No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Fuquay-Varina Health and Rehabilitation Center

410 S Judd Parkway SE, Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (919) 577-0421 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$76,047 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0602, F0606) — most recent Dec 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $76,047 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-18)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
231 N Judd Pkwy NE · (919) 235-6560 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
305 N Judd Pkwy NE · (919) 557-8300 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1308 N Main St · (919) 697-2277 · Call to confirm hours
Park
401 Old Honeycutt Rd · (919) 552-1400 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.6%15.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.8%7.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms22.3%5.9%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%3.5%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.3%18.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.4%21.3%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.5%94.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%5.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.8%20.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.5%14.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine68.8%78.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.8%22.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.1%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.941.781.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.591.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 92 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.72U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.33hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.28hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 131 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.6%CMS range 34.8–57.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 6.9–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge67.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 3.9–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.151.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
1.08
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.16
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.75
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
60.0%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 96.8 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-01)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff, police dispatch, physician, and responsible party (RP) interviews the facility failed to prevent a severely cognitively impaired resident (Resident #71) with known wandering behaviors and poor safety awareness from becoming trapped alone in a locked administrative staff's office with the lights off without staff's knowledge. The facility also failed to provide evidence that a thorough investigation of the incident was conducted and to put corrective measures in place after the incident to prevent a potential recurrence. This deficient practice had a high likelihood of causing Resident #71 serious physical and psychosocial harm. Resident #71 did not have the cognitive capacity to express an adverse outcome. A reasonable person would have suffered feelings of fear, anxiety, and/or helplessness from the incident. This was for 1 of 11 residents reviewed for the provision of supervision to prevent accidents. Immediate Jeopardy began on 7/26/23 when Resident #71 became…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident, staff, Physician, and pest control technician interviews the facility failed to control the presence of ants in the facility, maintain an effective pest control program, and to protect a vulnerable resident from having ants crawling on him while in bed. The resident sustained multiple ant bites/stings to his arms, torso, and upper back which resulted in the resident experiencing the discomfort of stinging and itching. Furthermore, the resident stated having ants in his bed, on him, and having been stung/bitten made him feel upset and like No one cared. The facility also failed to implement effective pest reduction measures when the ants were first observed on the resident by staff on 10-6-23. This occurred for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) observed for pest control. Immediate Jeopardy began on 10-6-23 when NA #1 first discovered red colored ants crawling on Resident #1's bed and person but had not reported the incident. Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 10-13-23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and Resident Representative (RR) and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide written information about advance directive and/or an opportunity to formulate an advance directive and to an obtain advance directive and maintain the advance directives in the medical record for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for advance directives (Residents #52 and #7). The findings included: Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #52's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the Care Plan dated 1/26/26 revealed Resident #52 had an advance directive of full code. Record reviews revealed there was no documentation in the record regarding providing information to the RR about the right to refuse medical or surgical treatment and formulate an advance directive for Resident #52. An interview with the Resident Representative (RR) on 3/31/26 at 9:30 AM revealed she had not had a representative from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of Residents Sampled - 6Number of Residents Cited - 1Based on record reviews, and staff, Guardian and physician interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not prescribed a medication to which the resident had a documented allergy for 1 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #115).Findings included: Record review of the hospital after-care summary dated 8/27/2025 through 8/30/2025 showed an allergy to Doxycycline causing shortness of breath. Record review of allergies listed on the resident banner in the electronic medical record (EMR) included Doxycycline.Review of nursing progress notes dated 1/19/2026, written by Nurse #3, stated Resident #115 tested positive for an infectious disease. The physician was made aware and a new order for Doxycycline 100 milligrams (mg) twice daily for seven days was received.Review of physician orders dated 1/19/2026 showed a telephone order for Doxycycline 100 mg twice daily written by Nurse #3. During an interview on 3/31/2026 at 2:05 PM, Nurse #3 stated she sent the physician a text message about the positive test results and did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to provide tracheostomy (an opening into the neck through the windpipe) care consistent with professional standards of practice when Nurse #2 cleaned and reused a single use disposable tracheostomy inner cannula when she provided tracheostomy care. This was for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #109).Findings included:Resident #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a state in which oxygen present in a tissue or the whole body is insufficient). A physician's order for Resident #109 dated 7/18/25 was for tracheostomy care every shift and as needed, clean or change inner cannula as applicable.Resident #109's comprehensive care plan revealed a focus area for her risk of complications related to tracheostomy. The goal dated as initiated on 7/22/25 was for Resident #109 to have no complications related to her tracheostomy. An intervention was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure medications and treatment supplies in a locked wound care cart for 1 of 2 wound care carts observed (Station 2 Wound Care Cart).Findings included:During continuous observation on 3/29/26 (Sunday) from 10:29 AM until 10:36 AM the Station 2 Wound Care Cart was observed unlocked and unattended at the nursing station. There were no staff, residents, or visitors observed in sight of the wound care cart at that time. At 10:30 AM a housekeeping staff member walked past the unlocked wound care cart followed by a nurse aide who also walked past the unlocked wound care cart. At 10:31 AM three visitors walked past the unlocked wound care cart. At 10:32 AM Nurse #1 went to the nursing station, retrieved an item from the nursing station, and left visual range of the Station 2 Wound Care Cart which remained unlocked. At 10:33 AM a nurse aide walked past the unlocked wound care cart. At 10:34 AM three visitors walked by the unlocked wound care cart. At 10:35 AM a visitor walked past the unlocked wound care cart. At 10:35 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated respectfully when a Nurse Aide was using her personal cell phone rather than responding to a resident's verbal yell for help and the activation of his call bell. This was for 1 of 15 sampled residents (Resident # 15).The findings included:Resident # 15 resided at the facility from 11/13/25 to 11/20/25. The resident was [AGE] years of age. Review of Resident # 15's 11/13/25 hospital discharge summary revealed the following information. Resident # 15 had undergone left hip surgery in February 2025 for a broken hip. He was admitted to the hospital again on 11/10/25 where he was identified to have a left acetabular fracture (a fracture in the socket in the left pelvis that forms the hip joint with the femur (leg bone) and also a sacral ala fracture (a fracture in the portion of the sacrum at the base of the spine and which can cause buttock and low back pain). Resident # 15 underwent conservative treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from misappropriation. This was for 1 of 1 sampled resident who was reported to have possible diversion of her pain medication (Resident #2). The findings included:Record review revealed Resident # 2 resided at the facility from 9/11/25 until 9/23/25. According to Resident # 2's hospital discharge summary Resident # 2 had undergone surgical repair of a fractured femur on 9/4/25 and was transferred to the facility for rehabilitation. The resident also had a diagnosis of dementia according to the discharge summary.Facility admission orders included Oxycodone 5 mg (milligrams) every six hours as needed for pain. Additionally, Resident # 2 was ordered to receive Acetaminophen 500 mg (milligrams) on a scheduled basis every eight hours for 10 days.Review of pharmacy delivery records revealed on 9/12/25 at 4:20 AM 28 tablets of Oxycodone 5 mg were delivered and received by the facility.Review of Resident # 2's September 2025 MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed Nurse # 13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolated
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews with staff and staff members at the North Carolina Board of Nursing, the facility failed to ensure it did not employ a nurse who currently had disciplinary action in effect against her professional license secondary to a history of drug diversion. This was for 1 of 2 staff members whose personnel information was reviewed (Nurse # 13). The findings included:Record review revealed Resident # 2 resided at the facility from 9/11/25 until 9/23/25. On 9/12/25 the facility reported an incident of suspected controlled pain medication diversion by Nurse # 13 to the state agency when multiple Oxycodone tablets could not be accounted for while Resident # 2 was under the care of Nurse # 13.The facility's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment Nurse was interviewed on 12/4/25 at 5:00 PM and reported the following. She was acting DON (Director of Nursing) on 9/12/25 and had completed the investigation while the Administrator was on a leave of absence. There had been problems with the following: 1) the number of tablets, which were filled and delivered by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with resident and staff, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy when they 1) failed to suspend a staff member who was accused of slapping a resident and 2) ensure the incident was reported to the Administrator in order that regulatory reporting timeframes to other agencies were met and an investigation was initiated on the day of the allegation. This was for 1 of 3 sampled residents who alleged abuse had occurred (Resident # 1).The findings included:Review of the facility's policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation, Crime which was dated 10/17/23, revealed the following information. All employees were responsible for immediately (no later than two hours after the allegation is made if the incident involves abuse or bodily injury) to report to the Administrator, or in their absence, the Director of Nursing, or their immediate supervisor any and all suspected or witnessed incidents of patient abuse. Allegations of abuse would result in staff suspension, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews with staff, Registered Dietician (RD), and Nurse Practitioner (NP), the facility failed to discontinue a previous enteral feeding (tube feeding) order when a new order was initiated which resulted in the resident not receiving the enteral feeding as most recently ordered. This was for 1 of 3 sampled residents who received nutrition by an enteral feeding (Resident #12).The findings included:Record review revealed Resident # 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident # 12's diagnoses included stroke, dysphagia, cognitive communication problems, and renal disease. Resident # 12's admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 11/6/25, coded the resident as moderately cognitively impaired. Resident # 12 was also coded to receive part of his nutrition by an enteral feeding as well as receiving a mechanically altered diet. His height was 66 inches, and his weight was 134 pounds.Resident # 12's care plan, dated 11/1/25, included that the resident had an enteral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the areas of Hospice (Resident #6), Hearing, Speech and Vision (Resident #13), Functional abilities and Goals (Resident #56) and Dialysis (Resident #350) for 4 of 21 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The findings included: Resident #6 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, hypertension, and heart failure. Review of a hospice visit note dated 6/13/24 revealed that Resident #6 was seen by hospice services as a follow-up evaluation. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] coded Resident #6 as not receiving hospice care services. MDS Nurse #1 was interviewed on 12/04/24 at 2:24 PM, and she revealed that the hospice services in section O of the 6/21/24 quarterly MDS assessment should have been coded as YES. MDS Nurse #1 stated she must have miscoded the hospice details by accident. Resident #6 had a hospice visit on 6/13/24, and she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to schedule a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 25 of 61 days reviewed for sufficient staffing. Findings included: Review of the daily assignment schedules from April 01, 2024, to May 28, 2024, revealed the facility failed to provide 8 hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on the following dates: 04/01/24, 04/03/24, 04/05/24, 04/06/24, 04/07/24, 04/13/24, 04/20/24, 04/21/24, 04/22/24, 04/26/24, 04/27/24, 04/30/24, 05/04/24, 05/06/24, 05/09/24, 05/10/24, 05/11/24, 05/14/24, 05/18/24, 05/19/24, 05/20/24, 05/21/24, 05/24/24, 05/25/24, and 05/28/24. An interview was conducted with the facility Scheduler on 12/04/2024 at 9:30 AM. During the interview the Scheduler reported she was not aware that she needed to schedule an RN for at least 8 consecutive hours every day. The Scheduler explained that there had been a large amount of staff turnover, including RNs, since the facility changed ownership in June-July 2024. She further explained the facility had been using staffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with Resident Council members and staff and review of Resident Council minutes, the facility failed to resolve concerns voiced by the Resident Council members for 1 of 6 months reviewed (July 2024). The findings included: Resident Council Meeting minutes from January 2024, February 2024, March 2024, July 2024, August 2024, and September 2024 were reviewed. A review of Resident Council minutes dated 7/9/24 indicated residents voiced concerns regarding not being able to get out of bed or get showers on their scheduled shower days due to staffing. Two administrative responses to the Resident Council form were reviewed dated 7/9/24. One stated the residents were being told they could not get out of bed due to staffing. There was no resolution listed. A second form revealed residents were concerned about not being able to get showers on their scheduled shower days due to staffing. There was no resolution listed. Review of Resident Council minutes dated 8/13/24 revealed there were no administrative resolutions from the July 2024 meeting. An interview was conducted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide written advance directive information and/or an opportunity to formulate an advance directive for 2 of 21 residents reviewed for advance directive (Residents #14 and Resident #17). The findings included: a. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure, dysphagia, and end stage renal disease. There was no documentation in Resident #14's medical record for education regarding the formulation of an advanced directive and/or an opportunity to formulate an advance directive was offered. An interview was conducted with the Director of Social Services on 12/04/2024 at 3:51 PM. She revealed that during care plan meetings or as needed, code status was discussed. However, the conversation never went further into detail to include advance directive. During an interview with the Admissions Director on 12/05/24 at 8:22 AM, she revealed that prior to the change of ownership in June 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 2 of 21 residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property (Resident #152 and Resident # 97). Findings included: a. Resident #152 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension, respiratory failure and fracture of facial bone. The resident was discharged from the facility on 11/01/2024. An admission Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #152 was cognitively intact. A review of the initial facility report dated 10/28/24 at 11:45 AM documented that a resident (Resident #152) reported that his air pods (wireless Bluetooth earbuds designed by apple) had been removed from his room. The resident reported he left the facility at approximately 4:30 PM on Friday 10/25/2024 and returned at 12:00 AM on 10/26/2024. Resident #152 reported he left the air pods charging on his bedside table. The air pods were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to include application of splints or multi podus boots for 1 of 32 residents (Resident #56) reviewed for comprehensive care planning. Findings included: Resident #56 was admitted into the facility on 4/16/2019 with a re-entry on 6/24/2024. A review of Resident #56's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 was severely cognitively impaired. A review of Resident #56's physician orders indicated on 7/1/2024 an order for bilateral multi podus boots up to four hours daily and on 10/8/24 an order for apply left hand splint when sitting up in wheelchair daily, remove when going back to bed. Resident #56's was to wear bilateral elbow extension splints daily, applied with afternoon care once back in bed and removed at PM care for effective contracture management. A review of Resident #56's comprehensive care plan revised on 10/22/2024 did not have a care plan related to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to apply left hand splint, elbow extender splints and multi podus boots as ordered for 1 of 3 sampled residents with limited range of motion/contractures (Resident #56). The findings included: Resident #56 was admitted into the facility on 4/16/19 and readmitted on [DATE]. A review of Resident #56's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated that he was severely cognitively impaired. A review of Resident #56's physician orders indicated on 7/1/2024 an order for bilateral multi podus boots (an orthotic to treat and prevent ankle and foot contractures) up to four hours daily and on 10/8/24 an order to apply left hand splint when sitting up in wheelchair daily, remove when going back to bed. Resident #56's was to wear bilateral elbow extension splints daily (an orthotic to help increase elbow extension in patients with non-fixed contractures), applied with afternoon care once back in bed and removed at PM care for effective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #64 was scheduled for a neurology appointment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medical appointments (Resident # 64). The findings included: Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, hypothyroidism and failure to thrive. Resident #64's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact. An interview was conducted with Resident #64 on 12/2/24 at 12:21 PM. She reported she had a referral to a neurologist and an appointment was never made. Resident #64 stated she questioned her diagnosis of Parkinson's disease and wanted a neurology appointment to confirm the diagnoses. Record review revealed a referral was made to neurology on 3/1/24 by the facility scheduler. A letter written to the facility by the Referral Coordinator at the local neurology office addressed to the Scheduler at the facility dated 3/26/24 read…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to dispose/discard expired medications in 1 of 3 medication carts (Rehab Medication Cart) observed. The findings included: During an observation of the Rehab Medication Cart on 12/04/24 at 9:34 A.M., one bottle of aspirin 325 milligrams (mg) tablets with an expiration date of 09/2024 and one bottle of Allergy Relief tablets with an expiration date of 04/2024 were observed in the top drawer of the cart. During an interview with Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #1 on 12/04/24 at 9:36 A.M., CMA #1 confirmed she had been working the Rehab Medication Cart that day. She stated it was the responsibility of the nurses to check the medication carts for expired medications. During an interview with Nurse #8 on 12/04/24 at 9:45 A.M., Nurse #8 stated it was his responsibility to check the Rehab Med Cart for expired medications. When asked if he was sole person responsible for checking the medication carts for expired medications, Nurse #8 clarified and stated that it was the responsibility of all nurses to check their medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a complete and accurate medication and administration record for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for medical record accuracy (Resident #250 and Resident #350). Findings included: 1. Resident #250 was admitted to the facility 07/19/24. Review of Resident #250's Emergency Department (ED) Note revealed she was sent to the hospital on [DATE] for evaluation and transferred to the hospital. Review of Resident #250's medical record revealed there was no entry to indicate the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] or the resident's condition at the time of transfer. The only documentation in the medical record was a nurse blood pressure vital sign 120/70 dated 08/09/24 at 10:04 AM written by Nurse #2 regarding Resident #150's hospital transfer. An interview was conducted on 12/04/24 at 1:45 PM with Nurse #2 revealed she was working as a floor nurse on the 700-hall on 08/08/24 and 08/09/24. Nurse #2 said Resident #250 told her that she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, facility staff failed to implement infection control policy and procedures when Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA #1) and Physical Therapist (PT #2) did not don Protective Equipment (PPE) for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EPB) to include a gown when providing high-contact resident care activities for Resident #251 who had indwelling upper chest dialysis catheter. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 staff members observed for infection control practices (PTA #1 and PT #2). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) dated 03/26/24 read in part: EBPs require use of gown and gloves by staff during high-contact patient care activities as defined below: Transferring. During an observation on 12/02/24 at 10:35 AM an EBP sign was posted by Resident #251's room door that read in part: Enhanced Barrier precautions, and providers and staff must wear gloves and a gown for the following high-contact resident care activities: dressing, bathing, showering, transferring, changing linens,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide the resident council members with a response to grievances reported during the resident council meetings for 3 of 3 resident council grievances reviewed. Findings included: Review of Resident Council minutes dated 8/1/23 revealed resident council members expressed a concern that the council does not get resolutions to issues from resident council meetings. A resident council grievance dated 8/2/23 stated a concern about resolutions to issues from resident council written by the Activities Director. The form reflected it being solely addressed by the Activities Director. The staff response section stated the Activities Director would ensure follow-up with department heads. The form had an area designated for the date on which the resolution was approved by the Resident Council. There was no council approval date, and the area was blank. The implementation date was 8/9/23. Review of Resident Council minutes dated 9/5/23 revealed concerns about showers and timeliness of pain medications. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure advanced directive information was accurate throughout residents' electronic and paper medical records for 4 of 5 residents (Resident #42, Resident #52, Resident #57, and Resident #76) reviewed for advanced directives. Findings included: 1) Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #42's electronic medical record revealed an active physician's order dated [DATE] that read full code. This order was still active on [DATE]. Resident #42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #42's care conference notes showed a note dated [DATE] at 2:00 P.M. read in part (Guardian) is requesting a letter be written to change the resident code status from CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) to DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) . Resident will remain a CPR CODE STATUS until the letter is received and approved by the guardian supervisor. Resident #42's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident, staff, and Physician interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders for pressure ulcer dressing changes, compete wound care as ordered, and set an alternating pressure mattress according to the resident's weight. This occurred for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #81, and Resident #32) reviewed for wound care. Findings included: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included paraplegia, stage 4 pressure ulcer to right buttocks, stage 4 pressure ulcer to left buttocks, stage 4, pressure ulcer to left lower back. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact and did not exhibit any behaviors. The MDS also documented Resident #1's pressure ulcers. Physician order dated 9-14-23 read clean stage 4 wound to right buttocks with wound cleanser, apply silver alginate, and cover with a foam dressing daily. Physician order dated 9-14-23 read clean stage 4 wound to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to have 8 consecutive hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 7 of 120 days reviewed. Findings included: Review of punch in times (times recorded by digital timecards) for 4/8/23, 4/9/23, 5/6/23, 5/7/23, 5/20/23, 5/21/23, and 6/17/23 at the facility revealed there was no RN working during these days. During an interview on 10/13/23 at 11:33 AM the Scheduler stated she took the position of scheduler on June 3rd. She further stated she was not trained in the position, and she was unaware that there was a requirement for an RN to be on the schedule for 8 hours. She concluded she had heard the term 'RN coverage' but was told by the administrator not to use agency RN for coverage and did not know there needed to be 8 hours for coverage due to lack of training. During an interview on 10/13/23 at 11:39 AM the Director of Nursing stated she was aware of the regulation that facilities needed 8 hours of RN coverage per 24 hours. She concluded there was no monitoring in place to review for 8 hours RN coverage of the schedule…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff, and Physician interviews, the facility failed to have a medication error rate less than 5% as evidenced by 15 medication errors out of 33 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 45.45% for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #14, and Resident #7) observed during the medication administration observation. Findings included: 1a. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included cerebral infarction and gastrostomy status. Observation of medication administration through a gastro tube occurred on 10-10-23 at 8:00am with Nurse #3. The nurse was observed checking the manufacturers instructions regarding if Resident #14's medication could be crushed. Nurse #3 contacted the Nurse Practitioner informing him some of Resident #14's medications were not allowed to be crushed (Duloxetine, and Memantine). The Nurse Practitioner instructed Nurse #3 to call the pharmacy. The nurse was observed and heard talking to the Pharmacist who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to discard expired medications for 1 of 2 medication storage rooms observed (station 1 medication room), failed to keep unattended medications in a locked medication cart for 1 of 5 medication carts observed (700-hall medication cart), and failed to keep unattended medications in a locked treatment cart for 2 of 3 treatment carts observed (station 1 treatment cart and station 2 treatment cart). Findings Included: 1. During observation of the station 1 medication room [ROOM NUMBER]/13/23 at 8:34 AM with the Director of Nursing, the station 1 medication room was observed to contain six bottles of simethicone 125 milligrams which had an expiration date of 9/2023, one bottle of simethicone 80 milligrams which had an expiration date of 8/2023, and one bottle of simethicone 80 milligrams which had an expiration date of 9/2023. During an interview on 10/13/23 at 8:34 AM the Director of Nursing stated the simethicone 125 milligrams, and 80 milligrams were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to 1) label/date opened food items stored in 1 of 1 one of one walk-in freezer and 2) label/date food items stored in 1 of 1 dry goods storage area. These practices had the potential to affect food served to all residents. Findings included: 1. Accompanied by the Dietary Manager, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 10/9/23 at 10:59 A.M. Observations made of the walk-in freezer identified the following: - 1 opened clear plastic bag filled halfway with shrimp, no open date or use by date on the package - 1 opened clear plastic bag with 19 beef hot dogs, no open date or use by date on the package - 1 opened clear plastic bag fille halfway with chicken patties, no open date or use by date on the package - 1 large Styrofoam cup with a red straw sticking out of the plastic lid on top, the contents were frozen, no label or date on the cup An interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager during the tour of the walk-in freezer on 10/9/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain the area surrounding the dumpsters free of debris for 2 of 2 dumpsters observed. Findings included: During an observation of the dumpster area with the Dietary Manager and the Assistant Dietary Manager on 10/9/23 at 11:15 A.M., debris was found next to and behind the back of the right and left dumpsters. Debris included 11 disposable gloves, 4 plastic lids used on disposable Styrofoam cups/bowls, 1 plastic knife, 4 plastic spoons, 1 plastic bowl, 1-8ounce empty bottle of water, one baseboard, and three pieces of damp crumbly cardboard. An interview was conducted on 10/9/23 at 11:15 A.M. with the Dietary Manager. The Dietary Manager confirmed there were items laying around the dumpster and stated the area should be free from debris. During the interview, he stated he had been employed at the facility for approximately three weeks and had not cleaned the area around the dumpsters during his period of employment. The Dietary Manager further explained he was unsure who was responsible for maintaining the area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and interviews with resident, family, responsible party, physician, police dispatch, and staff, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions that the committee had previously put in place following the recertification and complaint investigation survey of 6/11/2021, the revisit survey of 8/6/21, the complaint investigation survey of 9/20/2021, and the recertification and complaint investigation survey of 6/17/2022. This was for nineteen recited deficiencies on the current recertification and complaint investigation survey of 10/18/2023. The deficiencies included: Self Determination (F561), Request/Refuse/ /Discontinue Treatment/Formulate Advance Directive (F578), Grievances (F585), Reporting of Alleged Violations (F609), Accuracy of Assessments (F641), Baseline Care Plan (F655), Develop and Implement Comprehensive Care Plan (F656), Care Plan Timing and Revision (F657), Activities of Daily Living Care Provided for Dependent Residents (F677), Treatment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure Nurse Aides (NA) received at least 12 hours of in-service training in one year. This was for 5 of 5 NA in-service training records reviewed (NA #12, NA #10, NA #4, NA #5). Findings included: Education records from 6/1/2022 to 10/16/2023 provided by the facility's Regional Nurse Consultant reported the following training completed by each nurse aide. The number of hours of in-service training were not provided: * NA #12: Understanding Bloodborne Pathogens on 5/4/2023 and Let's Talk About COIVID Vaccination on 7/20/2023. * NA #10: Let's Talk About COVID Vaccination on 7/20/2023 * NA #13: Basics of Hand Hygiene, Effective Communication and Fire Safety: The Basics on 4/25/2023 and Let's Talk About COVID Vaccination on 7/20/2023. * NA #4: Weights, Weight: Measuring with a Wheelchair and Height Measurements on 7/9/2023 and Let's Talk About COVID Vaccination on 7/20/2023 * NA #5: Let's Talk About COVID Vaccination on 7/20/2023, On 10/16/2023 at 8:21 a.m. in a phone interview with NA #12, she stated she started…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide required dementia management training for 7 of 8 nursing staff (Nursing Assistant (NA) #12, NA #10, NA #13, NA #4, NA #5, Nurse #4 and Nurse #5) reviewed for education requirements. Findings included: Education records from 6/1/2022 to 10/16/2023 provided by the facility's Regional Nurse Consultant were reviewed for the following nursing staff: * NA #12: There was no dementia management training recorded on the education records. * NA #10: There was no dementia management training recorded on the education records. * NA #13: There was no dementia management training recorded on the education records. * NA #4: There was no dementia management training recorded on the education records. * NA #5: There was no dementia management training recorded on the education records. * Nurse #4: There was no dementia management training recorded on the education records. * Nurse #5: There was no dementia management training recorded on the education records. On 10/16/2023 at 8:21 a.m. in a phone interview with NA #12, she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to honor a resident's choice related to showers for 1 of 9 dependent residents reviewed for choices (Resident #29). Findings included: Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and diagnoses included congestive heart failure. The admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #29 was cognitively intact and considered choosing a sponge bath or shower very important. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #29 required physical assistance of one person with bathing, bed mobility and transfers. Resident #29's care plan dated 5/8/2023 indicated Resident #29 required assistance with grooming, bathing, mobility and transfers due to congestive heart failure, reduced mobility, and muscle weakness. Based on the facility's shower schedule, Resident #29 was scheduled showers on Mondays and Thursdays. There were no shower sheets for Resident #29 in the facility's shower book. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, interview with a Resident Representative and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission and failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan to the Resident or Resident Representative for 4 of 28 sampled residents (Residents #29, #77, #388 and #89). Findings included: 1. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part, diabetes and congestive heart failure. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was cognitively intact. Resident #29's medical record was reviewed and revealed no evidence a baseline care plan had been completed after the resident's admission. During an interview with Resident #29 on 10/10/23 at 2:08 PM, she said she could not remember if the facility offered her a written summary of the baseline care plan. On 10/10/23 at 9:38 AM an interview was conducted with MDS Nurse #1. She explained the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan which addressed wandering behavior and the use of a wander/elopement alarm for 1 of 33 residents (Resident #71) whose comprehensive care plans were reviewed. Findings included: Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, generalized muscle weakness and unsteadiness on feet. A review of an Elopement Risk Tool for Resident #71 dated 7/15/23 completed by the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed Resident #71 was found to be at risk for elopement. It further revealed her wandering behavior affected her safety and well-being. A review of the physician's orders for Resident #71 revealed an order dated 7/15/23 for a wander guard (a type of elopement alarm) to be placed to her right ankle. A nursing progress note dated 7/27/23 at 7:58 AM written by Nurse #2 revealed in part Resident #71 was reported missing around 9:00 PM to 11:00 PM (7/26/23). All open doors were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure an interdisciplinary team reviewed and revised a resident's comprehensive care plan and failed to ensure the resident's representative was involved in care planning after a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 33 residents (Resident #71) whose care plans were reviewed. Findings included: Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, generalized muscle weakness and unsteadiness on feet. A review of a progress note for Resident #71 dated 5/4/23 2:11 PM written by the Social Worker (SW) revealed the SW mailed an invitation to Resident #71's care conference to Resident #71's representative. A review of Resident #71's care plan revealed the following focus areas and their last reviewed dates: discharge, 5/27/23; activity, 8/23/23; falls, 11/14/22; respiratory, 11/14/22; pain, 11/14/22; nutrition, 11/12/22; communication, 11/14/22; cognition, 11/14/22; advanced directives, 11/14/22; and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and family interviews the facility failed to change a resident's soiled brief due to meal trays being passed on the halls for 1 of 8 resident reviewed for activities of daily living care (Resident #53). Findings included: Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #53's most recent Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was assessed as severely cognitively impaired. He had no moods or behaviors. He was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. He had an indwelling urinary catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. His active diagnoses included anemia, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, obstructive uropathy, and diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #53's care plan dated 9/28/23 revealed he was care planned to require assistance for eating, mobility, transfers, dressing, grooming, toileting and bathing related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to assess the resident's left upper arm shunt site upon returning to the facility after dialysis for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. (Resident #390). The findings included: Resident #390 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and diagnoses included end stage renal disease. Resident #390 was discharged from the facility on 8/21/2023 and was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Physician's orders dated 8/25/2023 included dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday at a local dialysis center. There were no other orders for Resident #390 related to dialysis care. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #390 was cognitively intact. The MDS reflected Resident #390 had received dialysis while not residing in the facility and had not received dialysis while a resident in the facility for the 5-day look back period. The care plan dated 9/5/2023 stated Resident #390 had end stage renal disease and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident attended a medical appointment for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for medically related social services (Resident #88). The findings included: Resident #88 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included reduced mobility and gait abnormality. Review of Resident #88's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed an orthopedic appointment scheduled 6/19/23. Resident #88's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact with no behaviors or refusals of care. There was no evidence in the medical record that Resident #88 attended her 6/19/23 outpatient orthopedic appointment scheduled for 6/19/23 as noted on the hospital discharge summary. The medical record indicated Resident #88 was discharged from the facility on 6/23/23. The resident was unavailable for interview. A phone interview was conducted on 10/11/23 at 11:26 AM with Resident #88's responsible party who stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and Medical Director, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication was time limited in duration for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #17). The findings included: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle spasms and convulsions. Resident #17 had a physician's order dated 5/8/23 for Lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for muscle spasms or convulsions. The order for the Lorazepam PRN was entered into the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) by Nurse #9 and did not have a stop date. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #17 was cognitively intact and received one day of an antianxiety medication during the assessment period. The August 2023, September 2023, and October 2023 Medication Administration Records (MARs) revealed Resident #17 had received as needed dosages…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their infection control policy when Nurse Aide (NA) #9 did not perform hand hygiene during meal delivery and set up which required NA #9 to reposition the resident's personal belongings for 1 of 2 NAs observed passing meal trays. This had the potential to result in cross-contamination of microorganisms between residents. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled; Hand Hygiene last revised 7/2021 revealed in part the following: IV. Policy: The facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. Hand hygiene must be performed after touching blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions, and contaminated items, whether or not gloves are worn; immediately after gloves are removed; and when otherwise indicated to avoid the transfer of microorganisms to other residents, personnel, equipment, and the environment. V. Procedure: 7. Staff will perform hand hygiene according to CDC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-04-01 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to post daily staffing information in an area of the facility visible to residents and visitors on 1 of 4 days of the survey (3/29/26). In addition, the facility failed to have an effective process in place to ensure staffing information data was posted daily, including on the weekend.The findings included:On 3/29/26 (Sunday) at 10:00 AM an initial tour was conducted in the facility. The posted daily staffing information sheet was observed on the counter at the reception desk in lobby and was dated 3/26/26 (Thursday).On 3/30/26 at 3:15 PM an interview with the Scheduler revealed she was responsible for posting daily staffing information sheets. She reported she had not been in the office on 3/27/26 and she didn't work on the weekends. She stated although she knew that staffing information sheets were required to be posted daily, the facility did not have a process for ensuring this happened when she was out of the office or on the weekends. She reported she had not completed and posted the daily staffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • No harm found · B2024-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews the facility, failed to replace stained privacy curtain in resident room (304), failed to remove the black greenish substance from the commode base caulking in resident rooms (304, 309, 708, 713, and 714), failed to repair damaged drywall in resident rooms (306, 309, 503, 605, and 713), failed to repair a broken bedside dresser handle in resident room (403), failed to replace a broken off towel rack in resident bathroom (304), and failed to replace missing resident's overhead bed light covers in rooms (714 and 718). These failures occurred on 2 of 8 hallways (300 Hall and 700 Hall) observed for a safe, clean, homelike environment. Findings included: 1a. An initial observation on 12/02/24 at 11:30 AM revealed large stains on privacy curtain, a broken bedside dresser handle, and a broken off towel rack in resident room (304). 1b. An observation on 12/04/24 at 12:35 PM revealed resident commodes (304, 309, 708, 713, and 714), were noted to have missing caulking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-12-05 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed provide to the Resident Representative and Ombudsman a written notification for the reason for transfer to the hospital for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident #56 and #21). Findings included: 1. Resident #56 was admitted into the facility on 4/16/19. A review of Resident #56's medical record revealed that the resident was discharged to the hospital on 6/20/24. Resident #56 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The medical record revealed no written notice of transfer was documented to have been provided to the Resident Representative or Ombudsman. An interview with the Resident Representative on 12/2/24 at 3:28 PM revealed that she knew why Resident #56 went to the hospital because she was at the facility. The Resident Representative further revealed that she had not received written notice of the discharge. An interview conducted with the facility Social Worker on 12/5/24 at 9:35 AM revealed she had not notified the Ombudsman…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and Resident Representative (RR) and staff interviews, the facility failed to conduct care plan meetings or invite residents to their care plan meetings for 1 of 31 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #47). Findings included: Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included Alzheimer's disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #47 was severely cognitively impaired. An interview on 12/04/24 at 11:13 AM with Resident #47's RR revealed she had not been invited to a care plan meeting since Resident #47's admission. She stated she would like to attend a care plan meeting. An interview on 12/05/24 at 9:39 PM with the Social Worker (SW) revealed that based on Resident #47's record, it appeared the RR had not been invited to attend Resident # 47's care plan meetings. The SW indicated she was aware of the requirement to hold care plan meetings quarterly and Resident #47's care plan was last updated 11/11/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-10-18 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to inform residents (Resident #4, #59, #24 and #36) of the location of the state inspection results, and failed to display state inspection results in a location accessible to residents. The findings included: On 10/9/23 at 11:48 am the survey inspection results white binder for the facility was observed on the reception counter, approximately fifty-six inches from the floor with a sign above which said survey inspection results. The binder was two feet from the edge of the counter. Due to other items on the counter in front of the survey binder it could not be reached from the front of the counter. The survey inspection results binder could only reached from inside the reception area. Residents were not permitted in the reception area. Observations revealed no other signs in the building regarding results of state inspection results. On 10/10/23 at 11:15 am during a Resident Council meeting, Resident #4, Resident #59, Resident #24, and Resident #36 stated state inspection results were not made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-10-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY d. Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a grievance for Resident #53 completed and submitted on 2/27/23 by Family Member #1 revealed there was documentation of the facility follow-up and no resolution of the grievance or concern. Review of Resident #53's most recent minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was assessed as severely cognitively impaired. During an interview on 10/11/23 at 2:15 PM Family Member #1 stated she had not received any response from the facility regarding the grievance she submitted on 2/27/23. During an interview on 10/11/23 at 2:31 PM the Social Worker stated he had been working at the facility for a little over six months. When someone filed a grievance the person who received the grievance gave it to the Administrator and she would then distribute the grievance to the appropriate department. The Administrator kept records of the grievances in her office. He concluded the Administrator would be able to speak to the process of grievance responses to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 2 of 37 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Residents #390 and Resident #30). Findings included: 1. Resident #390 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and diagnoses included end stage renal disease. Resident #390 was discharged from the facility to a hospital on 8/21/2023 and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Physician orders dated 8/25/2023 included Resident #390 receiving dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday at 12:30 p.m. at a local dialysis center. The 5-day Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #390 was moderately cognitively impaired and diagnoses included renal insufficiency and end stage renal disease. The MDS indicated Resident #390 received dialysis while not a resident in the facility and was not coded that Resident #390 received dialysis while a resident. Resident #390's care plan dated 9/5/2023 included a focus for end stage renal disease and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in the areas of wound care (Residents #32, #58, #1 and #81) and splint management (Resident #53). This was for 5 of 32 resident records reviewed. The findings included: 1) Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis (an inflammation of the bone caused by an infection) of the vertebra and sacral region and diabetes type 2. The physician orders included orders dated 8/31/23 for the following: - Cleanse the right buttock with wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply silver alginate (an antimicrobial dressing) to the wound bed and cover with a foam dressing daily. - Cleanse the left ischium (either half of the pelvis) with wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply silver alginate to the wound bed and cover with a foam dressing daily. A review of the September 2023 and October 2023 Treatment Administration Records (TARs) revealed no wound care had been signed off as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$76,047 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $76,047 — penalty dated 2023-10-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.3M
Related-party expense21% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 6%Other / private 19%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$345per resident / day
operating cost
$10,486per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$322per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in North Carolina
$9,733/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,798/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,496/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345561. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next