Billdora Senior Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 17.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 43.9 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.08 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent an elopement from the facility for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents reviewed. Resident #1The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision resulted in Resident #1 leaving the facility unnoticed and unsupervised on 1/20/26. This placed Resident #1 and all other residents who are at risk for wandering in a situation that is likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. This situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) that began on 1/20/26 when Resident #1 eloped from the facility. The facility Administrator was notified of the IJ on 1/28/26 at 6:00 PM and was presented with the IJ template. The facility provided an acceptable removal plan on 1/29/26, in which they alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ were completed on 1/20/26.The SA validated the Corrective Action…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2026-04-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide sufficient pain medication prior to wound care for a resident who moaned and yelled out during wound care for one (1) of two (2) wound care observations. Resident #1Findings Include:Policy review of facility's policy Pain Management dated 2025 revealed the facility should provide adequate management of pain to ensure that residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Behavioral signs and symptoms they may suggest the presence of pain include but are not limited to facial expressions grimacing, groaning.On 04/08/2026 at 9:02 AM, during an observation of wound care being provided by Registered Nurse (RN) # 1/Treatment Nurse and was assisted by RN #2/Infection Preventionist (IP) nurse, RN #1 informed the State Agency (SA) that Resident # 1 moans out during wound care. She stated they gave her Tylenol thirty minutes prior to starting wound care. Resident #1 was turned on her side, and the soiled dressing was removed. RN #1 began to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper hand hygiene and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during wound care and peri care for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident #1. Findings Include:Record review of the facility policy Hand Hygiene Policy dated 2025 revealed, Policy: Staff involved direct contact will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents and visitors.Record review of the facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions undated, revealed Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms.4. High-contact resident care activities include.d. Providing hygiene.f. Changing briefs or assisting with toileting.On 04/08/2026 at 9:02 AM, during an observation of wound care, provided by Registered Nurse (RN) 1/Treatment Nurse and assisted by RN #2/ Infection Preventionist (IP) nurse. RN #2 donned (put…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0576 — isolated
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with mail on Saturdays for one (1) of (17) sampled residents, Resident #25. Findings included: A record review of the facility policy Communications Within and External to the Facility revised in August 2024, revealed, The facility will protect and facilitate the resident's right to communicate with individuals and entities within and external to the facility. The facility will ensure the resident has the ability to .receive mail, letters, packages, and other materials delivered to the facility . On 03/04/2025 at 10:10 AM, during a resident council meeting, members stated that residents in the facility does not receive mail on weekends. On 03/04/2025 at 10:20 AM, during an interview, the facility Administrator stated that the Activities Director distributes mail during the weekdays. The Administrator further stated that the front desk receptionist, nurses, or Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) distribute mail on weekends when it is received at the front desk. The Administrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide prompt resolution of a grievance related to a resident's missing property for one (1) of (17) sampled residents. Resident #22. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Missing Property, dated 4/17, revealed It is the policy of the facility to safeguard resident' property (to the extent possible) to assure there is no misappropriation On 03/03/25 at 12:24 PM, in an interview, Resident #22 stated that a Saints jersey was missing from her closet. She was unsure when it went missing. She reported that Social Services (SS) initially told her they would order a replacement jersey but later informed her in January 2025 that they would need to reorder it. She further stated that SS told her they would check on the status of the jersey but never followed up with her. On 03/04/25 at 1:10 PM, in an interview, SS stated that she typically completes a grievance when residents report missing items. She confirmed that Resident #22 had reported her missing jersey late in 2024, during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification of the reason for a resident's hospital discharge to the resident and/or Resident Representative (RR) for one (1) of (1) residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident #18). Findings include: A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #18 on 6/10/24, with diagnoses including Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Acute Systolic Congestive Heart Failure. A record review of the transfer/discharge letter dated 1/9/25 revealed the Resident was discharged to the hospital on 1/8/25, however, the letter did not provide a reason for the transfer/discharge. On 03/04/25 at 1:07 PM, in an interview with the Social Service Director, she confirmed it was her role to mail hospital transfer/discharge letters to the family. She stated she was not aware that the letter was required to include the reason for the transfer/discharge and confirmed with the State Agency (SA) that the letter sent to the RR for Resident #18 did not include this information. On 03/04/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident requiring oxygen therapy had an Oxygen in Use sign placed on the resident's door as specified in the facility policy for one (1) of four (4) days of survey observations. (Resident #107). Findings Include: A record review of the facility's Oxygen Concentrator policy, revised April 2017, revealed Policy: To administer oxygen for the treatment of certain diseases or conditions. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Care of the Resident . h. Place an oxygen warning sign on the resident's door . On 03/03/25 at 11:30 AM, an observation of Resident #107 in her room, up in a wheelchair, revealed that oxygen was flowing at 3 milliliters per hour. However, there was no Oxygen in Use signage on the door. On 03/03/25 at 11:32 AM, during an interview, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)#1 confirmed that there was no oxygen signage on the door. She stated that an Oxygen in Use sign should have been placed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to collaborate with hospice services related to a resident's continuous plan of care for one( 1) of two (2) hospice residents reviewed. Resident #30. Findings Include: Record review of the facility's policy, Hospice Care-Facility Responsibilities, with a revision date of 4/2017, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to improve quality and consistency of care between hospice and the facility in the provision of hospice care to our residents in order to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 2. b. Communicating with hospice representatives and other healthcare providers participating in the provision of care for terminal illness, related conditions, and other conditions to ensure quality of care for the patient and family . Record review of the admission Record, for Resident #30, revealed the facility admitted the resident on 5/30/23, with diagnoses that included Chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$14,020 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $14,020 — penalty dated 2026-01-29
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-05 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $421K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS