Givens Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 146 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 114 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 54.7 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.14 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.28 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.65 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.29 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the fall history on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #4).Findings included:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, heart failure, and dementia. Review of the nurse's progress note dated 08/22/2025, a fall event record dated 09/06/2025, and the nurse's progress note dated 09/26/2025 revealed Resident #4 had three unwitnessed falls in her room where she was found sitting on floor. The notes and fall record revealed after each fall the nurse assessed Resident #4 and Resident #4 had no injury. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #4 had no falls since the prior assessment. During an interview of 03/18/2026 at 2:29 PM, the MDS Coordinator confirmed she completed Resident #4's fall history on the annual MDS dated [DATE]. She explained she reviewed the resident's fall event history…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 36 dishes ready for use on the tray line were free from dried scattered crumb like particles, provide expiration dates for 4 of 4 frozen boxes of pureed foods, label and date one stainless steel container of gravy and four cookie sheets of bacon that was located in 1 of 5 reach in coolers, and ensure 1 of 4 dietary staff restrained hair during food preparation. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents. Findings included: 1. During the initial tour of the kitchen on 02/03/2025 at 11:12 AM the following areas of concern were observed. Two white scoop bowls with a yellow/orange substance on the bottom and side of each bowl and three divided plates with yellow/orange dried scattered crumb like particles. The dishes were observed on the tray line, ready to be used. On 2/5/25 at 11:05 AM Dietary Assistant #2 was interviewed. She explained she was one of three people who checked the dishes for cleanliness. Dietary Assistant #2 revealed the person who pulled the dishes out of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had pain patches removed at bedtime as ordered for 2 of 29 residents reviewed for medication errors (Residents #45 and #31). Findings included: 1. Resident #45 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including wedge compression fracture of the thoracic vertebrae numbers 11-12 (lower end of the middle section of the spine) and low back pain. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 was severely cognitively impaired and was documented as requiring pain management. The physician order dated 1/23/25 read apply one Lidoderm (local anesthetic pain patch that contains lidocaine) 5% topical patch to T12 spine area every morning, remove Lidoderm patch each night at bedtime. A Medication Administration observation of Medication Aide (MA) #1 on 02/05/25 at 8:15 AM revealed a lidocaine patch was left in place on Resident #45's lower back dated 2/4/25. During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff and physician interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided supplemental oxygen per physician's orders for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for oxygen. findings included: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (an absence of enough oxygen to sustain bodily functions). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was severely cognitively impaired and was documented as requiring supplemental oxygen. The physician's order dated 10/29/24 read to administer oxygen at 2 to 3 liters per minute via nasal canula. An observation of Resident #43 occurred on 02/04/25 at 9:00 AM. Resident #43 was observed in the sitting area on the 300 hall watching television. The resident's nasal canula was in place in the resident's nostrils and the tubing was connected to a portable oxygen tank secured to the back of Resident #43's wheelchair. While…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation in the medical record for 2 of 29 residents (Residents #45 and #31) reviewed for accurate medical records. Findings included: 1. Resident #45 was admitted on [DATE]. The physician's order dated 1/23/25 read apply one Lidoderm (local anesthetic pain patch that contains lidocaine) 5% topical patch to T12 spine area every morning, remove Lidoderm patch each night at bedtime. A review of Resident #45's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of February 2025 revealed Nurse #1 had documented the removal of the Lidocaine pain patch from Resident #45's lower back at 8:00 PM on 02/04/25. A medication pass observation of Medication Aide (MA) #1 on 02/05/25 at 8:15 AM revealed a lidocaine patch was left in place on Resident #45's lower back dated 2/4/25. During an interview on 02/05/25 at 09:00 AM with MA #1, the MA verbalized that the overnight nurse must have forgotten to remove the pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to follow their infection control policies and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during high contact care for a resident with a urinary catheter for when Nursing Assistant (NA) #1 emptied the resident's urinary catheter bag without wearing a gown for 1 of 2 staff (NA #1) observed for infection control practices. Findings included: The facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions revised on 6/2024 states EBP refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multi-drug organisms that employs targeted gown, and gloves use during high contact resident care activities. Observation of Resident #43's door on 02/02/25 at 12:15 PM revealed signage for Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The signage indicated that staff who are performing direct care to Resident #43 required a gown and gloves to be worn. Further observation revealed a caddy outside of Resident #43's door that contained Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) such as gowns and gloves. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, family and staff interviews the facility failed to honor a resident's choice to have a beard for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for choices. The finding included: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility 11/02/22. A significant change Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #10 had severe cognitive impairment. On 12/18/23 at 3:39 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #10's family member and an observation were made of Resident #10 during the interview. Resident #10 was sitting in a semi reclined position sleeping. He was neatly groomed with a light growth of a gray beard and mustache. The family member explained that the Resident was always very particular about his facial hair and kept his beard and mustache neatly groomed for the past 30 years or more. She indicated if Resident #10 understood that his beard had been shaved off, he would have been disappointed. She continued to explain that a while back she came in to find that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure the code status information was accurate throughout the medical record for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident #47 and Resident #53). The findings included: 1. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the code status notebook maintained at the nursing station on [DATE] at 11:05 AM revealed a yellow golden rod code status of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) dated [DATE]. Resident #47's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was severely impaired. A review of Resident #47's medical record on [DATE] at 11:05 AM revealed an advanced directive status of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). On [DATE] at 11:30 AM an interview was conducted with Nurse #1 who explained the residents' code status was maintained in their electronic medical record under their picture on their profile screen. The Nurse also stated their code status was also maintained in the code status notebook…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF-ABN) prior to discharge from Medicare Part A services for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification (Resident #10). Findings included: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the beneficiary notifications for Resident #10 revealed a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was signed by Responsible Party (RP) on 11/06/23. The NOMNC showed the facility initiated Resident #10 be discharged from skilled rehab therapy on 11/09/23 due to no further progress. The facility was unable to provide evidence a SNF-ABN was provided to Resident #10 or the RP. Review of the beneficiary notification of residents discharged within the last six months revealed Resident #10 was discharged from Medicare Part A on 11/09/23 with remaining benefit days. Resident #10 remained as a resident in the facility. During an interview on 12/19/23 at 12:24 PM the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 14 days after the facility determined a significant change had occurred for 2 of 9 sampled residents reviewed for hospice and resident assessments (Residents #28 and #47). Findings included: 1. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included other neurological conditions and malnutrition. Review of Resident #36's electronic medical record revealed a significant change MDS assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/09/23. The MDS assessment was signed as completed on 12/14/23 which was 36 days after the facility determined Resident #28 had a significant change in status. During an interview on 12/19/23 at 4:35 PM, the MDS Coordinator revealed she was currently behind on completing MDS assessments. The MDS Coordinator confirmed Resident #28's significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] was late and not completed within the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC