Community Nursing Home Of Anaconda

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 17.6 residents a day — about 28% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.25 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.14 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.32 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.45 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.26 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-12-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have a designated registered nurse to serve as the director of nursing on a full-time basis. This deficient practice resulted in a failure of clinical oversight for all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During an observation on 12/15/25 at 9:00 a.m., the Director of Nursing was not present at the facility. During an interview on 12/15/25 at 9:15 a.m., staff member A stated the Director of Nursing resigned on 12/2/25, and a new Director of Nursing would start on 12/29/25. Staff member A stated she did not assign an interim Director of Nursing because she knew the new Director of Nursing would be starting soon. Review of a facility provided document, Survey Information, dated 8/18/25, reflected that the Director of Nursing resigned on 12/2/25, and a new Director of Nursing would start on 12/29/25. Review of a facility policy, Nursing Services, with a revision date of 10/2022, reflected: - . 3. b. Except when waived the facility must designate a registered nurse to serve as the director of nursing on a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-17 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit mandatory payroll-based data to CMS. This deficient practice prevented CMS review of the level of staff, employee turnover, and tenure to ensure safe staffing levels. Findings include:Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report, dated 12/9/25, for quarter four (7/1/25-9/30/25) reflected the facility failed to submit data for the quarter. During an interview on 12/15/25 at 9:15 a.m., staff member A stated the facility did not submit the PBJ for the fourth quarter of 2025 and once the facility realized the data had not been submitted, it was too late to submit the data.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-17 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the QAPI team identified, reported, investigated, and documented the development, implementation, and evaluation of corrective actions for performance improvement projects related to known activities department deficient practices for 2 (#s 2 and 6) of 14 sampled residents, and this failure increased the risk of all residents being affected due to the lack of necessary or preferred activities. Findings include:During the survey from 12/15/25-12/17/25, the facility failed to provide activities to meet the interests and preferences of residents who remained in their rooms for resident #s 2 and 6. (See F0679)During an interview on 12/16/25 at 9:50 a.m., staff member A stated there had been a struggle to get activities to take charge and work the activities programs. Staff member A stated she was aware the one-to-one visits and activities the activities staff should be doing were not being done. During an interview on 12/17/25 at 11:07 a.m., staff member A stated she interviewed staff after surveyors questioned the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the required personal protective equipment, i.e. N95 respirator, was available to staff and visitors. upon entry to the facility during a COVID-19 outbreak; failed to ensure staff properly wore N95 respirators during a COVID-19 outbreak; and failed to ensure staff wore faceshield/masks while in residents' rooms who had tested positive for COVID-19 for 4 (#s 6, 9, 12, and 16) of 4 confirmed COVID-19 positive residents, which remained on contact and droplet precautions. These failures likely contributed to the spread of COVID-19 and could affect all residents, staff, or visitors at the facility. Findings include:1. Entrance Personal Protective Equipment During an observation when entering the facility on 12/15/25 at 9:00 a.m., a sign was posted on the outside window beside the entrance door, which showed the facility was in outbreak status for COVID-19. Inside the entrance door was a small vestibule, which had a desk with a notebook to sign in as a visitor and screening for signs and symptoms of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication error rates were not 5 percent or greater by crushing medications administered to residents without a physician's order for 2 (#s 7 and 13) of 5 residents observed for medication administration. The medication error rate was 24 percent. Findings include:During a medication administration observation on 12/16/25 at 8:21 a.m., staff member B prepared resident #7's medications. The following medications were placed into a plastic medication cup, crushed, then added to applesauce:- citalopram hydrobromide 20 milligram tablet, give one tablet,- acetaminophen 500 milligram tablet, give two tablets, and- sennosides-docusate sodium 8.6-50 milligram tablet, give two tablets.Staff member B administered the crushed medications to resident #7. These medications were administered without a physician's order for crushed medications.During a medication administration observation on 12/16/25 at 8:38 a.m., staff member B prepared resident #13's medications. The following medications were placed into a plastic medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter bags were covered for 1 (#6) of 14 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in resident #6 feeling embarrassed to have the catheter bag visible to others. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 12/15/25 at 10:40 a.m., resident #6 was in his recliner in his room with the door open. Resident #6 had a catheter bag hanging from the pocket of his recliner filled half full of dark yellow urine. The catheter bag was facing the door and visible to those who walked past his room. Resident #6 stated, It's whatever, when the catheter bag and dignity was discussed. During an observation and interview on 12/16/25 at 9:10 a.m., resident #6's catheter bag was hanging from his right pocket of his recliner, uncovered, and was 1/4 filled with urine. The catheter bag was facing the doorway, and the door was open to the hallway. Resident #6 stated, It's a bit embarrassing, when asked about the catheter bag. During an interview on 12/16/25 at 11:40 a.m., staff member J stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's preferences of not being woken up in the morning and given a breakfast tray for 1 (#2) of 14 sampled residents. This deficient practice caused resident #2 frustration and anger leading to behaviors. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 12/15/25 at 10:45 a.m., resident #2 stated she was angry the staff continued to wake her and bring in a breakfast tray every morning even though she repeatedly asked them not to bring in a breakfast tray. Resident #2 stated she had never eaten breakfast and was not going to start. Resident #2 stated it was frustrating the facility would not listen to her wishes. The breakfast tray was sitting on her bedside table uneaten. During an interview on 12/15/25 at 11:45 a.m., staff member J stated resident #2 had not eaten breakfast since she was admitted to the facility. Staff member J stated she was told by the kitchen that resident #2 must receive a tray even if she refuses it. Staff member J stated that resident #2 would become very angry and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff member B protected a resident's right to privacy and confidentiality of her medical record for 1 (#9) of 5 residents observed for medication administration. Findings include:During an observation on 12/17/25 at 7:43 a.m., staff member B was in resident #9's room, administering her medications. The medication cart was parked outside resident #9's room. The computer used for medication administration was on top of the medication cart, with the computer screen open to resident #9's medication listing with her picture visible. At the time of the observation, another resident had exited her room and passed directly next to the medication cart.During an interview on 12/17/25 at 10:54 a.m., staff member B stated the computer on the medication cart should be locked each time she (staff member B) stepped away from the cart so a resident's record could not be seen by others.Review of the facility's policy titled, Confidentiality of Information, undated, showed:- .Confidentiality of the patient record shall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan, including the residents' preferences, for 2 (#s 2 and 6) of 14 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in resident #s 2 and 6 not having activities to meet their preferences. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 12/15/25 at 10:45 a.m., resident #2 stated she did not get out of bed anymore and did not have activities available in her room. She discussed her activities of interest, to include reading and quilting, but these things were not offered to her.Review of resident #2's care plan, dated 11/10/25, reflected resident #2 had little or no interest in activities. The care plan reflected, . [Resident name] enjoys watching television in her room, visiting in her room with friends and family, and going on outings with her family as able. The care plan did not include information related to the interest's resident #2 relayed during the interview. Review of resident #2's Kardex, dated 12/16/25, reflected a variety of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff member B adhered to medication administration best practice by crushing a medication indicated on a Do Not Crush medication listing for 1 (#13) of 5 residents observed for medication administration. Findings include:During a medication administration observation on 12/16/25 at 8:38 a.m., staff member B prepared resident #13's medications. The following medications were placed into a plastic medication cup, crushed, then added to applesauce:- cholecalciferol 1,000 unit tablet, give two tablets,- oxybutynin chloride 5 milligram tablet, give 0.5 tablet,- sennosides-docusate sodium 8.6-50 milligram tablet, give one tablet, and- trazodone hydrochloride 50 milligram tablet, give 0.5 tablet.Staff member B administered the crushed medications to resident #13.During an interview on 12/16/25 at 12:28 p.m., staff member B stated she knew which residents' medications to crush from the facility's roster/shift change sheet for nurses. Staff member B stated there were not any labels on any resident's medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in MT