Ruleville Community Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 98.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to protect one (1) of 108 residents right to be free from neglect as evidenced by [DATE] Resident #3 being unwilling to sleep in his room with his roommate due to Resident #1 getting in the bed with Resident #3. This resulted in the death of another resident (Resident #2) when Resident #1 laid on top of Resident #2 who was placed in the room with Resident #1. The facility's neglect to identify roommate incompatibility and provide appropriate person-centered behavioral interventions from [DATE]-[DATE] placed Resident #2 at risk, caused his death and placed other residents in a situation which was likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. The State Agency (SA) identified an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) on [DATE], which began on [DATE], when the facility neglected to ensure appropriate services for residents with behavioral needs. The facility's failure to provide appropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, care plan review, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan related to behaviors for (1) one of 13 residents reviewed for care plans. Resident #1 The facility's failure to revise Resident #1's care plans with appropriate interventions related to his known behavior of getting into bed with other residents resulted in staff not having access to preventative measures to deter this behavior. On [DATE], Resident #1 was found in bed on top of Resident #2 with only his hands visible beneath Resident #1. Resident #2 was unresponsive and did not respond to life sustaining measures and was pronounced dead. This placed the residents residing in the facility at risk, and in a situation that was likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. The State Agency (SA) identified an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE], which began on [DATE] when the facility failed to revise Resident #1's behavior care plan. On [DATE] at 10:30 AM, the SA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to reduce the risk of an accident/hazards when a resident with behaviors got into other resident's beds and did not have any increased supervision/monitoring put in place resulting, in the physical assault and death of a resident for (1) one of (4) four residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident #2) The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision and monitoring, placed Resident #2 and other residents residing in the facility at risk, and in a situation which caused Resident #2's death and was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death for others. The State Agency (SA) identified an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) on [DATE], which began on [DATE], when the facility failed to provide increased supervision/monitoring and ensure appropriate services for residents with behavioral needs. The facility's failure to provide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-31 · tag F0742 — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to recognize behaviors and provide appropriate person-centered behavioral interventions for one (1) of three (3) residents with documented behaviors resulting in the physical assault and death of a resident. (Resident #1) The facility's failure to identify behaviors and failure to provide appropriate person-centered behavioral interventions and supervision, from [DATE] through [DATE] resulted in the death of Resident #2 and placed other residents at risk, and in a situation which was likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. The State Agency (SA) identified an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) on [DATE], which began on [DATE], when the facility failed to identify behaviors, and ensure appropriate services for residents with behavioral needs. The facility's failure to identify potential abuse, failure to provide appropriate person-centered behavioral interventions and supervision…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-08-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and services to manage pain as evidenced by the facility failing to administer fentanyl patches as ordered for one (1) of five (5) medication reviews (Resident #106). This failure resulted in missed doses of prescribed pain medication and escalating pain levels causing actual harm through unnecessary suffering. Resident #106Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Pain Evaluation/Management reviewed 8/25 revealed under, Policy: All residents will be evaluated for pain at the time of administration, readmission, quarterly and as needed.An interview on 8/25/2025 at 10:55 AM with Resident #106 revealed he hurt in 26 different areas of his body and had chronic pain every day. He explained he had been using fentanyl patches for about 19 months and took gabapentin and oxycodone twice daily to help manage his pain. The resident further reported he also used lidocaine patches, bio freeze, and Tylenol as needed. He explained that a nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a care plan for resident's dependent on staff for nail care (Resident #6, #16, #102), showers (Resident #88, #94) and pain management (Resident #106) for six (6) of 31 sampled residents. Resident #6, #16, #88, #94, #102, #106 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans unrevised, revealed, Policy: Each resident will have a person-centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care. Resident #6 Record review of the Care plans for Resident #6 revealed under, Goals: I will maintain my current level of ADL (activities of daily living) status. Also revealed under, Interventions: extensive assist of one for personal hygiene. On 8/25/2025 at 11:12 AM, during an observation and interview with Resident #6, he held out his right hand and stated, I have claws, and voiced that he needed his nails trimmed. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide basic hygiene care by not ensuring that a dependent resident received showers (Resident #88 and Resident #94) and routine nail care (Resident #6, Resident #16, and Resident #102) for five (5) of eight (8) residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled Fingernails/Toenails Care unrevised, revealed, Policy: The purpose of this procedure is to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections. Record review of undated facility policy, Bath/Shower-Dependent revealed, A bath (shower/tub) for cleanliness and comfort is scheduled at least weekly for each resident. Resident #6 An observation and interview with Resident #6 on 8/25/2025 at 11:12 AM in the resident's room, he held out his right hand and stated, I have claws, and voiced that he needed his nails trimmed. He explained he had been trying to get someone to help him for a couple of days. The resident's nails were long,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to reasonable accommodation of needs by not providing access to oral hydration for two (2) of ninety-six residents reviewed (Resident #38 and Resident #47).Findings IncludeTop of Form Record review of the facility policy titled, Resident [NAME] of Rights undated, revealed, Each resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with access to persons and services inside and outside the Facility in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of (his or her) quality of life . 10. Reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs. Resident #38 Observation and interview on 8/25/2025 at 10:25 AM, revealed Resident #38 sitting in her room. No water was observed in either a water pitcher or a cup. The resident stated, I'll have to go up the hall to get some water. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff and resident interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to resolve a grievance for one (1) of eight (8) residents present at the resident council meeting. (Anonymous Resident).Findings IncludeReview of the facility policy titled Grievance/Missing Property with a revision date of 8/17 revealed under Purpose .to provide an opportunity for residents, resident representatives and/or family to present concerns or grievance to the proper authorities at the facility and to receive responses to the issue(s) raised. Under Procedure .A.3 .Supervisory personnel shall be responsible for notifying the resident of resolution and so indicate on grievance form .An interview on 8/25/25 at 10:15 AM, Anonymous Resident complained that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #6 jerked his legs when she turned him and it hurt his back. He admitted that he reported this to the staff, but no one had come to ask him about it.An interview and record review on 8/25/25 at 4:00 PM with the Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed that the Anonymous Resident had complained about…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable environment as evidenced by a bathroom floor covering that had been removed, leaving bare concrete with a black stained area around the toilet for one (1) of 38 residents on sample. Resident #43 Findings Include: Review of a typed statement on facility letterhead revealed the facility did not have a policy regarding maintenance repairs and was signed by the Administrator. On 8/25/25 at 9:05 AM, an observation revealed Resident #43's bathroom floor covering was removed. The floor was bare concrete with a black substance around the toilet base. During an observation and interview with the Housekeeper #1 on 8/26/25 at 11:06 AM, he stated he mopped the area, but the concrete floor could not be cleaned properly and that it had been that way for some time. On 8/26/25 at 11:30 AM, an interview with the Maintenance Staff #2, revealed that when flooring is torn or damaged, linoleum is sometimes removed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record reviews and facility policy review the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for Abuse and Neglect. Resident #3 Findings IncludeTop of Form Top of Form Top of Form Review of the facility policy titled: Abuse Prevention undated, revealed, The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone, including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff.Definitions: b) Verbal Abuse: The use of oral, written, or gestured communication or sounds that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents . Review of the facility policy titled: Resident [NAME] of Rights, with a revision date of 1/23, revealed A. Facility residents shall have the right to: 36 . be free of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property . A record review of a written statement dated 2/14/25 and signed by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 revealed, I, (proper name of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged abuse violations were reported to the State Survey Agency as required. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for abuse and/or neglect. For three (3) of the five (5) alleged abuse violations reviewed. Resident #3, Anonymous Resident, and Resident #68. Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled: “Abuse Prevention” dated 10/22, revealed, “The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone, including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff… under Reporting: Alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, …are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for abuse. Residents #68 and Anonymous Resident Findings IncludeReview of the facility policy titled, with a revision date of 10/22 revealed under Investigate: .the facility will initiate at the time of any finding of potential abuse or neglect an investigation to determine cause and effect, and provide protection to any alleged victims to prevent harm during the continuance of the investigation.An interview on 8/25/25 at 10:15AM with an Anonymous Resident revealed that Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #6 and CNA #7 came in to turn him and they jerked his legs and hurt his back. He admitted that he reported it to staff that he thought it was CNA #6 and admits that she hasn't worked with him since. He then stated that he reported to the Administrator that CNA #2 was giving him a bed bath and when he ask her to wash his back, she wet the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services for residents with contractures for two (2) of 31 sampled residents. Resident #16 and Resident #94. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, Range of Motion revealed that A range of motion program will be developed for a resident as indicated Purposes of ROM (Range of Motion) 1. Maintain or improve joint and soft tissue mobility. 2 Minimize contractures RESIDENT #16 An observation and interview on 08/25/25 at 2:45 PM with Resident #16, revealed her sitting in her wheelchair in the dining room. She had a contracture to her left wrist/hand and there was no orthotic device in use. An observation on 08/26/25 at 8:38 AM revealed Resident #16 lying in bed in her room. She had contracture to her left wrist/hand, and she had no orthotic device in place. She revealed that they sometimes rolled a towel and put it in her hand, but she couldn't remember the last time they applied it. Record review of Resident #16's Occupational Therapy Discharge Summary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for one (1) of five (5) medication reviews. Resident #106Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration -General Guidelines revised 8/16 revealed under, Policy: Medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Also revealed under, Procedure: . 9 . This individual records the administration on the resident's MAR/eMAR (medication administration record) and TAR/eTAR (treatment administration record) after the medication is given. At the end of each medication pass, the person administering the medications reviews the MAR/TAR to ascertain that all necessary doses were administered and all administered doses were documented . During an interview with Resident #106 on 8/25/2025 at 10:55 AM, he revealed he had a problem with a nurse on 3-11 shift not applying his fentanyl patch and stated he was not getting it like he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$101,474 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $22,315 — penalty dated 2025-08-28
• $79,159 — penalty dated 2024-05-31
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-27 for 23 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS