Whitefish Care And Rehabilitation
1305 E 7th St, Whitefish, MT 59937 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (406) 862-3557 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Aug 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (77) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $373,492 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-12)
- nursing-staff turnover (82%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-05, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2026-05 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.3% | 18.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.0% | 2.9% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.0% | 5.6% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.0% | 4.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.7% | 17.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.7% | 15.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.0% | 93.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.4% | 6.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.8% | 24.1% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.0% | 20.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 33.8% | 73.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.5% | 19.2% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 22.0% | 14.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.59 | 1.38 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.88 | 2.16 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 141 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 79.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.69 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.7%CMS range 37.8–52.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 8.3–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 79.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 61.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 70.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 87.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.5%CMS range 3.2–9.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.19 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 92.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 82% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
77 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 61 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-23 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the necessary skills and training for CPR for 2 (#s 1 and 3) of 26 sampled residents. Resident #s 1 and 3 expired in the facility. The facility failed to ensure a process was in place for identifying and tracking staff CPR certifications. The facility failed to obtain the supplies necessary, and ensure they were in stock and on the crash cart, for staff to perform high-quality CPR during emergent situations, which affected 2 (#s 1 and 3). The facility failed to have a process in place to identify and ensure supplies, including respiratory supplies, were on hand and readily available. On [DATE] at 11:09 a.m., an Immediate Jeopardy was announced to the Administrator and the Corporate Clinical Recourse Nurse related to F678 - Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. The Severity and Scope identified for the Immediate Jeopardy were Identified to be at the level of J, and upon removal of the immediacy, lowered to a G. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a clinical indication for a resident's long-term use of a Foley catheter; failed to follow up timely on a physician's PRN order for changing the catheter for over four months1 in an attempt to prevent infections or complications; failed to establish a voiding pattern; and failed to ensure a comprehensive individualized care plan was developed for the resident's long term catheter use, to include goals and interventions for the monitoring and care of the catheter, for 1 (#37) of 3 residents sampled for catheter use and care. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 3/10/26 at 9:51 a.m., resident #37 had a Foley catheter bag attached to the underside of his wheelchair. He stated he had the Foley for a while.Review of resident #37's urology notes, dated 2/10/25, showed the resident had BPH with obs/LUTS (obstructive/lower urinary tract symptoms). During this visit, the resident did not have a Foley catheter.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2025-10-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility nursing staff failed to obtain weekly weights and failed to recognize a resident's severe weight loss for 1 (#3) of 4 sampled residents; and failed to ensure residents were monitored and tracked for maintenance of proper hydration status for 3 (#s 1, 3, and 4) of 4 sampled residents. This deficient practice contributed to resident #3's decline in weight and for the development of dehydration, requiring hospitalization for residents #1, 3, and 4. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #3's hospitalist history and physical, for the admission date of 10/3/25, showed: . [Resident #3] is an [AGE] year-old female with a history of CHF (Congestive Heart Failure), CAD (Coronary Artery Disease), CKD (Chronic Kidney Disease) stage III, HTN [Hypertension] and hypothyroidism currently residing at (Facility Name) brought in for decreased responsiveness found to have acute renal failure with severe hyperkalemia .hypotension, lactic acidosis and acute hypoxic respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2025-10-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were competent in assessing, monitoring, and recognizing clinical changes for a resident with an ongoing clinical decline for 1 (#3) of 4 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in the resident developing an altered mental status, dehydration, and acute renal failure which resulted in a hospitalization. Findings include: Review of resident #3's Emergency Department Note, dated 10/3/25, showed: .XXX[AGE] year-old female from a care facility presented to the ED [Emergency Department] with four days of recurrent vomiting, hypotension (systolic in the 60s-78 mmHg [millimeters of mercury]), and altered mental status. On arrival she was minimally responsive and found to be hypoxic . Final Diagnosis: Aspiration pneumonia, Severe hyperkalemia, Acute renal failure, Sepsis .Review of resident #3's hospitalist history and physical, for the admission date of 10/3/25, showed: . (Resident #3) is an [AGE] year-old . brought in for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper respiratory supplies were readily available during emergencies, for 2 (#s 1 and 3) of 26 sampled residents. This deficient practice caused a delay in care during emergent situations, and an Immediate Jeopardy was cited for F678 - Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation, which included concerns with the lack of supplies and availability. Findings include: During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 11:55 a.m., staff member C showed the crash cart was located in the hallway by the medication room and the nurse's station on the 100 and 300 hallway. The crash cart was wedged in between a treatment cart and the wall and was not easily accessible. There was a light blue, tarp-like cloth covering the crash cart. Staff member C stated a secondary cart was in a utility room but not utilized because they could not access it. The crash cart in the utility room was in a back corner blocked in by intravenous poles and wheelchairs. The crash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which meet professional standards for care necessary to promote healing of wounds for 1 (#9) of 3 sampled residents with wounds. This deficiency had the potential to affect healing for residents with wounds. Findings include: During an interview on 10/23/24 at 12:03 p.m., resident #9 said she was sent to the facility for care of a wound that required a wound vac. The wound vac care she received was not correct, and she only had the wound vac functioning for a week. Resident #9 said the wound vac would alarm and staff would tell her to sit on it to seal the suction. Resident #9 said the wound was getting worse so she signed herself out of the facility against medical advice on 7/31/24. During an interview and record review on 10/23/24 a 7:54 a.m., staff member F said he had been trained on wound care, and the wound documentation. Staff member F said resident #9 was admitted for wound treatments and had a wound vac placed. The wound vac…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and supplies were removed from active stock for one medication room, one medication cart, and two central supply rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents receiving medications and requiring supplies for care. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 3/10/26 at 11:34 a.m., with staff member B, the following items were found:- In the medication room on 200-hall:Prevnar 20 x 37 doses expired [DATE]% dextrose 1000mL IV bag x 2 expired 2/2026- In the CNA Back supply room:19 cases of sterile gloves on floor15 cases of cleaning cloths on floor4 cases of Jevity 1.5 on floor3 cases of urinals on the floor6 cases of chucks on the floortrash/debris on floor- Nurse's back supply room:9 - 22Fr catheters expired 1/15/262 -14Fr catheters expired 6/28/251 -20Fr catheter expired 3/4/251 -16Fr catheter expired 6/22/2538 red rubber catheters expired 5/20/252 suction swab kits expired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0627 — patternEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the discharge planning process addressed goals, needs and referrals necessary to support a resident's request for discharge to another location closer to family for 1 (#81) of 25 sampled residents, and this was upsetting to the resident as it was an ongoing issue over the last year, although the resident had requested assistance with looking into other facilities multiple times. Findings include:During an interview on 3/10/26 at 8:45 a.m., resident #81 reported he was from North Dakota and desired to be discharged back to North Dakota because his family lived there and he had no support system in Montana.During an interview on 3/11/26 at 1:51 p.m., NF8 stated it had been resident #81's goal to return to North Dakota. NF8 stated, The facility kept telling us they were working on it. NF8 reported he had visited his brother on his birthday the previous year, and he had spoken with [Staff member A] about resident #81's desire to discharge to North Dakota. NF8 further stated, We would really love to have him back in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that included enhanced barrier precautions for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 (#81); and failed to include PTSD triggers and interventions on a resident's comprehensive care plan for 2 (#s 53 and 57) of 25 sampled residents. The deficient practice increased the risk for transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms for resident #81 and made it difficult for staff to assist in managing the residents' environment and identify what residents suffered from PTSD and their triggers for residents #53 and #57. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 3/10/26 at 12:10 p.m., resident #81 was observed lying in bed in his room with an indwelling urinary catheter in place. Review of resident #81's comprehensive care plan with an admission date of 7/24/24 showed: Focus: CATHETER: [Resident #81] has Indwelling Catheter r/t Neurogenic bladder and this was initiated: 12/9/24. The Goal showed, [Resident #81] will show no s/sx of Urinary infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update care plan interventions for 2 (#s 4 & 37) residents with new foley catheters; and failed to ensure a resident's family members were involved in the care planning process for 1 (#81) of 25 sampled residents. This failure limited the resident's representative involvement in resident #81's care and treatment decisions. Findings include:1. During an observation and interview on 3/11/26 at 3:07 p.m., resident #4 pointed to her catheter drainage bag hanging from the side of her bed and stated she had a catheter put in after her most recent surgery. Review of resident #4's urology note, dated 2/18/26, showed she was seen for acute urinary retention post hospitalization. Review of resident #4's care plan, revision date 4/30/25, showed, Urinary incontinence: [Resident #4] has urge/stress bladder incontinence . Interventions included ensuring the resident had an unobstructed path to the bathroom and an established voiding pattern. There were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0699 — patternProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and address the needs of residents with PTSD, to include their psychosocial well being related to past traumatic events, for residents' who displayed and or voiced concerns related to trauma, and or who had a diagnosis of PTSD, in an attempt to assist the residents' and staff in being able to meet the needs of the residents (refer to F656 Comprehensive Care Plan), for 3 (#s 53, 57, and 102) of 25 sampled residents. Resident #53 voiced being upset that no one listened to him about his trauma. Resident #57 stated his behavior was stemming from past trauma related to a significant injury, and resident #102 was often angry. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 3/10/26 at 8:41 a.m., resident #57 stated, No one from the facility has spoken to me about my PTSD or any triggers I have. I have had trauma in my life and became paralyzed three years ago. I would say that my screaming behavior was in response to my anxiety of past…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician signature was obtained for a POLST (Montana Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) directive prior to activating the order on the resident's EHR for 1 (#102) of 25 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a POLST being implemented during an emergency without a physician's order. Findings include: Review of resident #102's EHR screen reflected that resident #102 had a code status of Do Not Resuscitate: Comfort-focused. Review of resident #102's POLST, dated 3/5/26, reflected that staff member F had prepared a POLST for Do Not Resuscitate: Comfort-focused Treatment but had not been signed by the physician. The section labeled Physician / APRN / PA Signature showed that the section was mandatory. During an interview on 3/10/26 at 4:07 p.m., staff member B stated she was not aware that a POLST should be signed by the physician. Staff member B stated that the state she practiced in prior did not require a physician's signature to be valid. Review of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was being discharged from Part A Medicare services and continued living in the facility was fully informed of which services would and would not be covered for 1 (#86) of 3 residents sampled for beneficiary notices. Findings include: Review of resident #86's medical record showed her Medicare A services ended on 1/20/26. Resident #86 received and signed CMS form 10123 but did not receive CMS form 10055. Resident #86 is a current resident at the facility. During an interview on 3/12/26 at 9:05 a.m., staff member L stated resident #86 had not been given the form (CMS 10123 ABN) because her initial plan had been to go home. After some discussion with family it was decided that she would be staying in the facility long term. Staff member L stated, We had the conversation yesterday should we have given her the ABN after her discharge plan changed and decided yes. Going forward that is our process.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff and residents were aware of the process for filling out and filing grievance forms, failed to promptly investigate grievances, and failed to follow up with resident representative grievances for 2 (#s 40 and 53) of 25 sampled residents. This practice had the potential to affect anyone wanting to file a grievance or who had filed a grievance. Findings include:During an interview on 3/10/26 at 9:06 a.m., resident #53 stated he was missing multiple items of clothing, and he had spoken to facility staff about it. Resident #53 stated the facility never provided him with a form to fill out, and the facility did not offer to replace the missing clothes. Resident #53 stated, The laundry department is terrible, and I never get my clothes back after they take them to wash them.During an interview on 3/11/26 at 11:27 a.m., NF6 stated he had called staff member E about six months prior and spoke to her about some missing items of his dad's. NF6 stated he had been trying to coordinate a meeting with staff member E for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of the need for an antipsychotic was reflected in the medical record and to complete attempted gradual dose reductions for a resident receiving an antipsychotic for a diagnosis of dementia for 1 (#60) of 25 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to result in resident #60 remaining on an antipsychotic unnecessarily. Findings include: Review of resident #60's physician order for quetiapine fumarate (antipsychotic), dated 2/19/26, reflected resident #60 was receiving quetiapine 25 mg at bedtime, related to dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of resident #60's History and Physical, dated 1/20/26, reflected that resident #60 had been started on quetiapine during a hospital admission from 1/7/26-1/13/26, prior to his admission to the facility on 1/26/26. Review of resident #60's Informed Consent for Psychoactive Medications, dated 2/18/26, reflected resident #60's representative had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman was notified of a resident discharge for a resident who left against medical advice for 1 (#98) of 25 sampled residents. This failure increased the risk that the resident would not have access to independent advocacy and oversight during the discharge process. Findings include:During an interview on 3/10/26 at 2:41 p.m., resident #98 reported it was his choice to leave the facility against medical advice. Resident #98 stated it was cold outside, he was eating poorly and he feared his safety when he discharged .During an interview on 3/10/26 at 3:13 p.m., NF1 stated she was not notified of resident #98's discharge from the facility.During an interview on 3/11/26 at 8:26 a.m., staff member A stated resident #98 left the facility against medical advice. Staff member A stated, The Ombudsman was not notified in this case.Review of resident #98's progress notes showed the following nursing notes:-12/9/25 at 7:00 p.m., Note text: Resident left facility previous shift did not sign out and has not returned.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 61 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours for 1 (#102) of 25 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in staff difficulty communicating with resident #102, causing frustration and anger for resident #102. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 3/9/26 at 3:28 p.m., resident #102 was in his room with NF4, and he was yelling loudly. Multiple staff members entered the room and attempted to calm resident #102 but were unable to understand what he wanted or was saying. NF4 stated she thought he was angry because he wanted to go home. NF4 stated she attempted to explain to him that he could not safely go home yet, and he became angrier. NF4 stated resident #102 needed speech therapy because he could not be understood since his stroke. During an interview and review of resident #102's CNA Kiosk information on 3/11/26 at 10:25 a.m., staff member H showed this surveyor that resident #102 did not have a baseline…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to consistently implement fall prevention interventions for a resident with previous fall(s) and poor safety awareness for 1 (#77) of 25 sampled residents. This deficient practice placed resident #77 at risk of additional falls. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 3/9/26 at 2:43 p.m., resident #77 was in bed lying flat on his back with his call light clipped to the foot of the bed, resting. Resident #77 stated there were a couple of people who shouldn't work at the facility. He stated, They would leave you sitting in a pile of shit. Yesterday, they (CNAs) kept saying they would come back to change me from 10:00 a.m. in the morning until 8:00 p.m. at night and never changed me. They ignore call lights because you rang it too many times. I saw it happen to another resident across the hall, too. Resident #77 stated he did not know how to work the bed remote and could not reach his call light. Resident #77 stated he had a couple of falls since he had been in the facility but did not remember…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medically related social services were provided to meet resident needs by failing to implement discharge planning services and failing to assist with securing Social Security benefits for 1 (#81) of 25 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in resident #81 remaining in the facility without progress toward his expressed discharge goal of returning to North Dakota and without receiving Social Security income needed to meet personal financial needs, causing the resident to rely on family members for financial support. Findings include:1. During an interview on 3/10/26 at 8:45 a.m., resident #81 reported he was from North Dakota and desired to be discharged back to North Dakota because his family lived there and he had no support system in Montana.During an interview on 3/11/26 at 1:51 p.m., NF8 stated it had been resident #81's goal to return to North Dakota. NF8 stated, The facility kept telling us they were working on it. NF8 further reported he had spoken with staff member A during a visit during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents felt respected and cared for due to concerns with staffing customer service approach for 9 (#s 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 15) of 12 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in residents feeling: disrespected, not properly cared for, and that their needs were not all met. Findings include:During an interview and observation on 12/3/25 at 8:00 a.m., resident #9 stated he did not have his teeth brushed yet for the morning. He stated, They're (staff) always busy too. They can't just help one person (at a time). Resident #9 stated the staff members often would come to his room to respond to a call light, take care of one need, but then would get called to another room without taking care of all the requested needs. He stated staff members would rarely offer to brush his teeth or wash his face in the morning, and some staff members would make him feel like he was bothering them if he asked for too much.During an interview on 12/3/25 at 8:58 a.m., resident #10 stated some of the staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-22 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — patternHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure scheduled showers were consistently completed and documented for 4 (#s 1, 5, 6, 7) residents of 12 sampled residents. Findings include:1. During an interview on 12/3/25 at 1:26 p.m., NF1 stated the staff members did not take care of resident #5's overall hygienic needs including showering, shaving, hair trimming, and fingernail clipping frequently enough which resulted in NF1 doing these cares. NF1 stated resident #5 would refuse a shower sometimes and stated resident #5 refused a shower yesterday (12/2/25).Review of the [Facility Name] Shower Schedule, no date, showed resident #5 had showers scheduled for Tuesdays and Fridays.Review of resident #5's EHR showed nursing notes regarding showers from 11/11/25 to 12/2/25:-11/11/25 (Tuesday), a shower was documented,-11/19/25 (Wednesday), a shower was documented. Eight days later,-11/25/25 (Tuesday), a shower was documented. Six days later,-12/2/25 (Tuesday) no documentation of a given or refused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-22 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to place call lights in reachable and seen areas for 1 (#5); ensure there was safety during showers for 1 (#6); and ensure all call lights worked consistently and appropriately for 8 (#s 1, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14) of 12 sampled residents leading to residents feeling their needs were unmet. Findings include:1. During an observation on 12/3/25 at 8:32 a.m., resident #5 had his call light draped over the fall mat located next to the nightstand. Resident #5 was sitting at the edge of his bed, unable to locate his call light, and was attempting to reach his shoes at the end of the bed. The resident was a fall risk. During an interview on 12/3/25 at 1:26 p.m., NF1 stated that in the past, and for a long time now, resident #5's call light did not have a clip on it to hold it in a location. During an observation and interview on 12/3/25 at 6:28 p.m., staff member G attached the call light for resident #5 at an arm's length away to the left of the resident. The call light was clipped to the bed linen. When asked if the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean room for 3 (#s 5, 7, and 9) of 12 sampled residents. Findings include:a. During an observation on 12/2/25 at 2:33 p.m., resident #5's floor was dirty with visible dirt near the area right by the bed. There were little pieces of paper underneath resident #5's bed.During an interview on 12/3/25 at 1:26 p.m., NF1 stated there was garbage on the floor constantly in resident #5's room. NF1 stated they have never seen a staff member clean underneath the beds and stated they find garbage located there.b. During an observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 3:22 p.m., resident #7's floor had visible dirt where the resident and the wheelchair was located. Resident #7 stated, They could do a better job (with cleaning). Resident #7 stated the cleaning depended on the person and stated he often went outside and would drag dirt in so he felt bad for the cleaners and would never complain.During an interview on 12/3/25 at 5:40 p.m., staff member L stated some staff members were better at cleaning than others.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the basic ADL (activities of daily living) of teeth brushing was completed and documented for 1 (#9) of 12 sampled residents. Findings include:During an interview and observation on 12/3/25 at 8:00 a.m., resident #9 stated he had not brushed his teeth yet for the day, but wanted to wait until he was done eating breakfast. There was a piece of paper hanging off of resident #9's light shade on the wall. This piece of paper showed: . Complete/assist w/ oral care . Thank you, Speech TherapyDuring an interview on 12/3/25 at 12:48 p.m., resident #9 stated no staff member had helped him brush his teeth yet. He stated one staff member talked about doing it but because of an interruption with physical therapy, the task was not completed. Resident #9 stated interruptions in care were not a new issue. He stated he felt he had no consistent schedule in the day and stated physical therapy had never offered to help him brush his teeth.During an interview on 12/3/25 at 4:38 p.m., resident #9 stated he had not brushed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician wound orders were followed correctly for 1 (#1) of 12 sampled residents. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 12/3/25 at 11:49 a.m., staff member M removed resident #1's old wound dressing. Observation of the old wound dressing showed a yellow substance similar to xeroform, along with the old gauze and tape dressing supplies. Staff member M stated the substance was calcium alginate. Staff member M stated they added this to resident #1's wounds, as the wound had not been healing, and staff member M felt the calcium alginate would help. Staff member M stated they were not wound certified, and this was not what the wound certified PT had ordered for resident #1's wound treatment. Staff member M stated resident #1 had been at the facility for several months, with no wound improvement, and thought this addition would help with the drainage from the wound. Additionally, during the dressing change, staff member M did not perform proper hand hygiene after the old dressing had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: a shower room contained a pull cord attached to the call light system for 1 (#6), appropriate interventions were consistently in place to prevent falls for 1 (#5), and failed to ensure 1 (#10) had appropriate interventions resulting in falls with head injuries for 12 sampled residents. Findings include:1. Resident #6During an interview on 12/3/25 at 4:21 p.m., resident #6 stated he was left alone in the shower room for 45 minutes on 11/10/25. He stated there was no pull cord and he was wheelchair bound.During an observation and interview on 12/3/25 at 6:18 p.m., the shower room that resident #6 mentioned had no pull cord for the call light station on the wall. The call light station was also out of reach to staff members as there were shower chairs in the walkway. Staff member H stated no resident should be left in the shower room unattended as that was an unsafe practice. The shower room, without the call light availability and shower chairs, created a hazardous area. 2. Resident #5During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-22 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure necessary dental services were provided for a resident with a documented dental abscess who was pending Medicaid approval for insurance coverage, for 1 (#3) or 4 sampled residents. This deficient practice caused resident #3 to have difficulty eating with a resulting severe weight loss. Findings include:Record review of resident #3's admission history and physical, dated 9/5/25, showed resident #3 had a dental infection and was to complete a 10-day course of two different antibiotics. Resident #3 was scheduled for a follow-up dental appointment before her hospital discharge.During an interview on 10/21/25 at 3:55 p.m., staff member I said Medicaid would cover dental services for residents, and when a resident was unable to cover the expense of medically necessary dental services, the facility had other resources available to pay for the services. Staff member I said she did the initial social services assessment when resident #3 was admitted to the facility. Part of the admission assessment for a resident assesses if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide covid vaccines in a timely manner for 2 (#s 5 and 8) who both got sick with covid, but the facility offered a covid vaccine to 1 (#9) of 12 sampled residents. The failure could have contributed to the size of the COVID-19 outbreak or its spread of it. Findings include:During an interview on 12/2/25 at 2:40 p.m., resident #8 stated she was supposed to be getting the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease of 2019) vaccine. Resident #8 stated she was asked about a month ago if she wanted the vaccine, but she had not received it yet. She stated she wanted the COVID-19 vaccine and said it was . because I don't want to get it (Covid) again.During an interview on 12/3/25 at 4:55 p.m., NF1 stated they had asked the facility three times for resident #5 to get the COVID-19 vaccine. NF1 stated resident #5 was never given a consent or declination form for the COVID-19 vaccination. NF1 stated they were upset no vaccine was given or offered, which could have prevented resident #5 from getting sick when the facility had a COVID-19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit an initial report within two hours to the State Survey Agency for a suspected resident to resident sexual abuse event, for 2 (#s 1 and 2) of 8 sampled residents. Findings include:A review of a facility reported incident, dated 8/24/25 at 1:30 a.m., showed resident #1 was found in resident #2's room by two staff members. Resident #2 was lying in his bed with his brief undone, and resident #1 had her hand on his penis. The reportable incident was received by the State Survey Agency on 8/24/25 at 9:20 p.m., over 21 hours after the incident occurred. The report did not meet the required reporting timeline for abuse. During an interview on 9/9/25 at 9:58 a.m., staff member B stated she called the police sometime between 2:30 and 3:00 a.m. on 8/24/25. Staff member B further relayed that the incident was submitted to the State Survey Agency later that evening, on 8/24/25.During an interview on 9/9/25 at 2:03 p.m., staff member A relayed that he thought serious bodily injury resulting from abuse had to be reported to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation and take necessary action to protect a resident from ongoing abuse for a resident-to-resident sexual incident, and the facility failed to implement monitoring for the initiating resident, and failed to incorporate staff education for the prevention of abuse, for 2 (#s 1 and 2) of 8 sampled residents. Findings include:A review of a facility reported incident, dated 8/24/25, showed resident #1 was found in resident #2's room by two staff members. Resident # 2 was lying in his bed with his brief undone, and resident #1 had her hand on his penis. Resident #1 was redirected to her room, and both residents were assessed for injury.During an interview on 9/9/25 at 9:58 a.m., staff member B stated she received a call early in the morning on 8/24/25, from the ADON at the facility, informing her of a resident-to-resident sexual incident between the two residents, #1 and #2. She stated she went to the facility to start an investigation.A review of the facility's investigation documents, dated 8/24/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update a resident's care plan to include sexual behaviors towards others, which could be abuse, for 1(#1) of 8 sampled residents. Findings include:Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update a resident care plan to include sexual behaviors directed towards others which could be abuse, for 1 (#1) of # sampled residents. Findings include:A review of a facility reported incident, dated 8/24/25, showed resident #1 was found in resident #2's room by two staff member, and resident #2 had her hand on resident #1's genitals. A review of resident #1's current comprehensive care plan, accessed on 9/9/25, showed: Behaviors: [Resident #1] has had some manifestations of her Bi-polar, she has been shouting out and wandering with the efforts to elope., with a date Initiated of 08/07/2024 and a revision on 12/01/2024. Resident #1's care plan failed to show a focus area, goals, or interventions for sexual behaviors or potential sexual abuse towards others.During an interview on 9/9/25 at 2:03 p.m., staff member B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0887 — widespreadEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation in which each staff member was provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, that staff members were offered information on obtaining the COVID-19 vaccine, and records of the COVID-19 vaccine status of each staff member. Findings include: During an interview on 3/12/25 at 2:26 p.m., staff member B stated she would look for staff COVID-19 documentation, but did not believe there was documentation on any of the facility staff related to the COVID-19 vaccine. During an interview on 3/12/25 at 5:15 p.m., staff member A stated, regarding staff COVID-19 vaccination status or declination, We don't have it. A written request was made to the facility on 3/12/25 at 9:20 a.m., for five random staff members' documentation on COVID-19 vaccine education and vaccine status. No documentation was provided to the State Survey Agency prior to the survey exit on 3/13/25. Review of the facility's policy titled, COVID-19 Vaccination, undated, showed: - 19. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff member Z provided care consistent with professional standards during medication administration, resulting in residents possibly receiving the wrong medication(s) and having adverse outcomes from pre-poured and unlabeled medications, for 9 (#s 24, 27, 36, 43, 50, 58, 64, 65, 77) of 12 residents sampled for medication administration. Findings include: During observation and interview, on 3/12/25 at 1:40 p.m., staff member Z performed a medication pass for residents #27 and #36 from unlabeled medication cups found in the top right drawer of the medication cart. There were 12 unlabeled medication cups in the top right drawer of the medication cart with various pills in them. Staff member Z stated, I know who they belong to, I could not find them at the time. Staff member Z stated she thought the residents, who the unlabeled medication cups belonged to, were in an activity, and she didn't want to leave the cups of medications in the resident's room. During observation and interview on 3/12/25 at 1:55…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff member N followed enhanced barrier precautions during the administration of medications via enteral tube feeding for 1 (#2) of 1 sampled enteral tube feeding resident; failed to ensure staff members N and Z adhered to proper infection control practices related to hand hygiene when changing of gloves and during medication administration for 6 (#s 2, 24, 58, 64, 67, and 77) of 30 sampled residents; failed to ensure staff member O adhered to proper infection control practices during wound care for 1 (#67) of 1 sampled resident for wound care; and failed to ensure staff member V followed infection control procedures to prevent potential contact transmission of an infectious agent or communicable disease for 1 (#38) of 8 sampled smoking residents. Findings include: 1. Enteral Tube Feeding Medication Administration During an observation on 3/11/25 at 8:18 a.m., staff member N entered resident #2's room with medications to be administered via PEG tube. On the wall, next to the entrance into resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were screened and consented to pneumococcal immunizations (Prevnar13, Prevnar20, and PPSV23) were provided the vaccine for 3 (#s 2, 8, and 67) of 5 sampled residents for immunizations (influenza, COVID-19, and pneumococcal). Findings include: Review of resident #2's EHR document titled, Immunization Informed Consent Record, dated 2/5/25, showed the resident had consented to the pneumococcal vaccine. Review of resident #2's EHR document titled, Immunization Report, printed 3/12/25, showed no pneumococcal vaccine was administered. Review of resident #8's EHR document titled, Immunization Informed Consent Record, dated 2/10/25, showed the resident had consented to the pneumococcal vaccine. Review of resident #8's EHR document titled, Immunization Report, printed 3/12/25, showed no pneumococcal vaccine was administered. Review of resident #67's EHR document titled, Immunization Informed Consent Record, dated 2/10/25, showed the resident had consented to the pneumococcal vaccine. Review of resident #67's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain dignity for other residents when providing postmortem discharge of a resident for 1 (#47) of 30 sampled residents, which caused feelings of sadness; and failed to maintain dignity of a resident during an incontinent episode for 1 (#36) of 30 sampled residents, which caused them to be frustrated and angry. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 3/10/25 at 2:37 p.m., resident #47 was observed in the 300-wing hallway. Two unidentified individuals entered the room and came out with a resident on a stretcher covered fully with a blanket. They walked the stretcher past the nursing station where other residents were sitting. Resident #47 stated, What did I just see? Was that a dead body? An unidentified staff member stated, Yes, the resident passed away. During an observation on 3/10/25 at 2:40 p.m., two unidentified visitors were walking down the 300 wing, and one said to the other, Do you know what that was? It was a dead body. During an observation and interview on 3/13/25 at 8:06 a.m., resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to supervise the self-administration of a metered-dose inhaler for 1 (#6) and two pain pills for 1 (#35) of 30 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the risk for medication errors to resident's #6 and #35, as well as to confused residents, who may have wandered into resident #6 and #35's rooms. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 3/10/25 at 3:23 p.m., two blue pills were on resident #35's bedside table, in a plastic medicine cup, with no staff in the room. Resident #35 stated they were his Ibuprofen and Tramadol. Resident #35 stated some nurses offer to leave the medications so he can take them later, and some do not. During an observation and interview on 3/11/25 at 8:38 a.m., a metered-dose inhaler was sitting on resident #6's bedside table with no staff in the room. Resident #6 stated it was her rescue inhaler, she rarely used, but liked to have in her room just in case. During an interview on 3/12/25 at 9:30 a.m., staff member W stated when she administered medications, I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it had an effective process in place for the most current and accurate code status and advance directives to be readily known and available to staff, in the event of an emergency, for 1 (#7) of 30 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on [DATE] at 11:12 a.m., staff member I stated a resident's advance directives were requested on admission and updated ongoing during care conferences. Staff member I stated multiple personnel could potentially get the POLST or advance directive information from the residents. Staff member I stated the current copies would be found uploaded in the electronic medical record. During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 4:33 p.m., staff member E stated on admission resident #7 did not have advance directives. Staff member E assisted resident #7 in filling out a POLST form as a brief full code. Staff member E turned it in to the doctor to sign. Staff member E stated she did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that was clean and well-maintained for 3 (#s 24, 30, and 36) of 30 sampled residents. This deficient practice bothered resident #30, wheelchairs were not cleaned for residents as needed, and unpainted surfaces were not corrected. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 3/10/25 at 2:32 p.m., resident #30's wall, next to her roommate's bed, had paint chips along most of the wall. The bathroom was missing paint just above where the linoleum ends around the area of the sink, creating a non-cleanable surface. Resident #30 stated it was probably due to the wheelchairs hitting the wall. Resident #30 stated, It doesn't look good, which kind of bothers me. 2. During an observation on 3/10/25 at 2:46 p.m., resident #24's wheelchair had brown-colored debris covering the metal, around the footrest, near the front wheels of the wheelchair. Resident #24's bathroom was missing paint down, to the drywall just above the linoleum, on the wall around the sink. This was not a cleanable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a list of a resident's personal items and identify and investigate a grievance brought forth by a resident and their representative related to missing clothing for 1 (#85) of 30 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 3/12/25 at 8:50 a.m., NF1 stated the family was concerned with missing items of clothing after the resident's discharge. The facility was aware of the concerns. During an interview on 3/12/25 at 4:13 p.m., NF3 stated, I didn't realize resident #85 didn't have all his clothes when I picked him up. We have expressed our concerns to the facility and haven't received a response. During an interview on 3/13/25 at 8:10 a.m., staff member DD stated, Staff fill out an inventory list of resident items when they are admitted , and then the nurse double-checks them. The lists should be scanned into the resident's chart. During an interview on 3/13/25 at 8:17 a.m., staff member H stated the CNAs usually fill out the inventory lists of personal items when a resident was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was accurate for a residents' code status change, for 1 (#7) of 30 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 3/12/25 at 12:05 p.m., staff member I stated care plan updates were done by the department affected, and in the morning standup meeting someone would be assigned if a care plan update was needed. Review of resident #7's care plan focus of code status initiated on 2/14/25, and updated on 2/18/25, showed she was a full code per her POLST in her referral packet. Interventions included requesting copies of advance directives on admission and reviewing with the resident and responsible party on admission and at least quarterly. Review of resident #7's most recent POLST, signed by the provider on 2/17/25, showed the election of DNR.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to provide regular showers for 2 (#s 28 and 30) of 30 sampled residents, which made the residents feel dirty and/or upset. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 3/10/25 at 2:57 p.m., resident #28's hair was oily and stringy. Resident #28 stated, Baths have not been consistent since I've been here. I have been here around seven months. Resident #28 stated, I prefer baths, but when they aren't available, I do my own little baths. The worst is my oily hair, and those dry shampoo rinses just don't do it for me. Review of resident #28's electronic medical record showed resident #28 had two baths in a 30-day look-back period. Review of resident #28's care plan, with a revision date of 2/17/25, showed, Interventions: BATHING/SHOWERING: [Resident name] requires set-up for showers/bathing. 2. During an observation and interview on 3/10/25 at 2:32 p.m., resident #30 was sitting on her bed, and her hair was oily and matted down. Resident #30 stated, We don't get baths on a regular basis. I'm not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, staff member N failed to follow provider orders for the administration of medications via gastrostomy tube (GT) and check for placement of the GT prior to administration of medications for 1 (#2) of 1 sampled enteral tube feeding observation. Findings include: During an observation on 3/11/25 at 8:15 a.m., staff member N had placed into a medication cup the following medications and liquids: - ferrous sulfate 325 mg, crushed, - oxybutynin chloride 5 mg, crushed, - ursodiol 300 mg capsule, contents of capsule emptied into medication cup, - methenamine hippurate 1 gm tablet, crushed, - metoclopramide HCL oral solution (liquid) 5 mg/5 ml, and - 10 ml of water. During an observation on 3/11/25 at 8:18 a.m., staff member N placed a medication cup, with all medications, a new enteral syringe, and an empty graduated measuring container on resident #2's bedside table. Staff member N filled the graduated measuring container with an unmeasured amount of tap water, in resident #2's bathroom, then placed the water filled container onto the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer seven medications per prescriber's orders for 2 (#s 2 and 58) residents, out of 35 sampled resident medication orders, which led to a 20% medication error rate. Findings include: During and observation and interview on 3/12/25 at 2:11 p.m., staff member Z administered midodrine 2.5 mg to resident #58. The MAR for resident #58 showed midodrine 2.5 mg with meals. Staff member Z stated she did not know if resident #58 had eaten his lunch already. Staff member Z stated, The nurses have told me it is okay for him to take the midodrine without eating. During review of facility's policy, Medication Administration, dated 2024, showed, Medications are administered . as ordered by the physician . 10. Ensure that the six rights of medication administration are followed: .e. Right time . During an observation on 3/11/25 at 8:18 a.m., staff member N administered the following medications and liquid to resident #2 via PEG tube: - ferrous sulfate 325 mg, crushed, - oxybutynin chloride 5 mg, crushed, - ursodiol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff member X administered insulin in a safe manner resulting in a significant medication error, which put the resident's health and safety at risk and requiring immediate transfer to an emergency room for 1 (#6) resident of 30 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 3/10/25 at 2:50 p.m., resident #6 stated she went to the hospital overnight because the nurse made a mistake and gave her another resident's insulin on top of her own insulin. During a telephone interview on 3/12/25 at 8:40 a.m., staff member X stated he had an issue giving insulin 3 weeks ago. Staff member X stated he was distracted doing different things and brought two pre-filled insulin pens into resident #6's room. Staff member X stated one pen was filled with 18 units of long-acting insulin meant for resident #6, and the other pen was filled with 42 units of fast-acting insulin meant for resident #6's roommate. Staff member X stated he gave both doses to resident #6, then realized his error and spoke with staff member Y before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-23 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment was reviewed and updated as necessary when a new pulmonary program was planned and initiated. This deficient practice increased the risk of any resident needing pulmonary care and services to have a negative outcome, which did occur, and cited in other deficient practice areas. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 1/7/25, failed to show any information related to Respiratory Care and Services or the addition of a Pulmonary Program. The assessment did not include: - The type of care, services, or contracted services provided to the resident in the area of Respiratory Therapy Services and a Pulmonary Program. - Changes in staffing as a result of adding Pulmonary Program. - Equipment needed for residents who participated in the Pulmonary Program. - No staff training or competencies addressing the Pulmonary Program. - The medical supplies section did not address CPAP, BIPAP, or any emergency respiratory supplies, such as Ambu bags. During an interview on 1/15/25 at 2:10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-23 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was an affective training program for new staff, existing staff, staff providing contracted services; failed to ensure staff received training during orientation, and ongoing through employment, related to supply locations, supply ordering procedures, the crash cart, and CPR certification for 6 (staff members D, E, H, Q, M, and one anonymous staff member) of 26 staff sampled. This deficient practice increased the risk of any resident having a negative outcome related to the lack of training. Findings include: During an interview on [DATE] at 1:09 p.m., staff member D stated she was contracted staff employee. Staff member D stated she had not been educated to where extra supplies were kept or how to get supplies ordered. Staff member D stated, I was told that if supplies were needed to write it down. I was not shown where supplies were kept or where the order page was when I started here. During an interview on [DATE] at 7:08 p.m., an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-23 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespreadInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure new staff, existing staff, and contracted staff were trained on the facility's infection prevention and control program standards, policies, and procedures. This deficient practice increased the risk of a negative outcome for all residents in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 1/22/25 at 8:58 a.m., staff member P stated she had just started working at the facility. Staff member P stated she was not provided any education on infection prevention or hand hygiene policies and procedures, and she was just doing what I know. Staff member P stated she was not aware of who the Infection Preventionist was. During an interview on 1/22/25 at 12:20 p.m., staff member D stated she was contracted staff and had been working in the facility for over one month, and she had not been provided any education on infection prevention or hand hygiene policies and procedures. Staff member D stated she was not aware who the Infection Preventionist was. During an interview on 1/22/25 at 12:25 p.m., staff member U stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adhere to accepted standards of practice by administering medications and not following physician's medication orders for 3 (#s 18, 23, and 24) of 26 sampled residents, when standards of practice and physician's orders dictated the medication should not have been administered. Findings include: a. Review of resident #18's physician's orders dated 1/1/25, showed: Midodrine HCL oral tablet 2.5 Mg Give 2.5 mg by mouth three times a day hold if systolic >120, diastolic >60 related to ORTHOSTATIC HYPERTENSION. Notify provider for held medications. [sic] A review of resident #18's medication administration record, dated January 2025, showed: Midodrine HCL 2.5 mg was administered 20 times while blood pressure measurements were outside of ordered parameters. During an interview on 1/22/25 at 12:50 p.m., staff member Y stated vital signs should be done before administering a medication with ordered parameters. Staff member Y said, You never give a medication with parameters if the vital signs are not recent, and you follow the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly administer medications with physician-ordered parameters for 3 (#s 18, 23, and 24) of 26 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the risk of a negative outcome as failing to follow the physician's order could cause an increase or decrease in a resident's blood pressure. Findings include: 1.Review of resident #18's physician's orders dated 1/1/25, showed: Midodrine HCL oral tablet 2.5 Mg Give 2.5 mg by mouth three times a-day for hold if systolic >120, diastolic >60 related to ORTHOSTATIC HYPERTENSION. Notify provider for held medications. [sic] A review of resident #18's medication administration record, dated January 2025, showed Midodrine HCL 2.5 mg was given 20 times, on the following dates, while blood pressure measurements were outside of ordered parameters. - 1/1/25 at 6:00 a.m., with a blood pressure of 121/80, and 2:00 p.m., with a blood pressure of 142/67, - 1/2/25 at 6:00 a.m., with a blood pressure of 127/71, and at 2:00 p.m., with a blood pressure of 140/63, - 1/3/25 at 2:00 p.m., with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to adhere to standards of infection prevention and control practices, and hand hygiene, for 5 (#s 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20), and for enhanced barrier precautions, for 1 (#25) of 26 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the ability to negatively affect all residents in the facility by increasing the risk for spreading infection. Findings include: During an observation on 1/22/25 at 8:42 a.m., staff member P was walking down the hallway heading back to the medication cart. Staff member P was carrying a clear plastic medication cup, and a small plastic cup of water. Staff member P set the two cups onto the medication cart and started touching the computer located on top of the medication cart. Staff member P locked the medication cart, picked up the two plastic cups, walked into resident #16's room, and administered the medications to resident #16. No hand hygiene was performed prior to entering or exiting resident #16's room, and the staff member touched unclean surfaces prior to entering the room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper indwelling Foley catheter care daily to 2 (#s 21 and 26) of 26 sampled residents. This deficient practice caused resident discomfort and had the potential for an increased risk of catheter associated urinary tract infections. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 1/22/25 at 8:10 a.m., resident #26 was sitting in a wheelchair with a Foley catheter drain bag attached to the wheelchair. Resident #26 went down to his room and continued to sit in the wheelchair for the observation. Resident #26 had an indwelling Foley catheter. A foul urine odor was present. Resident #26's penile meatus was red, and there was a crusty solid like material on the Foley catheter, near the penile opening. Resident #26 pointed to the catheter and stated it hurt. During an observation and interview on 1/22/25 at 10:20 a.m., resident #21 way lying in bed, dressed in a hospital gown. Resident #21 stated staff were pretty good about doing his cares, but staff would get busy and forget at times. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed: to ensure a staff member's job duties were current and accurate; to ensure a staff member was practicing within their scope of practice/job description shown in a social services note in 1 (#12)'s chart; and to follow up for 1 (#15) and attempt to prevent or improve for the 21 AMA discharges in the facility from January 2024 to current; and to provide behavioral health services for 1 (#4) of 15 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #12's EHR showed a social service's note written by staff member F, dated 11/20/24: .has agreed to stay till this coming Wednesday, Dr. has been alerted and consulted. [Staff Name] and [Staff Name] will act as the primary nursing with [Staff Name] to dispense meds . is aware and has agreed to this plan of care for him. During an interview on 11/20/24 at 3:30 p.m., staff member F stated they were not able to hire nor fire staff, orient new staff, or provide leadership training. Review of staff member F's job duties, showed: . Terminate employees when necessary, documenting and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to professionally, properly, and sufficiently document the situation regarding AMA discharges for 2 (#s 4 and 12); provide proper notice before discharge for 2 (#s 4 and 12); and report the AMA discharge to the appropriate entities for 1 (#4) of 15 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in 3 residents (#s 3, 4, 12) not trusting staff member F, and 2 (#s 4 and 12) residents requesting to leave AMA from the facility. Findings include: Review of a facility provided document, titled Admission/Discharge To/From Report, dated 11/18/24, showed: 21 discharges (January 2024 to current). 1. A summary of resident #4's AMA situation showed no nursing documentation was completed, no statement, wishes, preferences, or requests were included in the documentation of resident #4, and APS was not contacted. Review of resident #4's EHR showed a note, dated 9/18/24 at 3:10 p.m.: [staff member G] and [staff member F] spoke with [resident #4] at 3pm (3:00 p.m.). [Staff member F] spoke with (resident representative) earlier this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessments for 4 (#s 2, 4, 6, and 7), failed to complete an Annual MDS Assessment for 1 (# 5), and failed to complete a Discharge MDS for 1 (#4) of 15 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 11/19/24 at 2:24 p.m., staff members H and I stated they were the MDS coordinators. Staff member H stated she started working as an MDS coordinator in June 2024 and staff member I stated she started working as an MDS coordinator in September 2024. Staff member H stated they were currently behind on completing MDS's. Staff member I stated, We are playing catch up. Staff members H and I stated they follow the guidelines in the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual. Staff members H and I stated they were not sure how many days they had to complete an MDS. 1. Review of resident #2's Quarterly MDS, with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 9/22/24, was not completed. The Quarterly MDS was 44 days overdue. Review of resident #4's Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 9/10/24, was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit MDS information within 14 days of completion for 5 (#s 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7) of 15 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 9/19/24 at 3:34 p.m., staff member J stated she was aware the MDS assessments were late. Staff member J stated the two MDS coordinators were new to the MDS process and had no prior MDS experience. During an interview on 9/20/24 at 9:45 a.m., staff member A stated she was aware the MDS assessments were late. Staff member A stated there had not been consistent oversight in the building, but it was her responsibility to make sure things were done and accurate. Review of resident #2's Quarterly MDS, with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 9/22/24, was not completed. The Quarterly MDS was 44 days overdue. Review of resident #4's Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 9/10/24, was not completed. The Quarterly MDS was 56 days overdue. Review of resident #6's Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 9/5/24, was not completed. The Quarterly MDS was 61 days overdue. Review of resident #7's Quarterly MDS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility quality assurance and performance improvement committee failed to identify and act on concerns for why a high number of residents discharged against medical advice during the last year, which included 1 (#15), and there was a total of 21 residents who discharged AMA during this time period. All 21 residents were at risk for a negative outcome due to each one leaving without a physician's discharge approval or a completed plan of care. Findings include: During an interview on 11/20/24 at 12:42 p.m., resident #15 stated they had a bad feeling about [Facility Name]. Resident #15 proceeded to provide examples of the stay at the facility, which was for less than 24 hours, and then the resident left AMA. Resident #15 stated feeling unsafe, stated staff were rude, the resident felt like a burden when the nurse scoffed at the resident for asking what pills the resident was encouraged to take, and felt the food was horrible. Resident #15 stated expressing concerns when leaving the [Facility Name], but resident #15 stated no one had ever…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — patternHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed: to ensure residents were smoking at a minimum of 25 feet away from the facility doors for 1 (#14); to ensure residents with a low BIMS score were not independently smoking for 2 (#s 6 and 13); and ensure all smoking materials were stored in the appropriate place for 1 (#5) of 15 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 11/19/24 at 10:55 a.m., staff member C stated smoking assessments were completed upon admission and as needed if there was a change in condition. Staff member C stated the smoking supplies were locked up and only nurses and the social services department had the keys. During an interview on 11/20/24 at 10:16 a.m., staff member O stated residents were allowed to smoke in a designated smoking area, located outside the door, from the activities room. During an interview on 11/20/24 at 10:26 a.m., resident #5 showed personal tobacco, which was located in the resident's room, and the resident would smoke the tobacco. During an observation on 11/20/24 at 10:46 a.m., resident #14 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents or resident representatives understood the risks and benefits of psychotropic medication for 2 (#s 6 and 9) of 15 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 11/18/24 at 4:33 p.m., resident #6 was sitting in his room. Resident #6 stated, I know I take a lot of medications, and some are for my mood, but I don't know the names of them. Resident #6 stated he did not know the side effects or any benefits of any of the medications he took. Resident #6 stated, Nobody has ever come and given me any information on my medications. During an observation and interview on 11/19/24 at 10:15 a.m., resident #9 was sitting in an electric wheelchair. Resident #9 stated she was her own person and handles all her medical and financial decisions and she does not have a power of attorney. Resident #9 stated, I take medications for anxiety and depression, but I have no idea what the side effects are. No one has ever come in and talked to me about any of my medications or what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were coded correctly for resident diagnoses and psychotropic medications used, for 2 (#s 9 and 10) of 15 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. A review of a physician's progress note, dated 8/6/24, showed resident #9 had a diagnosis of Anxiety and Depression. Review of resident #9's Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 8/18/24, showed: Section I, Active Diagnosis, Psychiatric/Mood Disorders- questions I5700 anxiety, I5800 depression, were not completed. Section N, Medications- N0415. High-Risk Drug Classes, showed antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medication was taken during the look back period. N0450. Antipsychotic Medication Review, was not completed. The area was left blank and did not show antipsychotic medication had been given. 2. Review of resident #10's MDS, with an ARD of 8/24/24, showed: Section I, Active Diagnosis, Psychiatric/Mood Disorders, was not completed. No psychiatric or mood diagnosis was marked. Section N, Medications- N0415. High-Risk Drug Classes, showed antipsychotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate discharge plan consisting of sufficient and thorough documentation throughout the discharge planning process for 1 (#12) of 15 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 11/20/24 at 10:42 a.m., staff member C stated, I keep getting told by (social services), that we have a plan for that person (to discharge), and they are not going through with it. Staff member C stated resident #12 was supposed to be discharged today (November 20th). Staff member C stated, I feel like he was kind of pressured. During an interview on 11/20/24 at 1:24 p.m., NF5 stated, From what I understood, he (resident #12) was getting discharged . NF5 stated, They (the facility) never talked about why he was appropriate for discharge (due to medical aquity). NF5 stated he then wanted to leave because he was upset. NF5 stated, I was confused too. NF5 stated, Yesterday was the first day I had talked to anyone about his discharge and about his condition. I did not get to talk to them as long as I had hoped. NF5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify any DSM diagnoses on the Resident Matrix; or consistently document behaviors and offer behavioral health services to residents with a DSM diagnosis, for 1 (#4) of 15 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of a facility document, titled Resident Matrix, dated 11/18/24, showed no residents residing in the facility had a mental disability, intellectual disability, or required a PASARR Level 2. Review of resident #4's EHR showed a diagnosis of anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of resident #4's EHR showed the last psychological evaluation was 3/3/21. Review of resident #4's EHR showed an assessment, titled Social Services - Trauma Informed Care Evaluation, dated 6/10/24, which included: . 1. Repeated, disturbing memories, thoughts, or images of a stressful experience from the past? . A little bit . . 4. Feeling irritable or having angry outbursts? . Moderately . During an interview on 11/19/24 at 7:58 a.m., NF1 stated no behavioral health services were offered to resident #4 while the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence of a thorough investigation for allegations of abuse for 5 (#s 1, 2, 4, 7, and 10) of 7 sampled residents for abuse. This deficient practice had the potential to allow residents to be exposed to further abuse. Findings include: 1. Review of a facility reported incident for resident #7, dated 6/2/24, showed an unidentified CNA reported an allegation of abuse occurred at breakfast with another unidentified CNA forcing a resident to drink water. Review of a written statement by a facility CNA, showed resident #7 was not done eating, and another CNA came to take her to her room. The reporting CNA witnessed resident #7 being forced to drink fluids by the CNA coming to get resident #7. Review of an Adult Protective Service Investigation Report, resident showed #7 was unable to drink fluids herself, nor voice any concerns for hydration. No abuse was substantiated by Adult Protective Services. Review of a facility document, Abuse Allegations, not dated, showed the investigation was conducted, residents and staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse within 24 hours of the incident for 2 (#s 1 and 4) of 7 sampled residents for abuse. This deficient practice had the potential to delay investigation activities to identify the presence of abuse. Findings include: 1. Review of a facility reported incident for resident #1, dated 6/8/24, showed resident #1 complained of being verbally assaulted by a nurse when he asked her to turn down her music. The nurse was playing music on a personal device while dispensing medication. The incident was witnessed by other staff members. The incident was reported to the State Survey Agency on 6/10/24. 2. Review of a facility reported incident for resident #4, dated 9/1/24, showed resident #4 was involved in a verbal altercation with a staff member D. The police were called to the facility. The incident was reported to the State Survey Agency on 9/4/24. During an interview on 10/23/24 at 3:42 p.m., staff member B said she expected to be notified immediately when any allegations of abuse was suspected or reported.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide ordered medications for 8 (#s 1, 3, 5, 10, 11, 12, 14, and 16) of 16 sampled residents, which resulted in significant discomfort for at least 1 (#5) resident. Findings include: During an interview on 5/8/24 at 11:58 a.m., staff member C stated, The meds are still not getting here. A resident left AMA [against medical advice] because she was not getting medications or receiving treatment. During an interview on 5/8/24 at 12:40 p.m., staff member D stated, Residents have complained about not getting medications. Sometimes it is days before they [their medications] get here. 1. Review of resident #1's EMR nursing note showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medication orders received by the facility at 12:50 p.m. on that day. 1. a. The following medications were not available to resident #1 on 4/26/24, at 9:00 p.m. when they were scheduled to be given: -Gabapentin 300mg, at bedtime for sleep, -Doxycycline Hyclate 100mg, twice a day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-14 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a certified director of food and nutrition services in the absence of a full-time qualified dietician. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. Findings include: During an interview on 3/11/24 at 1:47 p.m., staff member F stated she had been employed with the nursing facility sometime at the end of March or beginning of April of 2023. During an interview on 3/14/24 at 7:47 a.m., staff member N stated her hours were split between two nursing facilities. Staff member N stated her hours fluctuated from week to week between the two buildings. Staff member N stated .if I had to guess, I work 25-30 hours (per week) here (this facility). During an interview on 3/14/24 at 8:01 a.m., staff member F stated her prior certification was expired. Staff member F stated she had no current certification in dietary or food service management. During an interview on 3/14/24 at 8:39 a.m., staff member F stated she had no college degree in food service management or hospitality. Staff member F stated she had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post signs to alert family members and visitors of a COVID-19 outbreak; failed to properly wear PPE throughout the facility; failed to wear appropriate PPE in a room with droplet precautions for a COVID-19 outbreak; failed to maintain isolation for 1 (#72) of 42 sampled residents; failed to implement preventative measures for monitoring and prevention of Legionella in the facility's water supply; and failed to analyze surveillance data to address patterns/trends of infections. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 3/11/24 at 1:40 p.m., there was no alert signage on the entry doors showing the facility was experiencing a COVID-19 outbreak. During an observation on 3/11/24 at 3:20 p.m., there was no alert signage on the entry doors showing the facility was experiencing a COVID-19 outbreak. There was a box of isolation masks at the front counter. During an interview on 3/12/24 at 12:01 p.m., staff member A stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain comfortable and safe temperatures in resident rooms for 7 (#s 3, 9, 39, 44, 55, 57, and 180) of 42 residents sampled. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 3/11/24 at 4:05 p.m., resident #39's room felt cool upon entering the room. Resident #39 was sitting on the bed, with a space heater next to the bed, and it was turned on. Resident #39 stated she was cold. Resident #39 stated she did not recall room changes being offered when her room was cold. During an observation and interview on 3/11/24 at 4:16 p.m., resident #57's room felt cold. Resident #57 was sitting in his recliner, he was covered with a blanket, and was shivering. Resident #57 stated he was cold. Resident #57 stated he was not offered a room change when the heating system broke at the facility. During an observation and interview on 3/11/24 at 4:24 p.m., resident #9 was lying in her bed, covered in several blankets, which were pulled up to her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide or arrange for respiratory care, according to standards of quality, for 1 (#49), resulting in resident #49 feeling distressed; and failed to change oxygen tubing and respiratory supplies for 8 (#s 9, 16, 18, 20, 41, 45, 57, and 179), increasing the risk of respiratory infections, of 9 sampled residents with respiratory care needs. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #49's admission orders, dated 1/22/24 showed, .These are your current medications to keep taking at home .(DME) PaP . Review of resident #49's care plan, dated 1/29/24, showed, .[Resident #49] has a CPAP r/t dx of sleep apnea .Encourage [Resident #49] to wear CPAP nightly . Review of resident #49's hospital discharge orders, dated 1/22/24, showed, .Continued: (DME) PaP Device, See Rx instructions . Review of resident #49's physician orders showed the first order for a CPAP machine was entered on 2/22/24, one month after admission. During an observation and interview on 3/11/24 at 3:47 p.m., resident #49 appeared distressed, and there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and implement a facility-wide system to monitor the use of antibiotics to improve resident outcomes. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents taking antibiotics. Findings include: During an interview on 3/13/24 at 12:59 p.m., staff member M reviewed the antibiotic stewardship tracking book with the surveyor and stated, UTI's just haven't been properly handled. There are glaring signs of issues so this will be a great opportunity to get on track . Staff member M stated the facility used McGeer's criteria for antibiotic stewardship. Staff member M stated the nurses on the units should be filling out the surveillance data collection form, before they contact the physician, with the resident symptoms. Staff member M stated the current process in the facility consisted of nurses contacting the physician, without the form completed, and the Director of Nursing or Infection Preventionist would complete the form later when reviewing infection control duties. Staff member M stated many were not reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents non-disposable cutlery during meals for 3 (#s 10, 13, and 27) of 42 sampled residents. The residents voiced this made them sad or embarrassed, and #27 felt having to use plastic utensils was an insult. Findings include: During an interview on 3/11/24 at 3:57 p.m., resident #s 10 and 13 stated they often received plastic cutlery during their meals and it made them feel sad. The residents stated it was rare that they received real plates, and they often received Styrofoam plates to use. The residents stated they had to use plastic cutlery because the facility's dishwasher was broken. During an observation and interview on 3/12/24 at 1:05 p.m., resident #s 10 and 13 were eating lunch in their room, consisting of soup, a sandwich, and chopped fruit. Both residents were using plastic cutlery. Resident #13 stated using the plastic spoon made it hard to eat the soup, and she would have preferred a real (metal) spoon. During an observation and interview on 3/13/24 at 9:16 a.m., resident #s 10 and 13…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure written grievances received had a full investigation, to include decisions/resolutions decided upon and documented, and residents notified of the resolution, for 2 (#s 31 and 227) of 42 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's Grievance Concern Form, dated 11/20/23, reflected staff member Q found resident #31, .in bed with a wet bed liner, wet pants, & t-shirt (urine soaked). Brief found to be wet and heavy upon its removal (>2lb. weight). The report reflected the findings of the review included, Staff education on residents being wet and being changed timely. The grievance documentation lacked evidence failed to show the facility considered, nor investigated, the lack of ADL assistance as potential neglect of care. During an interview on 3/14/24 at 8:09 a.m., staff member Q stated resident #31 was soaked with urine at the time she arrived to complete therapy with him, when he was in his room at 1:50 p.m. on 11/20/23. Staff member Q stated resident #31 required one to two person assist with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code clopidogrel as an antiplatelet in the MDS assessment for 1 (#50 ) of 42 sampled residents. Findings include: A review of resident #50's Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 2/18/24, showed, resident #50 was administered seven days of an anticoagulant. The MDS did not show resident #50 was taking an antiplatelet. A review of resident #50's physicians order, dated 5/11/23, showed, Clopidogrel 75 milligrams by mouth daily. During an interview on 3/14/24 at 8:13 a.m., staff Member M stated, Clopidogrel was an antiplatelet and should not be coded as an anticoagulant. A review of the Resident Assessment Instrument, dated October 2023, showed: .N0415I1. Antiplatelet: Check if an antiplatelet medication (e.g., aspirin/extended release, dipyridamole, clopidogrel) was taken by the resident at anytime during the 7-day observation period (or since admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 days).
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to enter physician orders, in the resident's EMR, received upon admission, for 1 (#49) of 1 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in the resident not receiving prescribed respiratory treatments. Findings include: Review of resident #49's admission orders, dated 1/22/24 showed, .These are your current medications to keep taking at home .(DME) PaP . Review of resident #49's care plan, dated 1/29/24, showed, .[Resident #49] has a CPAP r/t dx of sleep apnea .Encourage [Resident #49] to wear CPAP nightly . This information on the CPAP was not reflected in the physician orders in the resident's electronic medical record. Review of resident #49's physician orders showed the first order for a CPAP machine was entered on 2/22/24, almost one month later. Review of resident #49's physician orders showed the first order for a noninvasive ventilator was entered into the resident's EMR on 3/12/24 at 9:00 p.m. During an interview on 3/13/24 at 11:31 a.m., staff member I stated, Usually which ever nurse was working on that hall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a GDR for 1 (#50) of 42 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of resident #50's Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber, for 1/25/24 - 2/26/24, showed, Psychotropic medications due for potential GDR review: Fluoxetine 40 mg daily for depression. Recommendation: Please consider a gradual dose reduction, or update this letter with a risk versus benefit analysis if a reduction is clinically contraindicated. A new order to decrease the Fluoxetine to 30 mg QD, dated on 3/5/24, was written on the Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber. Review of resident #50's MAR, dated March 2024, showed resident #50 was currently taking Fluoxetine 40 mg daily. During an interview on 3/13/24 at 10:30 a.m., staff member B stated after the provider reviewed and responded to any GDR recommendations given by the pharmacist, the GDR document went to the Director of Nursing for orders to be entered into the EMR if necessary. Staff member B stated she had been interim DON for three weeks, however, did not see the provider order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-29 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from misappropriation of their narcotic pain medications for 8 (#s 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5, 6, 7, and 8) of 8 sampled residents causing unnecessary pain for residents #s 2 and 4, and the potential for unnecessary pain for residents #s 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8, and including any other resident who had physician ordered narcotic pain medications during staff member C's shifts. This deficiency had the potential to cause the residents to be charged for medications they did not receive. The facility also failed to protect additional residents from being affected by not removing the nurse from her duties and handling medications after the suspicion of drug diversion was reported. Findings include: Review of facility documents titled Individual Narcotic Logs and Medication Administration Records for residents #s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, showed: - Resident #1's Individual Narcotic Log for Oxycodone 10 mg tablets, showed staff member C removed one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility licensed nurse failed to provide adequate pain relief for 2 (#s 2 and 4) of 8 sampled residents, who had pain medications misappropriated. Findings include: Review of resident #2's Individual Narcotic Log, for the physician ordered Norco 5-325 mg tablets, showed a staff member removed one tablet on 7/14/23 at 6:50 p.m., 7/15/23 at 12:20 a.m., and 6:00 a.m. Resident #2's MAR failed to show those medications were administered to the resident. Resident #4's Individual Narcotic Log for Norco 10/325 mg tablets, showed staff member C removed: - One tablet on 7/14/23 at 7:00 p.m., and 11:00 p.m., - 7/15/23 at 5:00 a.m., - 7/21/23 at 10:00 p.m., - 7/22/23 at 12:10 a.m., and 5:30 a.m., - 7/26/23 at 6:40 p.m., and 10:30 p.m., - 7/27/23 at 2:15 a.m., 5:30 a.m., and 9:30 p.m.; and, - 7/28/23 at 12:05 a.m., and 4:50 a.m. Resident #4's MAR failed to show those medications were given to the resident. Review of resident #2's Pain Assessment for the month of July 2023 showed, she rated her pain an 8 out of 10 on 7/12/23 and 7/13/23. The pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$373,492 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $82,250 — penalty dated 2026-03-12
- $95,148 — penalty dated 2025-09-09
- $91,314 — penalty dated 2025-01-23
- $104,780 — penalty dated 2024-10-23
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-11-20 for 34 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWEETWATER CARE OPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2019 |
| HOLT, JORDAN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/01/2019 |
| GAMETT, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2019 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Montana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 275132. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.