified that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately complete and request a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for a resident with a history of mental illness for one (1) of 12 residents reviewed. Resident #106 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening PAS/PASRR with a revision date of 6/13 revealed under, Level II PASRR . When Level 1 screening on the PAS (Preadmission Screening) indicates possible Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability/Developmental Disability and related conditions (RC) the DOM (Division of Medicaid) will notify Proper Name to review the case. Record review of the Level 1 PAS (Pre admission Screening) for Resident #106, with a submission date of 9/30/24, revealed under, Referral Question #28. Does resident have any history of abusing alcohol or drugs? No was marked. #31. Does resident have any history of mental illness? No was marked. #32. Does resident take, or have a history of taking psychotropic medication(s)? No was marked. Record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate care and treatment to a pressure ulcer to improve healing for Resident #104, for one (1) of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Wound Care with a revision date of 10/2/24 revealed under, Purpose: To provide standardized procedures for the prevention, identification, treatment, and ongoing management of wounds, ensuring the highest quality of care for all residents while maintaining compliance with local, state, and federal regulations . Also revealed under, a. Treatment Plan - A treatment plan will be developed by the wound care team and documented in the resident's medical record. This plan may include: - Cleansing and dressing the wound. - Use of appropriate topical medications or advanced wound care products . An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/1/24 at 12:32 PM revealed, she was doing the wound care until the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication had a stop date for one (1) of two (2) medication reviews. Resident #108 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Psychotropic Medications for PRN (as needed) Use and Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) Reviews undated, revealed under, Policy: . PRN use of psychotropic medications will be strictly regulated and monitored to comply with CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) regulations and ensure resident safety .Time Limitation: PRN orders for psychotropic medications must be limited to 14 days. After 14 days, the attending physician must review the resident's condition before extending the PRN order for continued use. This review must include a clinical evaluation to determine if continued PRN use is necessary. Record review of the September 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #108, revealed an order dated 9/3/24, Lorazepam 1 MG (milligram) tablet administer 1 mg (milligram) q…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to label and date food stored in the refrigerator and freezer for one (1) of two (2) kitchen tours. Findings include: Record review of the Storage of Frozen Food policy, undated, revealed the facility ensures the quality and safety of frozen food through accepted storage practices. Frozen foods are dated when received. The first in, first out method is used: products with the earliest date are stored in front of products with a later date. Frozen food is stored in the original package. Record review of the Storage of Refrigerated Food policy, undated, revealed the facility ensures the quality and safety and sanitation of refrigerated foods through accepted storage practices. All opened foods are labeled with common name of food, date stored, and use-by-date. On 12/15/19 at 10:51 AM, observation in the kitchen, revealed a zip-lock plastic bag of squash, in the freezer, without a date or label, a plastic bag of cut broccoli, without a date or label, and eight (8) cups of pudding on a metal pan, covered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for anticoagulant medication for two (2) of 12 resident care plans reviewed, Residents #24 and #34. Findings include: Record review of the Care Plan policy, undated, revealed a comprehensive care plan will be developed for each resident, that includes measurable, objective goals, with specific timeframes for meeting those goals. Resident #24 Record review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #24, revealed no care plan was developed for the anticoagulant, Coumadin, and its possible side effects, which would include bleeding. Record review of Resident #24's December 2019 Physician Orders, revealed an order dated 11/20/19, for Coumadin 3 milligram (mg) daily at bedtime. Resident #34 Record review of the care plan for Resident #34, revealed a care plan for administering an anticoagulant as ordered, however, there was no care plan developed for monitoring possible side effects, which would include bleeding. Record review of Resident #34's December 2019 Physician Orders,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the likelihood of infection, during medication administration, for one (1) of three (3) of six (6) residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of the Infection Control - Standard and Transmission-based Precautions, policy, undated, revealed: It is the policy of the facility to ensure that appropriate infection prevention and control measures are taken to prevent the spread of communicable disease and infections in accordance with State and Federal Regulation, and national guidelines. Procedure: Standard Precautions, 1. All staff are to adhere to standard precautions. a. Personal protective equipment is to be worn to protect health care workers (i.e. have a barrier) from contact with body fluids. b. Personal protective equipment includes gloves, gowns, masks, goggles and or face shield. c. The personal protective equipment worn will vary by task being performed and likelihood of exposure to body fluid. 2. Standard precautions apply to all residents. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-10-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer eye drops as ordered by the physician for one (1) of 32 medication administration opportunities; Resident #17. Findings include: Review of the facility's Drug Administration policy, dated 06/94, revealed the complete act of medication administration entailed removing an individual dose from a previously dispensed, properly labeled container (including a unit dose container), verifying it with the physician's orders, giving the individual dose to the proper resident, and promptly recording the time and dose given. An observation during medication administration on 10/10/2018 at 8:22 AM revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 administered Ketorolac 0.5% ophthalmic (opth) solution one (1) drop into Resident #17's left eye. Review of the cumulative October 2018 Physician Orders for Resident #17, revealed an order dated 09/06/18 for Ketorolac 0.5% opth solution one (1) drop in right eye four times a day. An interview, with LPN #1, on 10/10/2018 at 8:38 AM, confirmed Ketorolac 0.5% opth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHARKEY ISSAQUENA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 01/01/2016 |
| KEEVER, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in MS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Mississippi Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 255220. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.