No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Logan Health - Conrad

805 Sunset Blvd, Conrad, MT 59425 · Non profit - Corporation · 59 certified beds · (406) 271-3211 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (406) 271-3211 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$27,013 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2023
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $27,013 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-07)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
630 Park Ave · (406) 434-3260 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5 4th Ave SE (Olson's) / 600 S Main St #2 (Village)
Grocery
600 S Main St Ste 1 · (406) 278-7843 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Abel Park0.2 mi
16 N Kansas St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased23.4%18.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.9%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%2.1%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.6%2.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.8%5.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.6%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.3%4.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.7%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.4%15.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%6.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.9%24.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.1%20.4%17.1%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.541.381.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.922.161.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.02U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.02hours / resident / day
Physical therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.02 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.84
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 40.2 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.11 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-07)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision on a secure dementia unit, resulting in 1 (#34) of 22 sampled residents ingesting odor eliminator; and failing to keep chemicals secure and inaccessible to residents with cognitive impairment; and failed to provide adequate supervision for fall prevention, for 2 (#s 6 and 15). Findings include: 1. During an interview on 4/25/24 at 11:17 a.m., staff member R stated she was uncomfortable working on the secure care unit by herself, and asked not to be assigned back there (secure care unit) unless there was another staff member with her. Staff member R stated there were too many incidents that happened on the secure care unit, and only having one staff member on duty during the day was unsafe. During an observation on 4/25/24 at 11:27 a.m., two residents were sitting in the dining room, and two residents were wandering around the dining room, of the secure care unit. No staff were present in the dining room. Staff member O came into the dining room at 11:37 a.m. The four residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the active diagnoses section of the MDS for 1 (#1) of 17 sampled residents. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 5/5/26 at 8:28 a.m., resident #1 was observed to have a dry, hacking cough, but no obvious shortness of breath. Resident #1 denied being admitted to the hospital or being treated for any respiratory illness.Review of resident #1's EHR, accessed on 5/6/26, showed a pneumonia diagnosis was present at the time he was admitted to the facility in May of 2025. The resident's EHR failed to show any hospital admission since May of 2025.Review of resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, with an ARD of 2/22/26, showed an active diagnosis of pneumonia.During an interview on 5/6/26 at 9:50 a.m., staff member C stated resident #1 had pneumonia at the time he was initially admitted to the facility in May of 2025. Staff member C stated she should have deleted the pneumonia diagnosis when the resident completed the treatment and had fully recovered from the illness.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication was given for the use of an antipsychotic medication for 1 (#7) of 17 sampled residents. Findings include:During an observation on 5/4/26 from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., resident #7 was sitting at a table with two male residents. Resident #7 finished what was served for dinner and told staff she was still hungry. Staff provided a sandwich for the resident. The resident did not display any disruptive behavior during the dinner observation.Review of resident #7's physician order, dated 11/21/25, showed the resident was receiving olanzapine (anti-psychotic medication) 2.5 mg daily for a diagnosis of, F03.90 Unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety.During an interview on 5/6/26 at 1:45 p.m., staff member C stated she was responsible for ensuring pharmacy reviews and recommendations were completed. When asked about the use of an anti-psychotic medication (olanzapine) for a resident (#7) without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to discard expired food, and failed to properly date, label, and store food in the main kitchen freezer and cooler. These failures had the potential to affect all residents consuming food in the facility. Findings include:During an observation of the kitchen and interview with staff member G on 5/4/26 at 4:11 p.m., the dry storage area had two cups of instant oatmeal which expired on 3/11/26 and five boxes of instant cream of wheat which expired on 4/1/26. The cream of wheat boxes contained 10 packets each. There was also a 28-ounce box of creamy wheat which was open to air and not dated. The meat freezer was found to have a plastic bag containing some type of breaded meat product (possibly chicken tenders), a bag of breaded meat patties (possibly chicken), and a plastic bag containing beef patties. These three bags were open to air and not dated when received or opened. The vegetable cooler had an open bag of leaf lettuce which was not dated when received or opened. Staff member G stated she had been in her current position…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of the COVID-19 vaccination status (received or refused) for staff member F, out of those staff sampled for the received/refused COVID-19 vaccination tracking. Findings include: Review of staff member F's COVID-19 vaccination status, dated 5/6/26, showed the staff member had signed the declination on 5/6/26.During an interview on 5/6/26 at 10:42 a.m., staff member F stated he had been asked about getting the COVID-19 vaccination when he initially started at the facility (August of 2025). Staff member F stated he signed the declination form earlier on 5/6/26.During an interview on 5/7/26 at 8:59 a.m. staff members C and D stated staff member B was currently responsible for staff COVID-19 status documentation.Review of the facility's policy titled, COVID-19 Vaccination Program, 84.05.2021.OP.118, dated February of 2025, showed, Screening will be ongoing and allow for employees/residents who have initially declined, to receive the vaccine at a later date. The Infection Control Coordinator or designee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food at a safe and appetizing temperature for 6 (#s 1, 6, 9, 14, 19, and 139) of 17 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the potential for foodborne illness and decreased the residents' satisfaction and enjoyment of their food. Findings include: During an interview on 4/21/25 at 11:19 a.m., resident #9 stated the food was sometimes cold when served in the dining area or in his room. During an observation and interview on 4/21/25 at 11:26 a.m., kitchen staff were placing food on plates, covering them, and placing them in a metal cart. The doors on the cart remained open while staff were plating food. Staff member N stated the metal carts were not insulated and did not hold heat like they should. Staff member N stated the metal food carts were delivered to the dining room right around noon. During an observation on 4/21/25 at 12:10 p.m., the first tray was served in the dining room. The metal food cart doors were opened, and the tray was removed. The doors were not closed. Passing meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards by failing to dispose of expired food in dry storage and the walk-in cooler; track and record temperatures for a cooler located in a public area; and label and date food stored in the facility freezers; This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors at the facility. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 4/21/25 at 12:32 p.m., a package of strawberries covered in thick white mold was observed in a small refrigerator on the secure unit, located inside the Sweet Shop. During an interview on 4/24/25 at 11:10 a.m., staff member J stated there was a resident who helped with the Sweet Shop, and it was possible she had placed the strawberries in the fridge that staff didn't catch. 2. During an observation and interview on 4/21/25 at 11:26 a.m., the dry storage area contained six boxes of baking soda with an expiration date of 11/7/2021. The walk-in cooler had one open bag of Brussel sprouts, undated, and one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove expired items from the medication room. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 4/21/25 at 1:40 p.m., the following items were found in the medication room: - 1 bottle of Humulin R insulin was open but had no resident identifiers or an open or expiration date on the bottle or box, - 1 box of Ayr Saline Nasal gel with an expiration date of 1/2025, - 1 box of 144 individual packets of A&D ointment with an expiration date of 12/2024, - 1 box diaper rash ointment with an expiration date of 3/2025, - 1 suture removal kit with an expiration date of 2/28/25, and - 4 duoderm adhesive dressings with an expiration date of 11/1/2024. Staff member D stated, Pharmacy comes down once a month and goes through the medication room for any expired medications. We are all responsible for double checking medications and supplies for expirations. During an interview on 4/23/25 at 1:30 p.m., staff member Q stated she was responsible for checking the medication room for expired medications. Staff member Q…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have the required enhanced barrier precaution signage posted for residents who required enhanced barrier precautions for cares for 2 (#s 4 & 6) of 17 sampled residents; and failed to ensure staff adheared to proper infection control measures and policies for masking and hand hygiene for 1 (#9) of 17 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received care from staff not following infection control prevention measures. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 4/24/25 at 8:45 a.m., resident #4 was having wound care completed for a Stage III three pressure sore on her sacrum. Review of skin and wound assessments for the resident showed the wound had been present since early April 2025. There was no infection control signage, PPE supply cart, or extra PPE donned by staff, for enhanced barrier precautions. During an interview on 4/24/25 at 9:20 a.m., staff member F stated a pressure wound would require the use of enhanced barrier precautions. 2. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide hydration in cups that were not disposable. This deficient practice caused 2 residents (#s 1 and 31) of 17 sampled residents to feel distressed and frustrated. Findings include: During an observation on 4/21/25 at 12:29 p.m., staff member D was passing lunch trays in the main dining room. The lunch trays had hard plastic cups filled with juice or milk, and hard plastic handled cups for coffee, tea, or hot chocolate. After lunch trays were passed staff member D began to pass water in the dining room. The water was in clear, soft plastic, disposable cups. During an interview on 4/22/25 at 8:09 a.m., resident #31 stated using the disposable water cups upsets her and makes her feel like she is in jail. Resident #31 stated she was shaky at times and would spill the water from the soft plastic cup and caused her frustration. Resident #31 stated, I don't understand why my water cannot be in a normal cup, like my other drinks. During an observation and interview on 4/22/25 at 12:19 p.m., staff member D was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's diagnosed mental health condition was listed on their PASARR for 1 (#4) of 17 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential for appropriate mental health needs to be unaddressed. Findings include: Review of resident #4's physician orders, dated 12/17/24, showed the resident took Aripiprazole 2 mg daily for bipolar disorder. Review of resident #4's PASARR, dated 12/11/24, failed to show bipolar disorder as a listed diagnosis. During an interview on 4/23/25 at 10:00 a.m., staff member I stated the diagnosis of bipolar disorder was in resident #4's past medical history and H&P, but did not carry over to her current diagnoses, which were used when generating the PASARR. During an interview on 4/24/25 at 9:00 a.m., staff member L stated they did not know why a diagnosis which was in the H&P and attached to a medication would not be shown on the resident's list of medical diagnoses.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a baseline care plan, outlining pertinent information needed to care for a new resident within 48 hours of admission for 1 (#139) of 17 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the ability to affect all new admissions receiving care in the facility. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 4/22/25 at 8:16 a.m., resident #139 was sitting on the edge of his bed watching TV. The volume on the TV was very loud. Resident #139 had his legs in a dependent position, with his feet on the floor. His legs appeared to be swollen and there was an indentation on his legs from his socks. Resident #139 stated he had heart problems, and his legs were swollen all the time. Resident #139 states it can be uncomfortable at times. Resident #139 stated he needed some assistance with getting dressed, personal hygiene, and some help with setting up his meals. Review of resident #139's diagnoses list showed he had congestive heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was showered according to their preference for 1 (#4) of 17 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 4/22/25 at 11:11 a.m., NF2 stated the facility was sometimes short staffed and resident #4 would go a week and a half between showers. During an interview on 4/24/25 at 9:40 a.m., staff member B stated she was unsure if there was an error in documentation or if staff should have charted refused and selected n/a instead, but the records showed resident #4 was getting a shower about every nine days. Staff member B instituted a paper charting system to correct the deficiency. Review of resident #4's shower records, dated 1/1/25 - 4/23/25, showed the resident received 12 showers over the 96-day span. - 1/3/25 - 2/21/25 resident #4 was shown as having a shower every seven days. - 3/20/25 is the next documented shower, a 27 day gap. - 4/15/25 is the next documented shower, a 26 day gap. Review of resident #4's shower records, dated 1/1/25 - 4/23/25, showed only one documented refusal on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist identifed and addressed an as needed psychotropic medication for an excessive duration for 1 (#20) of 17 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of resident #20's physician orders, dated 11/21/24 to 4/23/25, showed an order for Lorazepam oral concentrate 2 MG/ML. Give 0.25 ml by mouth every 8 hours as needed for anxiety. No stop date was noted on the orders. Review of resident #20's monthly medication regimen review, completed by staff member L showed: - December 2024-Resident #20, No Significant Irregularities. - January 2025-Resident #20, No Significant Irregularities. - February 2025-Resident #20, No Significant Irregularities. - March 2025-Resident #20, No Significant Irregularities. During an interview on 4/24/25 at 9:01 a.m., staff member L stated she was responsible for the facility's medication regimen reviews. Staff member L stated when the medication regimen reviews were due she looked in the chart at progress notes, vital signs, current labs, physician's orders, assessments, and noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to limit an as needed anti-anxiety medication order to 14 days or provide a physician's rationale for continued extension of the medication's use, for 1 (#20) of 17 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of resident #20's physician's orders, dated 11/21/24 to 4/23/25, showed an order for Lorazepam oral concentrate 2 MG/ML. Give 0.25 ml by mouth every 8 hours as needed for anxiety. No stop date noted on the orders. Review of physician's progress notes dated 12/18/24, 2/11/25, and 4/15/25, showed no documentation for the continued use of lorazepam past 14 days. During an interview on 4/24/25 at 9:01 a.m., staff member L stated, Psychotropic medications are frowned upon and should be minimized. Psychotropic medications have a 14-day limit and after that time the physician needs to re-evaluate the resident. Review of a facility document titled, Extended Care Consultant Pharmacist, with an effective date of 5/2021, showed: . iii. PRN Psychotropic Drugs: 1. PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days, b.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a qualified Dietary Manager. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 4/21/25 at 11:26 a.m., staff member N introduced himself as the Director of Food Services. Staff member N stated he had been in that position since May 2024. Staff member N stated that all of his certifications had expired, and had been for awhile, but he had been trying to get them up to date again. Staff member N stated he registered for the course in October 2024 but had not taken the test yet. During an interview on 2/23/25 at 4:00 p.m., staff member S stated they were working on getting staff member N certified. Review of a facility document titled, Food Service Director, Undated, showed: . Job requirements - Bachelor's degree or at least 5 years' experience managing a culinary department or operation. - ServSafe and State Certified in Safe Food Handling and Sanitation . - Certified Dietary Manager Preferred.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Provider Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) was completed to include the signature, date, and time the provider signed the order for 1 (#31) and failed to ensure all areas of the form were completed by the resident or the resident representative for 1 (#139) of 17 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of resident #31's POLST form showed resident #31 wanted no CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) with selective treatment. Resident #31 signed the form on [DATE], but the POLST form was not signed by a physician, or an advanced practice practitioner. Review of resident #139's POLST form showed resident #139 wanted comfort focused treatment with no CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation). In the patient signature section of the form there appeared to be what looked like an x and a check mark. There was no printed name or date signed by the resident or resident representative. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:32 a.m., staff member H…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse was on staff at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. This practice had the potential to affect any resident needing RN services when one was not available. Findings include: Review of the CMS [NAME] Payroll-based Journal for this facility, with a run date of 4/16/24, showed the facility triggered for not having RN coverage for eight consecutive hours each day on 39 days between the dates of 10/8/23 and 12/31/23. Review of the facility's nursing schedules, dated 10/8/23 - 12/31/23, reflected the facility did not have RN coverage for eight consecutive hours on 10/29/23. During an interview on 4/23/24 at 3:35 p.m., staff member B reviewed the schedule with the surveyor, and stated the facility did not have a registered nurse on 10/29/23. Staff member B did not know why a registered nurse was not scheduled.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored off the floor in the cooler and freezer; that staff wore beard covers appropriately; cleaned thermometers before use; and ensured proper hand hygiene was used and followed when serving food. These practices had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 4/22/24 at 1:25 p.m., there was a stack of 13 food filled boxes on the floor of the freezer. One crate of 2% Milk was on the floor of the cooler. During an interview on 4/23/24 at 10:05 a.m., NF5 stated, food in coolers and freezers should be six inches off the floor, as a standard practice. 2. During an observation on 4/25/24 at 8:10 a.m., staff member X was wearing a beard cover, only covering his chin and mouth, not covering his full beard. Staff member X repeatedly touched his beard, beard cover, and nose while serving breakfast food at the buffet line in the main dining room. Staff member X pulled at his beard cover adjusting it 14 times in six minutes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff and residents had access to the grievance process forms, were able to complete grievance forms for concerns voiced by residents, investigate grievances, and maintain evidence demonstrating the results of all grievances for 3 (#s 16, 21, and 35) of 22 sampled residents. This practice had the potential to affect anyone wanting to file a grievance or who had filed a grievance. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 4/22/24 at 2:46 p.m., resident #16 stated she had many complaints regarding staffing, the quality of the food, a wound on her ankle, not getting ice water throughout the day, and not receiving food as ordered on her meal ticket. Resident #16 stated she had notified staff member A of her concerns, but did not hear anything back on how her concerns were addressed, and many of her concerns had not been addressed at all. Resident #16 stated her husband and her both wrote letters to the administrator regarding their concerns, and they called her sometimes as well. NF3 stated he had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide palatable food at an appetizing temperature for 4 (#s 10, 16, 21, and 33) of 22 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 4/22/24 at 2:46 p.m., resident #16 stated the quality of the food was a concern for her. Resident #16 stated the food was consistently cold, and often not what she ordered. Resident #16 stated she had voiced her concerns to the management staff regarding the food temperature and spicy food. 2. During an interview on 4/23/24 at 9:38 a.m., resident #35 stated, The food is always cold, and we (resident's #33 and 35) are tired of the same things over and over. During an interview on 4/23/24 at 2:00 p.m., staff member V stated the management receives test trays from the kitchen throughout the month. The management staff then complete a questionnaire on the food's quality, appearance, taste, and temperature. Staff member V stated, The temperature continues to be an issue and residents do complain about it, with good reason. During an observation on 4/24/24 at 12:05 p.m., surveyors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide dignity and respect for residents when staff failed to knock and announce theselves prior to entering the resident rooms, causing frustration, for 2 (#s 2 and 190), and their family members, of 22 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 4/23/24 at 8:54 a.m., resident #2 was lying in bed visiting with family members. Staff member M walked into the room without knocking. Resident #2 stated, I have no privacy, staff just walk in whenever they want. It is frustrating. NF2 stated, The staff do that all the time. I am here frequently, and it is rare to have a staff member knock before they enter [Resident #2's] room. It is frustrating that I can not even have a conversation with [Resident #2] with out someone just walking in. This is [Resident #2's] home. During an interview on 4/23/24 at 8:58 a.m., staff member M stated staff were to knock and get permission before entering a resident's room. During an observation on 4/23/24 at 9:00 a.m., staff member M walked into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medications for 1 (#31) of 22 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 4/24/24 at 7:55 a.m., staff member O was performing the morning medication pass. Staff member O stated she provided all of resident #31's medications to her. During an observation and interview on 4/24/24 at 8:05 a.m., staff member O took resident #31 her morning medications. On resident #31's bedside table was a bottle of Systane eye drops. Resident #31 stated she gave herself the eye drops, when she needed them. Resident #31 could not verbalize correct administration instructions or if there were any side effects of the Systane. During an interview on 4/24/24 at 8:09 a.m., staff member O stated she did not have any residents that were able to self-administer medications. During an observation on 4/24/24 at 9:10 a.m., resident #31 was sitting on the side of her bed. On the bedside table was a bottle of Systane eye drops, the lid was not on the bottle of eye…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to support and assist 2 residents, (#s 33 and 35) who were spouses, and the couple wished to share bed space but couldn't due to the lack of staff assistance, of 22 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 4/23/24 at 9:38 a.m., resident #35 stated she and resident #33 (a married couple) were told they could have a double bed in their shared room, or the single beds could be put together. Resident #35 stated she had asked the floor staff several times about the double bed but had not received a double bed or assistance with having the beds pushed together. Resident #35 began to cry, and she stated there was no reason she and her husband (#33) should not be allowed to share a bed. Resident #33 stated his bed was too short, and his feet dangled off the end. This surveyor observed the single beds, in separate sections of the room, and they were across from one another. The room was a double occupancy room. Therefore, the two were unable to share the same bed. The couple made the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and report findings following a facility reported incident of injury of unknown origin for 1 (#11) of 22 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the State Survey Agency on 11/22/23, showed an incident of unknown origin occurred with resident #11 on 11/21/23 at 12:30 p.m. In the report, resident #11 complained of pain to the right shoulder. The facility's assessment of resident #11's shoulder showed redness as well as a bruise to the left upper arm. An area was measured but no location was specified as showed in the report: Resident stated she had not fallen and could not recall what happened . The bruise was approx 10x6 cm. A request for the complete investigation and root cause analysis related to the event was requested on 4/22/24 at 1:40 p.m., and was not recieved prior to the end of the survey. No findings were submitted to the State Survey Agency within the required reporting timeline of five working days from when the incident occurred as the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to revise a resident care plan to show effective interventions following multiple falls with injury for 1 (#12) of 22 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation on 4/22/24 at 3:26 p.m., resident #12 was pacing up and down the hallway, in the secure care unit. Resident #12 was wearing regular socks, and no shoes. Resident #12 had a large yellow and purple bruise noted to her left eye and forehead area. During an interview on 4/22/24 at 3:29 p.m., staff member J stated resident #12 fell all the time. Staff member J stated it was not unusual for residents on the secure care unit to fall and be bruised. Staff member J stated, I had asked staff member A about the bruise on resident #12, and staff member A did not give me any information. Staff member J stated she believed all staff have access to resident care plans. When asked by the surveyor about the use of shoes or non-skid socks, Staff member J stated, The interventions are never updated so most of us (staff) don't bother looking anymore.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident had access to his hearing aids for necessary communication, and the hearing aids were kept by the nursing staff when not in use, and instructions for use were provided to staff on his care plan, for 1 (#6) of 22 residents. Findings include: During an interview on 4/22/24 at 3:50 p.m., NF7 stated she came to the facility almost every morning, and resident #6's hearing aids were never put in her ears until she specifically asked for the hearing aids to be placed. During an observation and interview on 4/24/24 at 1:04 p.m., resident #6 did not have his hearing aids in, and he was was having a hard time hearing the conversation with the staff. Staff member M stated the hearing aids were typically located in resident #6's room, on a hook, near the sink. Staff member M stated, I could not find them (the hearing aids) this morning. Staff member M stated, I could not find them yesterday either. During an interview and observation on 4/25/24 at 10:51 a.m., staff member I stated hearing aids were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to address the use of resident refrigerators sufficiently, and in a manner to promote safety, for the prevention of food borne illnesses and having expired food disposed of timely, for 1 (#2) of 22 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation on 4/22/24 at 3:04 p.m., resident #2 had a refrigerator in his room. No refrigerator temperature logs were visualized by the surveyor. During an interview on 4/22/24 at 4:08 p.m., staff member B stated the temperature checks for the refrigerators are documented in the resident's electronic medical record, under tasks, for each resident with a refrigerator. During an observation and interview on 4/23/24 at 8:54 a.m., resident #2's personal refrigerator in his room was observed to have a sticky substance stuck to the bottom, on the inside of the refrigerator. There were two open containers of vanilla yogurt, with a use by date of 4/19/24 and 4/21/24, a small, open container of milk with an expiration date of 4/21/24, and a facility dessert dish covered with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility staff failed to ensure a dependent resident had access to a call light for 1 (#105) of 5 sampled residents. This deficient practice caused the resident to feel frustrated and disrespected. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 3/6/24 at 12:55 p.m., resident #105 was seated in an electric wheelchair in the middle of the room. Resident #105's call light was plugged into the wall, clipped to itself, and was across the room. Resident #105 could not reach the call light from his seated postion in his electric wheelchair. Resident #105 stated, I never have my call light, staff never give it to me. If I need something I have to leave my room and go find someone or sit out at the nurse's station until someone sees me. I have had to yell out a couple of times for help, I should not have to resort to yelling out for help. It is frustrating and disrespectful. During an observation on 3/6/24 at 2:26 p.m., resident #105 was sitting in his electric wheelchair in the middle of the room. Resident #105 could not reach the call light,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and revise a care plan to show a wound, and any interventions associated with the wound, for 1 (#105) of 5 sampled residents. Findings include: During a phone interview on 3/6/24 at 9:45 a.m., NF2 stated resident #105 had a wound on his shin, since November 2023, and the wound was still not healed. During a phone interview on 3/6/24 at 10:08 a.m., NF3 stated she noticed the wound on resident #105's left shin area. NF3 stated when staff were asked about what happened they could not answer. NF3 stated, The nurse told me she did not know what happened, nothing was reported to her. During an observation and interview on 3/6/23 at 12:55 p.m., resident #105 was sitting in an electric wheelchair with a blanket across his lap. On resident #105's left lower extremity there was a dressing noted to his shin area. Resident #105 stated he had gotten the wound on his leg in November. During an interview on 3/6/24 at 1:10 p.m., staff member F stated nursing staff and the care plan team were responsible for updating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility nursing staff failed to assess, document, and provide initial wound care in a timely manner for 1 (#105) of 5 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the risk of a deterioration of the wound for the dependent resident. Findings include: During a phone interview on 3/6/24 at 9:45 a.m., NF2 stated resident #105 had a wound on his shin since November 2023, and it was still not healed. NF2 stated whenever he had asked about the wound he was told by staff, they were not sure about it. NF2 stated, The staff in that place have no idea what is going on. When you ask a question the only answer you ever get is I don't know, that was never reported to me. NF2 stated, They (the facility) call and let me know about minor things but do not ever notify me of some of the bigger things, I have to find out from [Resident #105]. It is so frustrating. I quit asking questions because the answer is always the same, nobody knows. The same things happen over and over again. During a phone interview on 3/6/24 at 10:58 a.m., NF1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review a facility staff member verbally abused and failed to regard the need for care when requested for a resident, for 1 (#1) of 12 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of a Facility Reported Incident, sent to the State Survey Agency, dated 8/5/23, showed, DON was called this time by a nurse on the floor who was informed of a situation that happened between 10 and 11pm last night, August 5th, 2023. Allegation of verbal misconduct in a resident room. Investigation started at the time it was reported today. The CNA that is alleged has been removed from the facility pending investigation of alleged misconduct. Resident(s) Involved. [Resident #1]. . Parties Accused [NF1] (staff). [sic] The facility investigation findings, submitted on 8/11/23, showed: The employee is still suspended as we continue the investigation; [NF1] has not had any contact with our residents since 8/5/2023. Interviews by the HR department continues with other associates. We will follow the disciplinary/corrective action steps when investigation is completed. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • No harm found · C2024-04-25 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit accurate and complete direct care staffing information to CMS. This practice had the potential to affect all residents. Findings include: Review of the CMS [NAME] Payroll-based Journal for the facility found the facility triggered concerns for licensed nurse staff on 66 days, between 10/7/23 and 12/31/23. The facility also triggered for not having RN coverage for eight consecutive hours each day on 39 days between 10/8/23 and 12/31/23. Refer to F727 for the RN staffing. Review of the facility's nursing schedules, dated 10/8/23 - 12/31/23, reflected the facility did have licensed staff 24 hours a day on the dates in question, and did have RN coverage for eight consecutive hours each day except on 10/29/23. The findings were inconsistent with the PBJ submittals. During an interview on 4/23/24 at 3:32 p.m., staff member A stated the facility had noted the errors in the PBJ when she took over her position. Staff member A stated she corrected the data moving forward by including the addition of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • No harm found · B2024-04-25 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing information on a daily basis, at the beginning of each shift. This practice had the potential to affect anyone who wanted to review the nurse staffing levels in the facility. Findings include: During an observation on 4/22/24 at 6:30 p.m., the facility nurse posting was found on a clipboard on a wall hanger. The posting dated 4/22/24 had not been filled out for the morning shift. The posting dated 4/18/24 was not filled in for the evening and night shifts. During an interview on 4/23/24 at 6:44 p.m., staff member B stated the nurses on the units complete the posting after their shift. Staff member B did not know why the postings on 4/18/24 and 4/22/24 had not been completed.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$27,013 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $23,868 — penalty dated 2024-03-07
  • $3,145 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-07 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MTWY HEALTHOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2022
BENGOCHEA, SEANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2023
DENZER, HALEYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2026
JONES, CAROLEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/28/2021
MORREN, CONRADIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/22/2019
RIES, BERNARDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2008
STURM, DEBBIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/25/2015
BARTHOLOMEW, CRAIGIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2023
BENNETT, DONALDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2022
COOK, KEITHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2023
DUNCAN, HEIDIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2023
GOGUEN, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2023
GORDON, ALICEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2023
HARRIS, MICHELLEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2023
KAPTANIAN, MELISSAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2023
KARAS, JANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2023
MATOSICH, BONNIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/17/2020
NYSTUEN, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
RAY, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/28/2021
ROBBINS, ANNAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2022
SEGER, CLINTONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2026
SIOMOS, VASSILISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2022
STOUT PATERSON, COURTNEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2019
BURKE, BRIGIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2024
GIBSON, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/27/2022
LAYTON, ELLENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/28/2024
NEWMILLER, VICKIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/27/2023
OTT, JUSTINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/28/2024
PILGRIM, PATTIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2023
KALISPELL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2025
SHRIVER, SHIRLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/21/2024
TAYLOR, JAYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2008

CMS files one row per role, so the 46 rows in the source record cover these 32 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in MT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Montana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Montana
$8,973/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,581/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,075/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 275119. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next