Powder River Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show <0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 41 beds and averages 23.3 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.37 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.70 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.55 to 0.92 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-03-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were performing cares within their scope of practice; failed to ensure sufficient supervision; and failed to ensure nursing staff performed adequate pain assessment and ongoing monitoring for the application of a heat pack for 1 (#9) of 16 sampled residents. The facility's failures resulted in the development of a partial thickness facial burn for one resident and increased the risk of serious injuries for any resident in need of heat pack application. Findings include: During an interview on 3/11/25 at 10:12 a.m., resident #9 reported he received a burn to his left face approximately five or six months ago when he reported a toothache. During an interview on 3/12/25 at 1:45 p.m., staff member D stated, We don't use hot packs here at all. There was an incident with one in the past. During an interview on 3/12/25 at 2:40 p.m. regarding the 7/1/25 burn incident reported by resident #9, staff member A stated, The CNA went back to physical therapy without permission and got a heat pack from the hydrocollator. As…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-03-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development and progression of a pressure wound, for 1 (#4) of 1 sampled resident with a Stage 3 sacral pressure wound. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 3/12/24 at 2:10 p.m., resident #4 was seated in a recliner in her room, leaning toward the left arm of the chair. A pressure relieving chair pad was observed on the chair. An air mattress was observed on resident #4's bed. Resident #4 stated she had a butt sore, which made it hard to sit up straight in the chair. Resident #4 stated, I got that new (air) mattress on the bed and this (pressure relieving chair pad) thing not too long ago, but I don't think they are helping much. Resident #4 stated, It's uncomfortable, how would you feel if you had a hole in your butt? During an interview on 3/13/24 at 9:35 a.m., staff member F stated resident #4's wound care had already been completed for the day and was completed by mid-morning, daily. Staff member F stated, I told them (nursing leadership) that she needed specialized wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to label, date, and store food in a manner to maintain food safety and prevent foodborne illness by failing to ensure all open items were dated. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who ate at the facility. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 4/21/26 at 7:40 a.m., the initial kitchen walkthrough showed the following items were stored on the open shelving to the right of the grill and stovetop. The containers were opened for use, and not marked with the date they were opened:- large plastic bottle of cooking oil, capped,- large plastic bottle of butter-flavored oil, capped,- large container of parsley flakes, capped,- large container of dry, chopped onions,- round container of Quaker oats, capped- box of Malt-O-Meal hot breakfast cereal,- box of instant mashed potatoes,- large container of ground ginger, capped- large container of ground coriander, capped, and- large container of whole sesame seeds, capped.Staff member H stated she had been the kitchen manager for 12 years. Staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect from sexual abuse 1 (#13) by resident #4; and failed to protect from physical abuse 1 (#5) by resident #8 of 12 sampled residents. Findings include:1. Sexual AbuseReview of the facility investigation for the incident reported to the State Survey Agency on 1/26/26, showed resident #4 was found by staff with his hand down resident #13's brief in a common area. Resident #13 did not have capacity to consent. The facility investigation did not show other residents were interviewed or assessed for potential to be affected by similar sexual abuse incidents.During an interview on 4/21/26 at 4:22 p.m., staff member A stated the incident between residents #13 and #4 was reported to the wrong facility type license as they were unaware, they had an adult day care service license as well as the skilled nursing facility license. Staff member A stated the two residents were assessed and many interventions were put in place, but for the investigation no other residents were present, so no others were asked or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of MDS assessments for 2 (#s 1 and 7) of 12 sampled residents. Resident #1 had a history of pneumonia and resident #7 had limited range of motion to her left arm and shoulder. These were not accurately shown in the resident's MDS assessments. The deficient practice had the potential to affect resident care as the resident's current status was inaccurately documented. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 4/21/26 at 12.41 p.m., resident #1 was seated in the dining room eating lunch. The resident showed no shortness of breath, no cough, or any other respiratory symptoms. The resident was not using oxygen.Review of resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, with an ARD of 2/27/26, showed an active diagnosis of pneumonia. Review of resident #1's EHR, accessed on 4/21/26 and 4/22/26, failed to show any treatment, medication, or provider notes related to a pneumonia diagnosis during the past six months.Review of resident #1's diagnoses list in the EHR, accessed on 4/21/26, showed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure direct care staff were aware of a resident's wandering behaviors and the need to increase monitoring when the weather warmed up for 1 (#6) of 12 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the risk the resident would leave the facility unaccompanied. Findings include: Review of resident #6's dementia care plan, initiated on 4/7/21, showed the resident had memory problems due to her dementia. An intervention, initiated on 7/2/25, showed, Sometimes I attempt to go outside on my own repeatedly so a wander guard bracelet was put on my walker to alert staff .and also have history of going outside alone to try to check the bird feeders . [sic]During an observation on 4/22/26 at 8:00 a.m., resident #6 was seated in the dining room eating breakfast. When the resident had finished eating, she used her wheeled walker to ambulate back to her room.During an interview on 4/22/26 at 8:10 a.m., staff member F stated she had worked at the facility for several years. When asked about resident #6's wandering…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0577 — isolated
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure readily available results of surveys completed by the State Survey Agency were located in a publicly accessible area. This failure would affect any person wishing to view the survey results. Findings include:During an observation on 9/8/25 at 1:18 p.m., the facility had a wall-mounted file holder viewable upon entrance into the facility's building, located on the wall of the common area TV room. The holder had a label with the words printed on it, SURVEY RESULTS. The holder did not have any binder or documents to view.During an observation on 9/10/25 at 8:22 a.m., the facility did not have any binder or documents to view in the same entry area wall-mounted file holder.During an interview on 9/10/25 at 10:12 a.m. staff member D stated she did not realize the binder with results from surveys was not available in the file holder. Staff member D stated she would check to see where it might be.During an interview on 9/10/25 at 10:51 a.m. staff member D stated she did not know why the binder had not been available in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a completed POLST form with physician signature was readily accessible in the hard chart and the electronic medical record for 1 (#5) of 5 sampled residents. Findings include:During a record review of resident #5's POLST, dated [DATE], showed No CPR and selective treatment was selected, and the form was filled by the resident's responsible party. The form was not signed by resident #5's responsible party. The form was not signed by the provider, it was without a date, and there was not a printed name of the provider.During an interview on [DATE] at 11:23 a.m., staff member F stated admission forms, including POLST forms, were reviewed by staff member F, the resident or responsible party, and or family member. Staff member F stated some forms were given to the resident or responsible party to fill out ahead of time, before entering the facility. Staff member F stated she was not sure why resident #5's POLST had not been completed and filled out…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was used for 3 (#s 5, 12, and 18); failed to ensure clean medical equipment (lifts) between resident uses for 2 (#s 12 and 18); failed to properly clean blood glucose monitor for 1 (#5); failed to provide effective education related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) throughout the facility, and failed to implement the appropriate use of enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 (#9) of 16 sampled residents. The deficient practices increases the risks of infection for all residents receiving care within the facility. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 3/11/25 at 3:58 p.m., staff member E and F were toileting resident #18, using the sit-to-stand lift. Staff member E began by gloving, without hand hygiene, and moved resident #18 over the toilet. Both staff member E and F removed the soiled brief. Resident #18 urinated. and without removing the dirty gloves, staff members E and F replaced resident #18's brief on and dressed him, while he was in the lift. Staff member E…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure opened facility-wide use medications were labeled with an expiration date when stored in the medication cart; and expired products in the medication room were disposed of. This deficient practice increased the risk of adversely affecting any resident who was taking these medications or using an inaccurately calibrated glucose monitor. Findings include: During an observation on 3/11/25 at 4:37 p.m., with staff member I, the following items were found: - Robafen DM with no open date, almost empty, - Maxtussin Mucus and chest congestion with no date and was half empty, - Mintox Max antacid with no open date and almost empty, - Cholestyramine 4 gm with no open date, - Metrix level 2 3ml Control solution, expired on 2/28/25, and - 8 IV extension tubing set, expired 4/2021. During an interview on 3/12/25 at 8:13 a.m., staff member D stated all medications were to be marked with an open date, once opened, and disposed of when expired. During an interview on 3/12/25 at 11:40 a.m., staff member C stated all medications were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document an event sent to the State Survey Agency regarding a resident-sustained facial burn and the resident had pain, due to the application of a heat pack, and failed to provide accurate documentation of the facility's investigative findings, for 1 (#9) of 16 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 3/11/25 at 10:12 a.m., resident #9 reported he had received a burn to his left cheek and ear, approximately five or six months ago, from a heat pack applied for a toothache. During a phone interview on 3/11/25 at 4:15 p.m., NF6 stated he received a complaint from resident #9 pertaining to receiving a burn. NF6 stated he saw the facial burn approximately one week after the incident. At the time of his visit, NF6 stated, There was no blistering remaining, but the entire cheek, from top of the ear to the left jawline, was quite red, inflamed, and was reported by [Resident #9] to be painful. During a phone interview on 3/12/25 at 1:15 p.m., NF5 stated resident #9's left face was red and blistered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0621 — isolated
  Treat residents equally regarding transfer, discharge, and provision of services for all residents, regardless of payment source
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement equal practices during the admission process, by failing to complete admissions on residents entering the facility for respite care for 1 (#77) of 16 sampled residents. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for staff providing effective, person-centered care. Findings include: During an observation on 3/10/25 at 3:15 p.m., resident #77 was in her room, with no name on the door, and was not listed on the census list provided by the facility. During an interview on 3/10/25 at 3:30 p.m., staff member C stated resident #77 was a respite patient, and the facility did not fully admit respite patients. Staff member C stated residents who were on respite stays would not be included in the census. Staff member C stated the facility accepted respite patients regularly and did not admit them the way they did for regular admissions. Staff member C stated a paper chart was started for respite patients, including a paper MAR, a facility contract, an initial assessment, and nursing notes. Staff member…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$48,318 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $12,438 — penalty dated 2025-03-13
• $35,880 — penalty dated 2024-03-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MT