Martha Coker Green House Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 26.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 53.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.95 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary refrigerator, label, and date open items in the refrigerator and freezer for one (1) of six (6) houses and failed to check and record food temperatures before serving meals for four (4) of six (6) houses reviewed during survey. Findings Include: House #5 Review of the facility policy titled, Cleaning of Food and Nonfood Contact Surfaces with a revision date of 1/24, revealed under, Food Contact Surfaces . To prevent cross -contamination, kitchenware and food-contact surfaces of equipment shall be washed, rinsed, and sanitized after each use and following any interruption of operations during which time contamination may have occurred. Also revealed, Food Contact Surfaces (meaning: those surfaces of equipment and utensils which food normally comes in contact, and those surfaces from which food may drain, drip, or splash back onto food or surfaces normally in contact with food.) Review of the facility policy titled Dating and labeling of Food in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for discharge deposition for one (1) of 15 elder assessments reviewed. Elder #58 Findings included: Record review of Facility Policy titled, Conducting an Accurate Resident Assessment revealed, Policy: The purpose of this policy is to assure that all residents receive an accurate assessment . Record review of the Notice of Transfer/Discharge Notice dated 7/29/24, for Elder #58 revealed that the elder discharged to an alternative nursing home. Record review of Elder #58's Discharge return not anticipated MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/29/24, revealed discharge status was coded as 04, indicating that the elder was discharged to a Short-Term General Hospital. During an interview with the MDS Coordinator on 9/25/24 at 10:47 AM, she confirmed that Elder #58 discharged to another long-term care facility and that the MDS was coded incorrectly. She stated it was a data entry error. She agreed that the importance of correctly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to submit a correct Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for an Elder identified as having a mental illness. This issue involved one (1) of three (3) elders reviewed for PASRR. Elder #8. Findings Included: A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program revealed: This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receive care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. A record review of the PASRR, dated 12/27/23, for Elder #8 revealed that he had a diagnosis of Schizophrenia; however, question 31 was answered no, indicating that the Elder did not have a history of mental illness. Further review of the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review Determination (PASRR) for Elder #8 revealed the following outcome: Level 1 Outcome:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, elder and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for nail care for two (2) of sixteen sampled elders. Elder #7 and #31 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans date implemented 10/2022 revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. Resident #31 Record review of Elder #31's Care Plan with a revision date of 9/11/2024 revealed, Focus: Elder has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) impaired balance, musculoskeletal impairment cervical disc disorder with myelopathy, paraplegia. Also, revealed under, Interventions: . Personal Hygiene . Elder is totally dependent on staff for personal hygiene . x…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, elder and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the necessary nail care for an elder dependent on staff for assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for two (2) of sixteen sampled elders. Elder #7 and #31 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Nail Care dated 10/2022 revealed, Policy: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the provision of care to a resident's nails for good grooming and health . 3. Routine cleaning and inspection of nails will be provided during ADL care on an ongoing basis Resident #31 During an observation and interview on 9/24/24 at 11:25 AM, with Elder #31 revealed long jagged fingernails on both hands measuring approximately three-eighths (3/8) inch in length with a dark brown substance underneath. The elder revealed he would like his nails cut. On 9/24/24 at 11:32 AM, an interview and observation with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 revealed the Shahbaz's were responsible for cutting the elder's nails that were not diabetic. She explained that if an elder was a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to use hand hygiene during wound care to prevent the possibility of the spread of infection for one (1) of four (4) care observations. Elder #44 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Clean Dressing Change with no revision date revealed under, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide wound care in a manner to decrease potential for infection and/or cross-contamination. Record review of Elder #44's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for September 2024, revealed an order dated 9/24/24, Apply collagen powder to wound bed. May dampen collagen powder with normal saline before application. Apply sureprep to peri area around wound, cover with bordered dressing daily until healed. every day shift for sacral wound. An observation of sacral wound care for Elder #44, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 9/25/24 at 11:40 AM, revealed she removed the soiled dressing from the sacrum and continued the treatment to the wound without performing hand hygiene and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately complete section N of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for a resident, as evidence by the incorrect coding of anticoagulant medication use during the 7-day observation look-back period for 1 (one) out of 19 residents sampled for anticoagulant use. Resident #10 Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Assessment -RAI with a revision date of 11/2016 revealed under, Policy: This facility makes a comprehensive assessment of each resident's needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences, using the resident assessment instrument (RAI) specified by CMS. Also revealed under, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guideline: . 2. The assessment will include at least the following: . n. Special treatments and procedures Record review of the Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/01/23 revealed under section N, Resident #10 received seven (7) days of Anticoagulant medication for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy the facility failed to implement a resident's comprehensive care plan for fluid restriction for one (1) of 15 care plans reviewed. Resident #34 Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, revised 11/2017, revealed Policy: It is the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment A record review of the care plan titled Elder has the potential for cardiovascular complications r/t (related to) CHF (Congestive Heart Failure), CAD (Coronary Artery Disease), HTN (Hypertension), AFIB (Atrial Fibrillation), SOB (Shortness of Breath) with exertion, with a revision date of 1/4/23, revealed Interventions: .1000ml fluid restrictions . A review of the medication record by for June 2023, revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy the facility failed to follow a resident's physician prescribed fluid restriction for one (1) of 15 resident records reviewed. Resident #34 Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Fluid Restriction, revised 03/23/23, revealed, Policy: It is the policy of the facility to ensure that fluid restrictions will be followed in accordance to physician's orders Compliance Guidelines: 1.) The nurse will obtain and verify the physician's order for the fluid restriction and an order written to include the breakdown of the amount of fluid per 24 hours An interview with Resident #34 on 6/26/23 at 2:05 PM, he revealed he had Congestive Heart Failure and was on fluid restriction. State Agency (SA) observed a glass of water with measurements on the side of the glass. SA observed 240 milliliters (ml) of water in the glass. Resident #34 revealed he was unsure of how much fluids he can have but confirmed he drinks what is given…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to discard expired food, and label and date opened food items for four (4) of six (6) kitchens observed. Findings include: Review of the facility's Food and Supply Storage Procedures policy, dated 6/09, revealed all food, non-food items and supplies used in food preparation shall be stored in such a manner as to maintain the safety and wholesomeness of the food for human consumption. Most products contain an expiration date. The words sell-by or use-by should precede the date. The sell-by date is the last date that food can be sold. Do not sell products in retail areas or place on patient trays and/or resident plates past the date on the product. Cover, label, and date unused portions and open packages. Date and rotate items, first in, first out (FIFO). Discard food past the use-by date. House #1 On 1/28/20 at 10:45 AM, the initial tour of the kitchen in House #1 revealed, the refrigerator in the pantry behind the kitchen had four (4) bottles of eight (8) ounces banana nut flavor shake with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS