Pelican Health Randolph LLC
4801 Randolph Road, Charlotte, NC 28211 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (704) 364-8363 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $19,663 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-24)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (76%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.8% | 15.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.6% | 7.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.4% | 5.9% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.4% | 18.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.8% | 21.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 94.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.0% | 5.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.1% | 20.7% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.8% | 14.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 73.8% | 78.1% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.9% | 22.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.1% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.8%CMS range 22.9–50.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.0–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 53.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 81.6 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 76% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, Transporter #1 failed to call emergency medical services (EMS) or have a resident assessed by a medical professional before moving Resident #1 after his wheelchair tipped over and he fell to the floor of a transportation van. On 1/19/24 Transporter #1 pulled out of the dialysis center parking lot and Resident #1's wheelchair tipped backwards, and he hit the left occipital region of his head. Transporter #1 pulled the transportation van over to a parking lot and pulled the resident back up into a sitting position and transported Resident #1 8.4 miles back to the facility. The transporter was not qualified to provide a competent physical assessment to determine if there was an adverse outcome for this resident who was on Plavix (anti-platelet medication that can have a side effect of bleeding). Once back at the nursing home, Resident #1 was assessed to have a bump on his head behind his left ear and he reported head pain and nausea. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide safe transportation for Resident #1 when he was being transported from dialysis back to the facility on 1/19/2024. Transporter #1 pulled out of the parking lot of the dialysis center and Resident #1's wheelchair tipped over, and he hit the left side of his head. Transporter #1 pulled the transportation van over to a parking lot, where Resident #1 insisted upon Transporter #1 sitting him back upright, and Transporter #1 pulled the resident back up into a sitting and upright position. Transporter #1 then transported Resident #1 8.4 miles back to the facility where he was assessed by the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) to have a bump on his head behind his left ear and he reported head pain and nausea after the fall. It was determined by the ADON Resident #1 needed to go to the hospital for evaluation. There was a high likelihood of a serious adverse outcome for Resident #1 due to hitting his head when his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, residents and staff interviews, the facility failed to fill the gaps around the packaged terminal air conditioners (PTACs) to separate the exterior environment from the interior of the residents' rooms and failed to secure the seal around the PTACs (rooms #108, #110, #135, #151) for 4 of 8 rooms on 3 of 4 halls reviewed for homelike environment. The findings included:a. An observation conducted on 9/12/25 at 9:32 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the PTAC unit did not align against the wall and there was an approximately one-inch gap across the top of PTAC unit where the remaining insulation was observed to be in a crumbled condition. Through the gap daylight from the exterior of the building was visible from the interior of the resident room.b. An observation conducted on 9/12/25 at 9:43 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the PTAC unit did not align with the wall across the top of the unit. The PTAC unit stuck out approximately one inch from the wall which created a gap where the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and resident, staff and Pest Control Technician interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent the presence of roaches and/or flies that were observed in 1 of 1 conference room, 1 of 1 lobby, 2 of 2 resident hallways (East and [NAME] hallways), and 4 of 4 resident rooms (Rooms 108, 109, 113, and 134). The findings included: A review of the pest control Commercial Services Agreement dated 12/24/24 revealed service for roaches, common ants, rats and mice and common spiders, and the service would occur two times per month. A review of the semi-monthly pest control service report dated 7/30/25 read: Inspected and serviced interior as requested. Left monitor boards (glue traps), applied gel bait throughout requested areas. The service report noted a recommendation to add/repair door sweep to address a door gap and indicated it was the customer's responsibility. The door was not specified, and no pest activity or problem areas were noted. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident could access the call light device for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #5).The findings included: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cervical spinal cord injury and quadriplegia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident #5 was unable to use upper and lower extremities and required maximum assistance for all activities of daily living. An observation was conducted on 9/10/2025 at 2:15 PM of Nurse Aide (NA) #1 providing catheter care to Resident #5. The call button was not in view during the observation. NA #1 completed catheter care and began to exit Resident #5's room without providing Resident #5 with a call button. Surveyor asked if Resident #5 had a way to call staff for assistance. NA #1 looked behind Resident #5's nightstand and retrieved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident, responsible party, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from resident to resident sexual abuse when Nurse Aide #7 and Floor Technician #1 observed Resident #22, a male resident, fondle a severely cognitively impaired female resident (Resident #27) when he placed his hand under her shirt near/on her bare breast. Resident #27 did not have the cognitive capacity to consent to this intimate sexual contact. This deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse (Resident #27).The findings included:Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy (a broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or structure) and cognitive communication deficit.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #22 was cognitively intact. Resident #22 propelled himself independently in his wheelchair.A Nurse Practitioner…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse to Adult Protective Services (APS) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident to resident abuse (Resident #27).The findings included:The facility's abuse policy revised on 10/20/2022 indicated all alleged violations involving abuse are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, to APS where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities in accordance with State law.Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].The 24-hour Initial Allegation Report dated 6/9/2025 at 11:55 AM indicated a Nurse Aide (NA) #7 had notified the Administrator that a male resident (Resident #22) had been observed fondling a female resident (Resident #27). The State Agency was notified on 6/9/2025 at 12:37 PM. Local law enforcement was notified on 6/9/2025 at 1:30 PM. The initial report was signed by the Administrator.The 5 Day Investigation Report dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and Ombudsman interviews, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman in writing of the resident's discharge home for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident #88). The findings included: Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A nursing note dated 7/22/25 at 10:11 AM stated Resident #88 was discharged from the facility to his home on 7/22/25 at 10:00 AM with his family member. Education on self-care provided and understanding was verbalized. A review of Resident #88's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed no transfer or discharge notice was issued to Resident #88. A telephone interview on 9/10/25 at 10:41 AM with the Ombudsman revealed she had not received a transfer or discharge list from the facility since May 2025 and was not familiar with Resident #88's discharge home. A telephone interview on 9/12/25 at 3:36 PM with the former Social Worker (SW) revealed she was employed at the facility from June 2025 to the end of August 2025 and was still in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and family and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment to a resident's bilateral legs for arterial and venous ulcers (an ulcer due to inadequate blood supply) as specified in the physician orders for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for arterial and venous wounds (Resident #2). In addition, the facility failed to ensure transportation was arranged for a resident to attend a scheduled appointment with a Gastroenterologist (doctor who specializes in gastrointestinal issues). This occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medical appointments (Resident #97). The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnoses which included peripheral vascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, edema, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #2’s quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact and required assistance with most activities of daily living. The assessment also indicated he had wounds to his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family member, staff, Nurse Practitioner, wound care physician, and Assisted Living Facility Executive Director interviews, the facility failed to identify, assess, and obtain wound care orders for a wound on the left ankle for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for wound care (Resident #89).The findings included: Review of Resident #89's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed Resident #89 would be discharged to the facility but had no documentation of any wounds when discharged from the hospital. Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: diabetes mellitus (DM), and vascular dementia. Review of the facility's admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] at 9:15 PM by Nurse #3 revealed Resident #89 had bilateral upper extremity bruising and bruising to her left ankle. Review of the facility's admission nursing note dated 02/06/2025 at 9:15 PM by Nurse #3 revealed Resident #89 arrived at the facility via wheelchair. Resident #89 was alert and oriented,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff, resident, and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews and record review, the facility failed to assess resident's feet to determine if nail care was needed, ensure resident's toenails were trimmed and podiatry services were arranged for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for foot care (Resident #3 and Resident #2). The findings included: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (occurs when blood flow to the brain is interrupted causing damage to brain tissue) with hemiplegia (a condition that causes paralysis on one side of the body), and diabetes mellitus (DM). Resident #3’s care plan dated 02/17/2025 and revised on 08/03/2025 revealed Resident #3 was care planned for activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficits related to her disease processes. The goals included total staff assistance in all aspects of daily care to ensure all needs were met. Interventions included staff to provide grooming and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide safe mechanical lift transfers when the lift swung and hit the resident on the forehead resulting in a hematoma (collection of blood outside of a blood vessel) (Resident #56). In addition, staff failed to follow manufacturer guidelines for the use of a mechanical lift (Resident #5). This affected 2 of 3 residents reviewed for free of accident hazards, supervision and devices (Resident #56 and Resident #5). The findings included: A review of the undated Safe Lifting of Residents policy revealed that floor based and overhead full-body sling lifts (i.e. mechanical lift) required a minimum of two person assist, and the manufacturer’s guidance/instructions would be followed on all other types of lifts. 1. Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included quadriplegia (a condition when a person experiences the partial or total loss of function and feeling in all four limbs and torso),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to empty urinary drainage bag and secure urinary catheter tubing with anchoring device to prevent trauma to urinary opening or dislodgment of the catheter. The deficient practice occurred for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheter care (Resident #5).The findings included: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cervical spinal cord injury and neurogenic bladder (a disorder or problem with the nerve control of continence and voiding function). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident #5 was unable to use upper and lower extremities and required maximum assistance for all activities of daily living. He was documented as having an indwelling urinary catheter. Resident #5's care plan dated 9/8/25 included the goal to provide urinary catheter to Resident #5 for neurogenic bladder. The interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow procedure for labeling a continuous gastrostomy tube (a tube surgically placed in the stomach to provide nutrition, hydration, and medications) feeding. This deficient practice was for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for enteral (the administration of nutrients directly into the gastrointestinal tract through a tube) feeding management (Resident #3). The findings included: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes mellitus (DM), and gastrostomy tube status. A review of Resident #3's Physician orders revealed:1. 01/20/2025 Nothing by mouth (NPO).2. 01/30/2025 Change enteral feeding pump tubing, solution, and piston syringe (used for flushing gastrostomy tubes) nightly. 3. 01/30/2025 Water flush of 200 milliliters every 3 hours via feeding pump.4. 04/07/2025 Enteral nutritional feeding continuously via gastrostomy tube at 45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was delivered at the prescribed rate for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care and services (Resident #3). The findings included:Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and cerebral infarction (occurs when blood flow to the brain is interrupted causing damage to brain tissue) with hemiplegia (a condition that causes paralysis on one side of the body). Review of Resident #3's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a physician's order dated 01/29/2025 for oxygen at 2 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula continuously. Review of the care plan revised on 08/03/2025 revealed Resident #3 was at risk for respiratory complications secondary to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia requiring supplemental oxygen. The interventions included to administer oxygen as ordered and to observe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow their Enhanced Barrier precaution policy when Nurse #2 did not don (put on) a gown to administer medications via gastrostomy (tube in the stomach) tube and Nurse Aide (NA) #1 did not don a gown to provide care to a urinary catheter for Resident #5. Additionally, the facility did not follow their hand hygiene policy or their clean dressing policy when the Wound Nurse failed to clean and sanitize her hands while preparing for a wound dressing after coming in contact with unclean surfaces. The deficient practice occurred for 3 of 10 staff (Nurse #2, NA #1, and Wound Nurse) observed for infection control. The findings included: The findings included: 1. Review of the facility’s infection control policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) dated 03/28/2024 read in part, “Criteria for implementing EBP include residents with indwelling medical devices including feeding tubes. EBP will be utilized to provide targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities to reduce the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the call light system was functioning properly for 1 of 2 residents who required assistance for activities of daily living (Resident #66). The findings included:Resident #66 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hypertensive heart disease and dysphagia.Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 was assessed as cognitively intact and needed partial assistance from staff with bed to chair and toilet transfers. In addition, the quarterly MDS assessment indicated he was occasionally incontinent of bowel and coded Resident #66 as having an indwelling catheter. Review of the care plan focus area for activities of daily living revised on 6/18/25 described Resident #66 as requiring assistance with his activities of daily living (ADL). Interventions put in place included partial assistance with transfers, supervision assistance with bed mobility and bathing. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interviews with staff, Hospice Nurse, Medical Director and Consultant Pharmacist, the facility failed to limit the duration of an antipsychotic medication (a drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) ordered on an as needed (PRN) basis to 14 days and failed to monitor for abnormal involuntary movements on a resident receiving an antipsychotic medication (Resident #63) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings included: Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #63's care plan revised 2/23/24 revealed Resident #63 had been care planned for psychotropic/ antipsychotic medication use. The care plan interventions included to monitor effects related to psychotropics. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated Resident #63 was cognitively impaired and coded for behaviors that included hallucinations. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff, Medical Director, Vascular Physician Assistant (PA), Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when a resident did not receive an antiplatelet medication as ordered. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #68) reviewed for significant medication errors. The findings included: Resident #68 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her medical diagnoses included: chronic ulcer of left heel, peripheral vascular disease/ severe peripheral arterial disease (decrease blood flow to the lower extremities), cerebral infarction (stroke). A review of Resident #68's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed she was hospitalized from [DATE] to 6/5/24 for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with chronic heel ulcer. She was seen by vascular surgery during her hospitalization and had a drug coated balloon angioplasty (a procedure used to open an artery to re-establish blood flow to tissues) procedure performed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have advanced directives accurate throughout the medial record for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #47 and Resident #45) reviewed for advanced directives. The findings included: 1. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #47's health directive Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) revealed that on 5/13/24 Resident #47 wanted his health directive to change from a Full Code to a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). The MOST form was signed by Resident #47 on 5/13/24 and in the health directive binder at the nurse's desk. The care plan with a revision date of 5/31/24 stated that Resident #47 health directive was a full code. An intervention was the health directive should be reviewed quarterly and as directed. An interview on 6/26/24 at 11:53 AM was conducted with the Social Services Director. She stated that she reviews health directives at admission, care plan meetings and re-admission from the hospital. The social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff, Nurse Practitioner (NP), and Pharmacist interviews the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% by having 2 errors out of 27 opportunities which resulted in an 7.41% medication error rate. This affected 1 of 3 residents observed for medication administration (Resident # 14). The findings included: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her medical diagnoses included: hypertension (high blood pressure), history of transient ischemic attacks (mini stroke), cerebral infarction (stroke). Dry eye syndrome of bilateral lacrimal glands. a. A Physician's order dated 8/11/21 read please crush medications and administer in applesauce, every shift for difficulty swallowing. A physician's order dated 8/12/23 read Nifedipine (blood pressure medication) extended release (ER) 24-hour oral 30 milligram (mg) tablet, give one tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension give with 90 mg tablet to equal total combined daily dose of 120 mg. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff, and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interview the facility failed to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing wound care for a resident requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This deficit practice occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for EBP (Resident #68). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy and procedure revised on 3/1/2023, entitled Enhanced Barrier Precautions read in part: - It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. -Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities. -Initiation of EBP- An order for EBP will be obtained for residents with any of the following: wounds (e.g., chronic wounds such as pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, unhealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to keep a urinary catheter drainage bag off the floor to reduce the risk of infection for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with urinary catheters (Resident 2). The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her cumulative diagnoses included obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage in the urinary tract), overactive bladder, severe chronic kidney disease, stage 4, and a history of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Resident #2's catheter care plan revised 7/3/23 included the use of a suprapubic catheter related to her diagnosis of obstructive uropathy and history of UTIs. Staff interventions included monitoring for conditions and complications that may contribute to urinary infections. A 3/12/24 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated Resident #2 had adequate hearing/vision, able to understand and be understood, clear speech, intact cognition, and no impairment in upper body range of motion.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess whether the self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) who was observed to have a medication at bedside. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute posthemorrhagic anemia, end stage renal disease, dialysis, peripheral vascular disease, and diabetes. Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and 2/23/24. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #1 to be cognitively intact without behaviors. Medication orders for Resident #1 revealed the following were ordered to be administered in the morning: Calcitriol 0.25 milligrams (mg) daily at 8:00 AM Clopidogrel 75 mg daily at 8:00 AM Edurant 25 mg daily at 8:00 AM Juluca 50/25 mg daily at 8:00 AM Nifedipine ER 60 mg daily at 8:00 AM Aspirin 81 mg daily at 8:00 AM Carvedilol 6.25 mg daily at 8:00 AM Cephalexin 500…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-28 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide residents with their preferred method of bathing (Residents #135, #1, #12, #58, and #284) and failed to accommodate a resident's request to be assisted out of bed (Resident #70) for 6 of 8 residents reviewed for choices and dignity. Findings included: 1. Resident #135 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included arthritis, left hand cellulitis, heart failure, and hypertension. The Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] noted Resident #135 was alert and oriented to person, place and situation. The baseline care plan dated 02/07/23 revealed Resident #135 could communicate easily with staff, understand others and his daily preferences included receiving a shower. The undated Master Shower Schedule provided by the facility revealed Resident #135 was scheduled to receive his showers on Mondays and Fridays during the hours of 3:00 PM and 11:00 PM. Review of the February 2023 Nurse Aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to repair jagged and splintered edges on the middle and lower portion of a bathroom door in the residents shared bathroom (room [ROOM NUMBER]); failed to clean the air vents and filters of the air condition and heating units in resident rooms (rooms 102, 106, 108, and 109); failed to maintain walls in good repair in a resident's room (room [ROOM NUMBER]-B) on 1 of 2 wings (West Wing). The facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary side rail for a resident's bed (room [ROOM NUMBER]-A); failed to appropriately label and store personal care equipment in residents shared bathrooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]); failed to maintain functioning overhead lights in residents bathrooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]); failed to provide functioning soap dispensers in residents bathrooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]); and failed to provide a resident a pillow in good condition (room [ROOM NUMBER]-B) on 1 of 2 wings (West Wing). The findings included: 1. An observation on 02/20/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to provide incontinence care (Resident #48), nail care (Resident #487, Resident #61, Resident #54, and Resident #185), and a shave (Resident #487) for 5 of 14 dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings included: 1. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility 08/16/19 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (abbreviated as CVA and meaning a stroke) and non-Alzheimer's dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was severely cognitively impaired, had no behaviors or rejection of care, and was always incontinent of bladder. Review of Resident #48's care plan last revised 01/18/23 revealed he was incontinent of bowel and bladder and interventions included checking him frequently and assisting with toileting as needed; providing incontinence briefs per manufacturer's recommendation; providing loose-fitting, easy to remove clothing; and providing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-28 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician visits were alternated with the Family Nurse Practitioner's visits every 60 days for 3 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for physician visits (Residents #3, #39 and #16). Findings included: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), hypertension, and dysphagia (trouble swallowing). The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #3 had moderate impairment in cognition. Review of Resident #3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed she was seen by the Medical Director on 03/03/22 and 04/07/22. There were no other progress notes of physician visits conducted by the Medical Director. Review of Resident #3's EMR revealed she was seen by the Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) on 05/12/22, 05/30/22, 06/20/22, 06/23/22, 07/25/22, 08/22/22, 08/29/22, 09/22/22, 10/20/22, 11/17/22, 12/12/22, 01/10/23, and 02/02/23. During a telephone interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, resident, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff resulting in residents not having their choices honored for bathing and not receiving transfer assistance when requested for 6 of 8 sampled residents (Residents #135, #1, #12, #58, #284, and #70). Findings included: This tag is cross referenced to: F561: Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide residents with their preferred method of bathing (Residents #135, #1, #12, #58, and #284) and failed to accommodate a resident's request to be assisted out of bed (Resident #70) for 6 of 8 residents reviewed for choices and dignity. During a telephone interview on 02/24/23 at 2:18 PM, Medication Aide (MA) #1 revealed since the previous survey, she had been assisting with coordinating the nursing staff schedule. MA #1 explained she used staffing agencies as needed to supplement the nursing staff schedule and tried to have a minimum of 7 to 8 Nurse Aides (NA) for the day shift, 7 NA for the evening shift,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to date and label opened food and remove expired food from 1 of 3 reach-in refrigerators. This practice had the potential to affect food served to residents. Findings included: On 2/20/23 at 9:57 AM an observation of the kitchen reach-in cooler #3 revealed one 5-quart square plastic container located on the top shelf that was approximately 1/8 full of grape jelly. The container was covered with plastic wrap and did not contain a label or use by date. A quart size food storage plastic bag contained sliced deli meat on the bottom shelf that did not contain a label or use by date and an open bag of pre-cut slaw mix was missing a label and use by date. Additionally, the same reach-in refrigerator contained a head of cabbage with dried and yellow outer shell. The Dietary Manager (DM) stated in an interview on 2/20/23 at 12:46 PM that the food items missing labels and use by dates should have been dated and labeled before placed into the reach-in refrigerator. The cabbage head should have been thrown away when the cook checked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions that the committee put into place following a recertification and complaint investigation survey completed on 11/22/21 and a complaint investigation survey completed on 02/17/22. This was for one repeat deficiency in the area of activities of daily living provided for dependent residents originally cited on 11/22/21 during a recertification and complaint investigation survey and on 02/17/22 during a complaint investigation survey. In addition, there were four repeat deficiencies in the areas of comprehensive assessments and timing, accuracy of assessments, free of accident hazards/supervision/devices, and sufficient nursing staff that were originally cited on 11/22/21 during a recertification and complaint investigation survey and/or complaint investigation survey on 02/17/22. The continued failure of the facility during three federal surveys of record show a pattern of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity by not providing incontinence care and oral hygiene when needed, ensuring bed linen and fall mat were clean and free of food debris, and ensuring the room was free of odor for 1 of 12 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #48). The reasonable person concept was applied to this deficiency. Individuals would expect to receive care needed and would be upset if observed with dried food debris on their mouth, bed, and floor; lying on bed linen that was not clean; and if their room smelled of urine. Findings included: Resident #48 was admitted to the facility 08/16/19 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (abbreviated as CVA and meaning a stroke) and non-Alzheimer's dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was severely cognitively impaired, had no behaviors or rejection of care, required set-up assistance with eating, and was always incontinent of bladder. a. While…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-28 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess the ability of a resident to self-administer medications for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medications (Resident # 186). Resident #186 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #186 was assessed as being cognitively intact. Review of Resident #186's medical records revealed no assessment for self-administering medications was included. Review of physician orders revealed on 02/15/23 an order was written for triamcinolone acetonide external lotion 0.1 % to apply to affected area topically two times a day for 14 days for atopic dermatitis. On 02/17/23 and order was written for regular strength suspension 200-200-20 milligram (mg)/5 milliliters (ml) of Aluminum and Magnesium Hydroxide-Simethicone give 30 ml every 4 hours as needed for indigestion and do not exceed 6 doses in 24 hours. An observation and interview were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate advanced directives throughout the medical record for 2 of 32 residents reviewed (Residents #18 and #29). Findings included: 1. Resident #18 was admitted on [DATE]. A DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) form dated 11/2/22 for Resident #18 was located in the advance directive book at the nurses' station. A review of Resident #18's medical record revealed a physician's order dated 11/2/22 for a DNR. Resident #18's care plan dated 2/15/23 revealed her to be a full code. The MDS Coordinator stated on 2/21/23 at 3:32 PM Resident #18's advance directive code status change should have occurred in real-time when the physician's order was signed. When the care plan was reviewed on 2/15/23, the advance directive code status should have been changed by the MDS coordinator who updated the care plan. The Administrator was interviewed on 2/24/23 at 4:13 PM and stated Resident #18's advance directive should have been reflected on the care plan with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC) and Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) prior to discharge from Medicare Part A skilled services to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notification review (Resident #27). The Findings Included: Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #27's medical record revealed no evidence a NOMNC and SNF ABN were provided to her or her Responsible Party (RP) which explained Medicare Part A coverage for skilled services would end on 10/31/22. Resident #27 remained in the facility. A joint interview was conducted with the Social Worker (SW) and Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse #1 on 02/22/23 at 9:36 AM. MDS Nurse #1 explained the Business Office Manager was responsible for issuing the SNF ABN when notified a resident had received a NOMNC. During an interview on 02/23/23 at 3:44 PM, the SW confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from neglect when it failed to provide incontinence care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for incontinence care (Resident #48). The reasonable person concept was applied to this deficiency. Individuals would expect to receive the care needed and would be upset if left in a wet bed. Findings included: Resident #48 was admitted to the facility 08/16/19 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (abbreviated as CVA and meaning a stroke) and non-Alzheimer's dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was severely cognitively impaired, had no behaviors or rejection of care, and was always incontinent of bladder. Review of Resident #48's care plan last revised 01/18/23 revealed he was incontinent of bowel and bladder and interventions included checking him frequently and assisting with toileting as needed; providing incontinence briefs per manufacturer's recommendation; providing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 14 days of the Assessment Reference Date (abbreviated as ARD and referring to the last day of the assessment period) for 2 of 32 sampled residents (Residents #75 and #135). Findings included: 1. Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #75's medical record at revealed an admission MDS assessment with an ARD of 12/11/22 was marked as completed on 12/27/22. During a telephone interview on 02/24/23 at 12:03 AM, MDS Nurse #2 explained she worked for the facility remotely, usually in the evenings or weekends, on a part-time basis assisting with MDS assessments. MDS Nurse #2 verified Resident #75's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not completed within the regulatory time frame but was not sure why. During an interview on 02/24/23 at 3:54 PM, the Administrator stated Resident #75's admission MDS assessment should have been completed within the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in the areas of Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) and hospice for 2 of 32 sampled residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Resident #45 and #34). Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed a North Carolina Medicaid Long Term Care form (a preadmission form which describes a patient's medical condition and the amount of care they need when placed in a long term care facility) dated 10/18/21 that indicated Resident #45 had a time-limited Level II PASRR determination. Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder and major depressive disorder. The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #45 was not currently considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have a serious mental illness. During a telephone interview on 02/24/23 at 12:03 AM, MDS Nurse #2 reviewed the MDS annual assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to request a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) before the expiration date for 1 of 3 residents reviewed with a Level II PASRR (Resident #45). Findings included: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed a North Carolina Medicaid Long Term Care form (a preadmission form which describes a patient's medical condition and the amount of care they need when placed in a long term care facility) dated [DATE] that indicated Resident #45 had a time-limited Level II PASRR ending in an E. Review of the North Carolina Skilled Nursing Facility PASRR authorization codes document revealed a PASRR ending in E indicated Level II: 30-day rehabilitation services authorization only. Review of Resident #45's medical record on [DATE] at 12:57 PM revealed no evidence a PASRR evaluation was requested or a new PASRR had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to request a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) re-evaluation after a significant change in physical status for 1 of 3 residents diagnosed with a mental health disorder (Resident #29). Findings included: Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder. A PASRR determination notification letter dated 09/21/21 indicated Resident #29 had a Level 1 PASRR effective 09/21/21 with no expiration date and noted in part, no further PASRR screening is required unless a significant change occurs with the individual's status. The North Carolina Medicaid Uniform Screening Tool (NC MUST) inquiry dated 02/21/23 revealed Resident #29 had a PASRR review on 09/21/21. There were no requests for re-evaluation after 09/21/21. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was not currently considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have a serious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, individualized care plan that addressed Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II status for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #45). Findings included: Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed a North Carolina Medicaid Long Term Care form (a preadmission form which describes a patient's medical condition and the amount of care they need when placed in a long term care facility) dated 10/18/21 which indicated Resident #45 had a 30-day Level II PASRR determination. Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #45's active care plans, last reviewed/revised 01/21/23, revealed no care plan that addressed the Level II PASRR determination. During a telephone interview on 02/27/23 at 12:52 PM, MDS Nurse #1 explained the Admissions Director or Social Worker notified MDS when a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to supervise 1 of 4 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #22). The findings included: Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), and cognitive communication deficit. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 was cognitively intact and was coded for current tobacco use. Review of the care plan dated 12/15/22 for Resident #22 revealed he was a supervised smoker and would not smoke without supervision. Interventions included to instruct the resident about the facility policy on smoking, locations, times, safety concerns, monitor oral hygiene, notify charge nurse immediately if resident is suspected of violating the smoking policy, observe clothing and skin for signs of cigarette burns, and staff will supervise resident during smoking sessions for safety. Review of the smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and Pharmacy Consultant, Nurse Practitioner (NP), and staff interviews the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of antipsychotic ordered 07/27/22 and antidepressant medication ordered 03/12/22 for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication (Resident #34). Findings included: Resident #34 was admitted to the facility 02/14/22 with diagnoses including non-Alzheimer's dementia and encephalopathy (a disturbance in brain functioning). Review of Resident #34's orders revealed an order dated 03/12/22 for Mirtazapine (an antidepressant) 30 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for encephalopathy. Resident #34 also had an order dated 07/27/22 for Quetiapine Fumarate (an antipsychotic) 25 mg 1 tablet twice a day for agitation. Review of Resident #34's Medication Administration Records (MARs) from March 2022 through February 2023 revealed he received Mirtazapine and Quetiapine Fumarate as ordered. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 was severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to keep unattended medications stored in a locked medication cart for of 1 of 4 medication carts (East A medication storage cart) and they failed to ensure medications were under direct observation by the administering nurse who left medications unattended at the bedside for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication storage. Findings included: 1. A continuous observation of the East A medication cart on 02/24/23 from 11:12 AM until 11:29 AM revealed there were 7 medication cards lying on top of the medication cart and Nurse #8 was not in view of the medication cart. During the observation 1 resident in a wheelchair propelled by the medication cart, 1 resident using a rolling walker walked by the medication cart, and 4 staff members walked by the medication cart. No residents or staff members noticed the unattended medications. The medications were within reach of every person that passed by the East A medication cart on 02/24/23 from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-28 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the call light annunciator panel located at the nurses' station functioned to identify the room number and sound an alarm and failed to ensure the light above the room entry door worked when the call light at the bedside and bathroom were engaged for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for call lights on 1 of 2 wings (West Wing). The findings included: Resident #16 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including debility and heart failure. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 was assessed as having moderately impaired cognition and was independent with bed mobility and needed supervision with transfers and extensive assistance with toilet use. Review of the care plan focus area for activities of daily living revised on 07/09/22 described Resident #16 as having a self-care deficit related to an intolerance to activity due to diagnoses. Interventions put in place included encourage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-05-03 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to post nurse staffing data at the beginning of each shift for 2 of 2 days of the survey. The findings included: On 4/30/24 at 11:00 AM nurse staffing data was observed posted for 4/28/24 and recorded the census of 85. The first shift staff was recorded as 1 Registered Nurse (RN), 5 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), and 9 Nurse Aides (NA). The second shift staff was recorded as 0 RN, 5 LPN, and 8 NA. The third shift staff was recorded as 0 RN, 3 LPN, and 5 NA. On 5/1/24 at 10:37 AM nurse staffing data was observed posted for 4/30/24 and recorded the census of 82. The first shift staff was recorded as 0 RN, 5 LPN, and 9 NA. The second shift staff was recorded as 1 RN, 5 LPN, and 8 NA. Third shift staff was recorded as 1 RN, 2 LPN, and 5 NA. An interview on 5/1/24 at 5:45 PM with the Scheduler revealed she typically worked from 8:30 AM or 9:00 AM until 4:30 PM or 5:00 PM. The Scheduler stated she was responsible for posting nurse staffing data daily once she arrived at work. She stated she was aware that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-05-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to update the comprehensive person-centered individualized care plan to reflect an assessment to self-administer medications. This failure occurred for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for self-administration of medications (Resident #3). The findings included: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included neuralgia and neuritis (nerve pain caused by inflammation of the nerves). A 1/10/24 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment evaluated Resident #3 with adequate hearing and vision, clear speech, made self-understood, able to understand others, intact cognition, no upper extremity impairment, and no behavior symptoms. A review of the care plan revised on 2/28/24 for Resident #3 revealed it did not reflect that Resident#3 was approved to self-administer medication. A 3/11/24 Self Administration of Medications assessment, completed by the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) recorded that Resident #3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$19,663 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-04-24
- $7,823 — penalty dated 2024-04-24
- $7,823 — penalty dated 2024-04-24
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NC
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345134. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.