Sardis Oaks

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 88.7 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 30% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments (Resident #4).The findings included:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of a stroke and dysphagia (the inability to swallow). A physician progress note dated 1/23/2025 indicated Resident #4 underwent replacement of her percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (PEG, a flexible feeding tube inserted through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach) on that date.Resident #4 had a physician's order dated 8/1/2025 for a specialized nutritional supplement, 237 milliliters (ml), three time daily bolus via PEG if consumed 50% or less of meal. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated Resident #4 had received the specialized nutritional supplement, 237 ml bolus tube feeding via the PEG on 10/9/2025, 10/10/2025, 10/11/2025 and 10/12/2025.A review of a Registered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a request for a Level II Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation for a resident with a new diagnosis of a serious mental illness for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #45).The findings included:Review of the medical record revealed a Level I PASRR was completed for Resident #45 on 9/02/22 prior to admission to the facility.Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including lymphedema and cellulitis and open wound of left lower extremity. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed there was no evidence that a Level II PASRR evaluation request was submitted for Resident #45.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 was cognitively intact, exhibited no behaviors during the assessment period and was coded for receiving antidepressant and anticonvulsant medications. Resident #45's list of active diagnoses included major depressive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to separate the tube feeding syringe components prior to storing it for use, which created the potential for bacterial growth, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #79).Findings included:Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a gastric tube (flexible tube inserted in through the abdominal wall directly to the stomach) for medication, food, and water administration.The Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #79 had a severe cognitive deficit. Resident #79 was coded as having a feeding tube, receiving 51% or more of his total calories via tube feeding and more than 501cc (cubic centimeters) of fluid via tube feeding.On 12/17/2025 at 8:03 AM an observation revealed Nurse #1 administering medication via gastric tube using a 60 cc syringe. After use, Nurse #1 disassembled the syringe, rinsed the parts with tap water at the bathroom sink, reassembled the syringe without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to clean normal saline solution bag connection port with alcohol prior to connecting antibiotic vial to the normal saline bag for mixing, which could introduce bacteria in the mixture. This was for 1 of 1 staff member observed for intravenous medication administration (Nurse #1).Findings included:On 12/17/2025 at 12:50 PM an observation revealed Nurse #1 preparing antibiotic intravenous bag for Resident #103. Nurse #1 gathered one (1) normal saline bag/100 ml (milliliters) and one (1) vial of Cefepime 2 grams powder antibiotic. Nurse #1 cleaned her hands and donned gloves. Next, Nurse #1 connected the antibiotic vial to the normal saline bag without cleaning the normal saline medication port with an alcohol swab. Nurse #1 then squeezed the normal saline in the antibiotic vial to mix with the antibiotic power. Nurse #1 mixed the antibiotic solution in the 100 ml normal saline bag to administer to Resident #103.An interview was conducted with Nurse #1 on 12/17/2025 at 1:20 PM. Nurse #1 stated the normal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to post cautionary and safety signage outside of resident rooms that indicated the use of oxygen for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #73, #52, #15, and #37) reviewed for respiratory care. The findings included: 1. Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with acute chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #73 was coded for receiving oxygen. A review of Resident #73's physician orders revealed an order dated 6/20/24 for oxygen to be administered continuously via nasal cannula at 5 liters per minute (l/min). An observation on 9/23/24 at 1:00 PM revealed Resident #73 was lying in bed wearing a nasal cannula with oxygen being administered at 5 l/min. There was no cautionary or safety signage posted at the entrance to Resident #73's room to indicate oxygen was in use. An observation of Resident #73 conducted on 9/25/24 at 9:56 AM revealed she was lying…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews with the Corporate Support Dietary Manager, and staff, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene prior to plating food, wear a hair and beard restraint, maintain a working thermometer in the reach-in refrigerator, remove expired foods from frozen storage, and store potentially hazardous foods in sealed containers with a label that recorded the date of storage and the use by date in four of six cold storage units. This failure had the potential to affect food served to 85 of 92 residents. The findings included: 1. A continuous observation of the lunch meal tray line occurred on 9/26/24 from 12:00 PM until 12:10 PM. During the continuous observation, Dietary Aide (DA) #2 was observed to wear the same pair of gloves to place insulated dome lids on meal trays, place condiments and crackers on resident's meal trays, open/close the reach-in refrigerator to remove cold items, and placed meal trays on a metal cart. On 9/26/24 at 12:10 PM, DA #2 used the same gloves, without performing hand hygiene, to plate French Fries with her right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews with a resident and staff, the facility failed to replace a nonfunctioning air conditioner unit in room [ROOM NUMBER]. This failure occurred for on 1 of 4 halls reviewed for a safe, clean, comfortable and home like environment (200 hall). The findings included: An observation and interview with the Resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] occurred on 9/23/24 at 1:45 PM. During the interview, the Resident stated that her air conditioner in her room had not worked for the past three weeks. She said she was currently hot in her room, and she reported this concern to her nurse aide (NA) three weeks ago. The Resident stated that when she reported the concern, the NA checked her air conditioner and said it was not blowing cool air and that she would report it to the maintenance department. The Resident said her air conditioner worked off/on since her admission to the facility in July 2024, but that three weeks ago it stopped blowing cool air completely. The Resident stated no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide nail care for a dependent resident for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) (Resident #12). The findings included: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis' which included hemiplegia (inability to move one side of the body). A review of a care plan dated 03/18/24 revealed Resident #12 had impaired mobility related to left-sided hemiplegia and blindness with interventions which included for staff to encourage Resident #12 to participate in activities of daily living (ADL) care as able and to assist her as needed. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact and was not coded for rejection of care. Resident #12 was coded for impairment on one side of her upper extremities and required moderate assistance with personal hygiene. An observation was conducted on 09/23/2024 at 3:46 PM. Resident #12 was observed to have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide an environment free from a potential hazard when an insulin syringe was observed lying on Resident #74's beside table with the safety cap off and the needle exposed. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #74). The findings included: Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #74 was severely cognitively impaired and received insulin 7 days during the assessment period. A review of Resident #74's physician orders revealed an order dated 9/12/24 for Insulin NPH (intermediate-acting insulin used to control blood sugar) 10 units injected subcutaneously (under the skin) twice a day. A review of Resident #74's medication administration record indicated 10 units of insulin NPH was administered by Unit Coordinator #1 on 9/23/24 at 8:57 AM. An observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure an opened bottle of tube feeding formula was labeled with the date and time the formula was hung for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #74). The findings included: Resident #74 was admitted to the facility 6/07/24 with diagnoses that included dysphasia (difficulty swallowing) and gastrostomy (surgical procedure to insert a tube into the stomach to provide nutritional support). A review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 6/07/24 for Resident #74 to receive Glucerna 1.5 (nutritional formula used for tube feeding) at 55 milliliters per hour (ml/hour) and water at 50 ml/hour continuously. A review of the care plan dated 6/17/24 indicated Resident #74 required a permanent feeding tube due to a diagnosis of dysphagia and an inability to take any nutrition by mouth. The interventions included administering tube feedings and water flushes as ordered by the physician. The quarterly Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATRIUM HEALTH — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC