No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lakeview Rehabilitation And Nursing LLC

1050 Grand Dr, Bigfork, MT 59911 · For profit - Limited Liability company · (406) 420-2201 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (406) 420-2201 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2026
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

/5
CMS overall
Not rated
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verifiedNot rated
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ)Not rated
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facilityNot rated

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8299 MT-35 · (406) 837-5541 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8111 MT-35 · (406) 837-4370 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8111 MT Highway 35 · (406) 837-5010 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measuresNot rated

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent verbal abuse by a staff member who was fairly new to the facility position, and who had already received further education due to communication concerns while working with residents, but the staff member then verbally abused 1 (#3) resident of 5 sampled residents. This reflected the facility's abuse prevention program was not effective to prevent abuse for this resident. Findings include:Review of facility reported incident investigation showed on 4/23/26, [Resident #3] reported to [staff member C] that an incident occurred the previous evening on [4/22/26] at approximately 8:30 p.m. [Resident #3] stated that while receiving assistance with bedtime care, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) [NF4] spoke to her using what she described as 'gruff' language. The resident did not wish to have NF4 provide care to her any longer. The investigation showed a witness confirmed resident #3's allegation, and NF4 was terminated for abuse.During an interview on 5/6/26 at 11:37 a.m., staff member C stated resident #3 told her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document the required information for a resident discharge from the facility for 1 (#2) of 5 sampled residents. Findings include:During an interview on 5/7/26 at 9:08 a.m., staff member B stated the discharge for resident #2 was planned. Staff member B stated she was transferred to another facility by her family, although the documentation (in the EHR) does not show it. Staff member B stated the documentation expectation for a discharge would include a discharge planning assessment with the required discharge information, and on discharge, a discharge summary documented in the nurse's progress notes.Review of resident #2's EHR census tab showed she was discharged from the facility on 2/18/26.Review of resident #2's Nurse Progress Notes for February 2026 showed, Resident left at this time via [local transport company]. [Family member] was here to pack up her personal belongings. Medications sent with her. No other documentation was completed or found in the medical record to show the discharge was planned, where the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide regular bathing to 1 (#2) of 5 sampled residents. Findings include:During an interview on 5/6/26 at 2:06 p.m., staff member E stated the residents were bathed at least once a week, with several scheduled twice a week. Staff member E stated they filled out forms for any resident refusals after several attempts, and the nurse on duty had to sign off.During an interview on 5/7/26 at 8:27 a.m., staff member B stated she might have had the old shower sheets (documents) for January and February (2026) for resident #2, but the timeframe was when the facility was implementing new forms to document their bathing process.During an interview on 5/7/26 at 8:37 a.m., staff member B stated she looked through forms and could not find any documentation showing resident #2 had showers from 1/10/26 until 2/2/26, per the EHR documentation.Review of resident #2's bathing documentation from January through February 2026 showed resident #2 did not receive bathing from 1/11/26 until 2/2/26; for 22 days.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow a planned and approved menu to ensure residents received the expected meals and nutrition. This deficient practice effected residents who ate meals prepared by the facility. Findings include:During an observation and interview, on 12/1/25 at 2:43 p.m., a package of sliced ham was observed in a black bin filled with water, on the three-compartment kitchen sink. Staff member F stated she had thawed out the ham because she did not have what she needed to make breakfast on the menu. Staff member B stated the facility would do substitutions verbally notifying the dietician but did not document the substitutions in any way. Staff member B did not know what the notification to the residents was, if any, of the menu changes when they happened. Staff member B stated the dietician was currently on vacation and the dietary manager was out.Review of the facility menu on 12/1/25, showed breakfast was to be a French toast bake, bacon, fresh fruit, and juice.During an observation on 12/3/25 at 8:41 a.m., residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served with an appetizing appearance and a palatable taste for 3 (#s 16, 18, and 19); and failed to serve altered food diets in an appealing manner for 1 (#28) of 14 sampled residents. This failure affected the residents' satisfaction and enjoyment of their food. Findings include:Review of the facility's lunch menu for 12/2/25, showed the facility served a honey glazed pork chop, baked potato, cauliflower, baked roll, and fruit cobbler.1. During an observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 12:30 p.m., resident #28 was sitting at her table in the dining room. She was eating lunch from a three-way sectioned plate that had a watery textured pureed meal. The plate contained three different watery purees in each separate section of the plate. All pureed items on the plate appeared to be white/beige in color. It was not obvious which section of the plate contained which food item. The resident asked the surveyor for sugar for her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and distributed to residents in their rooms in a sanitary manner to protect food from cross contamination, food borne illnesses, and improper infection control practices. This practice had the potential to affect all residents receiving food delivered to their room. The facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions. This practice effected all resident who ate food prepared by the facility kitchen. Findings include: 1.During an observation on 12/2/25 at 12:58 p.m., staff member K was preparing to distribute the lunch service meal trays to residents in their rooms. The meal trays were loaded on a large, wheeled cart, that was not enclosed. There were 11 uncovered maroon colored bowls that contained a dessert. The beverage glasses on the cart were also uncovered. During an interview on 12/2/25 at 12:58 p.m., staff member K stated she was not aware if the drinks or the bowls with the dessert needed to be covered. During an interview on 12/2/25 at 1:00 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wheelchair was clean and well-maintained, and the soiled wheelchair bothered the resident, for 1 (#22) of 14 sampled residents. Findings include:During an observation on 12/1/25 at 3:15 p.m., resident #22 was laying in his bed. His wheelchair was next to the bed. The wheelchair had a large amount of piled up, brown and black dried and slivered debris as well as a sticky appearing debris on the frame of the wheelchair by the locks, on the arm rests, as well as the peddles. During an observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 9:19 a.m., resident #22's wheelchair had a large amount of piled up, brown and black dried and slivered debris as well as a sticky appearing debris on the frame of the wheelchair by the locks, on the arm rests, as well as the peddles. The resident stated he could not remember the last time his wheelchair was cleaned. He stated he preferred it to be clean, and it bothered him to have so much food debris…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive, person-centered care plans were developed and implemented for a resident with a left hand contracture and who had a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder for 1 (#25), and a resident who required physical therapy for 1 (#31), and the facility failed to care plan the risks and interventions for a resident's weight loss and swallowing risks for 1 (#28) of 14 sampled residents. The deficient practice increased the risk of decline in range of motion, re-traumatization, physical function and weight loss. Findings include:1. During an interview on 12/2/25 at 9:02 a.m., resident #25 stated she had not been seen by a provider for treatment of her post-traumatic stress disorder. Resident #25 became tearful when asked about the history of trauma and endorsed a history of traumatic events. During an observation on 12/2/25 at 9:22 a.m., resident #25 was observed with her left hand contracted. Review of resident #25's admission MDS with an ARD of 10/28/25, showed under section I6100 (diagnosis),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide regular showers for 2 (#s 21 and 31) of 14 sampled residents. Findings include:1. During an interview on 12/1/25 at 2:28 p.m., NF1 stated there were weeks where resident #21 did not receive a shower. NF1 further stated resident #21 was supposed to have had a shower two times per week.Review of resident #21's Baseline Care Plan, dated 3/9/25, showed resident #21 preferred to have showers two times per week.Review of resident #21's Comprehensive Care Plan, last reviewed on 9/29/25 showed, .Focus: [Resident Name] has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t hx CVA, Date initiated: 5/19/25. Goal: [Resident Name] will maintain current level of function in ADLs through the review date. Interventions: BATHING/SHOWERING: [resident name] requires maximum assist by 1 staff with bathing and showering one time week and as necessary - per her preference. [sic]Review of resident #21's Tasks List for showers for the last 30 days showed resident #21 had a shower once per week.Review of the weekly shower schedule, updated 11/6/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify a resident's contracture, risk factors of the contracture, and failed to assess and implement preventative measures to prevent further decline in the contracture, for 1 (#25) of 14 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the risk of the resident's contracture worsening. Findings include:During an observation on 12/2/25 at 9:22 a.m., resident #25 was observed with her left hand contracted.During an interview on 12/4/25 at 7:18 a.m., staff member M stated she thought there was something on the TAR about it (left hand contracture) but could not find anything in the orders regarding resident #25's left hand contracture. Staff member M did note the left-hand contracture was listed on the CNA task sheet.During an interview on 12/4/25 at 7:19 a.m., staff member L stated she was unaware of resident #25's left hand contracture.During an interview on 12/4/25 at 7:25 a.m., staff member B stated she was informed of resident #25's left hand contracture on the day prior. Staff member B stated there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-12-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify the risks and put interventions in place to prevent a significant weight loss of 12 percent over 41 days, for 1 (#28) of 14 sampled residents. Findings include:During an observation on 12/3/25 at 8:47 a.m., resident #28 was in the dining room for breakfast, and her food was pureed in separate containers. Resident #28 had eaten some food and was trying to get a condiment container of brown sugar open to eat, but did not know what it was.During an interview on 12/3/25 at 10:52 a.m., staff member N stated he went to nutrition at-risk meetings, and they would determine as a team what interventions were needed for a resident. Staff member N stated that nursing would monitor residents' weights.During an interview and observation on 12/3/25 at 11:51 a.m., staff member L looked up resident #28's chart and stated resident #28 had a choking incident on 11/9/25 and had been downgraded to a pureed diet that the resident hated. Staff member L…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify a resident's past history of trauma and identify triggers that may cause re-traumatization for 1 (#25) of 14 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the risk for the resident to experience trauma that could have been prevented. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 9:02 a.m., resident #25 stated she had not been seen by a provider for treatment of her post-traumatic stress disorder. Resident #25 became tearful when asked about the history of her trauma and she endorsed a history of traumatic events.Review of resident #25's admission MDS with an ARD of 10/28/25, showed under section I (active diagnoses), Psychiatric/Mood disorder, I6100: resident #25 had a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder.During an interview on 12/3/25 at 2:16 p.m., staff member A stated trauma informed care assessments were not being completed.A request was made for resident #25's trauma assessment on 12/3/25 at 2:18 p.m.Review of resident #25's Resident Trauma Interview, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure specialized rehabilitation services were delivered as ordered by the physician and failed to further assess and monitor for the need for continued specialized therapy services for 1 (#31) of 14 sampled residents. This deficient practice limited the opportunity for the resident to achieve her highest level of physical function. Findings include:During an interview on 12/1/25 at 3:05 p.m., resident #31 reported concern about the lack of physical therapy she had received. Resident #31 stated she would have to go ask them (the staff) about when or how often she was to be seen by therapy.Review of resident #31's, [Facility Name] Healthcare Discharge Orders, dated 7/28/25, reflected resident #31 was to be seen by physical therapy twice weekly.Review of Physician's Order, dated 8/5/25, showed, .Description: PT order per [Physician Name] at [Facility Name] Ortho: PT eval and treat for muscle strengthening and active assisted ROM 2-3x/week 8-10 weeks.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WHITE ASH LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 04/01/2024
MYERS, KATIEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2024
MYERS, WALTERIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2024
SWAIN, HOLLYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2024
SWAIN, JAREDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2024
COTTONWOOD HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
LAKEVIEW HEALTH HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS ADVISORS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
SLATTERY & HOLMAN P.C.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
GEDLAMAN, DEREKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2025
GRAY, AMBERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in MT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Montana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Montana
$8,973/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,581/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,075/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 275160. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next