Cedars Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 398 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 169 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 127.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.15 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.07 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from neglect for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents, Resident #1.On 10/14/25 at approximately 10:16 AM, after returning to the facility from an appointment the facility abandoned Resident #1 on the facility's transport van. Resident #1 was left alone and unattended on the facility transport van for approximately two hours. At 12:15 PM, the facility staff located Resident #1 still strapped in the facility transport van. This resulted in Resident #1 missing her hydration, care and expressing a fear that she was anxious, and thought she would die.The situation was determined to be Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) at Past Non-Compliance (PNC). The SA determined the IJ began on 10/14/25 when the facility abandoned Resident #1 on the facility transport van and was removed on 10/15/25 when the facility put measures in place to protect all residents from further abuse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident, staff, and family interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for personal hygiene and grooming for five (5) of 28 sampled residents. Resident #4, #10, #34, #60, and #92 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans unrevised, revealed under, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan Resident #4 Record review of Resident #4's Care Plan Report revealed that he needed assistance with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) related to recent hospitalization for left femur fracture, total hip arthroplasty d/t autoimmune encephalitis, falls, episodes of confusion. He has weakness and requires staff assistance with dressing, bathing, personal hygiene and transfers, w/c for mobility. An observation of Resident #4 and interview with the resident's sister-in-law at the bedside on 11/17/25 at 11:00 AM revealed the resident was lying in bed and had approximately one-eighth (1/8) inch gray, facial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff, resident, and resident representative interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide nail care (Resident#10 and Resident #92), and shaving (Resident#4, Resident #34, Resident #60 and Resident #92) for five (5) of 28 sampled residents. Resident #4, #10, #34, #60, and #92Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living unrevised, revealed under, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 2. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Resident #4 During an observation on 11/17/25 at 11:00 AM it was revealed that Resident #4 was lying in bed unshaved. His facial hair was approximately one-eighth (1/8) inch long and gray. Resident 4's sister-in-law was present at the bedside. During an interview with Resident #4's sister-in-law on 11/17/25 at 11:05 AM, she stated that he likes to be clean…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a wheelchair in a clean and sanitary manner for one (1) of seven (7) residents using mobility devices in house 600. Resident #92 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment unrevised, revealed under, Policy: In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. An observation of Resident #92 on 11/17/25 at 11:35 AM revealed she was sitting in her wheelchair in the front lobby area. The lower wheelchair frame and left wheel were covered in an orange-colored dried substance. An observation and interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #6 on 11/18/25 at 1:15 PM confirmed Resident #92's wheelchair was dirty and covered in a dried substance that she thought was food. She stated it was everybody's responsibility to ensure the resident equipment was clean. An interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 11/18/25 at 2:10 PM revealed her expectations were for staff to ensure the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor refrigerated medications for proper temperature control to ensure safe medication storage for one (1) of 11 medication refrigerators in facility. Rehabilitation Unit refrigerator Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medication Requiring Refrigeration, dated 4/2025 revealed, It is the policy of this facility to assure proper and safe storage of medications requiring refrigeration and to prevent the potential alteration of medication by exposure to improper temperature controls. Refrigerators used for the storage of medications and biologicals: e. Temperature should be maintained between 36 - 46 degrees F (Fahrenheit). f. Temperature to be monitored daily to ensure proper temperature control and documented on the temperature log with the date, time, and signature of person performing the check clearly written. During an observation of the medication storage room in the rehabilitation/therapy area of the facility, it was noted that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff, and resident, caregiver, and responsible party interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to accurately complete an elopement assessment and identify risks to prevent an unsupervised resident from exiting the facility door for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for elopement and wandering. Resident #1. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, Accidents and Interventions dated 05/05/19 revealed, The resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as is possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. This includes: 1. Identifying hazard(s) and risk(s) . An interview on 05/05/25 at 8:45 AM with Administrator (ADM), revealed that on 04/26/25, they had a resident to propel himself in his wheelchair outside the facility through an automated sliding door. She revealed that Resident #1 had been at the facility less than a week, he had limited mobility, and there had been no indications that he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wheelchair was in good repair for one (1) of 26 residents reviewed during survey. Resident #236 Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Safe and Homelike Environment date implemented 1/2024, revealed under the Policy: In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belonging to the extent possible. This includes ensuring the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk . An interview and observation on 08/05/24 at 2:20 PM, with Resident #236 revealed she was complaining of her wheelchair arm on the right side being messed up and bothering her. She stated that she had told the nurse twice, but no one has done anything. This observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately submit information into the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment system for one (1) of 26 residents sampled. Resident #34 Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled, Conducting an Accurate Resident Assessment, dated October 2023, revealed, .The purpose of this policy is to assure that all residents receive an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment, by staff qualified to assess relevant care areas. Accuracy of assessment means that the appropriate, qualified health professionals correctly document the resident's medical, functional, and psychosocial problems and identify resident strengths to maintain or improve medical status, functional abilities, and psychosocial status using the appropriate Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) . Record review of Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)'s Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) dated October 2023 revealed, Insulin is a medication used to treat diabetes mellitus (DM).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for a resident that required the use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (Resident #85) and assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) (Resident #106) for two (2) of twenty-six care plans reviewed. Resident #85 and #106 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans dated 10/2022 revealed Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. Resident #85 Record review of Resident #85's Care Plan revealed Focus: The resident requires tube feeding r/t (related to) Dysphagia .Interventions .Elder to remain on enhanced barrier precautions with care at all times d/t (due to) presence of PEG (Percutaneous…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for a resident dependent on staff for bathing, shaving, and nail care for one (1) of 26 residents sampled. Resident #106 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living dated 10/2023 revealed Policy . Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care . An observation of Resident #106 on 8/5/2024 at 12:09 PM revealed, he was lying in bed, alert with confusion. The resident was unkept, with his hair unbrushed and greasy on the edges. Gray facial hair was observed on his face and above his lip, measuring approximately one fourth (1/4) inch in length. Long fingernails were observed on both hands measuring approximately three-eights (3/8) inch in length. An observation and interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) # 2 on 8/6/2024 at 10:25 AM revealed, Resident # 106 was scheduled to get his shower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five (5) % (percent) for two (2) of 28 medication opportunities involving Resident #84. Medication error rate was 7.14%. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration dated 1/2024 revealed Policy: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 10. Ensure that the six rights of medication administration are followed .c. Right dosage . An observation of medication pass, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 on 8/7/2024 at 8:09 AM, revealed she prepared and administered MiraLax 17 grams one capful mixed in water to Resident #84. She then handed the resident a bottle of Flonase (Fluticasone Propionate) nasal spray, in which he administered one spray to each nostril. Record review of Resident #84's August…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,153 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $16,153 — penalty dated 2025-10-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS