Sheridan Memorial Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 24.1 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.37 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.45 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.43 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.61 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-04-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse and neglect of care needs for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents. The deficient practice resulted in the resident feeling worthless, anxious, confused, and feeling like she was being punished. Findings include: Review of a Facility-Reported Incident, dated 3/7/26, showed resident #1 reported she was forced to remain in a recliner in the day lounge rather than in her bed. The resident also stated she was denied water upon request and did not have access to a call light or any other way to summon help if needed. The report also showed that the resident repeatedly expressed feeling as if she was being punished for something.During an interview on 4/8/26 at 8:28 a.m., staff member H stated she was assigned to care for resident #1 on the day shift on 3/7/26. Staff member H stated resident #1 was in a recliner in the day lounge when she came on shift on the morning of 3/7/26. Staff member H stated resident #1 was sitting in a recliner, which was unusual for her. The staff member stated that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to safely use a sit-to-stand lift when transferring a resident, causing injuries to include fractured ribs, and the resident was hospitalized for further evaluation, for 1 (#26) of 4 sampled residents for accidents. Findings include:Review of a facility reported incident, sent to the State Survey Agency, dated 6/20/25, showed resident #26 was found to have a large area of bruising over his right chest wall with swelling. The area was firm and tender to touch. Resident #26 was sent to the ED for further evaluation. The facility investigation concluded the used of the sit-to-stand lift for transferring resident #26 was the cause of the injury. The investigation did not show if the facility determined the lift sling being used was appropriate for resident #26. The resident was found to have an elevated PT/INR that caused significant bruising and hematoma on the right chest wall. Resident #26 did not complaint of pain in that area, per the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to use a gait belt when ambulating a resident, resulting in a minor injury, which was a skin tear with tendon exposure to the left fourth digit, requiring only nursing treatment for 1 (#4); and failed to evaluate and modify Interventions to prevent future falls for 3 (#s 2, 4, and 5) of 3 residents sampled for falls. These deficient practices contributed to continued falls for the residents and increased the risk of potential injuries. Findings Include:1. Review of a Facility-Reported Incident, dated 11/4/25, showed resident #4 fell while ambulating with staff member K. Resident #4 was using a rolling walker and was wearing supplemental oxygen. Staff member K turned her back on the resident, and the resident lost her balance, falling backward onto her bottom. The report showed the resident hit her left arm and hand on the door jam and sustained a minor injury, which was a skin tear with tendon exposure on her left fourth finger. The resident was not wearing a gait belt. A dressing was applied by the nurse, and no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish a grievance policy which included information on how to file a grievance anonymously for 2 (#s 19 and 20) of 21 sampled residents; and failed to post the grievance officer's address and phone number in a prominent location. This deficient practice affected all who have the right to file a grievance anonymously and who to contact if they wish to file a grievance. Findings include: During an interview on 7/29/25 at 9:21 a.m., resident #20 said he did not know anything about how to file a grievance or the grievance process. He did not know there was a process to file a grievance anonymously. Resident #20 said he had not seen a grievance form or a place to deposit the form. During an observation on 7/30/25 at 9:56 a.m., there was no information posted identifying who the grievance officer was and the required contact information for the grievance officer. During an interview on 7/30/25 at 11:44 a.m., resident #19 stated she had not filled out a complaint or grievance before. Resident #19 stated she did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-30 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of the Medical Director's (or Designee's) attendance and participation for Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings, which were at a minimum, required to be completed quarterly. The Medical Director had involvement in the oversight of the care and services, and ensuring services met professional standards for care, and provided oversight for the review and approval of policies and procedures. This failure could affect all residents. Findings include:During a record review of the facility QAPI binder, on 7/30/25 at 4:18 p.m., one document for April 2025 was found in which a medical provider attended the scheduled facility QAPI meeting. Review of documents with meeting dates from September 2024 to March 2025, and May 2025 to July 2025, did not show a medical provider or director in attendance at the QAPI meetings, although attendance was required. During an interview on 7/30/25 at 4:33 p.m., staff member B and staff member D stated they were filling in to answer QAPI-related…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to uphold proper infection prevention and control practices during medication administration for 3 (#s 2, 22, and 27) of 4 residents receiving medication. Findings include:During an observation on 7/29/25 at 3:52 p.m., staff member Q prepared medications for resident #27, and failed to perform hand hygiene prior to handling the medications for the administration to resident #27. One of the two medications to be given to #27 was dropped onto the surface of the cart by a staff member Q, and then picked up with a plastic spoon. The medication was placed in the medication cup. Staff member Q failed to perform hand hygiene before administering the medications to resident #27, and the surface of the medication cart was not observed to be sanitized prior to the medication preparation. During an observation on 7/30/25 at 7:23 a.m., staff member Q administered medication to resident #22, but failed to perform hand hygiene prior to handling medications for the resident and administering them.During an observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify a resident's past history of trauma and failed to identify triggers to avoid re-traumatization for 1 (#5) of 21 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of resident #5's electronic health record showed the resident was seen for the treatment of chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, by NF4. Review of the NF4 provider notes for resident #5 showed the following: -1/30/24, . 1. Chronic post-traumatic stress disorder - Recent medication changes have actualized and been effective . - 4/8/24, .2. Chronic post-traumatic stress disorder - Will increase the venlafaxine by double from 75 mg to 150 mg. - 5/6/24, .2. Chronic post-traumatic stress disorder - She was either in a dissociative state today or acutely confused. Regardless she still having quite a bit of depression. Will increase the venlafaxine from 150 mg daily to 225 mg. [sic] - 8/20/24, .2. Chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, F43.12 Post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic. - 12/11/24, .2. Chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, F43.12 Post-traumatic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly refer a resident with lost partial dentures to dental services for 1 (#11) of 21 sampled residents. The deficient practice caused the resident to go without his partial denture, and the resident had experienced a weight loss. Findings include:During an interview on 7/30/25 at 12:46 p.m., NF1 stated when she came to pick up resident #11 for a home visit on the Christmas holiday, he was not wearing his upper partial dentures. NF1 stated she was informed by staff when she came to pick up resident #11 that his upper partial dentures were missing. NF1 stated the partial dentures were never found, and the facility had not offered to refer the resident to dental services for the missing partial dentures or to replace them. NF1 stated she, and her family, were disappointed that the partial dentures were missing because they planned to take a family photo, and the loss of dentures would compromise how resident #11 looked in the family photo. NF1 stated resident #11 was on a pureed diet, and he didn't like the pureed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to recognize, identify, and call a physician for confirmation of a coumadin order not being discontinued or held, for a resident with a critical lab value, for 1 (#26) of 3 sampled residents on coumadin. Findings include:During an interview on 7/30/25 at 10:47 a.m., staff member B said resident #26 was discharged from the emergency department with no medication changes. Resident #26's Coumadin dosage was not stopped, and it was not questioned by the nursing staff. Staff member B said his expectation was for staff to use their nursing judgment and if they had a question, contact the provider for clarification. Staff member B said critical thinking should have been used, especially when the patient had a known elevated PT and INR.During an interview on 7/30/25 at 2:40 p.m., staff member C said he had intended to hold the Coumadin for resident #26. The medication was held in the hospital EMR system but the hold order did not follow through to the long-term…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to include 1 (#14) of 16 sampled residents, in care plan meetings. Findings include: During an interview on 7/2/24 at 8:05 a.m., resident #14 said she was not invited to any care plan meetings. Resident #14 stated her family goes, but she was not invited. Resident #14 said she would like to go to the meeting. Review of resident #14's electronic medical record failed to show any documentation of the resident being invited to attend her care plan meetings. Review of resident #14's MDS showed resident #14 was assessed for her cognitive condition using a Brief Interview for Mental Status. The result was a score of 13; cognitively intact. During an interview on 7/2/24 at 9:00 a.m., staff member C said she calls, emails, or talks to resident family members to invite them to care plan meetings. Staff member C said she does not document the invitations to the care plan meetings. Staff member C stated she will invite resident #14 to her care plan meetings going forward.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify bilateral grab bars as a potential restraint, and did not complete a risk assessment, obtain a consent, or have restraint monitoring, for 1 (#10) of 16 sampled residents with bilateral grab bars in place. Findings include: During an observation on 7/1/24 at 1:53 p.m., bilateral grab bars were observed on resident #10's bed. During an interview on 7/1/24 at 4:16 p.m., NF3 said he probably gave consent for the bilateral grab bars, because resident #10 fell out of bed and got bruised up. NF3 said resident #10 had head scans due to falls and hitting her head. During an observation on 7/2/24 at 10:05 a.m., bilateral grab bars were observed on resident #10's bed. Review of resident #10's electronic medical record failed to show documentation a risk assessment was completed, a physician's order obtained, or a signed consent authorizing the use of bilateral grab bars on resident #10's bed. Review of resident #10's MDS with an assessment reference date of 4/11/24, showed resident #10 is dependent for turning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist was monitoring a resident receiving an as needed psychotropic medication for an excessive duration for 1 (#8) of 16 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of resident #8's MAR, dated from 2/29/24 to 7/3/24, showed the resident received as needed doses of lorazepam on 4/4/24 at 5:43 p.m. and 4/11/24 at 10:30 a.m. During an interview on 7/3/24 at 11:21 a.m., staff member B stated she was not aware resident #8 had an order for as needed lorazepam which was in place for more than 14 days. Staff member B did not know why the pharmacist did not address the situation with the medical provider. Review of resident #8's Medication Regimen Reviews, dated March of 2024 thru May 2024, failed to show the pharmacist identified the as needed use of lorazepam for more than 14 days. The review forms failed to show the pharmacist contacted the provider regarding the issue. Review of the facility policy titled, Psychotropics, dated 8/23/23, showed the pharmacist was responsible for monitoring the use of psychotropic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,358 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-07-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in MT