Jnh-Jefferson Inn

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 75.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.25 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.15 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-10-09 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received meals at regular intervals not exceeding 14 hours between the evening and morning meal, or 16 hours when a bedtime snack is provided, for residents residing in the facility for one (1) of three (3) days of survey. Findings include:On 10/09/2025 at 10: 05 AM, an observation revealed Residents in building #31 were eating breakfast.On 10/09/2025 at 10:28AM, during an interview the Director of Operations (DO) stated breakfast was serviced at 9:45 AM, two (2) hours later than scheduled times for the residents in building #31.On 10/09/2025 at 11:05 AM, the DO stated that snacks are served at 10 AM and 2 PM daily and given at night for the diabetic residents. Residents who are not diabetic have access to snacks if they ask. She further confirmed that if a non-diabetic resident did not ask for a snack on Wednesday night, they would have gone almost 17 hours without a meal until breakfast Thursday morning (10/9/25). She confirmed that Food Service Aide (FSA) states dinner was served at 5 PM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-10-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that food was prepared and served in a sanitary manner to prevent foodborne illness. Specifically, a food-service worker was observed failing to change gloves after touching a door handle while taking food temperatures. This failure demonstrated a breach of proper hand-hygiene and glove-use procedures and created a risk of cross-contamination for one (1) of four (4) dietary observations.Findings include: A record review of the facility's Food Storage policy (revised June 2025) revealed, Employees will maintain good personal-hygiene practices and safe food-handling procedures during food storage.A record review of the facility's Food Preparation and Meal Service policy (revised June 2025) revealed, Employees will observe safe-handling practices during preparation and service of food to residents and patients.An observation on October 9, 2025, at 8:09 AM, during breakfast temperature checks in the dietary department, the State Agency observed Dietary Member #2 (DM #2), who had been employed at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement the resident's care plan for monitoring dialysis weights and identify changes in condition for one (1) of (32) sampled residents (Resident #9). Findings include: A record review of the facility policy Care Plan Policy, no date, revealed, .2.Policy: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan will be developed and implemented for each resident by the interdisciplinary team, (IDT), resident, and his/her legal representative to include measurable objective and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs.A record review of the Care Plan Report' with a date initiated of 7/30/2025 revealed Focus: ARF (At risk for) Altered nutritional status r/t (related to) CKD/ESRD (chronic kidney disease/End Stage Renal Disease) .Interventions/Taks.Notify MD (Medical Doctor)/RD (Registered Dietician)/Correspondent of any significant weight changes . However, there was no individualized care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure completion and follow-up of resident communication forms used to coordinate care services, resulting in potential unmet resident needs in one (1) of (1) sampled resident receiving dialysis. Resident #9.Findings include:Record review of the facility policy Hemodialysis Care effective September 2024 revealed, .When a patient/resident is determined by a physician/nurse practitioner to need hemodialysis, the dialysis treatments will be provided by a contracted entity. The outside medical facility will arrange, develop, implement, and exchange information with Mississippi State Hospital (MSH) regarding the patient's/resident's specific dialysis care plan. A record review of the Identification and Summary Sheet revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), requiring routine dialysis. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the provision of physician-ordered care and services for a resident receiving dialysis treatment. Specifically, the facility failed to accurately correspond, obtain, and document dialysis weights for one (1) of 32 sampled residents. (Resident #9).Findings include: A record review of the Identification and Summary Sheet revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), requiring routine dialysis. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD0 of July 30, 2025, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. A record review of Resident #9's Dialysis Communication forms revealed that no pre- or post-dialysis weights were documented for August 6, 8, 11, and 18, 2025.A record review of the Physician Orders dated 9/20/25 revealed dialysis treatments three times per week, a renal-high diet,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete documentation of dialysis weights for a resident receiving hemodialysis. Specifically, dialysis weights were not recorded on the dialysis communication form for four (4) of 30 dialysis treatment days during August 2025. Resident #9. Findings include:A record review of the facility's Hemodialysis Care policy, effective September 2024 revealed, .II. POLICY: When a resident or patient is determined by a physician or nurse practitioner to need hemodialysis . the outside medical facility will . exchange information with Mississippi State Hospital regarding the resident-specific dialysis care plan. III. PROCEDURE: .3. C. The nurse will document in the patient's or resident's medical record any significant psychological or physiological changes of a patient or resident receiving dialysis and report such changes immediately to the provider . Record review of Dialysis Communication forms revealed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record reviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection during wound care as evidenced by failure to implement proper use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during wound care for one (1) of three (3) care observations. Resident #11Findings include:A record review of the facility's Standard Precautions & Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 6/2024 revealed 2. POLICY: All employees will utilize Standard Precautions or Enhanced Barrier Precautions when indicated, on all patients/residents at all times .3. Enhanced Barrier Precautions expands the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) beyond situations in which exposure to blood and body fluids is anticipated. High contact resident care includes Wound care (any skin opening requiring a dressing. A record review of the EBP signage revealed .Providers and staff must also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities .Wound care: any skin opening requires dressing.On 10/06/2025 at 2:43 PM, during initial tour,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to be treated with dignity and respect, as evidenced by staff provided incontinent care without providing privacy for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1 and Resident #2. Findings include:Record review of the facility policy titled, RIGHTS OF RESIDENTS, dated July 2023, revealed .All persons admitted to (Proper name of facility) will be assured that their legal rights will be protected and promoted. The resident will receive care consistent with basic human dignity.The resident has the right to a dignified existence .On 7/30/25 at 9:39 AM, during a pre-survey interview with the Complainant who is the facility Ombudsman stated that during a routine visit at this facility on 6/10/25, she walked down the hallway and noticed two aides with Resident #1 in the hallway and there was something going on that was not right. She stated that it appeared the staff were attempting to provide care for the resident in the hallway and that they put the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to follow physician orders for dietary supplements for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for nutrition. Resident #68 Findings Include: On 08/05/24 at 1:25 PM, an observation of Resident #68 eating lunch in the dining room revealed the resident could feed himself, using his left hand, after staff set up his tray. The resident consumed 100% of his meal, but there was no dietary supplement on his lunch tray. On 08/06/24 at 1:20 PM, an observation of Resident #68 eating lunch in the dining room revealed that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 noted that there was no Boost on his tray, so she left the dining area and returned with the Boost in hand. The resident immediately picked it up and began to consume it. On 08/07/24 at 10:10 AM, in an interview with the Registered Dietitian (RD), she stated she expected the staff to honor residents' preferences and encourage them to eat. She mentioned she expected the staff to offer the Boost and noted the resident had gained some weight over the past couple of months.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to date medications that were opened and stored in two (2) of four (4) medication refrigerators in medication storage rooms. Findings Include: A record review of the facility policy titled MultiDose Vials, dated 11/21, revealed 1.This policy establishes the requirements to regulate the use of multidose vials to ensure stability and prevent contamination . 2. POLICY: The pharmacy attempts to supply injectable drugs in unit of use vials when practical, but many items are only available in multidose vials. 3. PROCEDURE: A. All multi-dose vials must be dated with a 28-day expiration date from the time of initial puncture . On 08/07/24 at 08:30 AM, during an observation of the medication room in Building 33 on the second floor with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, the medication refrigerators were found to contain Novolin R vials that had been opened and not dated. On 08/07/24 at 08:35 AM, an interview with LPN #1 revealed that nurses were trained during orientation and at least yearly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in MS