Tsali Care Center
267 Tsali Care Way, Cherokee, NC 28719 · Non profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (828) 497-5048 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0569, F0570)
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (82) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $157,555 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-31)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.1% | 15.6% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.1% | 7.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.2% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.4% | 5.9% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.8% | 3.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.5% | 18.3% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.9% | 21.3% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 74.6% | 94.1% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 12.3% | 5.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.7% | 20.7% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.9% | 14.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 38.5% | 78.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.5% | 22.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.5% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.59 | 1.78 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.77 | 1.80 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
37.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 37.9%CMS range 24.0–51.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.6–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 13.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 82.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 3.5–15.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.21 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 77.9 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.30 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.23 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.37 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.45 to 0.92 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
82 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 68 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) was safely transferred from the facility van. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Complete Traumatic Amputation to Left Lower Leg and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. He was cognitively intact. During an interview on 4/8/25 at 9:00 AM, Resident #1 stated on 12/27/24 he was returning to the facility from an appointment in Asheville for suture removal to his stump (amputated leg). He arrived back to the facility via Tsali's van with facility's staff driver #1. While she was getting him out of the van, and on the ramp down, I slid out of the chair and landed on my stump. This was the leg that just had sutures removed. He stated van driver #1 explained to him the reason he came out of the chair was due to the cushion not being properly secured to his wheelchair. He stated the accident caused him to have to be sent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-08-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff, resident and physician interviews, and facility policy titled Pain Management Protocol Policy, the facility failed to manage pain for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #159). The findings include: Resident #159 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included hemiplegia, personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), cerebral infarction without residual deficits, anxiety disorder, depression, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, psychoactive substance, other psychoactive substance dependence, and disorder of the kidney and ureter. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed that the MDS was in progress. A review of the care plan-focused concern revealed, I have/or am at risk for pain r/t (related to) dx (diagnoses) of neuropathy, decreased mobility. Interventions reflected Give medications as ordered by the physician. Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness. Focused concern also included I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete a thorough fall investigation to identify root cause(s) and appropriate interventions to prevent future falls for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #3). This failure resulted in the resident sustaining a right femoral neck fracture, a type 4 fracture of the sacrum and a rib fracture. The findings include: Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] and most recently readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including: unspecified fracture of right femur, dysphasia, type 4 fracture of sacrum, muscle weakness, unspecified dementia and anxiety disorder. Review of the progress notes dated 6/20/24 revealed 2041 (8:41 PM) Resident yelling for help, found res (resident) lying on her left side next [sic] with her walker lying sideways next to the closed door. Res reported 'I fell'. Res c/o (complained) pain to her left arm. BLE (bilateral lower extremities) in proper alignment, able to bear weight BLE denies hitting her head. Res did not have her shoes on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable pressure ulcer for one (1) of one (1) sampled residents for pressure ulcers, Resident #23, who was at risk for skin impairment, developed a pressure ulcer to the penis due to the facility's failure to promptly identify that the catheter tubing was causing pressure injury to the resident's penis resulting in harm to the resident. The findings include: Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), Type 2 Diabetes, Retention of Urine, History of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), and Hypertension. Review of Resident #23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, total dependence for bathing, extensive assistance for toileting and personal hygiene, was at risk for developing pressure ulcers and had unhealed pressure ulcers. During an interview with Resident #23 on 07/11/23 at 10:51 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) failed to identify there was no physician order in the electronic medical record (EMR) orders to correctly identify all residents' code status, and failed to provide oversight of staff's audits of residents' EMR Code Status to ensure the audits were accurate and to make corrections to ensure sustained compliance with the citation which had the potential to affect 72 of 72 residents who resided in the facility. The findings include: During an interview on 11/14/25 at 5:28 PM, the Administrator could not provide audit tools related to the monitoring of code status in resident records. The Administrator stated, The Director of Admissions and Marketing is not in the facility and has the audit tools on her computer. She would need to come into the facility to forward the audit tools electronically. On 11/14/25 at 7:30 PM, the Administrator provided a copy of the audit tool for monitoring code status. The Administrator stated the audit tool was completed by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee, the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to 1. ensure the QAPI committee policy addressed data collection and analysis, data and adverse event monitoring, and feedback; 2. track and analyze data and conduct at least one process improvement plan (PIP) this year; and 3. maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions that the committee put into place following the recertification survey of 08/22/24 and the complaint surveys on 10/18/24 and 04/10/25. This was for deficiencies re-cited during the recertification and complaint survey conducted 07/28/25-08/01/25. The recited deficiencies included F 550, F 578, F645, F689, F698, and F761. The continued failure of the facility during three (3) Federal Jurisdictional surveys indicates a pattern of the facility to sustain an effective QAPI program. This was for six (6) of 25 deficient practice citations.The findings include:1.Review of the facility's policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-01 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of the facility policy titled Administrative-Residents Rights for Senior Service, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of the risks of treatment of prescribed medications for four (4) of five (5) residents sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident #'s 1,4, 7 and 8). The findings include: 1.Resident #7 was admitted to the facility 06/26/25 with diagnoses that included Parkinsonism, type 2 diabetes, insomnia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and heart failure. The resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of physicians orders revealed Resident #7 was receiving quetiapine (an antipsychotic) 25 milligrams (mg) as needed for agitation every afternoon/evening; empagliflozin (for diabetes) 10 mg once a day; paroxetine (antidepressant) 10 mg once a day; insulin in the morning and at bedtime; sitagliptin (for diabetes) 100 mg every morning; acetaminophen (pain reliever) 500 mg twice a day; carbidopa-levodopa (for Parkinson's disease) 25-100 mg three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-01 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and the facility's Medication Self-Administration and Storage policy, the facility staff failed to assess residents for safe self-administration and storage of medications/biologicals, i.e., medicated cough drops, Zinc Oxide topical ointment, Anesep antimicrobial skin wound cleanser, and Betadine Gluconate 4% Solution Antiseptic Surgical Scrub, left unsecured at the bedside for four (4) of 23 sampled residents (Resident #s 17, 18, 21, and 45). The findings include: 1. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, and potential/impaired skin integrity. On 07/29/25 at 4:30 PM and 07/30/25 at 11:00 AM, and 07/31/25 at 11:30 AM, an open four-ounce tube of Zinc Oxide topical ointment was observed on top of the resident's bedside table. Review of medical records revealed no evidence of an interdisciplinary team (IDT) assessment of the resident's ability to safely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Advance Directives Policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate Advance Directives were readily available in resident records or appropriate Advance Directives were in place for six (6) of 23 residents (Resident #'s 16, 17, 27, 34, 51, and 66) reviewed for Advance Directives. The findings include: 1.Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 diabetes mellitus and encephalopathy She was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an Advance Directive and Code Status Acknowledgment of Receipt form with the box checked I have chosen to formulate and issue Advance Directives. The form also indicated a Guardianship Letter. There were no Advance Directives or Guardianship Letter readily available in her medical record. 2. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis, and heart failure She was cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights for Senior Services Policy, the facility failed to provide privacy for one (1) of 25 resident residents (Resident #51) during a temperature monitoring. The facility also failed to ensure staff did not leave resident protected health information (PHI) unattended, uncovered and visible on top of the [NAME] neighborhood's diabetic treatment cart for 13 of 23 sampled residents (Residents #s 1, 8, 10, 15, 18, 23, 24, 32, 44, 45, 58, 61, and 71). The findings include: 1.During an observation on 07/28/25 at 4:36 PM, a clip board with a Vital Signs Chart attached, dated July 28, 2025, was observed atop of the diabetic treatment cart, which sat on the north wall inside the [NAME] neighborhood's resident day room. The vital signs sheet contained the blood pressure, temperature, pulse, respiration, and/or pulse oximetry results for Resident #s 15, 44, 58 and 71. Additionally, an 8 x 11-inch sheet of blue/white paper with the heading…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility's policy titled Complaints and Grievances Policy, the facility failed to resolve a grievance timely for one (1) resident of 23 sampled residents (Resident #66). The findings include:Resident #66 was admitted to the facility 11/14/24 with diagnoses that included unspecified atrial fibrillation, cerebrovascular disease, and moderate persistent asthma. The resident was cognitively intact.During an interview on 07/29/25 at 11:42 AM, Resident #66 stated approximately two and a half (2 1/2) weeks ago she woke up and there were ants all over her bed. The Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) and the housekeeper tried to get all the ants up, but they were in the mattress. Resident #66 stated she continued to see ants for seven (7) days. Resident #66 stated she slept on that same mattress with the ants during that week. The facility would not change the mattress.During an interview on 07/31/25 at 9:56 AM, Housekeeper #1 stated about a week or two ago, the housekeeper saw ants in the room of Resident #66. Housekeeper #1 saw a trail of ants by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility's Medication Storage policy, the failed to ensure staff secured medication inside a locked medication cart and did not repeatedly leave one (1) of three (3) medication carts unlocked, unattended, and accessible to residents, staff, and the general public. The facility also failed to ensure staff did not leave one (1) of two (2) diabetic treatment carts unlocked and unattended. The findings include: 1. During multiple observations on 07/28/25 at 4:37 PM and on 07/30/25 at 10:00 AM and at 1:23 PM, the diabetic treatment cart was left unlocked and unattended. The top drawer of the cart was full of lancets (sharp device used to prick the finger for blood glucose test), chemical cleansing wipes, and a pressurized can of Febreze deodorizing spray. On 07/29/25 at 4:50 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 returned to the medication cart, parked next to the treatment cart, completed a task, and left the treatment cart unlocked. On 07/30/25 at 1:33 PM, LPN #2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Personal Protective Equipment Policy, Catheter Drainage Bags and Tubing-Clinical Protocol, and Infection Control- Hand Hygiene, the facility failed to ensure 1. staff appropriately donned and doffed personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing laundry services; 2. staff kept indwelling catheter bags and/or tubing off the floor for one (1) of three (3) residents sampled for indwelling catheters (Resident #21); and 3. that during dining ,the staff performed hand hygiene before and after resident contact and after touching soiled surfaces (i.e. garbage can lid), and avoided touching inside of the residents' plates with while serving food.The findings include: 1. During an observation and simultaneous interview on 07/29/25 at 9:55 AM, Laundry Aide #2 was observed wearing an N95 face mask, a face shield, gown, and gloves while walking around on the Laurel Unit. He touched the nurse station door attempting to locate staff. During the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, facility policy review, and the online resource from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the facility failed to ensure residents received education and were given the opportunity to accept or decline immunizations according to the CDC Adult Immunization schedule for four (4) residents (Resident #'s 21, 23, 45, and 71) of the five (5) residents reviewed for Immunizations.The findings include:1. Resident #21 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), urinary tract infection (UTI), heart failure, and diabetes mellitus type two (2).Review of Resident #21's immunization record revealed the followingInfluenza administered - 10/11/23Pneumonia vaccination - no documentation 2. Resident #23 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM) type two (2), and end-stage renal disease (ESRD).Review of Resident #23's immunization record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 68 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to treat two (2) residents (Resident #6 and #23) in a dignified manner to promote the residents' quality of care and quality of life in a sample size of 23 residents who were reviewed for resident rights. The findings include: 1.Resident #6 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia, type 2 diabetes, and major depressive disorder. Resident #6’s quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that he was cognitively impaired, dependent on activities for daily living (ADLs) and required a two person assist Hoyer lift transfer. In a telephone interview with the resident representative for Resident #6 on 07/29/25 at 11:12 AM, she stated she filed a complaint/grievance with Social Worker (SW) #3 regarding an incident that occurred with her uncle while she visited the facility sometime in June. She recounted that, on this day, she requested that the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) staff put her uncle in his chair so…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of the facility's policy titled (Facility Name) Administrative-Residents Rights for Senior Service, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was provided appropriate durable medical equipment (DME) that allowed the use of the bathroom for one (1) of twenty-three (23) sampled residents.The findings include:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included obesity, acute respiratory failure, unspecified psychosis, manic episode, and type 2 diabetes.Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that he was cognitively intact, dependent for activities for daily living (ADLs) and required a one person assist for transfers.During an observation and interview on 07/30/25 at 4:32 PM Resident #4 reported he smashed the pointer finger on his left-hand a couple of months ago while attempting to self-propel his wheelchair (WC) through the threshold of the bathroom to access the sink. He stated, look at the dark marks on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy titled Medication Regimen Review, the facility failed to ensure an order for an as needed (PRN) antipsychotic had a stop date and a supporting diagnosis for use for one (1) resident of five (5) sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident #7). The findings include:Resident #7 was admitted to the facility 06/26/25 with diagnoses that included Parkinsonism, type 2 diabetes, insomnia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and heart failure.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was moderately cognitively impaired; had verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others, other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others, and rejected care one (1) to three (3) days during the seven (7) day look back period; did not have any psychiatric or mood disorder diagnoses; and in the past seven (7) days had received antianxiety, antidepressant, and hypnotic medications.Review of the physician's orders revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and a review of the facility's Resident Assessment Instrument policy, facility staff failed to identify and document a skin tear injury on the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for skin integrity (Resident #18). The findings include:Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia without behavior, and encephalopathy.Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18's skin was intact without notation of skin tears, abrasions, or open wounds/injuries. During an observation and interview on 07/29/25 at 2:41 PM, Resident #18 sat in his room in a recliner chair with both legs elevated engaging with his sister. The skin on his lower legs was dry with dark pin-head size scabs and a two-centimeter redden/open and moist skin tear was visible on his lower left leg/shin.During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II upon a new qualifying mental health diagnosis for one (1) out of two (2) residents sampled for PASRR Level II (Resident #4 ). The findings include:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure, obesity, and type 2 diabetes.Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that he was cognitively intact, dependent with activities for daily living (ADLs) and required one person assist for transfers. Review of past MDS revealed a diagnosis of unspecified. psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition dated 2/19/2025 and Manic episode, unspecified dated 11/12/24.During an interview on 07/30/25 at 4:20 PM, Resident #4 denied any behavioral health or mental health concern. He reported his mood was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), the facility failed to ensure the accurate completion of the Level I PASRR and referral for Level II PASRR for a resident with a mental health diagnosis for one (1) out of two (2) residents sampled for PASRR (Resident #5). The findings include:1. Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included delusional disorders, history of left below the knee amputation, peripheral vascular disease, and diabetes.Review of Resident #5's PASRR Level I Assessment, dated 12/05/24, revealed .The individual does not meet the federal definition for mental illness/ mental retardation. No further PASRR screening is required unless a significant change occurs with the individual's status which. suggests a diagnosis of mental illness or mental retardation or, if present, suggests a change in treatment needs for those conditions.no qualifying mental health diagnosis.Review of Resident #5's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policies Resident Rights for Senior Services, Behavioral Health Services and Trauma-Informed Care, and Care Plans - Nursing Facility, the facility failed to ensure staff developed and/or implemented comprehensive care plans for three (3) of 23 sampled residents reviewed, that included person-centered interventions for behaviors (Resident #7), trauma informed care (Resident #8), and restorative services (Resident #45). The findings include: 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility 06/26/25 with diagnoses that included Parkinsonism and insomnia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was moderately cognitively impaired; had verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others, other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others, and rejected care one (1) to three (3) days during the seven (7) day look back period; and required substantial/maximal assistance with personal care and mobility. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, policy review, and review of Up To Date medical reference, the facility: 1. failed to ensure arrangements were made for a dermatology consult in accordance with a physician order for one (1) resident (Resident #27); 2. failed to ensure assessment and treatment for potential insect bites for one (1) resident (Resident #66); and 3. failed to ensure arrangements were made for a speech and language evaluation in accordance with an order for one (1) resident (Resident #21) of 23 sampled residents. The findings include: 1. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility 06/12/25 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and adjustment disorder with depressed mood. The resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 07/28/25 at 5:35 PM, Resident #27 stated she was admitted [DATE] and the only complaint the resident had since being admitted was this itching that won't go away.from head to toe. The resident stated the itching made it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Restorative Nursing Care, the facility failed to initiate restorative care nursing services for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for two (2) residents out six (6) residents sampled for ADL decline and rehabilitation and restorative care (Residents' #3 and #5). The findings include:1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, contracture of right hand, adult failure to thrive, and end stage renal disease (ESRD). Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact.During an interview on 07/29/25 at 10:50 AM with Resident #3, she stated that she was not getting any stronger and still weak. She stated she was informed that she would continue with exercises, but the facility staff had done nothing. Review of Resident #3's therapy note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policies titled Bathing and Dressing Policy and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Policy, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided at least twice a week as scheduled for one (1) resident of three (3) sampled residents for ADLs (Resident #66). The findings include:Resident #66 was admitted to the facility 11/14/24 with diagnoses that included unspecified atrial fibrillation, cerebrovascular disease, and moderate persistent asthma. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 was cognitively intact. Resident #66 did not exhibit any mood or behavior symptoms and did not resist or refuse care. The resident required partial/moderate assistance with showering/bathing. During an interview on 07/29/25 at 11:48 AM, Resident #66 stated that she had trouble getting showers twice a week, mostly on nights when there was a male and a female Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) scheduled to work. She stated sometimes the female…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, and review of the facility's Wound Care and Dressing Change-Clinical Protocol policy, facility staff failed to identify, treat, and/or implement appropriate measures to prevent friction-related skin tear/injuries during showering or personal care, in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed, with fragile skin susceptible to injury (Resident #18).The findings include:1. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia without behavioral, peripheral vascular disease and glaucoma. During an observation and interview on 07/29/25 at 2:41 PM, Resident #18 sat in his room in a recliner chair with both legs elevated engaging with his sister. The resident's ankles were swollen and the skin on his lower legs were dry with dark pin-head size scabs. There was a two-centimeter redden/open and moist area on his left lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, and review of the facility's Restorative Nursing Care, policy, facility staff failed to provide or re-evaluate appropriate restorative treatment and services to increase, maintain and/or prevent decrease in range of motion (ROM) and/or mobility for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for limited ROM and/or mobility (Resident #s 45).The findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting the left non-dominate side, morbid obesity, spinal stenosis and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the Resident #45's cognition was moderately impaired. The resident was dependent on staff to assist with activities of daily living (ADLs), for substantial assistance for bed mobility and transfers. During an observation and interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Fall Risk Reduction and Management, the facility staff failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were resident-centered, practicable, consistently implemented, and that adequate supervision was provided to prevent falls for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed with a history of multiple falls (Residents' #18 and #33). Additionally, staff failed to document its assessment and safety education for the use of smokeless (chewing) tobacco and offer nicotine cessation alternatives for one (1) of one (1) resident who used smokeless tobacco (Resident #71). The findings include: 1. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia without behavioral, peripheral vascular disease and glaucoma. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18's cognition was severely impaired. The ambulated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Dialysis Services and the Nursing Home Dialysis Transfer Agreement, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of one (1) sampled residents reviewed for dialysis services had coordinated care with the dialysis center to include communication between both facilities regarding the assessment of the resident pre and post dialysis for any changes in condition and/or for any complications and providing updates to the health care provider and dialysis center regarding missed dialysis visits to ensure appropriate interventions were developed and followed (Resident #3) . The findings include: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis three days per week, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, contracture of right hand, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the Medication Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of the facility's policy titled Social Services-Behavioral Health Services and Trauma-Informed Care, the facility failed to assess the needs of a resident with a history of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for one (1) of twenty-three (23) sampled residents (Resident# 8).The findings include:Resident #8 was admitted to the facility 06/24/24 with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type; post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); depression and type 2 diabetes.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had mild cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of PTSD; no behaviors during seven-day (7) day look back period and was independent with activities of daily living (ADLS).Review of the medical record revealed, there were no specific assessment that addressed Resident #8's specific needs to related to the PTSD diagnosis to minimize triggers and to prevent re-traumatization of the resident.During observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and a review of the facility's Referrals to Outside Agencies policy, facility staff failed to assess residents' dental care needs and did not assist with coordinating, scheduling, or rescheduling routine or emergency dental evaluations for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed. This included one resident with a missing upper denture (Resident #45) and another with broken and decayed teeth (Resident #70). The findings include: 1.Resident #70 was admitted to the facility 10/07/24 with diagnoses that included acute osteomyelitis left ankle and foot, heart failure, and Alzheimer's disease, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure. Review of the significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 had moderately impaired cognition, required partial/moderate assistance with eating and substantial/maximal assistance with oral hygiene, had obvious or likely cavities or broken natural teeth, and had not lost weight. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolatedHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of three (3) residents were provided their visitation rights. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Complete Traumatic Amputation to Left Lower Leg and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. He was cognitively intact. During and interview on 3/10/25 at 3:52 PM, Resident #1's wife stated she was not allowed to visit her husband at the facility inside or outside of the facility. She stated she had been visiting her husband several days prior to the interview and was stung or bitten by something in the resident's room. It must have come through the screen of the window we had open. She indicated she had been sitting in the window seat. She stated she began itching and having an allergic reaction to the bite so I told the staff. Resident #1's wife indicated that the facility Administrator, told her at the time of the incident, You must have some type of parasite and need to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of facility documents, and review of the facility policy entitled Transfers and Discharges Policy, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) was provided a discharge notice giving at least a 30-day notice of discharge and contained the necessary information required in the notice. Resident #1 was given a 48- hour discharge notice. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Complete Traumatic Amputation to Left Lower Leg and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. He was cognitively intact. During an interview on 4/8/25 at 9:00 AM, Resident #1 stated on 3/21/25, he was given a 48-hour discharge notice by the Assistant Administrator (AA) with no explanation. He stated later that afternoon, he was provided a 30-day discharge notice, with no explanation other than she had stated to him. He stated he was not provided information on an appeals process in either notices he received. He stated the notices informed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of facility documents, and review of the facility policy entitled TCC Nursing Services - Care Plans - Nursing Facility Policy, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) or the resident's representative received notification of care plan meetings. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Complete Traumatic Amputation to Left Lower Leg and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. He was cognitively intact. During an interview on 3/10/25 at 3:52 PM, Resident #1's wife stated she had never received a notice of a care plan meeting. She stated she specifically asked to be invited to the care plan meeting on Resident #1's admission to the facility. She stated Resident #1 had not received a notice of a care plan meeting. During an interview on 4/8/25 at 9:00 AM, Resident #1 stated he and not received a notice of a care plan meeting. He stated I finally have a care plan now. They had a meeting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and review of the facility's policy titled Wound Care and Dressing Changes - Clinical Protocol Policy, the failed to ensure one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #6) received wound care daily as ordered by the physician. The findings include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility 01/08/25 with diagnoses including heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and end stage renal disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had moderately impaired cognition and had one (1) stage 2 pressure ulcer and two (2) unstageable deep tissue injuries. Review of the Initial Evaluation Note from the facility physician revealed Resident #6 was transferred from a hospital and admitted to the facility for short-term rehab. The resident had a history of triple vessel coronary artery disease and was not a candidate for surgery. The resident was on dialysis for chronic kidney disease stage 5, chronic renal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, interview, and review of the facility policy titled General Guidelines for Medication Administration Policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident received three (3) doses of an ordered medication that was required to prevent an allergic reaction during a procedure for one (1) resident of 10 residents reviewed (Resident #6). The finding included: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility 01/08/25 with diagnoses that included: heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and end stage renal disease. Review of the electronic health record revealed Resident #6 was allergic to iodine, iodine containing products, and Conray (radiopaque contrast dye used in radiographic procedures). The resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of a Nurses Note for Resident #6 dated 03/26/25 at 10:22 PM, written by Registered Nurse (RN) #2 revealed, .Received call from [Vascular physician office] regarding an appointment on 3/30/25. Pre op instructions faxed over to writer, emailed to ADON [Assistant Director of Nursing] and to transport.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility policy entitled Cleaning and Disinfection Policies and Practices Policy, the facility failed to ensure a blood glucose monitor was properly cleaned and disinfected for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #2) observed after a blood glucose monitoring. The findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. He was moderately cognitively impaired. During an observation and simultaneous interview on 4/8/25 at 8:54 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 was observed exiting room [ROOM NUMBER] and returning to an insulin cart with a glucometer. She wiped the glucometer with an Oxivir TB wipe for five (5) seconds and then immediately placed the glucometer inside the cart into a plastic cup. She stated the proper amount of time to clean and disinfect the glucometer was one (1) minute. She confirmed she had not cleaned and disinfected the glucometer for the full one (1) minute wet/contact time.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and test tray evaluation, the facility failed to ensure food and beverages were served at an appetizing temperature for residents who ate breakfast in their rooms and had the potential to affect 55 of 55 residents in the facility. The findings include: Review of an anonymous complaint revealed residents who ate breakfast in their room did not receive hot food. Review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes from February 2024 through July 2024 revealed the resident council met on a regular basis and the Activity Director documented the meeting minutes and attendance. Concerns regarding food included the following: 07/30/24 - Food trays are still coming out late and cold - will follow up with dietary supervisor. 06/27/24 - Food trays are still coming out late and cold - will follow up with dietary supervisor. Residents are concerned about the food trays coming out late and cold. (Name of Dietary Manager) spoke with residents about staffing issues and why trays are late on the halls. 05/28/24 - Breakfast and lunch trays are late residents say at times. 04/25/24 -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, confidential interviews, staff interview, and review of the Nursing Home Dialysis Transfer Agreement and Nursing Services-Dialysis Services Policy, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident A) reviewed for dialysis services had coordinated care with the dialysis center and communication between both facilities was established to ensure any changes in condition, complications and/or changes in the plan of care were monitored to ensure appropriate interventions were developed and followed. The findings include: Resident A was admitted to the facility 9/26/24 with diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease, Hypertension, Anemia, Dementia, Absence of Left Foot, Anxiety and Type II Diabetes. The resident was discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Resident A was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Minimum Data Set had not been completed. During a confidential interview on 10/11/24 at 1:37 p.m., an anonymous complainant reported Resident A was taken to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0582 — widespreadGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, review of facility documents, and review of a facility policy entitled TCC Administrative - Advance Beneficiary Notices, Beneficiary Appeal Rights, and Expedited Review Policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were issued a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage form for 12 of 12 residents (Resident #s 15, 20, 29, 32, 46, 51, 112, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263) who no longer qualified for Medicare part A and had days remaining. The findings include: During an interview on 08/22/24 at 12:41 PM, the [NAME] Specialist stated she started at the facility on 08/05/24. She stated since she began as [NAME] Specialist, she had not sent any NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) notices. She stated she was not aware it was her responsibility to send out NOMNC notices and had no understanding of the NOMNC and who should have received them. During an interview on 08/22/24 at 01:13 PM, the Administrator stated the [NAME] Specialist was responsible for making sure NOMNC notices were sent out. She stated she was unaware NOMNCs were not being sent. She confirmed the above listed 12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-22 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and review of the Facility Assessment the facility failed to ensure the required parties were involved in developing the Facility Assessment, failed to ensure the staffing plan was provided per unit as required, failed to address resources necessary to grandfather residents who smoke, and did not clearly state staff competencies and required training, which had the potential to affect 56 of 56 residents. The findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment revealed it was revised 4/1/24 and updated 7/25/24. The persons involved in completing the assessment were listed as the Administrator, the Director of Nursing (DON), the Medical Director and a Governing Board Member. There was no indication that direct care staff were involved in completing the assessment or that the facility solicited and considered input from residents, resident representatives and family members. Further review revealed that the staffing plan listed the number of Floor Nurses (Registered Nurse or Licensed Practical Nurse), Medication Aides, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, review of the dish machine operation manual, review of dish machine temperature logs, review of work orders, and review of the facility's policy TCC Dining Services - Warewashing - Dish Machine Policy, the facility failed to ensure the dish machine in the dietary department had a functioning wash temperature gauge which affected 56 of 56 residents in the facility. The findings include: During an observation and interview in the dietary department on 08/21/24 at 9:40 AM, the dish machine had two gauges, one for the wash cycle and one for the rinse cycle. The wash cycle gauge had a minimum required temperature of 150 degrees Fahrenheit (F) stamped under the dial. The kitchen staff ran a rack of dishes through the dish machine and the wash temperature read 146 F on the gauge. The staff ran a second rack of dishes through the washer, and the wash temperature on the gauge read 144 F. The Assistant Dietary Manager (ADM) confirmed the instructions on the machine indicated the wash temperature was to be 150 F minimum and stated the wash temperature never…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the resident group interview, review of resident council meeting minutes, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure grievances voiced in the group meeting were promptly acted upon and responded back to the resident group to address issues regarding cold food for six (6) of nine (9) residents who attended and participated in the group interview. The findings include: Review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes from February 2024 through July 2024 revealed the resident council met on a regular basis and the Activity Director documented the meeting minutes and attendance. Concerns regarding food included the following: 07/30/24 - Food trays are still coming out late and cold - will follow up with dietary supervisor. 06/27/24 - Food trays are still coming out late and cold - will follow up with dietary supervisor. Residents are concerned about the food trays coming out late and cold. (Name of Dietary Manager) spoke with residents about staffing issues and why trays are late on the halls. 05/28/24 - Breakfast and lunch trays are late residents say at times. 04/25/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide residents an opportunity to formulate advanced directives for four (4) residents of 18 sample residents (Residents #33, #31, #112 and #9). The findings include: 1. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including non-ST elevation (NSTEMI) myocardial infarction (heart attack). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the Advance Directive and Code Status Acknowledgement of Receipt form in Resident #33's chart revealed Resident #33 signed the form 05/01/24 and marked I have chosen to formulate and issue Advance Directives. The resident indicated on the document that a Living Will and Do Not Resuscitate had been formulated. The form was signed by the admission Coordinator on 05/01/24. Review of the electronic medical record and the resident's chart revealed there were no copies of a Living Will available. A Do Not Resuscitate Order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. There were five (5) medication errors out of 31 opportunities for a medication error rate of 16.13%. The findings include: On 08/19/24 at 4:45 PM Licensed Practical Nurse ((LPN) #3 was observed administering 12 units of LISPRO Insulin to Resident #49 using an insulin pen. LPN #3 did not prime the insulin pen prior to administration. On 08/19/24 at 5:00 PM Registered Nurse (RN) #3 was observed administering 22 units of FIASP Insulin to Resident #4 using an insulin pen. RN #3 did not prime the insulin pen prior to administration. During an interview on 08/19/24 at 5:58 PM LPN #3 confirmed she just dialed up the 12 units of insulin and administered the insulin. She confirmed she did not prime the insulin pen and stated that she was not aware it needed to be primed. During an interview on 08/19/24 at 6:10 PM RN #3 confirmed she dialed up the 22 units of insulin and administered the insulin without priming the insulin pen. She confirmend that she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, record review, and review of the facility's Resident Rights, the facility failed to promote dignity by ensuring a resident was dressed for one (1) resident of 19 sample residents (Resident #112). The findings include: Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis (kidney infection) and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. During an observation and interview on 08/20/24 at 09:45 AM, Resident #112 was in bed with a cover pulled up to his chin. The resident stated he didn't have any clothes on because his clothes had gotten dirty. He stated he had clean shirts in his closet, but staff had not helped him get dressed and he would like to have clothes on. The resident pulled the cover down to show his shoulders and chest were bare. The resident stated all he was wearing was a pull up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy titled, Resident Funds Policy, the facility failed to ensure a quarterly statement was provided to one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for personal funds (Resident #9). The findings include: Resident #9 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed on 07/16/24 revealed that the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS revealed that Resident #9 was the primary respondent. The resident's face sheet revealed Resident #9 was his own responsible party. The medical record did not reflect that Resident #9 had requested or appointed another representative to receive the personal fund statements, nor an appointed legal financial representative. During an interview on 08/20/24 at 10:34 AM, Resident #9 stated he did not receive a quarterly statement of his monies. During an interview on 08/22/24 at 12:56 PM, [NAME] Specialist #1 stated she had been in her role for two weeks and was still determining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a worn and soiled mattress was replaced and failed to ensure a soiled slipper pan was cleaned or replaced for one (1) of 22 sampled residents (Resident #14). The findings include: On 08/20/24 at 10:46 AM Resident #14's mattress was observed. There was an approximately 3 foot long by 2 foot wide worn discolored area on her mattress. The mattress was green, but the worn area was grey brown and appeared dirty. There was also a slipper pan in her bathroom that had brown matter residue inside the slipper pan. It was sitting on top of a package of briefs. Photographic evidence obtained. On 08/22/24 at 6:40 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) observed the photos of Resident #14's mattress and slipper pan and stated that the Certified Nursing Assistants should have reported the poor condition of the mattress, and it should have been changed out for a new one. She also stated that the slipper pan should have been discarded and replaced with a new one.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of the facility's procedure entitled Instructions for Residents to Transfer to Hospital, and review of the facility's policy TCC Social Services - Transfers and Discharges Policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident received notification of the reason for transfer to the hospital for one (1) resident of three (3) sample residents (Resident #112). The findings include: Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute pyelonephritis (kidney infection) and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of a Nurses Note dated 07/03/24 at 07:47 PM revealed, CNA [Certified Nurse Aide] staff reported to this nurse resident was not responding appropriately to them. Immediately assessed resident and resident was unable to speak, eyes were not reactive to light, resident unable to grip bilaterally,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility's procedure entitled Instructions for Residents to Transfer to Hospital, the facility failed to ensure a resident received notification of the facility's bed hold policy on transfer to the hospital for one (1) resident of three (3) sample residents (Resident #112). The findings include: Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute pyelonephritis (kidney infection) and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of a Nurses Note dated 07/03/24 at 07:47 PM revealed, CNA [Certified Nurse Aide] staff reported to this nurse resident was not responding appropriately to them. Immediately assessed resident and resident was unable to speak, eyes were not reactive to light, resident unable to grip bilaterally, upper extremities flaccid, and respiration was shallow .Notified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to submit a referral for Level 2 PASSAR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) Evaluation for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #42) with an expired Level 2 PASSAR who remained in the facility. The findings include: Resident #42 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms; anxiety disorder; post-traumatic stress disorder; and type 2 diabetes mellites. He was admitted for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation. Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #42 was admitted with a PASSAR Level 2 for short term admission which expired [DATE]. The most recent PASSAR Level 2 approval was also for short term admission and expired [DATE]. There was no evidence within the medical record to indicate the facility had submitted a referral for another Level 2 evaluation to extend approval past the [DATE] expiration date. During an interview with the Social Worker on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observations, and review of the facility policy TCC Nursing Services - Safe Lifting and Moving of Residents Policy, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1. falls interventions, and 2. after a change in condition for two (2) residents of 19 sample residents (Residents #51 and #112). The findings include: 1. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, was not ambulatory, required substantial/maximal assistance for transfers, and had a history of falls. Review of a Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #51 revealed a fall risk score of 12, with a score of 10 or greater indicating the resident was a high risk for falls. Review of an Incident Note dated 02/08/2024 at 06:58 PM revealed, The nurse was alerted to the dayroom by a CNA [Certified Nurse Aide].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observations, and review of staff training, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aides were competent to report changes in condition to the nurse for one (1) resident of 19 sample residents (Resident #112). The findings include: Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute pyelonephritis (kidney infection) and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. Review of the significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Functional ability for sit to stand, chair/bed-to-chair transfer, and toilet transfer was not assessed due to the resident's medical condition or safety concerns. Resident #122 was dependent for tub/shower transfer. Review of Resident #112's care plan last revised 07/22/24 revealed the resident required assistance of one (1) person for transfers. During an observation and interview on 08/20/24 at 09:45 AM, Resident #112 stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff and Medical Director interview, record review, and review of facility policy the facility failed to 1) ensure medication was available as ordered for two (2) of five (5) residents (Resident #s 14 and 9) reviewed for unnecessary medications and failed to 2) ensure a staff member followed facility policy to sign off the controlled count sheet immediately after dispensing a controlled medication for one (1) of two (2) staff observed dispensing controlled medication. The findings include: 1) Review of the August 2024 Medication Administration Record for Resident #14 revealed the resident's Duloxetine DR 20 mg (milligram) capsules twice daily for anxiety was documented as not given due to waiting on pharmacy, three (3) evenings in a row on August 13th, 14th and 15th. Review of the August 2024 Medication Administration Record for Resident #9 revealed the resident's Xifaxan 550 mg 1 tablet twice daily for liver disease was documented as not given due to meds not available from pharmacy, or waiting on pharmacy, or on order on 5 evenings August 1st, 2nd and 3rd and August 17th…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the manufacturer's Prescribing Information the facility failed to ensure in-use insulin was dated when opened and dated with an accurate Do Not Use After date, and failed to ensure an inhaler medication was dated when opened for one (1) of three (3) medication carts (Hall D). The findings include: On 8/19/24 at 4:30 PM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 was observed opening a new LISPRO Insulin Pen for Resident #49. LPN #3 wrote the opened date as 08/19/24 and the Do Not Use After date as 10/18/24 (60 days after opened date). During an interview on 08/19/24 at 5:48 PM LPN #3 confirmed she had documented the discard date for Resident #49's LISPRO Insulin Pen as 60 days after opening because she thought that was how long it could still be used after opening. After looking up the information she confirmed 60 days was not correct and the opened LISPRO could only be used for 28 days. She revised the Do Not Use After date to 9/16/24 (28 days). An observation of the Hall D medication cart on 08/19/24 at 6:07 PM, with LPN #3 present,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, the facility failed to 1) implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for one (1) of one (1) resident admitted with a pressure ulcer (Resident #31); and failed to 2) ensure a single resident use glucometer was cleaned and disinfected according to facility policy and the sanitizing wipes manufacturers instructions for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #49). The findings include: 1. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included pressure ulcers. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed on 08/01/24 revealed Resident #31 was admitted with one (1) stage 2 and one (1) stage 3 pressure ulcer. The MDS reflected that the resident had one (1) unstageable pressure ulcer with slough and/or eschar and one (1) unstageable pressure ulcer with suspected deep tissue injury in evolution present on admission. The MDS Care Area Assessment revealed that pressure ulcers were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident, family and staff interview and review of the Facility Assessment, the facility failed to have sufficient nurse staffing to meet activities of daily living needs and preferences of residents for five (5) of seven (7) sample residents (Resident #'s 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) and failed to meet the facility's planned Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) staffing ratio of 1:13 on the night shift (7:00 PM - 7:00 AM) on seven (7) of 56 nights. In addition, on the A and D halls the ratio was consistently over 1:13. The facility also failed to meet the planned number of Nurses on night shift for 16 of 56 nights during the period 5/18/24 - 7/20/24. The findings include: During an interview with Resident #2 on 7/16/24 at 7:25 PM, she stated that she liked to receive showers on night shift around 3:00 or 4:00 AM (as care planned) but on Sunday (7/14/24) she was unable get her shower because the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was too busy. She stated that there were not enough staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility Resident's Rights document, the facility failed to ensure the resident's dignity was maintained during medication administration for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed (Resident #8). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff did not call out from across the room to prompt/encourage residents to eat for four (4) of nine (9) sampled residents (Resident #s 2, 3, 4, and 8); and did not engage in personal conversation or discuss another resident, while assisting Resident #5 with her meal. The findings include: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's and non-traumatic brain dysfunction. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was severely impaired. During an observation on 04/15/24 at 12:27 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 assisted Resident #5 with lunch and simultaneously discussed funeral arrangements for Resident #1 (who had expired on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and review of the facility's policies, titled Handwashing and Hand Hygiene and Cleaning of Glucometer, the facility failed to ensure staff cleaned and disinfected the glucometers prior to use for two (2) of two (2) residents observed (Resident #s 3 and 8). The facility also failed to ensure staff washed/sanitized their hands between direct contact with four (4) of nine (9) sampled residents (Resident #s 2, 3, 4, and 5), and assisted residents with hand hygiene before and after the meal for nine (9) of nine (9) residents in the Memory Care Unit's dining room, (Resident #s 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 11). The findings include: 1. Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's and non-traumatic brain dysfunction. Review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5's cognition was severely impaired, and the resident was fully dependent on staff for personal hygiene . Including washing/drying face and hands . 2. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, review of facility policy, and review of the IDF (International Diabetes Federation) Clinical Practice Recommendations for Managing Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care - 2017, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to facility policy and standard of practice for 21 of 25 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #7, #8, #9, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24 and #25). The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility 08/08/19 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, asthma, and insomnia. Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for September 2023 revealed the following physician's orders: Accu Check (fingerstick blood sugar check) check blood sugar before meals and at bedtime, written 12/31/20. Basaglar 100 units/milliliter (ml) Kwikpen (long-acting insulin) inject 34 units every day for diabetes mellitus, written 09/08/23. Novolog Flexpen 100 units/ml (short-acting insulin) inject 20 units with breakfast and lunch, and inject 18 units with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, review of staffing schedules, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure adequate staff were available to administer medications within the 2-hour medication administration time for 21 of 25 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #7, #8, #9, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24 and #25). Cross reference to F-658 all examples. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility 08/08/19 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, asthma, and insomnia. Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Med Pass Details for September 2023 revealed the resident's medications were not administered according to scheduled times on 09/17/23, 09/26/23, and 09/27/23 with deviations ranging up to 2 hours and 44 minutes from the scheduled medication administration time. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility 02/15/22 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, senile degeneration of the brain, dementia, angina, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement committee implemented a plan to correct repeated occurrences of nursing staff failing to administer medications within the established 2-hour medication administration time for 21 of 25 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #7, #8, #9, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24 and #25). Cross reference to F-658 and F-725 all examples. The findings include: Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Med Pass Details for September 2023 revealed the resident's medications were not administered according to scheduled times for 3 of 9 days reviewed: 09/17/23, 09/26/23, and 09/27/23. Review of Resident #2's MARs and Med Pass Details for September and October 2023 revealed the resident's medications were not administered according to scheduled times for 3 of 9 days reviewed: 09/19/23, 09/25/23, and 10/11/23. Review of Resident #3's MARs and Med Pass Details for August, September, and October…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility policy entitled Medication Storge, the facility failed to ensure unattended medications were secure on two (2) of three (3) hallways. The findings include: During an observation on 10/11/23 at 08:23 PM of the Memory Care Unit day room, the medication cart was observed unlocked and unattended. Registered Nurse (RN) #1 was not in the day room where the cart was located. There were two (2) Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) in and out of the day room during this observation. During an interview on 10/11/23 at 08:30 PM, RN #1 stated the medication cart was to be locked when she left the room. During an interview on 10/11/23 at 08:48 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated it was her expectation medication carts were to be locked when not in use. During an interview with Resident #14 on 10/12/23 at 5:15 PM, Resident #14 stated that a medication bottle had been left in his room on his nightstand last night. Resident #14 stated that he had given the medication to License Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 this morning. Interview with LPN #3 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-21 · tag F0570 — widespreadAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and review of the facility's surety bond, the facility failed to ensure to balances for the resident trust account did not exceed insured amount for 12 of 13 months reviewed. The findings include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility 01/04/06 with diagnoses including: Other Hemorrhagic Disorder Due to Intrinsic Circulating Anticoagulants, Antibodies, or Inhibitors, Hypertension, and Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. During an interview on 09/21/23 at 01:15 PM, the Skilled Nursing Facility [NAME] Specialist stated they were bonded up to $80,000 to cover resident fund losses. She confirmed June, July, August, October, November, and December of 2022 and January - July of 2023, the facility's resident accounts had exceeded the amount of the surety bond. During an interview on 09/21/23 at 02:56 PM the Interim Director confirmed resident accounts for the months listed above were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, review of the facility documents, and review of the facility policy entitled Resident Funds Accounting, the facility failed to ensure funds in excess of $50 were in an interest-bearing account for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #6) reviewed. The findings include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility 01/04/06 with diagnoses including: Other Hemorrhagic Disorder Due to Intrinsic Circulating Anticoagulants, Antibodies, or Inhibitors, Hypertension, and Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. During an interview on 09/18/23 at 09:03 AM, the Skilled Nursing Facility [NAME] Specialist stated on June 9, 2023 a concern was discovered with Resident #6's billing account. She stated it was found Resident #6 had $69,852.69 in his billing account. She stated this concern began in October 2019. She stated all resident money should be in an interest-bearing account. She confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, review of the facility documents, and review of the facility policy entitled Resident Funds Accounting, the facility failed to maintain a system that assured a full and complete accounting, according to generally accepted accounting principles for resident's personal funds entrusted to the facility on the resident's behalf for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #6) reviewed for personal funds accounting. The findings include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility 01/04/06 with diagnoses including: Other Hemorrhagic Disorder Due to Intrinsic Circulating Anticoagulants, Antibodies, or Inhibitors, Hypertension, and Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. During and interview on 09/18/23 at 09:03 AM, the Skilled Nursing Facility [NAME] Specialist stated that during a recent training session with a consultant, it was discovered Resident #6 had a large amount of money in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policy entitled Resident Funds Accounting, the facility failed to ensure residents were notified when resident accounts reached $200 less than the Social Security Income (SSI) resource limit for one person for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #6) reviewed for resident trust accounts. The findings include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility 01/04/06 with diagnoses including: Other Hemorrhagic Disorder Due to Intrinsic Circulating Anticoagulants, Antibodies, or Inhibitors, Hypertension, and Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. During an interview on 09/18/23 at 09:03 AM, the Skilled Nursing Facility [NAME] Specialist stated on June 9th it was discovered Resident #6's had $69,852.69 in his billing account and $24,491.33 in his trust account. She stated Resident #6 had reached the maximum limit of $2000 in October 2019. She confirmed there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to allow six (6) of sixteen (16) residents to choose where to eat their evening meal (Resident #'s 2, 13, 22, 32, 43, and 47). The findings include: During an observation on 09/18/23 at 05:10 PM, there were many residents moving in the hallways; some were coming from the dining room towards their rooms, talking to one another and with other residents, and discussing or informing other residents that they had been informed by staff residents were eating in their rooms that evening. Residents that overheard and/or were seen moving back to their rooms included Residents #2, #13, #22, #32, #43, #47. Resident #47 appeared confused asking where she was supposed to go and telling Resident #25 they were eating in their room. Resident #13 stated all the residents had to eat in their room tonight, but did not know why and was not given an explanation. They just said we are eating in our rooms tonight. She preferred to eat in the dining room on this night. During an interview on 09/18/23 at 05:23 PM, Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the resident group interview, review of resident council meeting minutes, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure grievances voiced in the group meeting were promptly acted upon and responded back to the resident group to address issues regarding missing items, menus, wander guards, and mail delivery for twelve (12) of fifty (50) residents who attended the group interview. The findings include: A review of the resident council meeting minutes from January 2023-June 2023 revealed the resident council met on a regular basis and staff documented the meeting minutes. The minutes recorded staff and resident attendance but did not include documentation for old business, resident rights, changes to facility policy, all which were sections on the form. In January 2023, the staff member taking the notes did document the group inquired about the menu change, but the following month, there was no documentation of follow up in the minutes. A group interview was conducted on 07/11/23 at 1:32 PM. Twelve (12) alert and oriented residents participated in the discussion (two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0572 — patternGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and resident group and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure twelve (12) of twelve (12) residents that attended the group interview out of the fifty (50) residents that resided in the facility, were aware of resident's rights (Resident #s' 4, 5, 15, 16, 17, 22, 25, 28, 32, 34, 36, and 43). The findings include: During the group interview, conducted on 07/11/23 at 1:32 PM, twelve (12) of twelve (12) residents in attendance indicated the facility did not discuss resident's rights with them and they were unaware of their rights. Review of the resident council meeting minutes form, revealed a section entitled Resident Rights Reviewed. This section was left blank on all meeting minutes dated back to January 2023. During an interview on 07/12/23 at 7:58 AM, the Activities Director (AD) indicated he was new to his position and had not discussed resident's rights at the meeting he conducted but would do so at future meetings.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0573 — patternLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and resident group and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure ten (10) of twelve (12) residents in the group interview were aware they had the right to review their medical record. The findings include: During the group interview, conducted on 07/11/23 at 1:32 PM, ten (10) of twelve (12) residents indicated they were not allowed to view their own medical record. Resident Z said, They tell us it is confidential. I would like to see my medications. Resident A said, Since it is on the computer, they won't let us see. Six (6) of the ten (10) residents who were unaware they could view their medical record indicated they would like to see their record. During an interview on 07/12/23 at 7:58 AM, the Activities Director (AD) indicated he was new to the position and had not discussed medical records with the Resident Council. He confirmed a discussion about medical record review was not included in the last six months of resident council meeting minutes.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and resident group and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure twelve (12) of twelve (12) residents that attended the group interview out of the fifty (50) residents that resided in the facility, were aware of how to contact pertinent regulatory agencies to file a complaint, were aware of the Ombudsman program and how to contact the Ombudsman, and were unaware of any posting in the facility on how to contact regulatory agencies. The findings include: During the group interview, conducted on 07/11/23 at 1:32 PM, twelve (12) of twelve (12) residents indicated they were unaware of how to contact pertinent regulatory agencies to file a complaint, were unaware of the Ombudsman program or how to contact the Ombudsman, and were unaware of any posting in the facility on how to contact regulatory agencies. Resident Z said, What is an Ombudsman? I've never heard of it. Resident A said, I think you just have to report to the big boss. During an interview on 07/12/23 at 7:58 AM, the Activities Director (AD) indicated he was new to the position and had not discussed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and resident group and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure twelve (12) of twelve (12) residents that attended the group interview out of the fifty (50) residents that resided in the facility, were aware of their right to review the facility's inspection results and were aware of the location of the inspection results. The findings include: During the group interview, conducted on 07/11/23 at 1:32 PM, twelve (12) of twelve (12) residents indicated they were not unaware of where the inspection results were located or that they could review the results. Resident F said, I would like to read them. Can you give me a copy? The Resident Council President asked, Could the report be read in our meeting? I want a copy too. Resident Z said, They really don't want us to know if something happens here. They are afraid we will tell our family. During an interview on 07/12/23 at 7:58 AM, the Activities Director (AD) confirmed a discussion about the facility's inspection results was not included in the last six (6) months of resident council meeting minutes.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of the facility's policy titled Advance Beneficiary Notices, Beneficiary Appeal Rights, and Expedited Review, the facility failed to provide a Notice of Medicare Non Coverage for three (3) of three (3) residents (Resident #'s 5, 34, and 53) reviewed for Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage. The findings include: During an interview on 07/13/23 at 3:25 PM, the Fiscal Coordinator (FC) stated she was unaware of the Notice of Medicare Non Coverage (NOMNC) form until today (07/13/23). She stated Resident #'s 5, 34, and 53 were not provided a NOMNC form two (2) days prior to services ending. During an interview on 07/13/23 at 3:40 PM, the Administrator in Training (AIT) #2 confirmed Resident #'s 5, 34, and 53 were not provided a NOMNC form. She confirmed residents would have no way of knowing their Medicare coverage had ended until they received a bill. During an interview on 07/13/23 at 3:50 PM, the Administrator stated she was informed today, 07/13/23, that NOMNC forms were not being completed. She stated she was aware of the process and confirmed it was her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the group interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an ongoing program to support residents in their choice for evening and weekend activities for ten (10) of twelve (12) residents in the group interview. The findings include: During the group interview, conducted on 07/11/23 at 1:32 PM, ten (10) residents in attendance complained there were no evening or weekend activities. Resident C said, There is nothing to do after the administrative staff goes home. The activities end at 3 PM. Resident Z said, All we can do is go to our room. Resident A said, We love the new Activities Director, but we would like to have more outings and things on the weekend. Review of the May 2023 activity calendar revealed that on three (3) days in May no activities were planned after 10:30 AM during the weekdays and then on the remaining days no activities were planned after 2:30 PM. On Saturdays, the exact same activities were offered each week: 9:00 AM Coffee Cart, 10:30 AM Puzzles/Coloring and 2:30 PM Slushies and Snack. On Sundays, the following was offered:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a qualified activities professional, to direct the provision of activities to residents, was employed by the facility which had the potential to affect forty-three (43) of fifty (50) residents who regularly attended activities in the facility. The findings include: During an interview with the Activities Director (AD) and Administrator on 07/12/23 at 7:58 AM, the AD indicated he had been in the position since June of 2023. He further indicated he was not a certified recreational therapist and had no recreational program experience. He also indicated he did not have a consultant. The Administrator indicated that the facility had attempted to enroll the AD in a certification program, but he had been wait listed for the class. At the time of the interview, the facility did not have a date the AD would participate in the class. The Administrator indicated she had many years of experience and was assisting the AD with learning the position. She confirmed the facility did not have a qualified consultant for the activities department…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to promote quality of life and promote dignity for two (2) of eighteen (18) sampled residents. Resident #43 was not given an explanation when a wander guard was placed on her ankle which embarrassed her and made her feel like she didn't want to leave her room at the facility. Resident #12 was not provided dignity in dining when staff stood over the resident during meal observations. The findings include: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility 03/22/23 with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder, Hypertension, Insomnia, Heart Failure and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had some short-term and long-term memory problems, was independent with most activities of daily living, had no wander/elopement alarm used, it was very important for her to go outside for fresh air, and had no behaviors. During an interview with Resident #43 on 07/10/23 at 3:25 PM, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy titled Advance Directive, the facility failed to formulate or provide an opportunity to formulate an advance directive for two (2) of seven (7) residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident's #11 and 13). The findings include: 1. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Psychotic Disorder with Hallucinations due to known physical condition, and Hypertension. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed a Full Code status, but no information about advance directives documentation. 2. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Benign Neoplasm of the Meninges, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Depression. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed the Tsali Care Center Advanced Directive and Code Status Acknowledgement of Receipt form was incomplete. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to refer residents for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) evaluation and determination for specialized services, for two (2) of two (2) residents admitted with serious mental disorder(s) (Resident's #16 and 28). The findings include: 1. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Anxiety. Review of Resident #16 's medical record revealed a PASARR history that included the resident's last submitted PASARR Level I on 03/25/15. There was no referral or completed Level II PASARR evaluation since that date. 2. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depressive disorder. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed a PASRR history that included the resident last submitted PASARR Level I on 10/26/18. There was no referral or completed Level II PASARR evaluation since…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan with realistic interventions for one (1) of eighteen (18) sampled residents (Resident #43) related to elopement risk and use of a wander guard. The findings include: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility 03/22/23 with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder, Hypertension, Insomnia, Heart Failure and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had some short-term and long-term memory problems, was independent with most activities of daily living, had no wander/elopement alarm used, it was very important for her to go outside for fresh air, and had no behaviors. During an interview with Resident #43 on 07/10/23 at 3:25 PM, she stated that she had a wander guard placed on her ankle. She said, They told me I had to wear it. I was not given a choice. I don't try to leave. I don't go where I am not supposed to go. I feel like a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure Oxygen in Use signs were posted for two (2) out of five (5) residents observed who received Oxygen (Resident's #13 and #254). The findings include: 1.Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Benign Neoplasm of the Meninges, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Depression. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an order dated 06/01/23, May use oxygen (O2) at two (2) Liters per minute (LPM) prn as needed for Shortness of Breath (SOB), may titrate up to 4 LPM to keep oxygen saturations (the measurement of oxygen in the blood) greater than (>) 89 % and a care plan for Oxygen therapy. Resident #13 was observed sitting in the bed on 07/11/23 at 8:48 AM and 07/13/23 at 9:25 AM wearing oxygen at two (2) LPM via nasal cannula. During those observations there was no Oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure administrative staff and the provider on-call were notified to address a possible change in emotional well-being and difficulty adjusting to living in a skilled nursing facility for (1) of eighteen (18) sampled residents (Resident #34). The findings include: Resident #34 was admitted to the facility 06/16/23 with diagnoses of Right Below Knee Amputation, Heart Failure, Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes, and Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive deficits and had no mood or behavioral issues. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following Nurses Note, dated 07/08/23, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported to nurse while setting his tray up and cutting up his cabbage roll, resident became agitated .Tray ended up on floor. Nurse came and deescalated situation. Explained to resident staff was trying to make it easier…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to ensure that the indwelling catheter tubing was not on the floor for one (1) of three (3) residents sampled for indwelling catheters (Resident #34) and that staff performed hand hygiene and changed gloves during wound care for one (1) of one (1) resident sampled for pressure ulcers (Resident #23). The findings include: 1. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility 06/16/23 with diagnoses of Right Below Knee Amputation, Heart Failure, Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes, and Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety. Review of the resident's medical record revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. The MDS revealed the resident had a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) in the past 30 days. Resident #34 was observed on 07/11/23 at 1:30 PM seated in his wheelchair in the day room. The resident's catheter tubing was dragging the floor under his wheelchair. The tubing was filled with cloudy urine that had sediment. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$157,555 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $11,047 — penalty dated 2025-07-31
- $15,028 — penalty dated 2025-04-10
- $12,542 — penalty dated 2024-07-31
- $118,938 — penalty dated 2024-07-31
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-29 for 81 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DANDO, JONATHAN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 09/09/2002 |
| COOPER, CASEY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/09/2002 |
| CHEROKEE INDIAN HOSPITAL AUTHORITY | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/01/2019 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $712K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NC
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345475. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.