No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Valley View Home

1225 Perry Ln, Glasgow, MT 59230 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 96 certified beds · (406) 228-2461 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (406) 228-2461 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2026
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
301 Knapp St · (406) 653-2150 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
54181 US Highway 2 · (406) 228-8252 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
54151 US Highway 2 · (406) 228-4717 · Call to confirm hours
Park
10 Th St · (406) 228-8341 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1220 10th St N · (406) 228-9554

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.9%18.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.9%2.1%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection7.5%2.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.0%5.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.6%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury9.8%4.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.9%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.4%15.8%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.0%6.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.9%24.1%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.6%20.4%17.1%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.111.381.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.802.161.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.78
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.79
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.98
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
40.0%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 56.1 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.79 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-17)
0
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide meaningful activities for residents for 2 (#s 43 and 44) of 10 memory care residents. This deficient practice increased the risk of the residents becoming bored or escalating their behavior. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 6/16/26 at 2:45 p.m., staff members G and L were sitting at the nurses' station in the memory unit. Resident #43 was sitting in the dining room at a table by himself. Resident #43 was not involved in any activity. Resident #43 got up from his chair and went to his room and came back out a moment later, wandering in the hallway, and then to the common room where he sat in the recliner watching television. Resident #43 got back up a few minutes later and wandered back to his room. There was not an activity occurring at the time. 2. During an observation and interview on 6/16/26 at 3:10 p.m., resident #44 slept on the couch in the common area. Staff member G stated that resident #44 preferred to sleep on the couch throughout the day and night. Staff member G stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the IDT team verified a resident who was self-administering medication was determined to be clinically appropriate to self-administer medications, and medications were left for the resident to take independently, without supervision, for 1 (#4) of 26 sampled medication administrations. Findings include:During an observation on 6/17/26 at 11:27 a.m., staff member K prepared two acetaminophen 500 mg tablets for resident #4, placing them in a pill cup and taking them to the resident's room. Staff member K placed the medication cup on the bedside table and left the room without observing the administration of resident #4 taking the medications. During an interview on 6/17/26 at 11:28 a.m., staff member K stated resident #4 did not appear to have a self-administration of medication assessment. Staff member K stated she did not think about it before she left the medication without observing him taking the pills. Staff member K stated she knew she should stay with residents when administering medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure two vulnerable residents were not subjected to abuse, neglect, or psychosocial harm, when a staff member P physically and mentally abused resident #47 when the resident was resisting care, and when the same staff member left resident #43 unattended at an out of town appointment, neglecting her safety and supervision needs, for 2 (#s 43 and 47) out of 18 sampled and supplemental residents. Using the reasonable person perspective, both vulnerable residents may have ongoing psychosocial harm, fear, or behavior related to the abuse and neglect events involving staff member P. Findings include: 1. Review of a written warning, dated 3/5/26, showed staff member P left a cognitively impaired resident alone at an out-of-town appointment while the resident was in his care, neglecting the resident's safety. The resident was left in the corner of a corridor for at least an hour, with the wheelchair locked, and no one was there to assist or help the resident. When the resident was found by witnesses, she was observed to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure boxes of resident food and drinks were stored off the floor in the kitchen area, and the improperly stored foods may be exposed to dust, pests, moisture, and other environmental hazards, affecting any resident eating food prepared or served by the kitchen. Findings include:During an observation on 6/16/26 at 7:42 a.m., one box of supplemental drinks was found on the floor upon entering the kitchen.During an observation on 6/16/26 at 7:46 a.m., two cases of Gatorade, one case of green beans, and one case of supplemental drink were on the dry storage floor.During an observation on 6/16/26 at 2:30 p.m., a box of supplemental drinks were found on the floor, propping open the kitchen door.During an interview on 6/17/26 at 8:35 a.m., staff member M stated the food delivery truck came late the previous day, she was aware of the food not being put away, and it was on the floor. Staff member M stated she was also aware of the supplemental drink being used to prop open the kitchen door. Staff member M stated that had been the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a full time DON. Findings include:During an interview on 1/29/26 at 9:48 a.m., staff members B and C stated the facility was without a DON for a little over a month. Staff member C stated the DON tasks were divided between the IDT.Review of an email from staff member A showed an advertisement for the DON position with a posting date of 9/8/25. The email goes on to show the IDT took over the DON tasks.During an interview on 1/29/26 at 10:00 a.m., staff member A stated the new DON started on 10/16/25.Review of an email sent by staff member A, dated 9/8/25 at 2:34 a.m., showed the previous DON no longer worked at the facility. There was no documentation available to show the prior DON's duties were specifically reassigned to an RN (or multiple RNs), until a new DON was recruited. Review of an email sent by staff member A, dated 10/16/25 at 3:26 p.m., showed staff member B started as DON on 10/16/25. The facility was without a DON for 37 days.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary and beneficial interventions were identified and implemented for the supervision of a resident (#1) who displayed various behaviors and this resident wandered into other residents' rooms which increased her risk of harm if others acted out on her. Resident (#1) had interactions with male residents, which were sexual in nature, and on one occasion, she was found in the male's room when the encounter was occurring. The facility implemented behavioral and medication interventions to help intervene in her behaviors but failed to implement a monitoring and supervision program that would meet resident #1's safety needs as related to her wandering and the sexual encounters she experienced. Staff documented she continued to have her baseline behaviors, and her behaviors changed in some areas, such as refusing medications and or care, but these were not clearly linked to the interactions she had with the two male residents. Resident #1 later transferred to the hospital and had not returned. Findings include:During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an incident was reported within 24 hours of the date of the incident for 1 (#8) of 10 sampled residents. Findings include:During an interview on 1/29/26 at 9:48 a.m., staff members B and C stated the time frame for reporting incidents was 24 hours. Staff member B stated that as soon as we hear about a reportable, we start the investigation. Staff member B stated that the staff abuse training is done yearly. Staff member B stated there are in-services on abuse and reporting timelines throughout the year.During an interview on 1/29/26 at 10:00 a.m., staff member A stated the administrator, DON, and Social Services are responsible for obtaining statements from staff and residents. Staff member A stated the time frames for reporting to the State Survey Agency were two hours for serious bodily injury, or 24 hours if there is no serious bodily injury. Staff member A stated the findings are to be reported to the State Survey Agency within five days. Review of an incident of abuse submitted to the State Survey Agency, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to screen visitors for signs or symptoms of Covid-19, prior to entering the building, during a Covid-19 outbreak; failed to post transmission based precaution signage on the doors of Covid-19 positive residents, and failed to follow transmission based precautions for 4 (#s 15, 21, 26, and 27); failed to practice proper hand hygiene during a laundry pass for 2 (#s 14 and 31); and failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions for 3 (#s 14, 31, and 42) of 22 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the risk of an individual contracting Covid-19, other viruses, or infections, for all residents, staff, or visitors. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 7/15/24 at 2:24 p.m., the facility had printed signs on the entrance doors showing there was a Covid-19 outbreak. Upon entrance into the facility, there was a sign in log, and N-95 masks. There was no staff member present, no screening equipment, or a questionnaire asking visitors about signs or symptoms of Covid-19. During an observation on 7/16/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-17 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document resident declinations and education regarding the Covid-19 vaccine, for 2 (#s 11 and 27) of 5 sampled residents for immunizations. Findings include: A review of resident #11's preventive health care report, with a creation date of 12/14/23, showed, resident #11's resident representative refused the administration of the Covid-19 vaccination. A review of resident #27's preventative health care report, with a creation date of 12/14/23, showed, resident #27's resident representative refused the administration of the Covid-19 vaccination. A request was made on 7/17/24 at 10:16 a.m., for the signed declinations for resident #11 and #27. The signed declinations were not provided prior to the end of the survey. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 1:03 p.m., staff member J stated she did not have any signed declinations or documentation for resident #11 or #27's Covid-19 vaccinations. Staff member J stated she did not provide any education regarding the risks and benefits to the resident representatives for resident #11 or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow outlined interventions for 1 (#25) of 3 residents sampled for weight loss. This deficient practice increased the risk of further weight loss for the resident who had a severe weight loss over a three month period. Findings include: During an observation on 7/16/24 at 8:11 a.m., resident #25 was asleep in her bed. Across the room, on her desk, was her full breakfast tray. During an observation on 7/16/24 at 9:00 a.m., resident #25 was still asleep and her full breakfast tray had been removed. During an observation on 7/17/24 at 8:09 a.m., resident #25 was sitting at the desk in her room with her breakfast tray. She was pushing eggs around with her silverware, but not consuming anything. During an observation on 7/17/24 at 12:07 p.m., resident #25 was sitting at the dining table in the resident common area. Her lunch was untouched in front of her. There were no staff around to cue the resident to eat. She got up from the table and wandered away down the hall. Review of resident #25's care plan, with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items placed in the unit's nourishment refrigerator were dated and labeled with a resident name. This deficient practice increased the risk of a resident receiving incorrect, or out dated, food items. Findings include: During an observation on 7/17/24 at 7:54 a.m., there was an unlabeled and undated Tupperware container in the resident nourishment refrigerator, which was located at the end of the 100 hall. The contents of the container included a homemade, unknown yellow liquid substance. There was no indication of which resident the food belonged to or how long it was in the refrigerator. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 10:11 a.m., staff member L stated it was the responsibility of housekeeping to clean refrigerators in the resident common areas. Staff member L stated family members would often place items in the refrigerator without staff knowing. Review of the facility policy Use and Storage of Food Brought in by Family or Visitors, dated 12/27/18, showed, All food items that are already…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received, or had the opportunity to receive, the pneumococcal vaccine series, for 1 (#15) of 5 sampled residents for vaccinations. Findings include: Review of resident #15's immunization record showed resident #15 had received one pneumococcal vaccine on 4/4/2018. The immunization record did not show what type of pneumococcal vaccine resident #15 had received. A review of a facility document titled, Pneumococcal Vaccine Informed Consent/Decline, showed, resident #15's resident representative signed for resident #15 to receive pneumococcal vaccines on 4/16/24. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 1:03 p.m., staff member J stated, [A Facility Name] works with us on providing vaccinations. Pneumococcal vaccines are not one the facility keeps in house. I just have not set up a clinic (vaccination) yet. It is just something I have not thought about doing yet. I am behind on looking at the immunizations. I have started asking the hospital to provide the pneumococcal vaccine prior to discharge. Review of a facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to monitor a cognitively impaired resident with a known history of elopement attempts, which resulted in the resident leaving the building unsupervised, putting the resident at risk for serious injury or death for 1 (#2) of 2 sampled residents for elopements. Findings include: Review of a Facility Reported Incident, sent to the State Survey Agency for resident #2, dated 4/14/24, showed, Call received from another resident who was outside of facility reporting resident [#2] was outside at [School Name] playground alone. [Staff member name] received a call from [staff member] that she found resident at [School Name] and she would not get in her vehicle to bring her back to facility. [Staff member] arrived at [School Name] and [resident #2] was returned to facility by [staff member] in private vehicle. During an observation on 6/3/24 at 2:45 p.m., resident #2 was asleep in her room, one door away from the exit door. During an interview on 6/3/24 at 3:10 p.m., staff member D stated all residents at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SVENNINGSON, KANDIIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/11/2013
COLE, JEFFIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2014
FEWER, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2014
FUHRMAN, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2014
KOMPEL, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2014
NEUMILLER, RAYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2014
PETERSON, SHEILAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2014
TWEETEN, PAULIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2014
WILTFONG, LISAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2014

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in MT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Montana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Montana
$8,973/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,581/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,075/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 275091. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next