Senatobia Healthcare & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 234 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 31.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 99 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 96.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 75% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement effective comprehensive care plan interventions for a resident who was at risk for wandering and elopement for one (1) of three (3) residents at risk for wandering and elopement. Resident #1 Resident #1 was left on the front patio, where she subsequently exited the premises unnoticed and unsupervised. The resident was later found at a grocery store approximately 0.3 miles from the facility. Video surveillance footage revealed Resident #1 left the facility at 4:05 PM and was located at the grocery store at 4:25 PM. The facility's failure to implement effective care plan interventions placed Resident #1, and all other residents at risk for wandering and elopement, in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, serious injury, serious impairment or death. The State Agency (SA) identified an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 8/15/24 when Resident #1 eloped from the facility unsupervised. The SA notified the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, record reviews, facility policy reviews, and the facility's investigation, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident #1, who was identified as an elopement and wandering risk from leaving the facility unnoticed and unsupervised for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for wandering. Resident #1. The facility's failure to provide supervision resulted in Resident #1 being left on the front patio, where she subsequently exited the premises unnoticed and unsupervised. The resident was later found at a grocery store approximately 0.3 miles from the facility. Video surveillance footage revealed Resident #1 left the facility at 4:05 PM and was located at the grocery store at 4:25 PM. The facility's failure to provide supervision to a resident who was at risk for wandering and elopement placed Resident #1, and all other residents at risk for wandering and elopement, in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, serious injury,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician's orders and accepted standards of practice for four (4) of 4 residents observed during medication administration observation on one (1) of two (2) halls. The facility's medication error rate was 100%. This had the potential to affect residents through delayed medication administration. Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3 and Resident #4. Cross Reference F760Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Medication Errors dated 09/09/25 revealed Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .2. The facility must ensure that it is free of medication error rates of 5% or greater as well as significant medication error events An observation and interview on 05/13/26 at 10:48 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 revealed that she was assigned to 27 residents today. She revealed that all residents should receive their medications within one hour of the time ordered and stated that the nurses had from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to administer physician ordered significant medications timely for one (1) of four (4) medication carts observed. Cross Reference F759Findings Include:Review of the facility policy Medication Errors dated 09/09/25 revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide protection for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by ensuring residents receive care and services safely in an environment free of significant medication errors .Resident #1On 05/13/26 at 12:15 PM an observation and interview with Resident # 1 revealed that her medications were late most of the time. She stated, If you consider eleven o'clock, one o'clock or two o'clock on time, then I'm getting them on time. She revealed that she had mentioned it before, but it didn't do any good. Resident #1 revealed that she would like to take her medications earlier. Record review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record revealed an order for Digoxin 125 MCG (Micrograms) to Give 0.5 tablet by mouth…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from exploitation and misappropriation of personal funds for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for misappropriation of property (Resident #1).Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, implemented 8/22/24, revealed the following under Definitions: Misappropriation of Resident Property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. Under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines, item 1(a) stated: The facility will develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent misappropriation of resident property.During an interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 10/27/25 at 9:30 AM, related to the facility-reported incident of misappropriation of property/funds, he stated that Resident #1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and the facility's policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents or their representatives were involved in the care planning process for two (2) of 28 residents reviewed for care planning. Residents # 21 and 87. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Care Planning-Resident Participation, revealed, Policy: This facility supports the resident's right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her care planning and treatment (implementation of care) . Resident #21 During an interview on 8/4/25 at 10:55 AM, with Resident #21 she stated that she had not attended a care plan meeting but would like to. Record review of the “admission Record” revealed the facility admitted Resident #21 on 9/6/24 with a diagnosis of Malignant Neoplasm of Endometrium. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/11/25 for Resident #21 revealed a score of nine (9), under Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating that the resident is mildly cognitively impaired. Resident #87 In…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of medications for two (2) of eight (8) residents reviewed for drug diversion (Residents #14 and #42). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, “Drug Diversion,” undated, revealed: “Policy: This facility recognizes the risks associated with diversion of controlled medications and monitors staff with access to controlled substances to prevent diversion .” During an interview with the Administrator on 8/5/25 at 12:30 PM regarding the facility-reported incident MS #477259, he stated that during the investigation, it was discovered that on 6/21/25 at 1:45 AM, agency Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 signed out an oxycodone for Resident #14 on the controlled substance log, but the medication was not documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) as given. He stated video from that date and time showed LPN #2 preparing and taking routine medications to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete and transmit Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the timeframes required by the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual for (3) three of 33 MDS assessments reviewed. Residents #39, 69, and 95. Findings Include Record review of the facility policy titled MDS 3.0 Completion revealed: Policy Explanation of Compliance Guidelines: 1. According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate and standardized assessment of each resident’s functional capacity, using the RAI specified by the State. 2. Types of Assessments…b. admission Assessment – Completed within 14 days of admission counting the day of admission as day #1 .Annual Assessment…completed using an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) no greater than 92 days from the most recent quarterly assessment . Resident #39 Record review of the Annual MDS with an ARD of 7/01/25 revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to complete and transmit the Quarterly and Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the required time frame for 10 of 33 MDS assessments reviewed. Residents # 24, #35, #58, #63, #82, #90, #105, #107, #108 and #118. Findings Include Record review of the facility policy titled MDS 3.0 Completion date implemented 2/01/2025 revealed: Policy Explanation of Compliance Guidelines: 1. According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate and standardized assessment of each resident’s functional capacity, using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) specified by the State. 2. Types of Assessments…e. Quarterly Assessment completed using an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) no greater than 92 days from the most recent prior quarterly or comprehensive assessment. f. Discharge Assessment - completed using the discharge date at the ARD. Must be completed within 14 days of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded for one (1) of 33 MDS assessments reviewed. Resident #122.Findings Include Record review of the facility policy, “Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Completion” revealed “Policy Explanation of Compliance Guidelines: 1. According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate and standardized assessment of each resident’s functional capacity, using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) specified by the State. Record review of the Progress Note for Resident #122, dated 7/17/25, revealed that the resident was discharging home. Record review of Section A2105 of the Discharge MDS for Resident #122, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/18/25, revealed the discharge status was coded as short-term general hospital. During an interview with the MDS nurse on 8/6/25 at 9:21 AM, she confirmed that the discharge MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for six (6) of 29 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Residents #12, #42, #79, #84, #108, and #111)Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled “Medication Errors,” last reviewed 6/30/25, revealed: “Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by ensuring residents receive care and services safely in an environment free of significant medication errors .” During an interview with the Administrator on 8/5/25 at 12:30 PM regarding facility-reported incident, he stated that on the morning of 6/25/25, the day shift nurse reported that several of the evening shift medications from 6/24/25 were still in sealed packets on the unopened medication cart. He stated that agency Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, who had worked the medication cart on that shift, had signed all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident and staff interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for residents with personal hygiene needs for two (2) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident #5 and Resident #6. Findings Include: Record review of the undated facility policy, Comprehensive Care Plans revealed, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs . Resident #5 On 03/25/25 at 11:30 AM, an interview with Resident #5 revealed she did not get her shower on Saturday, 03/22/25, and she hadn't had a shower since last Thursday, 03/20/25. She revealed that she had missed several showers and stated, I've been averaging about one shower a week this month. Resident #5 revealed that her scheduled shower days were Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. She also revealed that she kept it in her calendar, and had it written…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,021 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-08-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS